Life’s Ultimate

Questions “Aquinas”
Christopher Ullman, Instructor
Christian Life College

1
 Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274)
• Known as the greatest
Christian medieval
theologian-philosopher, he
single-handedly stemmed
the tide of Islamic
Aristotelianism into Europe
• His friends playfully called
him “the dumb ox”
• He produced over ninety
works in a little over two
decades
• Summa Theologica
• Summa Contra Gentiles
• The Ways of God: For
Meditation and Prayer
• He stands at the top of the
group of thinkers known as
Scholastics
• At age 48 he suddenly
stopped writing
• Maybe he suffered a brain
hemorrhage
• Maybe he had a vision that
academic learning was not the
most important thing
• “All that I have written seems
like straw to me,” he told a
friend
• A year later, he died on the
road to a church council
2
 Followers and Critics of Aquinas
• Philosophers who follow
Aquinas’ teachings are
known as Thomists
• Pope John Paul II (Fides et
Ratio)
• Etienne Gilson (The Spirit of
Medieval Philosophy and The
Christian Philosophy of St.
Thomas Aquinas)
• Norman Geisler (Baker
Encyclopedia of Christian
Apologetics, and over 50 other
books)
• Catholic hospitals follow
Aquinas’ ethics
• Frances Schaeffer joins
Ronald Nash in being a
critic of some aspects of
Aquinas’ philosophy
• “In Aquinas’ view the will
of man was fallen, but
the intellect was not. . . .
Out of this, as time
passed, man’s intellect
was seen as
autonomous.” – Escape
from Reason, p. 211
3
 Aquinas’ works and methods
• His greatest works:
• Summa Contra Gentiles
(an apologetic refuting the
influence of Islamic
teachings in Europe)
• Summa Theologica (a
statement of Christian
doctrine, in the light of
Scripture, church tradition,
and philosophy)
•“The study of philosophy
is not done in order to
know what men have
thought, but rather to
know how truth herself
stands.”
•He was objective to a
fault, and obsessively
thorough in his analyses
•Received truth wherever
he found it
•Believed that faith and
reason can never conflict
4
 Aristotle,
Averroes, and
Aquinas
• The Islamic philosopher
Averroes (Ib’n Rushd) had •Aquinas took on the
tailored Aristotle’s teachings task of studying
so that the beliefs in
Aristotle for himself,
creation, the immortality of
the soul, and the unity of and building a
truth were discarded Christian worldview to
• Averroes influenced many in counter that of the
Christian academia Averroists 5
 Scholasticism
 the method and manner of dialectical
philosophizing (question and answers)
taught in the schools
 the period from 9th century CE, when new
schools arose in Europe to spread
Patristic faith disciplined by dialectic
methods of thinking
 Christian Rationalism, as distinct from
Augustinian Intuitionism
 reason applied to nature, human nature
and supernatural truth
6
The Major Scholastic Thinkers
 St. Anselm (1033-1109)
 first to incorporate Aristotelian rationalism into
Christian theology; rational proofs for existence
of God in Monologium and Proslogium
 Peter Abelard (1079-1142)
 Sic et non, collection of contradictory sayings
from Scripture and Church Fathers, introduces
method of resolving contradictions, lays
foundation for scholastic method
 Peter Lombard (c.1100 - c.1160)
 Sentences, compilation of early theological
opinions, becomes central text of scholastic
theological instruction
7
The Major Scholastic Thinkers
 St. Albertus Magnus (1193/1206 - 1280)
 from Averroes, introduces Aristotle’s treatises
and method; his Summa theologiae disputes
Averroes and reconciles Aristotle and
Christianity
 Roger Bacon (1212-1294)
 Franciscan, first great Scholastic empiricist
 St. Bonaventure (1221-1274)
 Franciscan, reconciles Aristotle with Augustine;
reason subservient to faith
 John Duns Scotus (1266-1308)
 Franciscan, greatest opponent of Thomism
 William of Occam (1285-1349)
 Franciscan, scientific empiricist; disputed self-
evident principles in Thomism, denying 8

competence of reason re faith

 St. Thomas Aquinas
 St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274)
 Italian, born near Naples
 Dominican, student of Albertus Magnus, professor
of theology at Paris, papal advisor
 Century of Dispute
 The 13th Century is torn between Augustinians
who make truth a matter of faith and Averroists, led
by Siger de Brabant ( ? - 1277), who separate truth
from faith
 St. Thomas advances a middle ground
 reason and faith constitute two harmonious realms
 faith complements reason
 reason has autonomy of its own 9
 St. Thomas Aquinas
 Thomist Philosophy
 systematic application of Aristotelian methods and
distinctions
 repeated Avicenna’s position on Universals which
becomes standard Scholastic view
 Aquinas’ Works
 Commentary of the Sentences (public lectures
1254-56)
 seven quaestiones disputatae (public debates
1256-72)
 commentaries on several of Aristotle’s works
 Summa contra Gentiles (1258-60)
 Summa theologica (1267-73) 10
 Scholastic Process

