Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Davis, 1991),
(www.ccastronomy.org/
The Challenger disaster is the
foundation of the discussion.
Robert Lund (VP for Engineering at
Morton Thiokol)
Recommends against the
launch
Because of faulty O-rings
(Davis, 1991),
(www.aerospaceweb.org/.
The shuttle crashes seconds after take-off
(Davis, 1991)
Whats the difference in thinking like a
manager and thinking like an engineer?
(Davis, 1991)
What is thinking like an engineer?
(Davis, 1991)
Why do we have codes of
ethics?
a convention between professionals
a guide to what engineers may
reasonably expect of one another
a guide to what engineers may expect
other members of to profession to help
each other do
(Davis, 1991)
Why obey ones code?
Protects professionals from certain pressures
Such as cutting corners
By making it more likely that good conduct will not
be punished
(Davis, 1991)
National Society of Professional
Engineers (NSPE) Code of Ethics
. Fundamental Canons
(Davis, 1991)
What if Lund had insisted on
cancelling the launch?
Would he have been a hero?
(Davis, 1991)
Do engineers professional
responsibilities go beyond the code?
(Davis, 1991)
Additional comments?
(Davis, 1991)
What is the moral principle of
Daviss argument?
Fairness
Since Lund voluntarily accepts the
benefits of being an engineer, he is
morally obliged to follow the convention
that helps to make those benefits
possible.
(Davis, 1991)
What were Lunds two ethical
options?
To either refuse to authorize the
launch
To insist that the astronauts be briefed
in order to get their informed consent
(Davis, 1991)