Error Probability Analysis and Applications of

Amplitude-Coherent Detection in Flat Rayleigh

Fading Channels

GROUP MEMBERS

Muhammad MUDASSAR
Ali Uzair
Contents:

 Introduction
 Channel State Information with detection type
 System and Channel Model
 Optimal, Suboptimal and Heuristic Detection
 Comparison of SER performance
 Conclusion
Introduction:


 Continue..

 Coherent Detection Vs Non-Coherent Detection

 If information of ‘h’ is known the Coherent Detection(CD) is used

with MPSK, MFSK, MASK or QAM

 If information of ‘h’ is unknown the Non Coherent(NCD) with MFSK

or Diffrentially Coherent Detection(DCD) can be used
 Channel State Information with
detection type and possible modulation schemes
CSI Type of Detection Modulation Scheme

α, θ Coherent QAM,MPSK,MASK,MFSK

θ Coherent MPSK, MFSK

- Non-ceherent MFSK, BASK

P(θ) Partially Coherent MPSK

α Amplitude Coherent MASK, MFSK

System and Channel Model:

 Continue..


PDF of NCD with decision variable

 Amplitude Coherent Detection

Optimal Detection Sub-Optimal Detection Heuristic Detection

Less Complex Expression

 SER performance

Easily differentiate between PDFs

Tail decay rapidly

PDF of Optimal Detector

 Comparison of SER performance

Heuristic is better than Sub-

optimal

Optimal is better than Heuristic

Conclusion:

 In this work we demonstrate the design along with analysis.

 AS the optimal detector was complex so, two lesser complex
suboptimal detectors were derived. In which we modify the Bessel
function to derive one suboptimal detector and the second one is
derived by using heuristic
approach.
 For optimal detector Monte Carlo simulations were used to estimate
its SER and PDF and SER of other two suboptimal detectors were
derived.