Bank Management, 6th edition.

Timothy W. Koch and S. Scott MacDonald

Copyright © 2006 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning

Managing Interest Rate Risk:

GAP and Earnings Sensitivity

Chapter 5

William Chittenden edited and updated the PowerPoint slides for this edition.
Interest Rate Risk

 Interest Rate Risk

 Thepotential loss from unexpected
changes in interest rates which can
significantly alter a bank’s profitability
and market value of equity.
Interest Rate Risk: GAP & Earnings
Sensitivity
 When a bank’s assets and liabilities do
not reprice at the same time, the result
is a change in net interest income.
 The change in the value of assets and
the change in the value of liabilities will
also differ, causing a change in the
value of stockholder’s equity
Interest Rate Risk

 Banks typically focus on either:

 Net interest income or
 The market value of stockholders' equity
 GAP Analysis
 A static measure of risk that is commonly
associated with net interest income (margin)
targeting
 Earnings Sensitivity Analysis
 Earnings sensitivity analysis extends GAP
analysis by focusing on changes in bank
earnings due to changes in interest rates and
balance sheet composition
Asset and Liability Management
Committee (ALCO)

 The ALCO’s primary responsibility is

interest rate risk management.
 The ALCO coordinates the bank’s
strategies to achieve the optimal
risk/reward trade-off.
Two Types of Interest Rate Risk

 Spread Risk (reinvestment rate risk)

 Changes in interest rates will change
the bank’s cost of funds as well as the
return on their invested assets. They
may change by different amounts.
 Price Risk
 Changes in interest rates may change
the market values of the bank’s assets
and liabilities by different amounts.
Interest Rate Risk:
Spread (Reinvestment Rate) Risk
 If interest rates change, the bank will have
to reinvest the cash flows from assets or
refinance rolled-over liabilities at a different
interest rate in the future.
 An increase in rates, ceteris paribus,
increases a bank’s interest income but also
increases the bank’s interest expense.
 Static GAP Analysis considers the impact of
changing rates on the bank’s net interest
income.
Interest Rate Risk:
Price Risk
 If interest rates change, the market
values of assets and liabilities also
change.
 The longer is duration, the larger is the
change in value for a given change in
interest rates.
 Duration GAP considers the impact of
changing rates on the market value of
equity.
Measuring Interest Rate Risk with GAP

 Example:
A bank makes a $10,000 four-year car
loan to a customer at fixed rate of
8.5%. The bank initially funds the car
loan with a one-year $10,000 CD at a
cost of 4.5%. The bank’s initial spread
is 4%.
4 year Car Loan 8.50%
1 Year CD 4.50%
4.00%
 What is the bank’s risk?
Measuring Interest Rate Risk with GAP

 Traditional Static GAP Analysis

GAPt = RSAt -RSLt
 RSAt
 Rate Sensitive Assets
 Those assets that will mature or reprice in
a given time period (t)
 RSLt
 Rate Sensitive Liabilities
 Those liabilities that will mature or reprice
in a given time period (t)
Measuring Interest Rate Risk with GAP

 Traditional Static GAP Analysis

 What is the bank’s 1-year GAP with the
auto loan?
 RSA1yr = $0
 RSL1yr = $10,000

 GAP1yr = $0 - $10,000 = -$10,000

 The bank’s one year funding GAP is -10,000

 If interest rates rise (fall) in 1 year, the
bank’s margin will fall (rise)
Measuring Interest Rate Risk with GAP

