You are on page 1of 29

MANUFACTURING PROCESS AND VALIDATION

Rutendo Kuwana

Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Finished Pharmaceutical Product Manufacturing

 Manufacturing and marketing authorization


 Pharmaceutical development
 Formulation
 Sites of manufacture
 Manufacturing process
 Manufacturing process controls of Critical steps and intermediates
 Process validation and Evaluation

2| Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Manufacturing site(s)
 Name and street address of each facility where any aspect
of manufacture occurs including production, sterilisation,
packaging and quality control
– Blocks and Units should be clearly stated
– Including any alternative manufacturers

 Certificate issued by the Competent DRA according to


WHO Certification scheme for each site where a major
step of manufacturing is performed

 Valid GMP certificate (may not insist if inspected by WHO)

3| Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Development of manufacturing process

Pre- formulation

Formulation

Pilot manufacture

Industrial Scale
4
4| Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Development of manufacturing process

Relationship between method of manufacture and process


validation data

Process should address the need and value of in process


controls

Process evaluation and validation should justify reduction


of some tests from routine
5
5| Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Development of manufacturing process

Scale Up Data

 Used to generate information from laboratory through


pilot to production scale batch

 Evidence that scale up will not result in loss in quality

 Should show that variations in batch size will not


adversely alter FPP characteristics

6
6| Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Manufacturing process
Information required

 Flow diagram
 critical steps – in-process controls

 Description of manufacturing/packaging, including


 Scale
 Equipment by type (e.g. tumble blender) & working
capacity
 Process parameters for steps, e.g. time, temp, pH
 Environmental conditions, e.g. rel. humidity for
hygroscopic FPPs.

7
7| Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Manufacturing process (2)

 Proposal for reprocessing – justified with data

 Copy of master formula

 Batch manufacturing record – real batch

 Sterile products – sterilisation steps and / or aseptic procedures

 Description of in-process tests

 Data for ≥ 3 full scale batches to show achievement of


predetermined specifications

8
8| Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Manufacturing process
Controls of critical steps and intermediates

 Critical steps
Acceptance criteria (justified)
Test methods (cross reference acceptable)

 Intermediates isolated during process e.g tablet cores in


film-coated tablet production
Acceptance criteria (justified if not Compendial)
Test methods (cross reference acceptable)

9
9| Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Manufacturing Process Controls of Critical steps and
Intermediates
Manufacturing step Test Item Methods Acceptance criteria

After Step 1.1 Yield By weighing 99-110%

After Step 1.2 Yield By weighing 100-110%

After Step 2.1.3 Yield By weighing 98-100%

After Step 2.2.3 Yield By weighing 98-100%

After Step 3.2 Appearance Visual inspection See table below

After Step 3.2 Thickness - See table below

After Step 3.2 Average mass In-house See table below

After Step 3.2 Hardness Eur. Ph. See table below

After Step 3.2 Friability Eur. Ph ≤1%

After Step 3.2 Disintegration time Eur. Ph ≤15min

After Step 3.2 Yield By weighing 97-100%

10 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Manufacturing Process Controls of Critical steps and
Intermediates

Test Item 100/270mg Tablets


Average Mass – Layer 1 421- 447mg
Average Mass - layer 1+2 679 - 721mg
Appearance Round, biconvex, bilayered tablet;
one layer is yellow coloured and may
be mottled, and the other one is white
to slightly yellow, with a break line,
engraved "GP" on one side, and
"100" on the other side

Thickness 4.1-4.4mm
Hardness >100N

11 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Process Validation and Evaluation

WHO validation definition

The documented act of proving that any procedure, process, equipment,


material, activity, or system actually leads to the expected results.

Process validation is the collection and evaluation of data, from process


design stage throughout production, which establishes scientific
evidence that a process is capable of consistently delivering quality
products

US FDA

12 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Process validation & evaluation

Differentiate between the following generics:

New FPPs (new for manufacturer, not marketed yet)


– FPPs that have been newly developed by the manufacturer, though it will be
a generic
– Full validation required

Established FPPs
– The manufacturer has manufactured & marketed this FPP for quite some
time
– Submit review of report for ≥ 10 recent consecutive batches
• Manufactured within the preceding year. If less than 10 batches, may extend the period to
3 years
• result/trend/statistical analysis & discussion
• Rejected batches excluded - submit failure investigation
13
13 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
What should be validated ?