“Through doubting we come to

inquiry, and through inquiry
we perceive the truth.”
- Peter Abelard

11
 Knowing or Believing (the
separation of reason and faith)
• Knowing applies to the domain of reason
• Any truth humans gain apart from divine revelation is
acquired by the unaided light of the intellect
• Philosophy, natural science, mathematics, psychology are
examples
• Believing applies to the domain of revelation
• Truths of the faith are acquired by believing the
authoritative word of God
• Theology is the example
• Knowledge of God is the one exception

12
 The Five Ways (how philosophy
can support the belief that God
exists)
1. The Argument from Change to a Prime Mover
2. The Argument from Cause and Effect to a First
Cause
3. The Argument from Contingent Beings to a
Necessary Being
4. The Argument from Degrees of Perfection to a
Perfect Being
5. The Argument from Design in the Cosmos to a
Designer of the Cosmos 13
 The Five Ways Summed Up
• Logic is employed in each to show that the
cosmos as we know it depends in different ways
upon the existence of God
• God is the sufficient answer to the “why”
questions
• God is the one necessary being upon which all
the existences of all other beings depends
logically
• Only the existence of God can make sense of
the facts of existence

14
 Aquinas the Empiricist
• Denial of innate ideas means that sensed
experience is the trigger or catalyst of all
knowledge
Only then can my
A Sensed
particular passive intellect
thing Experience become aware of it

Only then can my active intellect

analyze and categorize it as one of
many of a universal kind
15
 Knowing God
God is not perceived through the senses, but
1. We can know what God is not (the way of
negation)
• Focuses on God’s absence of limitations
• The Jewish philosopher Maimonides also taught the way
of negation
• Arguments based on universal negatives (“No X is Y”)
are always deductive (their conclusions are believed to
be necessarily true)
• Does the certainty of negative knowledge depend on
some positive knowledge?
• How can I say, “God is not ____,” if I have no idea of what God
16
is?
 Knowing God
God is not perceived through the senses, but
2. We can know what God is like (the way of
analogy)
• Focuses on the similarities between particular things and
God
• Knowledge that X is similar to Y assumes that they share some
attribute in common, and that each possesses some attribute the
other does not
• Arguments from analogy are always inductive (their
conclusions are only probably true)
• Since Aquinas believes we have no innate ideas, the
way of analogy cannot escape the charges that
• It depends on anthropomorphism (human nature is the point of
reference: “God is like us”) or
• It commits equivocation (a fallacy in which one term is used in
two different ways) 17
 Knowing God
1. The way of negation and the way of analogy are
useful means of ascertaining who God is if and
only if
• We have innate ideas
• One of those innate ideas is the idea that God exists
2. Aquinas’ empiricism makes no place for innate
ideas, so neither way is effective
3. Augustine’s emphasis on imago Dei makes the
two ways usable
4. The starting point must be the divine nature, not
human nature
FROM TO US
GOD 18
 What Happens After Death?
1. Aquinas agreed with Aristotle that the
soul exists in union with the body, giving
the body its “form”
2. He affirmed that the soul survived the
death of the body, because God willed
that it should
3. This stance requires a setting aside of
• Aquinas’ empiricism
• Aristotle’s soul-body union
19
 What is the right thing to do?
What is the right way to live?
• Right is that which corresponds to a
thing’s nature
• It is our nature to seek happiness (fulfillment)
• This is attainable only in heaven
• Moving toward this good goal is the standard
for judgment
• We are capable of right acting and right
living because of virtues and laws

20
Virtues: Guidance from the Inside
Cardinal virtues are part of the created nature of all
humans and are knowable through reason
• Aquinas affirms
• Plato’s doctrine of four virtues (prudence, courage, temperance
and justice) and
• Aristotle’s doctrine of the golden mean (virtue is somewhere
between the deficiency and the excess)
Theological virtues are attainable only by grace
through faith
• Faith: leads our minds to see truth and our wills to assent to truth
• Hope: makes us willing to seek God’s help in attaining happiness
• Love: is the divine gift that inclines us to seek God’s friendship

21
 Law: Guidance from the Outside
Four different kinds of law
• Eternal law: both moral and physical
principles governing all of God’s creation
• Natural law: the part of eternal law that
applies to humans, knowable through reason
• Human (positive) law: humans trying to
make practical laws based on natural law
• Divine law: God’s law knowable through the
Bible
(Refer to Figure 7.2 on p. 185)
22
 Natural Law
• Aquinas takes insights present in Plato, Aristotle
and the Stoics (such as Epictetus and Cicero)
• He then sifts them through a Christian filter
• The result is a powerful tool for coaxing non-
Christians to an awareness of objective moral
standards
• Natural law shows up in our Declaration of
Independence, the Civil Rights Movement, and
the ethical positions of the Catholic Church

23
 Some Tenets of Natural Law

1. Every created thing has a God-given nature

2. The nature of humans is to love and obey God
3. A thing’s nature should always be allowed to be
expressed
4. Good is that which corresponds to a thing’s nature
5. Good is to be done. Evil is to be avoided.
6. The Principle of Double Effect: Every action has
a good effect, and a bad effect
• Weigh the good and the bad
• Assess the motive of the action
24
 Why Aquinas Made a Difference
• He realized the • He had the faith
need for a and the courage to
comprehensive confront the culture
worldview, and built in which he lived on
one with God at the its own terms
center
• He applied
• He employed his mind to
logic to a
study of
understand the teachings of the the world
wise, and used those he God
believed corresponded to truth created