PNP Disciplinary Mechanism

Module 1.
3 PNP Disciplinary Mechanism
PNP DISCIPLINARY
MECHANISM
IOBC 1
Module 1.3 PNP Disciplinary Mechanism
Lesson Goal
The lesson aims to instill awareness to the

participants of the PNP Disciplinary Mechanism
IOBC 2
Scope of Presentation
Identify who is a Police Officer

References governing PNP Administrative Disciplinary
Mechanism
PNP Disciplinary Law and Order general provisions
Jurisdiction of Cases Procedures to be observed at the
NHQ, Regional and NSU level regarding citizens
complaint
IOBC 3
Scope of Presentation
Summary dismissal powers of the NAPOLCOM, Chief,
PNP and the Regional Directors
Commencement of a complaint
Pre-charge evaluation procedure
Summary hearing procedure
Offenses punishable and the imposable penalties
Different administrative remedies
IOBC 4
Who is a Police Officer?
IOBC 5
A Police Officer a man

in uniform
The man in uniform
belongs to the elite in public service.
... He is a gentleman. He is given arms
to insure his capability as an instrument
of peace.
However, when he wavers and fails to

live up to the highest standard of
fidelity to his country and people,
IOBC 6
A Police Officer a man

in uniform
He becomes an outlaw and disgrace
to his uniform.
The State has the right to hold him

to account for his transgressions
and to see to it that
he cannot use the awesome powers of
his status to jeopardize the security and
peace of the citizenry.
Abadilla vs. Fidel Ramos

G.R. 79193, 1 Dec. 1987
IOBC 7
References Governing Admin

Disciplinary Mechanism
Revised Rules on Administrative Cases in the

Civil Service (RRACCS)
- applies to NUP
NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 2007-001

- applies to all members of the PNP (PCOs and
PNCOs) before the different administrative
disciplinary authorities and the Internal Affairs
Service.
IOBC 8
References Governing
Admin Disciplinary System
DISTINCTIONS:
NAPOLCOM MC 2007-001 RRACCS
Pre-Charge Evaluation Preliminary Investigation

Probable Cause Prima Facie Case
Reglementary period of 10 Reglementary period of 15
days days
IOBC 9
PNP Disciplinary Law and

Order General Provisions
Definition of terms:
Answer a pleading in which a respondent or

sets forth the negative and affirmative defenses
Appellate Bodies RAB and NAB of

NAPOLCOM; and SILG
Breach of Internal Discipline minor offense

affecting the order and discipline within the
police organization
IOBC 10
Definition of terms
Citizens Complaint initiated by natural or

juridical person or his/its duly authorized
representative or guardian on account of an injury
damage or disturbance sustained as a result of an
irregular or illegal act or omission of a PNP member
IOBC 11
Definition of terms
Conduct Unbecoming of a Police Officer done in

official or private capacity which seriously
compromising his character and standing in the PNP
in such a manner as to indicate vitiated or corrupt
state of moral character which shows his unworthiness
to remain the police service.
IOBC 12
Definition of terms
Decision the written disposition of the disciplinary

authority or appellate body stating clearly the facts and
the law upon which it is based
Disciplinary Authorities shall refer to the city or

municipal mayors; COPs or equivalent supervisors;
PDs or equivalent supervisors; RDs or equivalent
supervisors; PLEB; Chief PNP; NAPOLCOM En Banc
IOBC 13
Definition of terms
Equivalent Supervisors PNP Officers occupying

positions/designations equivalent to that of COP, PD
and RD who are vested with disciplinary authority
over personnel of their respective offices, charged
with minor offenses involving breach of internal
discipline.
IOBC 14
Definition of terms
Formal Charge a complaint initiated before any of

the disciplinary authorities or IAS after finding the
existence of probable cause
IOBC 15
Definition of terms
Forum Shopping the filing of several complaints

arising from one and the same cause of action
involving the same parties asking for the same relief
with the different administrative disciplinary authorities,
the IAS and Office of the Ombudsman
Jurisdiction authority vested by law to hear and

decide a case
IOBC 16
Definition of terms
Minor Offenses not involving moral turpitude, but

affecting the internal discipline of the PNP, and shall
include but not limited to:
simple misconduct
negligence
insubordination
frequent absences and tardiness
habitual drunkenness; and
gambling prohibited by law
IOBC 17
Definition of terms
Moral Turpitude done contrary to justice, honesty,

