Strict liability offenses in Malaysia do not require proof of mens rea or criminal intent. They are exceptions to the general rule that criminal liability requires proof of both the act (actus reus) and mental state (mens rea). Some statutory crimes and offenses defined under Malaysian law are strict liability offenses where only proof of the prohibited act is needed for conviction. Whether an offense can rebut the presumption of mens rea depends on factors like whether the offense relates to public health and safety, the severity of punishment, and the effectiveness of strict liability in achieving the statutory objective.
Strict liability offenses in Malaysia do not require proof of mens rea or criminal intent. They are exceptions to the general rule that criminal liability requires proof of both the act (actus reus) and mental state (mens rea). Some statutory crimes and offenses defined under Malaysian law are strict liability offenses where only proof of the prohibited act is needed for conviction. Whether an offense can rebut the presumption of mens rea depends on factors like whether the offense relates to public health and safety, the severity of punishment, and the effectiveness of strict liability in achieving the statutory objective.
Strict liability offenses in Malaysia do not require proof of mens rea or criminal intent. They are exceptions to the general rule that criminal liability requires proof of both the act (actus reus) and mental state (mens rea). Some statutory crimes and offenses defined under Malaysian law are strict liability offenses where only proof of the prohibited act is needed for conviction. Whether an offense can rebut the presumption of mens rea depends on factors like whether the offense relates to public health and safety, the severity of punishment, and the effectiveness of strict liability in achieving the statutory objective.
PREPARED BY: 1. WAN NASREEN SYAZA BINTI WAN MOHAMAD NASIR 1162194 Definition of Criminal Strict Liability • Strict liability is a legal term referring to the holding of an individual or entity liable for damages or losses, without having to prove carelessness or mistake. • In criminal law, strict liability is defined as an exception to the general rule of liability, which usually demands that is essential to show mens rea. • However, many statutory crimes and offences do not require this. • Some of these offences in the absence of defence or provisions amount to absolute liability. General Principle • In order to convict a person to be liable in criminal offences, the general rule have to be proven: 1. Mens Rea 2. Actus Reus • However, there is an exception for cases fall under the meaning of strict liability. • An offence of strict liability is one where an element of mens rea is dispensed with. It is one where proof of Actus Reus alone suffices for a conviction, however morally free from blame the defendant may be. Can rebut the general principle? Presumption of mens rea approach • The guiding criteria: 1. Depends on the subject matter of the case. Relates to matter of social regulation such as public health, safety and welfare, traffic regulation, etc. a) public safety 2. Severity of the punishment, if not severe, can disregard the MR Carries relatively light punishment a) imprisonment – severe (Fundamental liberty is involved)(Stigmatization of society as exconvict) b) Typically a fine 3. Type of criminal. 4. Effectiveness in promoting the object of the statue (statutory objective)