The document discusses whether the government should limit the use of ethyl chloride (cramp spray) and only allow it for athletes with doctor permission. However, the document does not provide any clear arguments or evidence for either position and consists primarily of an exclamation with no other details. It does not take a clear stance or provide essential information to summarize in 3 sentences or less.
The document discusses whether the government should limit the use of ethyl chloride (cramp spray) and only allow it for athletes with doctor permission. However, the document does not provide any clear arguments or evidence for either position and consists primarily of an exclamation with no other details. It does not take a clear stance or provide essential information to summarize in 3 sentences or less.
The document discusses whether the government should limit the use of ethyl chloride (cramp spray) and only allow it for athletes with doctor permission. However, the document does not provide any clear arguments or evidence for either position and consists primarily of an exclamation with no other details. It does not take a clear stance or provide essential information to summarize in 3 sentences or less.