modesty, or good morals
Newly Discovered Evidence evidence which

could not have been discovered and produced
during the hearing of the case despite due
diligence, and if presented, would probably alter
the decision
IOBC 18
Definition of terms
Pending Case a case when the respondent had
been formally charged before any of the disciplinary
authorities or IAS; or appeal is pending with any of the
appellate bodies
Recidivist a person who has been previously

penalized for a grave offense and is again charged of
another or the same grave offense
IOBC 19
Definition of terms
Reglementary Period the period required by law or

these Rules to perform a specific act
Repeatedly Charged formally charged

administratively for at least 3 times and was found
culpable in any one of them and meted a penalty not
lower than 60 days suspension
IOBC 20
Definition of terms
Serious Charge a complaint involving an offense

where the maximum imposable penalty is dismissal
from the service
Subpoena Ad Testificandum a process directed

to a person requiring him to appear and testify in an
investigation or hearing
IOBC 21
Definition of terms
Subpoena Duces Tecum a process directing a

person to appear and bring with him books,
documents or things under his control in an
investigation or hearing
Substantial Evidence such relevant evidence as

reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support
a conclusion
IOBC 22
Definition of terms
Summary Hearing Officer officer designated by the

disciplinary authority or IAS to conduct the formal
hearing, and to submit a ROI
Summary Proceeding an expeditious

administrative proceeding conducted consistent with
due process to determine the culpability or innocence
of the respondent
IOBC 23
Definition of terms
Summons written notice informing the respondent

that he is charged with an offense and directing him
to file his Answer.
IOBC 24
Jurisdiction of Admin
Cases
A. Citizens Complaint
IMPOSABLE PENALTIES PERIOD DA
withholding of privileges; not exceeding 15 days COP, CD
restriction to specified
limits; suspension or
forfeiture of salary; or any
combination thereof
-do- not less than 16 days but Mayors
not exceeding 30 days
-do- exceeding 30 days PLEB
plus demotion or by
dismissal from the service
IOBC 25
Cases
A. Citizens Complaint
*All other citizens complaints where no PLEB is
organized shall be filed with the provincial or regional
IAS where the offense was committed.
IOBC 26
Cases
B. Breach of Internal Discipline
admonition; reprimand; restriction total period COPs or ES
to specified limit; withholding of shall not
privileges; forfeiture of salary or exceed 15
suspension; or any combination days
admonition or reprimand; total period PDs or ES
restrictive custody; withholding of shall not
privileges, forfeiture of salary or exceed 30
suspension; or any combination days
IOBC 27
Cases
B. Breach of Internal Discipline
dismissal from the service; total period RDs or
admonition or reprimand; shall not ES
restrictive custody; withholding of exceed sixty
privileges; suspension or (60) days
forfeiture of salary; demotion ; or
any combination
by dismissal from the service; not Chief, PNP
demotion; suspension or exceeding
forfeiture of salary, or any 180
combination
IOBC
thereof days
28
Procedures to be Observed
at the NHQ Level
SOURCE
COMPLAINT RECEIPT TASK GROUP, CPNP COMPLAINT ACTION

OFFICE, CRAC PCRG, DPRM
W/ VERIFIABLE DATA
W/O VERIFIABLE DATA EXCEPT WITH VERIFIABLE DATA BUT W/O
W/ SS AFFIDAVIT OR
COMPLAINT ITSELF ANY DOCUMENTS/AFFIDAVIT
DOCUMENT/S
CIDG VALIDATION &

DIDM, PCE DI, IG VALIDATION
INVESTIGATION
WITH W/O
PROBABLE PROBABLE WITH BASIS W/O BASIS WITH BASIS W/O BASIS
CAUSE CAUSE
FORMAL
DROP &
CHARGE,
CLOSE
PENDING CASE
DLOD, DPRM
SHO-HEARING RESOLUTION D, LS REVIEW DECISION ARCHIVE
IOBC 29
Procedures to be Observed
at the RHQ/NSU Level
SOURCE
COMPLAINT RECEIPT TASK GROUP, RD COMPLAINT ACTION

OFFICE, CRAC, RPHRDD, PPOs, CPOs, MPS
W/ VERIFIABLE DATA
W/O VERIFIABLE DATA EXCEPT WITH VERIFIABLE DATA BUT W/O
W/ SS AFFIDAVIT OR
COMPLAINT ITSELF ANY DOCUMENTS/AFFIDAVIT
DOCUMENT/S
RIDMD/RHQ, PPO, CPO MPS CIDG VALIDATION/