 Traditional Static GAP Analysis

 Funding GAP
 Focuses on managing net interest
income in the short-run
 Assumes a ‘parallel shift in the yield

curve,’ or that all rates change at the

same time, in the same direction and by
the same amount.
Does this ever happen?
Traditional Static GAP Analysis
Steps in GAP Analysis
 Develop an interest rate forecast
 Select a series of “time buckets” or
intervals for determining when assets
and liabilities will reprice
 Group assets and liabilities into these
“buckets ”
 Calculate the GAP for each “bucket ”
 Forecast the change in net interest
income given an assumed change in
interest rates
What Determines Rate Sensitivity (Ignoring
Embedded Options)?
 An asset or liability is considered rate
sensitivity if during the time interval:
 It matures
 It represents and interim, or partial, principal
payment
 It can be repriced
 The interest rate applied to the outstanding
principal changes contractually during the
interval
 The outstanding principal can be repriced
when some base rate of index changes and
management expects the base rate / index to
change during the interval
 What are RSAs and RSLs?
 Considering a 0-90 day “time bucket,” RSAs and
RSLs include:
 Maturing instruments or principal payments
 If an asset or liability matures within 90 days,
the principal amount will be repriced
 Any full or partial principal payments within
90 days will be repriced
 Floating and variable rate instruments
 If the index will contractually change within
90 days, the asset or liability is rate sensitive
 The rate may change daily if their base rate
changes.
 Issue: do you expect the base rate to
change?
Factors Affecting Net Interest Income

 Changes in the level of interest rates

 Changes in the composition of assets
and liabilities
 Changes in the volume of earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities
outstanding
 Changes in the relationship between
the yields on earning assets and rates
paid on interest-bearing liabilities
Factors Affecting Net Interest Income:
An Example
 Consider the following balance sheet:
Expected Balance Sheet for Hypothetical Bank
Assets Yield Liabilities Cost
Rate sensitive $ 500 8.0% $ 600 4.0%
Fixed rate $ 350 11.0% $ 220 6.0%
Non earning $ 150 $ 100
$ 920
Equity
$ 80
Total $ 1,000 $ 1,000

NII = (0.08 x 500 + 0.11 x 350) - (0.04 x 600 + 0.06 x 220)

NII = 78.5 - 37.2 = 41.3
NIM = 41.3 / 850 = 4.86%
GAP = 500 - 600 = -100
Examine the impact of the following changes

 A 1% increase in the level of all short-term

rates?
 A 1% decrease in the spread between assets
yields and interest costs such that the rate
on RSAs increases to 8.5% and the rate on
RSLs increase to 5.5%?
 Changes in the relationship between short-
term asset yields and liability costs
 A proportionate doubling in size of the
bank?
1% increase in short-term rates
Expected Balance Sheet for Hypothetical Bank
Assets Yield Liabilities Cost
Rate sensitive $ 500 9.0% $ 600 5.0%
Fixed rate $ 350 11.0% $ 220 6.0%
Non earning $ 150 $ 100
$ 920
Equity
$ 80
Total $ 1,000 $ 1,000

NII = (0.09 x 500 + 0.11 x 350) - (0.05 x 600 + 0.06 x 220)

NII = 83.5 - 43.2 = 40.3
NIM = 40.3 / 850 = 4.74% With a negative GAP, more
GAP = 500 - 600 = -100 liabilities than assets reprice
higher; hence NII and NIM fall
1% decrease in the spread
Expected Balance Sheet for Hypothetical Bank
Assets Yield Liabilities Cost
Rate sensitive $ 500 8.5% $ 600 5.5%
Fixed rate $ 350 11.0% $ 220 6.0%
Non earning $ 150 $ 100
$ 920
Equity
$ 80
Total $ 1,000 $ 1,000

NII = (0.085 x 500 + 0.11 x 350) - (0.055 x 600 + 0.06 x 220)

NII = 81 - 46.2 = 34.8
NIM = 34.8 / 850 = 4.09% NII and NIM fall (rise) with a
GAP = 500 - 600 = -100 decrease (increase) in the
spread.
Why the larger change?
Changes in the Slope of the Yield Curve

 If liabilities are short-term and assets

are long-term, the spread will
 widen as the yield curve increases in
slope
 narrow when the yield curve
decreases in slope and/or inverts
Proportionate doubling in size
Expected Balance Sheet for Hypothetical Bank
Assets Yield Liabilities Cost
Rate sensitive $ 1,000 8.0% $ 1,200 4.0%
Fixed rate $ 700 11.0% $ 440 6.0%
Non earning $ 300 $ 200
$ 1,840
Equity
$ 160
Total $ 2,000 $ 2,000

