The progress of a country largely depends

upon the efficiency and high quality of its

government servants. They play an important
role in running the administrative apparatus
of the state beside to enable them to
discharge their functions fearlessly they must
have a feeling of security of tenure. The
elaborate provisions contain in part XIV of the
constitution regarding the services under the
union and the states indicates the great
importance.
 Inspite of safeguards enshrined in article.311
its is doubt how far the safeguard will protect
the interest of the civil servants satisfactorily
from the view point of the civil servants.

 The position regard to applicability and scope

of article.311 is somewhat complicated.
 To analyze the role of judicial interpretation
regarding the adequate protection to the civil
servants in cases of dismissals, removal and
reductions in rank.

 To study unsatisfactory position of

constitutional safeguards.
“The safeguards enunciated under article.311
of the constitution are not adequate to
protect the interest of civil servants in the
light of interpretation given by the apex court
and safeguards must be strengthened by
adequate measures to give true protections
to the civil servants.”
 In this work I have opted the ‘’Doctrinal
research methodology’’ .

 Primary sources are acts and statutes,

documents of Constituent Assembly debates.

 Secondary sources are books, journal ,

newspapers and internet.
 CHAPTER 1 : CIVIL SERVANTS

 CHAPTER 2: DOCTRINE OF PLEASURE

 CHAPTER 3: CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS

 CHAPTER 4: DISMISSAL OR REMOVAL FROM

SERVICES.

 CHAPTER 5 :REMEDIES