VALIDATION RIU, RID
INVEST SECTION - PCE INVESTIGATION
WITH W/O
PROBABLE PROBABLE WITH BASIS W/O BASIS WITH BASIS W/O BASIS
CAUSE CAUSE
FORMAL
DROP &
CHARGE,
CLOSE
PENDING CASE
LOS, RPHRDD
RIAS SHO-
RESOLUTION RLS REVIEW DECISION ARCHIVE
HEARING
IOBC 30
A. Summary Dismissal Case

1. Charge is serious and evidence of guilt is strong;
2. Respondent is a recidivist /repeatedly charged and

there are reasonable grounds to believe that he is
guilty of the charge;
3. Respondent is guilty of a serious offense involving

conduct unbecoming of a police officer; and
4. AWOL for a continuous period of 30 days calendar

days or more.
IOBC 31
B. Respondent is a
Presidential Appointee
can only be subjected to summary hearing after

clearance from the Office of the President
ROI together with the complete

original records of the case
to be submitted to the Office
of the President
IOBC 32
Principle of Exclusivity
A complaint shall be heard and decided exclusively

by the disciplinary authority which first acquired
original jurisdiction over the case.
Any disciplinary authority or IAS Officer who violates

this provision shall be proceeded against
administratively for serious irregularity in the
performance of duty.
IOBC 33
Complaint, How to Initiate?
1. by filing a written and sworn statement,

accompanied by:
a. affidavits of witnesses and other evidence.
b. certificate of non-forum shopping,

if none, the complainant is required to
submit within 5 days from notice;
otherwise the complaint shall be
dismissed
IOBC 34
Complaint, How to Initiate?
2. If verbally made, the concerned agency shall

assist the complainant in preparing his complaint-
affidavit and supporting documents.
3. A letter complaint complainant and witnesses

must affirm their signatures and to execute
affidavits to substantiate the complaint,
accompanied by a certificate of non-forum
shopping.
4. An anonymous complaint must be validated.
IOBC 35
QUESTION?
What is the prescriptive period of an

Administrative Case?
IOBC 36
Prescriptive Period Of An
Administrative Case
Jurisprudence
Administrative offenses do not prescribe
(Floria vs. Sunga, 368 SCRA 551).
Defense of Prescription not applicable.
IOBC 37
Pre-charge evaluation
A process to determine the existence of

probable cause based on the allegations on the
complaint and supporting evidence.
Within 3 days, from receipt of the complain,

evaluate the same and submit recommendation
to the concerned disciplinary authority for proper
disposition.
IOBC 38
Evaluation
Determine whether it shall be:

closed or dropped outright for lack of
probable cause;
referred to the appropriate disciplinary authority;
treated as a grievance/request for assistance which
may be referred to the concerned office or
government agency; or
recommended for summary hearing.
IOBC 39
Preventive Suspension of the

Respondent by the DA and IAS
Respondent may suspended for a period not
exceeding 90 days under the following instances:
a. The charge is serious or grave and the

evidence of guilt is strong.
b. Respondent is exerting efforts to harass,

intimidate, coerce or unduly influence the
complainant or his/her witnesses into
withdrawing his complaint or retracting his
sworn statement or that of his witnesses or to
tamper with the evidence.
IOBC 40
Preventive Suspension of the

Respondent by the PLEB
a. When the respondent refuses to heed to summons

or subpoena;
b. When the PNP personnel have been charged with

offenses involving bodily harm or grave threats;
c. When the respondent is in a position to tamper

with the evidence; and
d. When the respondent is in a position to unduly

influence the witnesses.
IOBC 41
Prohibition of Reassignment of
Respondent
During the Pendency of an Administrative Case, a

respondent PNP member shall not be
reassigned or transferred, unless the concerned
disciplinary authority or IAS certifies that the
presence of the respondent is no longer necessary.
IOBC 42
Nature of a Summary Hearing
Shall not strictly adhere to technical rules of

procedure and evidence applicable in judicial
proceedings
Sworn statements/affidavits identification and

affirmation of the truth of its contents
Documents proof of authenticity or reliability
IOBC 43
Conduct of Summary Hearing