NII = (0.08 x 1000 + 0.11 x 700) - (0.04 x 1200 + 0.06 x 440)

NII = 157 - 74.4 = 82.6
NIM = 82.6 / 1700 = 4.86% NII and GAP double, but NIM
GAP = 1000 - 1200 = -200 stays the same.
What has happened to risk?
Changes in the Volume of Earning Assets and
Interest-Bearing Liabilities

 Net interest income varies directly with

changes in the volume of earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
regardless of the level of interest rates
RSAs increase to $540 while fixed-rate assets
decrease to $310 and RSLs decrease to $560
while fixed-rate liabilities increase to $260
Expected Balance Sheet for Hypothetical Bank
Assets Yield Liabilities Cost
Rate sensitive $ 540 8.0% $ 560 4.0%
Fixed rate $ 310 11.0% $ 260 6.0%
Non earning $ 150 $ 100
$ 920
Equity
$ 80
Total $ 1,000 $ 1,000

NII = (0.08 x 540 + 0.11 x 310) - (0.04 x 560 + 0.06 x 260)

NII = 77.3 - 38 = 39.3
Although the bank’s GAP
NIM = 39.3 / 850 = 4.62%
GAP = 540 - 560 = -20
(and hence risk) is lower,
NII is also lower.
Changes in Portfolio Composition and Risk

 To reduce risk, a bank with a negative

GAP would try to increase RSAs
(variable rate loans or shorter
maturities on loans and investments)
and decrease RSLs (issue relatively
more longer-term CDs and fewer fed
funds purchased)
 Changes in portfolio composition also
raise or lower interest income and
expense based on the type of change
Changes in Net Interest Income are directly
proportional to the size of the GAP
 If there is a parallel shift in the yield
curve:
ΔNII exp  GAP  iexp
 It is rare, however, when the yield
curve shifts parallel
 Ifrates do not change by the same
amount and at the same time, then net
interest income may change by more
or less.
 Summary of GAP and the Change in NII

GAP Summary
Change in Change in Change in Change in
GAP Interest Interest Interest Net Interest
Income Income Expense Income
Positive Increase Increase > Increase Increase
Positive Decrease Decrease > Decrease Decrease

Negative Increase Increase < Increase Decrease

Negative Decrease Decrease < Decrease Increase

Zero Increase Increase = Increase None

Zero Decrease Decrease = Decrease None
Rate, Volume, and Mix Analysis

 Banks often publish a summary of how net

interest income has changed over time.
 They separate changes over time to:
 shifts in assets and liability
composition and volume
 changes associated with movements in

interest rates.
 The purpose is to assess what factors
influence shifts in net interest income over
time.
 Measuring Interest Rate Risk: Synovus

2004 Compared to 2003 2003 Compared to 2002

Change Due to * Change Due to *
Interest earned on: Volume Yield/Rate Net Change Volume Yield/Rate Net Change
Taxable loans, net $ 149,423 (117,147) 32,276 161,222 36,390 197,612
Tax-exempt loans, net† 1,373 (586) 787 1,108 (450) 658
Taxable investment securities (5,313) (916) (6,229) 4,507 2,570 7,077
Tax-exempt investment securities† 2,548 74 2,622 2,026 (206) 1,820
Interest earning deposits with banks 223 (176) 47 28 48 76
Federal funds sold and securities
406 (1,745) (1,339) 1,447 1,410 2,857
purchased under resale agreements
Mortgage loans held for sale 7,801 (1,680) 6,121 (113) 549 436
Total interest income 156,461 (122,176) 34,285 170,225 40,311 210,536

Interest paid on:

