You are on page 1of 42

Coherent Control by Four-Wave Mixing

Hrvoje Skenderovi
Institute of Physics, Zagreb Graz, May 2008.

1
Coherent Control Introduction

Four-wave Mixing
-Carotene
Experiment
Control of Vibrational Modes

2
Coherent Control Introduction

Motivation for the fs FWM spectroscopy

Fs FWM enables excitation and monitoring:

In gas, liquid and solid state


Excited and ground states
Rotational, Vibrational and Electronic states

Determination od spectroscopic constants with high precision


Ultrafast thermometry in extreme consitions (large pressure,
large temperature)
Real-time chemistry dynamics: Femtochemistry
Control and monitoring of molecular dynamics with shaped
pulses.

K. Nelson, A. Weiner, Fleming, Kiefer, ..., Motzkus 3


Coherent Control Four-Wave Mixing

The Four Wave Mixing (FWM) signal results from the polarization of the
sample following three consecutive electric field interaction.

ka
k1

k3

k2 k2

k3

k1
L

4
Coherent Control Four-Wave Mixing

k3

k2
k S k1 k 2 k 3
ks

k1
Momentum and
Energy conservation
2 3

S 1 2 3 1 s

5
Coherent Control Four-Wave Mixing

Time-resolved FWM experiments were done in


the following configuration:

Temporal Transient Grating

Geometrical Folded Box-Car

Laser Frequencies Degenerate

6
Coherent Control Four-Wave Mixing

Boxcar configuration
ks
signal

k1

k2

k3

We look for the signal in the direction: ks = k1 k2 + k3

7
Coherent Control Four-Wave Mixing

8
Coherent Control Four-Wave Mixing

9
Coherent Control Four-Wave Mixing

Transient grating: Two pulses come simultaneosly


The third is scanned in time

FWM TRANSIENT

Time Time

10
Coherent Control Four-Wave Mixing

Optical Parametric Generation


Noncollinear optical Amplifier
White Light Generation NOPA (J. Yvon, A.G. Riedle)

Second Harmonic Generation 17 20 fs


11
Coherent Control Four-Wave Mixing

Experimental Setup
1 2 3
NOPA;
490 nm,
17 fs
Linear
Stage
Pulse
Shaper
Time

Spectrograph Sample

3
Spherical Mirror
2

1
12
Coherent Control -Carotene

All-trans--Carotene ( N=11 )

Ground State Freq.(cm-1)


Vibrations
C=C Symmetric
stretch
1524
C-H Plane
bending
1269
C-C Symmetric
stretch
1157
Methyl to chain
rock
1004

13
Coherent Control -Carotene

FWM in -Carotene
Non-resonant Resonant

Sn Sn

S2 S2

S1 S1
DFWM 1,0 1,0

Absorption spectrum of
DFWM 500 nm
555 nm

Carotene
S0 S0
0,5 0,5

0,0 0,0

Hornung T. Skenderovi H. Motzkus M. 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
Observation of all-trans-beta-carotene wavepacket motion on the electronic ground and (nm)
excited dark state using degenerate four-wave mixing (DFWM) and pump-DFWM,
Chemical Physics Letters. 402(4-6):283-288, 2005 Feb 4. 14
Coherent Control Experiment

The first two pulses generate wave packets in the


ground and excited state via Impulsive Raman
1 2 3 a scattering.
e
Propagation of the packets is monitored by the
third pulse.

Observation of real-time vibrations requires that


the frequency bandwidth of the laser pulses
g overlap two or more vibrational levels.

Beside vibrational, other dynamics are present.


Rotational, restoration of solvent configuration,
etc...

15
Coherent Control Experiment


2
I FWM ( ) P (t , ) dt
(3)

Calculation of the induced Polarization requires knowledge of the


third order density operator r(3)(t). The form of r(3)(t) follows from a
perurbative solution of the Liouville equation that describes evolution
of the system under the influence of the incident laser fields and
intrisic relaxation.

16
Coherent Control Experiment

2D Transient 1D Transient
540
530
Wavelength (nm)

520
510
500
490
480
470
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Time Delay (fs)

Vibrational dynamics
FWM Signal

600 900 1200

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000


Time Delay (fs)

17
Coherent Control Experiment

Transient, nonresonant excitation, and sliding window spectrogram

18
Coherent Control Experiment
Transient, resonant excitation, and sliding window spectrogram

19
Coherent Control Shaping

Coherent Control
Can we selectively excite just one mode employing pulse shaping?
0,0006

0,0005 1155.6
797.5
FFT Spectrum

0,0004

0,0003
1529.9
1009.1

0,0002

0,0001

0,0000
0 500 1000 1500 2000
-1
Frequency (cm )

20
Coherent Control Shaping
0,4
Recipe
n T0

Shape the Pulse into several 0,3

replicas. Make the separation


between replicas equal to n T0 0,2

(T0 is vibrational period of the


mode to be excited) 0,1

[ M. M. Wefers, K. A. Nelson,
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12, 1342 (1995) ]
0,0
-400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400

(fs)

Energy T(fs) 2 T(fs) 3 T(fs) 4 T(fs) 5 T(fs)


(cm-1)

1524 21.9 43.8 65.7 87.6 109.5

1157 28.8 57.6 86.4 115.2 144

1004 33.2 66.4 99.6 21


Coherent Control Shaping

Third order polarisation, [Silberger et al, J.Chem. Phys. 118 9208 (2003)]
1
P (3) ( ) C d E3 ( ) A()
R i R