SHO ISSUE SUMMONS TO THE
RESPONDENT WITHIN 3 DAYS
DEFINIE AND
SIMPLIFY ISSUES
RESPONDENT SUBMITS ANSWER IN
ENTER INTO
WRITING WITHIN 5 DAYS FROM THE
ADMISSIONS/STIP
RECEIPT OF SUMMONS
ULATION OF
FACTS
LIMIT THE NO. OF
ORDER OF SUMMARY PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE WITHIN WITNESSES
HEARING 10 DAYS FROM RRECEIPT OF SCHEDULE
ANSWER. FINISHED WITHIN 2 DAYS HEARING
MARKING OF
COMPLAINANT EVIDENCE
ADDUCE EVIDENCE HEARING PROPER WITHIN 5 DAYS THRESHING OUT
RESPONDENT FROM PHC MATTERS
PRESENT EVIDENCE
EXAMINATION OF
WITNESS BASED ON SHO MAY REQUIRE THE PARTIES TO
UBMIT THEIR RESPECTIVE POSITION SUMMARY
EVIDENCE PRESENTED
PAPER WITHIN 10 DAYS HEARING MAY
CLARIFICATORY
BE DISPENSED
QUESTIONS MAY BE
W/ INSTEAD
ALLOWED IF
MEMO OR
REQUESTED SHO HAVE 30 DAYS TO SUBMIT ROI POSITION
TO DA WHO DECIDES THE CASE PAPER BE
WITHIN 30 DAYS SUBMITTED
IOBC 44
Right to Counsel in Admin

Proceedings
Administrative inquiry may or may not be
assisted by counsel, irrespective of the nature
of the charges and of the respondents
capacity to represent himself, and no duty
rests on such body to furnish the person being
investigated with counsel. (Remolona vs. CSC,
362 SCRA 304)
IOBC 45
Question
What is the possible effect

of the retraction or withdrawal of complaint by the
complainant?
IOBC 46
Answer
Proceedings against a public officer or

employee for misconduct, malfeasance cannot
be withdrawn at any time by the complainants
and should not be made to depend on their
whims and caprices since the complainants are,
in real sense, only witnesses. (Florendo vs.
Enrile, 239 SCRA 22 [1994])
IOBC 47
Offenses Punishable and

Imposable Penalties
1. Neglect of Duty or Nonfeasance

2. Irregularities in the Performance of Duty or
Misfeasance
3. Misconduct or Malfeasance
4. Incompetence
5. Oppression
6. Dishonesty
7. Disloyalty to the Government
IOBC 48
Classification of Offenses
A. LIGHT OFFENSES:
1. Simple Neglect of Duty
2. Simple Irregularity in the Performance of Duty
3. Slight or Simple Misconduct
B. LESS GRAVE OFFENSES:

1. Less Grave Neglect of Duty
2. Less Grave Irregularities in the Performance
of Duties
3. Less Grave Misconduct
IOBC 49
Classification of Offenses
C. GRAVE OFFENSES:
1. Serious Neglect of Duty
2. Serious Irregularities in the Performance of Duties
3. Grave Misconduct
4. Oppression
5. Gross Incompetence
6. Disloyalty to the Government
7. Dishonesty
IOBC 50
Imposable Penalties
The following are the penalties that may be imposed in

police administrative cases:
a. Withholding of privileges
b. Restriction of specified limits
c. Restrictive custody
d. Forfeiture of salary
e. Suspension
f. Any combination of penalties (a to e)
g. One (1) rank demotion
h. Dismissal from the service
IOBC 51
Range of Penalties
For Light Offenses:
PENALTIES RANGE PERIOD
Withholding of 1 day to 10 days Minimum
privileges; restriction to
specified limits;
restrictive custody,
suspension or forfeiture
of salary; or any
combination
-do- 11 days to 20 days Medium
-do- 21 days to 30 days Maximum

IOBC 52
Range of Penalties
For Less Grave Offenses:
PENALTIES RANGE PERIOD
Withholding of 31 day to 40 days Minimum
privileges; restriction
to specified limits;
restrictive custody,
suspension or
forfeiture of salary;
or any combination
-do- 41 days to 50 days Medium
-do- 51 days to 69 days Maximum

IOBC 53
Range of Penalties
For Grave Offenses:

PENALTIES PERIOD
Sixty (60) days to Six (6) Minimum

months suspension
One (1) rank demotion Medium
Dismissal from the service Maximum
IOBC 54
Limitation in the Imposition

of Penalties
Forfeiture of salary - the amount shall not exceed the

equivalent of one (1) month salary.
The penalty of Withholding of Privileges shall be

confined to:
a. deferment of vacation leave privileges,
b. participation in training grants or programs and
c. other similar privileges normally enjoyed by
civil service employees.
IOBC 55
Qualifying Circumstances
Mitigating Circumstances:
1. Illness
2. Good Faith
3. Length Of Service In The Government
4. Awards And Commendations
5. Analogous Circumstances
IOBC 56
Aggravating Circumstances
1. Taking advantage of official position;