Interest bearing demand deposits 6,074 (12,517) (6,443) 1,537 5,433 6,970
Money market accounts 21,380 (36,244) (14,864) 4,654 13,888 18,542
Savings deposits (369) (3,307) (3,676) (660) (67) (727)
Time deposits 32,015 (22,545) 9,470 38,824 32,812 71,636
Federal funds purchased and securities
(6,165) (29,744) (35,909) 23,148 15,870 39,018
sold under repurchase agreements
Other borrowed funds 21,318 (4,272) 17,046 21,960 3,361 25,321
Total interest expense 74,253 (108,629) (34,376) 89,463 71,297 160,760
Net interest income 82,208 (13,547) 68,661 80,762 (30,986) 49,776
Interest Rate-Sensitivity Reports
Classifies a bank’s assets and liabilities into time intervals
according to the minimum number of days until each
instrument is expected to be repriced.
 GAP values are reported a periodic and
cumulative basis for each time interval.
 Periodic GAP
 Is the Gap for each time bucket and

measures the timing of potential income

effects from interest rate changes
 Cumulative GAP
 It is the sum of periodic GAP's and

measures aggregate interest rate risk over

the entire period
 Cumulative GAP is important since it

directly measures a bank’s net interest

sensitivity throughout the time interval.
 Measuring Interest Rate Risk with GAP
1-7 8-30 31-90 91-180 181-365 Over Not Rate
Days Days Days Days Days 1 year Sensitive Total
Assets
U.S. Treas & ag 0.7 3.6 1.2 0.3 3.7 9.5
MM Inv 1.2 1.8 3.0
Municipals 0.7 1.0 2.2 7.6 11.5
FF & Repo's 5.0 5.0
Comm loans 1.0 13.8 2.9 4.7 4.6 15.5 42.5
Install loans 0.3 0.5 1.6 1.3 1.9 8.2 13.8
Cash 9.0 9.0
Other assets 5.7 5.7
Total Assets 6.3 15.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 35.0 14.7 100.0
Liabilities and Equity
MMDA 5.0 12.3 17.3
Super NOW 2.2 2.2
CD's < 100,000 0.9 2.0 5.1 6.9 1.8 2.9 19.6
CD's > 100,000 1.9 4.0 12.9 7.9 1.2 27.9
FF purchased -
NOW 9.6 9.6
Savings 1.9 1.9
DD 13.5 13.5
Other liabilities 1.0 1.0
Equity 7.0 7.0
Total Liab & Eq. 5.0 11.0 30.3 24.4 3.0 4.8 21.5 100.0
Periodic GAP 1.3 4.0 -20.3 -14.4 6.0 30.2
Cumulative GAP 1.3 5.3 -15.0 -29.4 -23.4 6.8
Advantages and Disadvantages of
Static GAP Analysis
 Advantages
 Easy to understand
 Works well with small changes in interest
rates
 Disadvantages
 Ex-post measurement errors
 Ignores the time value of money
 Ignores the cumulative impact of interest rate
changes
 Typically considers demand deposits to be
non-rate sensitive
 Ignores embedded options in the bank’s
assets and liabilities
Measuring Interest Rate Risk with
the GAP Ratio
 GAP Ratio = RSAs/RSLs
A GAP ratio greater than 1 indicates a
positive GAP
 A GAP ratio less than 1 indicates a
negative GAP
What is the ‘Optimal GAP’

 There is no general optimal value for a

bank's GAP in all environments.
 Generally, the farther a bank's GAP is
from zero, the greater is the bank's
risk.
 A bank must evaluate its overall risk
and return profile and objectives to
determine its optimal GAP
GAP and Variability in Earnings
 Neither the GAP nor GAP ratio provide
direct information on the potential variability
in earnings when rates change.
 Consider two banks, both with $500 million
in total assets.
 Bank A: $3 mil in RSAs and $2 mil in RSLs.
GAP = $1 mil and GAP ratio = 1.5 mil
 Bank B: $300 mil in RSAs and $200 mil RSLs.
GAP equals $100 mill and 1.5 GAP ratio.
 Clearly, the second bank assumes greater
interest rate risk because its net interest
income will change more when interest rates
change.
Link Between GAP and Net Interest Margin