Two Photon Absorption: A() d ' E2* ( ') E1 ( ')

1,0
p=20 fs

0,8
p=15 fs

0,6

A()

0,4

0,2

0,0
0 500 1000 1500 2000
-1 22
(cm )
Coherent Control Shaping

How to select R : Frequency domain approach

A( R ) d ' E2* ( ') E1 ( R ') E() E() ei( )

( ) (R ) 0 Phase should be
Konstructive Interference at R for every periodic with R

Destructive Interference for other



0,08 ( ) a sin 2 N c
R
-1
Pulse Train for 1004 cm
0,07
FL Pulse
0,06

0,05
A()

0,04

0,03

0,02

0,01

0,00
0 500 1000 1500 2000
-1 23
(cm )
Coherent Control Shaping

620

600
Wavelength (nm)

580

560

540

520

500
-200 -100 0 100 200

Time (fs)
1524

1157

1004

0 500 1000 1500 2000


-1
wavenumber (cm ) 24
Coherent Control Shaping

Non-resonant case, conclusions

Non resonant DFWM with ultrashort pulses


efficiently excites high-frequency vibrational modes
in ground state with pulse replicas set at N * T
Selective excitation with shaped pulses is achieved
Can we increase the selective excitation efficiency
with resonant DFWM?

25
Coherent Control Shaping

DFWM - Resonant case

Sn
S2

S1
DFWM
500 nm

S0

Hauer J. Skenderovi H. Kompa K-L. Motzkus M.


Enhancement of Raman Modes by Coherent Control in -Carotene.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 421 523-528 (2006).
Hauer J. Buckup T. Skenderovi H. Kompa K.-L. Motzkus, M.Selective
preparation of vibrational states in complex molecules by quantum control //
Quantum Computing: Back Action, Kanpur, India 2006..
26
Coherent Control Shaping

27
Coherent Control Shaping

n
S (t ) i sin( i t i )
A e
i 1
t / i

/ fs
1,0
EXP
FIT

0,5 1004 1200


DFWM Signal

1156 1350
0,0

1532 650
-0,5

1390 144
800 900 1000 1100 1200
(ps)

28
Coherent Control Shaping

Applying multipulse sequences matching the periodicity of single


vibrations, the modes of b-carotene solvated in cylcohexane were
not only specifically excited, but under resonant conditions also
enhanced compared to the Fourier-limited case.
This effect is attributed to an increased population transfer to the
excited state and stronger coherences created and demonstrates
the feasibility to selectively amplify ground state Raman modes by
coherent control.

29
Coherent Control Shaping

At 484 nm At 538 nm
0,45

0,35

0,30
5,7 Shaped 0,40
0,35
1,8

0,25

0,20
Unshaped 0,30
0,25
0,20
0,15 0,15

0,10 0,10
0,05
0,05
0,00
0,00
800 1000 1157 1524
800 1000 1157 1524
0,50
0,50
0,45
0,45 1,3
0,40 5,5 0,40
0,35
0,35
0,30
0,30
0,25
0,25
0,20
0,20
0,15
0,15
0,10
0,10
0,05
0,05
0,00
0,00

1000 1000 1157 1524


1157 1524

0,15 2,5 0,45


0,40 1,2
0,10 0,35
0,30
0,25
0,05 0,20
0,15
0,10
0,00
0,05
1000 1157 1524 0,00 30
1000 1157 1524
Coherent Control Shaping

Absorption spectrum of 1,0 1,0

Carotene

0,5 0,5

0,0 0,0

450 500 550


(nm)

31
Coherent Control Shaping

[] we conclude that the physical mechanism


responsible for increasing/suppressing of the S0 S1
population transfer is resonant excitation of
the underlying vibrational states
by keeping them in a coherent superposition during
the excitation.

[N. A. Prokhorenko VI, Miller RJD, JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 122,


Art. No. 184502 (MAY 8 2005, 2005)]

32
Coherent Control Shaping

Theory of resonant DFWM

Buckup T. Hauer J. Serrat C. Motzkus M. Control of excited-state population


and vibrational coherence with shaped-resonant and near-resonant excitation
Journal of Physics B-Atomic Molecular & Optical Physics. 41(7):74024, 2008 Apr 14.
33
Coherent Control Introduction

Acknowledgment

Max-Planck-Institut fr Quantenoptik, D-85748 Garching


Institute of Physics, HR-10001, Zagreb

J. Hauer
T. Hornung
M. Motzkus K. L. Kompa
G. Pichler

34
Third Harmonic Generation in Na IFS

Third harmonic generation in sodium


by Parametric Wave Mixing PWM

35
Third Harmonic Generation in Na IFS

Two beams, angular phase-matching,


enhancement of THG

36
Third Harmonic Generation in Na IFS

N
(3 )
(3)
3
mn
g n nm mg

1

( g 3 )(ng 2 )(mg )
1

( g )(ng 2 )(mg )
1

( g )(ng 2 )(mg )

1

( g )(ng 2 )(mg 3 )

37
Third Harmonic Generation in Na IFS

38
Third Harmonic Generation in Na IFS

Third beam - Mode competition

Time

39
Third Harmonic Generation in Na IFS

40
Third Harmonic Generation in Na IFS

Dr. Goran Pichler


Dr. Ticijana Ban
Dr. Damir Aumiler
Silvije Vdovic
Natasa Vujicic
H.S.

41
Third Harmonic Generation in Na IFS

Thank you

42

You might also like