2. Taking undue advantage of subordinate;
3. Use of government property in the commission of
the offense;
4. Repeatedly charged;
5. Offense is committed during office hours and/or
within the premises of the government office or
building;
IOBC 57
6. Employment of fraudulent means to commit or

conceal the offense;
7. Intoxication;
8. Being a recidivist
9. Offense committed in consideration of a price
or reward;
IOBC 58
10. Victim is a minor, feeble minded, or physically

disabled;
11. Offense is committed in cooperation with two (2)
or more persons;
12. Utilizing minor in the commission of the
offense; and
13. Analogous circumstances
IOBC 59
Guidelines in the
Application of Penalties
a. Like penalties shall be imposed for like offenses

and only one penalty shall be imposed for each
case.
b. For minimum period, only mitigating and no

aggravating circumstances are present.
c. For medium period, no mitigating and aggravating

circumstances are present.
IOBC 60
Guidelines in the
d. For maximum period, only aggravating and no

mitigating circumstances are present.
e. Where aggravating and mitigating circumstances are

present:
rule (b) shall be applied where there are more
mitigating circumstances present;
rule (c) shall be applied where the circumstances
equally off-set each other;
IOBC 61
Guidelines in the
rule (d) shall be applied when there are more
aggravating circumstances
f. If the respondent is found guilty of 2 or more

charges or counts, the penalty to be imposed
should be that corresponding to the most serious
charge or count and the rest shall be considered
as aggravating circumstances.
IOBC 62
Guidelines in the
g. Mitigating and aggravating circumstances must

be invoked by the party concerned, otherwise not
to be considered in the determination of penalty
to be imposed
IOBC 63
Admin Disability Inherent in

Certain Penalties
a. The penalty of dismissal carry with it:
- cancellation of eligibility,
- forfeiture of retirement benefits, and
- disqualification for re-employment in the
government.
b. The penalty of suspension carry with it that of

disqualification for promotion and withholding of
privileges corresponding to the period of suspension.
IOBC 64
Admin Disability Inherent in

Certain Penalties
c. The penalty of forfeiture of salary, which

consists of an amount not exceeding 1 month
salary, shall carry with it that of disqualification
for promotion corresponding to the period of
the penalty imposed.
IOBC 65
Administrative Remedies
A. Motion for Reconsideration

within 10 days from receipt of a copy of the
decision on the following grounds:
1. Newly discovered evidence
2. Errors of law or irregularities
IOBC 66
B. Appeal
How taken:
1. By filing a notice of appeal with the deciding

authority within 10 days from receipt of a copy of
decision.
2. Submit Memorandum of Appeal in 3 copies NLT 15

days from filing a notice of appeal.
*Failure to comply with 1 and 2 shall be sufficient

ground for the dismissal of the appeal.
IOBC 67
Nature of Right to Appeal
Perfection of an appeal within the statutory or

reglementary period is not only mandatory but also
jurisdictional and failure to do so renders the
questioned decision final and executory, and
deprives the appellate court or body of jurisdiction to
alter the final judgment much less to entertain the
appeal. (Republic vs. CA, 313 SCRA 376; Zacate
vs. Comelec, 353 SCRA 441).
IOBC 68
Question
May the complainant appeal from the

decision in an administrative case?
IOBC 69
Answer
Being a mere witness for the government,

complainant cannot appeal the decision rendered,
the right to appeal being limited by existing
jurisprudence to the respondent or to the CSC, the
persons considered as parties adversely affected
by the decision. (NAB vs. Mamauag, et al., G.R.
No. 149999, August 12, 2005).
IOBC 70
Question
Must the respondent be informed of the Findings and

Recommendation of an Investigating Committee or
Recommendation of the Hearing Officer?
IOBC 71
Answer
An investigating committee is under no legal

obligation to furnish respondent with a copy of
the resolution or report of investigation of the
committee or hearing officer containing his
findings and recommendation. 206 SCRA 256
[1992].
IOBC 72
Appellate Bodies
1. Regional Appellate Board
a. Decisions of the PLEB, PNP RD or ES where the

penalty imposed is demotion or
dismissal from the service;
b. Disciplinary recommendations of the Regional IAS

not acted upon by the PNP RD or ES within 30
days from submission, the recommended
penalty is demotion or dismissal from the service
IOBC 73
Appellate Bodies
1. Regional Appellate Board
c. Disciplinary recommendations of the Regional