 Many banks will specify a target GAP

to earning asset ratio in the ALCO
policy statements

Target Gap (Allowable % Change in NIM)(Expec ted NIM)


Earning assets Expected % change in interest rates
Establishing a Target GAP: An Example

 Consider a bank with $50 million in

earning assets that expects to
generate a 5% NIM.
 The bank will risk changes in NIM
equal to plus or minus 20% during the
year
 Hence, NIM should fall between 4% and
6%.
Establishing a Target GAP: An Example
(continued)
 If management expects interest rates to vary
up to 4 percent during the upcoming year,
the bank’s ratio of its 1-year cumulative GAP
(absolute value) to earning assets should
not exceed 25 percent.
 Target GAP/Earning assets

= (.20)(0.05) / 0.04 = 0.25

 Management’s willingness to allow only a 20
percent variation in NIM sets limits on the
GAP, which would be allowed to vary from
$12.5 million to $12.5 million, based on $50
million in earning assets.
Speculating on the GAP

 Many bank managers attempt to adjust

the interest rate risk exposure of a
bank in anticipation of changes in
interest rates.
 This is speculative because it assumes
that management can forecast rates
better than the market.
Can a Bank Effectively Speculate on the GAP?

 Difficult to vary the GAP and win as

this requires consistently accurate
interest rate forecasts
 A bank has limited flexibility in
adjusting its GAP; e.g., loan and
deposit terms
 There is no adjustment for the timing
of cash flows or dynamics of the
changing GAP position
Earnings Sensitivity Analysis
 Allows management to incorporate the
impact of different spreads between
asset yields and liability interest costs
when rates change by different
amounts.
Steps to Earnings Sensitivity Analysis

 Forecast future interest rates

 Identify changes in the composition of
assets and liabilities in different rate
environments
 Forecast when embedded options will be
exercised
 Identify when specific assets and liabilities
will reprice given the rate environment
 Estimate net interest income and net
income
 Repeat the process to compare forecasts of
net interest income and net income across
different interest rate environments.
Earnings Sensitivity Analysis and the
Exercise of Embedded Options
 Many bank assets and liabilities
contain different types of options, both
explicit and implicit:
 Option to refinance a loan
 Call option on a federal agency bond
the bank owns
 Depositors have the option to withdraw
funds prior to maturity
 Cap (maximum) rate on a floating-rate
loan
Earnings Sensitivity Analysis
Recognizes that Different Interest
Rates Change by Different Amounts at
Different Times
 It is well recognized that banks are
quick to increase base loan rates but
are slow to lower base loan rates when
rates fall.
 Recall the our example from before:
4 year Car Loan 8.50%
1 Year CD 4.50%
4.00%
 GAP1Yr = $0 - $10,000 = -$10,000
 What if rates increased?
1 year GAP Position
Change in Rates Base Change in Rates
-3 -2 -1 GAP1yr +1 +2 +3
-1,000 -2,000 -8,000 -10,000 -10,000 -10,000 -10,000
Re-finance the auto loans All CD’s will mature
What about the 3 Month GAP Position?

 Base GAP3m = $10,000 - $10,000 = 0

3 Month GAP Position

Change in Rates Base Change in Rates
-3 -2 -1 GAP3m +1 +2 +3
+8,000 +6,000 +2,000 0 -1,000 -3,000 -6,000
Re-finance auto loans, and People will “pull” the CD’s
less likely to “pull” CD’s for higher returns
The implications of embedded options

