advertising • Dramatic increment of marketing of tobacco in Retail outlet in 1999 • Increment of the cigarette consumption Objectives • To inspect the area and types of cigarette advertising materials in stores • To asses tobacco companies acquiescence with the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement. Design of the research • Study of 700 stores that sold cigarette in California • A cross-sectional analysis of random sample of 586 stores that sold cigarette Setting and the main outcome measures • US state of California(Settings) • Trained data collectors classified cigarette advertising materials by type(signs, displays, functional items) • Location(interior or exterior • Placement below 3 feet(1m) Fig: Tobacco retail marketing material by store type Fig: proportion of interior tobacco retail market Result of the Research • On average 17.2(S.D 16.1) retail outlets featured tobacco advertising materials • Approx 85% of tobacco advertising materials were within 4 feet of the counter. • 23% had cigarette product display next to candy • 3% of stores featured signs with cartoons • 11% had large exterior signs Conclusion • Aggressive use of stores to market cigarette • Violation of MSA-to protect children from cigarette advertising • The impact of exposure to cigarette advertising in stores on adult smokers and youth • Future studies should monitor the industrial use of retail outlets References • Federal Trade Commission (2001) Report to congress for 1999 pursuant to the federal cigarette labeling and advertising act. (US Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC) Google Scholar • (1998) Master Settlement Agreement. (National Association of Attorneys General), http://www.naag.org/tobaccopublic/library.cfm Google Scholar • Kessler D, Witt A, Barnett P, et al. (1996) The Food and Drug Administration's regulation of tobacco products. N Engl J Med 335:988–994