IAS which were not acted upon by the PNP RD
or equivalent supervisor within 30 days from
submission by the Regional IAS, where the
recommended penalty is demotion or dismissal
from the service .
IOBC 74
Appellate Bodies
2. National Appellate Board
a. Decisions of the Chief, PNP penalty is demotion or

dismissal from the service;
b. Disciplinary recommendations of the Inspector General,

IAS not acted upon by the Chief, PNP within 30 days
form submission by the Inspector General, IAS, where
penalty is demotion or dismissal; and
c. Decisions of the Inspector General affirming the

Resolution of the regional IAS dismissing the
complaint for lack of probable cause.
IOBC 75
Appellate Bodies
3. Appellate Jurisdiction Of SILG

Decisions of the NAB and RAB
4. Appellate Jurisdiction Of The Civil Service

Commission
a. Decisions of the SILG;
b. Decisions of NAPOLCOM en banc as summary
dismissal authority
IOBC 76
QUESTIONS???
IOBC 77
Summary
In this lesson, we learned the following:

A Police Officer A Man in Uniform
References Governing PNP Administrative
Disciplinary System
PNP Disciplinary Law and Order general provisions
Jurisdiction of Cases
Procedures to be observed at the NHQ, Regional
and NSU level regarding citizens complaint
IOBC 78
Summary
Summary dismissal powers of the NAPOLCOM,

Chief, PNP and the Regional Directors
Commencement of a complaint
Pre-charge evaluation procedure
Summary hearing procedure
Offenses punishable and the imposable penalties
Different administrative remedies
IOBC 79

PNP Disciplinary Mechanism

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PNP Disciplinary Mechanism

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Module 1.

3 PNP Disciplinary Mechanism

The lesson aims to instill awareness to the

Identify who is a Police Officer

Who is a Police Officer?

A Police Officer a man

However, when he wavers and fails to

A Police Officer a man

The State has the right to hold him

Abadilla vs. Fidel Ramos

References Governing Admin

Revised Rules on Administrative Cases in the

NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 2007-001

Pre-Charge Evaluation Preliminary Investigation

PNP Disciplinary Law and

Answer a pleading in which a respondent or

Appellate Bodies RAB and NAB of

Breach of Internal Discipline minor offense

Citizens Complaint initiated by natural or

Conduct Unbecoming of a Police Officer done in

Decision the written disposition of the disciplinary

Disciplinary Authorities shall refer to the city or

Equivalent Supervisors PNP Officers occupying

Formal Charge a complaint initiated before any of

Forum Shopping the filing of several complaints

Jurisdiction authority vested by law to hear and

Minor Offenses not involving moral turpitude, but

Moral Turpitude done contrary to justice, honesty,

Newly Discovered Evidence evidence which

Recidivist a person who has been previously

Reglementary Period the period required by law or

Repeatedly Charged formally charged

Serious Charge a complaint involving an offense

Subpoena Ad Testificandum a process directed

Subpoena Duces Tecum a process directing a

Substantial Evidence such relevant evidence as

Summary Hearing Officer officer designated by the

Summary Proceeding an expeditious

Summons written notice informing the respondent

COMPLAINT RECEIPT TASK GROUP, CPNP COMPLAINT ACTION

CIDG VALIDATION &

SHO-HEARING RESOLUTION D, LS REVIEW DECISION ARCHIVE

COMPLAINT RECEIPT TASK GROUP, RD COMPLAINT ACTION

RIDMD/RHQ, PPO, CPO MPS CIDG VALIDATION/

A. Summary Dismissal Case

2. Respondent is a recidivist /repeatedly charged and

3. Respondent is guilty of a serious offense involving

4. AWOL for a continuous period of 30 days calendar

can only be subjected to summary hearing after

ROI together with the complete

A complaint shall be heard and decided exclusively

Any disciplinary authority or IAS Officer who violates

Complaint, How to Initiate?

1. by filing a written and sworn statement,

a. affidavits of witnesses and other evidence.

b. certificate of non-forum shopping,

Complaint, How to Initiate?

2. If verbally made, the concerned agency shall

3. A letter complaint complainant and witnesses

4. An anonymous complaint must be validated.

What is the prescriptive period of an

Defense of Prescription not applicable.

A process to determine the existence of

Within 3 days, from receipt of the complain,