 Does the bank or the customer determine

when the option is exercised?
 How and by what amount is the bank being
compensated for selling the option, or how
much must it pay to buy the option?
 When will the option be exercised?
 This is often determined by the
economic and interest rate environment
 Static GAP analysis ignores these
embedded options
 Earnings Sensitivity Analysis (Base Case)
Example
 Assets
3 Months >3-6 >6-12 >1-3 >3-5 >5-10 >10-20 >20
Total or Less Months Months Years Years Years Years Years
Loans
Prime Based 100,000 100,000
Equity Credit Lines 25,000 25,000
Fixed Rate >1 yr 170,000 18,000 18,000 36,000 96,000 2,000
Var Rate Mtg I Yr 55,000 13,750 13,750 27,500
30-Yr Fix Mortgage 250,000 5,127 5,129 9,329 32,792 28,916 116,789 51,918
Consumer 100,000 6,000 6,000 12,000 48,000 28,000
Credit Card 25,000 3,000 3,000 6,000 13,000
Investments
Eurodollars 80,000 80,000
CMOs FixRate 35,000 2,871 2,872 5,224 13,790 5,284 4,959
US Treasury 75,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 40,000
Fed Funds Sold 25,000 25,000

Cash & Due From Banks 15,000 15,000

Loan Loss Reserve -15,000 -15,000
Non-earning Assets 60,000 60,000
Total Assets 1,000,000 278,748 53,751 101,053 228,582 104,200 121,748 51,918 60,000
 Earnings Sensitivity Analysis (Base Case)
Example
 Liabilities and GAP Measures
3 Months >3-6 >6-12 >1-3 >3-5 >5-10 >10-20 >20
Total or Less Months Months Years Years Years Years Years
Deposits
MMDAs 240,000 240,000
Retail CDs 400,000 60,000 60,000 90,000 160,000 30,000
Savings 35,000 35,000
NOW 40,000 40,000
DDA Personal 55,000 55,000
Comm'l DDA 60,000 24,000 36,000
Borrowings
TT&L 25,000 25,000
L-T notes FR 50,000 50,000
Fed Funds Purch 0
NIR Liabilities 30,000 30,000
Capital 65,000 65,000
Tot Liab & Equity 1,000,000 349,000 60,000 90,000 160,000 30,000 50,000 0 261,000

Swaps- Pay Fixed 50,000 -25,000 -25,000

GAP -20,252 -6,249 11,053 43,582 49,200 71,748 51,918 -201,000
CUMULATIVE GAP -20,252 -26,501 -15,448 28,134 77,334 149,082 201,000 0
 Fed Funds Forecast vs. Implied Forward Rates
4.50
Interest Rate Market Implied Rates
4.25
Forecasts % Most LikelyForecast
e
ta4.00
R
s3.75
d
n
u
F3.50
d
e
F3.25

3.00
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
Time (month)
Most LikelyForecast and Rate Ramps Dec. 2005
6
5
t
n4
e
c
r3
e
P
2
0
11 1 3 5 7 9 11 1 3 5 7 9 12
2006 2007
 1.0
Sensitivity of Earnings: Year One
.5
Earnings sensitivity over one and
2
two years versus most likely rate

Change in NII ($MM)

(.5)
ALCO Guideline
(1.0)
Board Limit
(1.5)
(2.0)
(2.5)
(3.0)
(3.5)
- 300 -200 -100 ML +100 +200 +300
Ramped Change in Rates from Most Likely (Basis Point)
1.0
Sensitivity of Earnings: Year Two
.5
Change in NII ($MM)

2
(.5)
ALCO Guideline
(1.0)
scenario

Board Limit
(1.5)
(2.0)
(2.5)
(3.0)
- 300 -200 -100 ML +100 +200 +300
Ramped Change in Rates from Most Likely (Basis Points)
Earnings Sensitivity Analysis Results

 For the bank:

 The embedded options can potentially
alter the bank’s cash flows
 Interest rates change by different
amounts at different times
 Summary results are known as
Earnings-at-Risk or Net Interest
Income Simulation
Earnings Sensitivity Analysis
 Earnings-at-Risk
 The potential variation in net interest income
across different interest rate environments,
given different assumptions about balance
sheet composition, when embedded options
will be exercised, and the timing of repricings.
 Demonstrates the potential volatility in

earnings across these environments

 The greater is the potential variation in

earnings (earnings at risk), the greater is

the amount of risk assumed by a bank , or
 The greater is the maximum loss, the

greater is risk
Income Statement GAP

 Income Statement GAP

 Forecasts the change in net interest
income given a 1% rise or fall in the
bank’s benchmark rate over the next
year.
 It converts contractual GAP data to
figures evidencing the impact of a 1%
rate movement.
 Income statement GAP is also know in
the industry as Beta GAP analysis
Income Statement GAP Adjusts the
Balance Sheet GAP to Incorporate the
Earnings Change Ratio

 The Earnings Change Ratio

 This ratio indicates how the yield on
each asset and rate paid on each
liability is assumed to change relative
to a 1 percent move in the benchmark
rate.
 Amounts In Thousands Prime Down 100bp Prime Up 100bp
Balance Income Balance Income
Sheet Statement Sheet Statement
t t
GAP* ECR GAP GAP* ECR GAP
Rate-Sensitive Assets A B AXB C D CxD
Income Statement GAP

Loans
Fixed Rate $5,661 100% $5,661 $5,661 100% $5,661
Floating Rate 3,678 100% 3,678 3,678 100% 3,678
Securities
Principal Cash Flows
Agencies 200 71% 142 200 71% 142
Agy Callables 2,940 71% 2,087 300 60% 180
CMO Fixed 315 58% 183 41 51% 21
Fed Funds Sold 2,700 96% 2,592 2,700 96% 2,592
Floating Rate
Total Rate-Sensitive Assets $15,494 $14,343 $12,580 $12,274
Rate-Sensitive Liabilities
Savings $1,925 75% $1,444 $1,925 5% $96
Money Mkt Accts 11,001 60% 6,601 11,001 40% 4,400
NOW 2,196 80% 1,757 2,196 20% 439
Fed Funds Purch/Repo 0 96% 0 0 96% 0
CDs - IOOM 3,468 85% 2,948 3,468 85% 2,948
CDs < 100M 4,370 84% 3,671 4,370 84% 3,671
Total Rate-Sensitive $22,960 $16,420 $22,960 $11,554
Liabilities
Rate Sensitivity Gap (Assets- ($7,466) ($2,077) ($10,380) $719
Liab)
Total Assets $29,909 $29,909 $29,909 $29,909
GAP as a Percent of Total -24.96% -6.94% -34.71% 2.40%
Assets
Change in Net Interest ($20.8) $7.2
Change in Net Interest 0.07% 0.02%
Net Interest Margin 5.20% 5.20%
Percentage Change in Net 1.34% 0.46%
Managing the GAP and Earnings Sensitivity
Risk
 Steps to reduce risk
 Calculate periodic GAPs over short
time intervals.
 Fund repriceable assets with matching
repriceable liabilities so that periodic
GAPs approach zero.
 Fund long-term assets with matching
noninterest-bearing liabilities.
 Use off-balance sheet transactions to
hedge.
Adjust the Effective Rate Sensitivity of a
Bank’s Assets and Liabilities

Objective Approaches
Buy longer-term securities.
Reduce asset
Lengthen the maturities of loans.
sensitivity
Move from floating-rate loans to term loans.

Increase asset Buy short-term securities.

sensitivity Shorten loan maturities.
Make more loans on a floating-rate basis.
Pay premiums to attract longer-term deposit
Reduce liability
instruments.
sensitivity
Issue long-term subordinated debt.
Pay premiums to attract short-term deposit
Increase liability instruments.
sensitivity Borrow more via non-core purchased
liabilities.
 Bank Management, 6th edition.
Timothy W. Koch and S. Scott MacDonald
Copyright © 2006 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning

Managing Interest Rate Risk:

GAP and Earnings Sensitivity

Chapter 5

William Chittenden edited and updated the PowerPoint slides for this edition.