“Any aspect of operation, including significant changes to the


premises, facilities, equipment or processes, which may
affect the quality of the product, directly or indirectly,
should be qualified and validated”

14 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Purpose of Process Validation

Process validation is intended to establish that the proposed


manufacturing process is a suitable one and yields
consistently a product of the desired quality.

i.e. that the process is suitable and under control

15 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Process Validation and Evaluation
Validation is mandatory for processes including all critical steps

The aim is to show that critical steps are under control and lead
continuously to the desirable quality

Examples of critical steps (list non exhaustive)


 mixing,

 coating,

 granulation,

 emulsification,

 non-standard sterilisation

16 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Process Validation and Evaluation
Details required on first 3 production batches

 Batches
batch number
batch size
place and date of manufacture
batch number of API(s)
yield
batch purpose (validation, stability, clinical trial …)
 Process
equipment
process parameters
validation protocol.
 Results
critical steps
in process control
finished product specification

17 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Validation “new” product
Concurrent / prospective validation (1)
Concurrent validation
– Carried out during normal production
– First 3 production batches (prospective validation)
– In-process controls are set on outcome of validation

Extensive sampling and testing during process, for example (tablets)


– planned sampling on mixing / granulation stages for content uniformity (low-
dose FPPs & FDCs !)
– A large number of tablets for mass and/or content uniformity, hardness,
friability and even dissolution
• Sampled according to plan during process
• Statistical analysis of results with conclusions
• To be within acceptance criteria

18
18 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Validation “new” product
Concurrent / prospective validation (2)

 Parenteral products, aseptically filled (if terminal sterilization is not


possible)
– Filling ampoules with culture media, then
– Incubation and control of microbial growth
– Level of contamination: ≤ 0.1%

 Challenge experiments to determine


– robustness of process
– effect of material variations, such as particle size can be carried out on
experimental batches e.g. stability of granulate over time
– Effect in case of unplanned stoppage

19
19 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Validation “new” product
Concurrent / prospective validation (4)

Laboratory scale batches (small size),


– To support e.g. formulation and packaging development

Pilot batches
– Used e.g. in stability and safety/efficacy studies
– Size for oral solid dosage forms: the largest of 10% of production scale or
100,000 units

Productions scale
– For full validation and stability studies
– Scale-up / scale down after registration
• Up to10-fold compared to the original batch size (minor amendment/change)

20
20 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Process Validation Data

 Compliance with FPP specifications alone inadequate to


demonstrate validation of processes and control over
process

 Manufacturer may not have completed formal validation


on production scale batches

 Important to link development and evaluation of


laboratory and pilot scale batches, process development
and optimisation

21
21 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Development of manufacturing process
Process Validation Scheme/Protocol

 To be used for applications where production scale


batches not yet produced

 To outline the formal validation process to be conducted


on production scale batches (at least 3 consecutive
batches)

 Data should be available for verification post -


registration

22
22 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Development of manufacturing process
Process Validation Scheme/Protocol (2)

Information required

- short description of the process including critical processing steps or


parameters to be monitored

- FPP release specifications

- Details of analytical methods

- IPC proposed and acceptance criteria

- additional testing and analytical validation

- sampling plan – where, when and how samples are taken

- details of methods for recording and evaluating of results

- proposed timeframe
23
23 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Development of manufacturing process
Process Validation Report

After validation

 Batch analytical data

 Certificates of analysis

 Batch manufacturing records

 Report on unusual findings, modifications or changes found


necessary with appropriate rationale

 Conclusions

 Significant deviations to be informed to DRA and regulatory


approval required before implementation
24
24 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009
Other requirements

For well-established processes/product


for the manufacturer – report on review of NLT 10 batches
manufactured in the past 12 months

25 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Review report for established FPP should contain at
least the following
 List of reviewed batches - batch numbers, manufacturing dates and batch size. Any
differences from the prequalified/approved batch size should be clarified.
 Review of starting materials (active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients) –
list of sources (API), compliance with specifications
 Review of primary packing materials used in the FPP, including reference to those from
new sources.
 A tabulation of Batch Analysis data (including in-process test results and finished product
quality control results) together with statistical and trend analysis where appropriate.
 A review of all out-of-specification and related investigations, with indication of batches
that failed to meet specification(s)
 A review of all deviations.
 All changes carried out
 Quality-related returns, complaints and recalls.

26 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Alternatives

If validation data (on production scale batches) are not


available submit

 validation protocol,

 commitment that validation report will be submitted later


for evaluation,

 commitment that data will be available in case of


inspection,

 commitment that WHO will be informed of any significant


deviation.

27 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Analytical Methods

Process knowledge depends on accurate and precise


measuring techniques on starting material, intermediates
and finished product.

For data to be of value the analytical tests must be


scientifically sound

Validated analytical methods are not required during


product and process development activities. The methods
should however be scientifically sound (e.g. specific,
sensitive, accurate), suitable and reliable for the specified
purpose.

28 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009


Use of analytical methods - generics
Clinical Pharmaceutical Methods
At initial phase of pharmaceutical development
To determine To develop a stable and reproducible To understand the profile of -
bioavailability in formulation for the manufacture related substances and to study
healthy volunteers of bioequivalence, dissolution, stability and start measuring the
stability and pilot-scale validation impact of key product and
batches manufacturing process parameters
on consistent FPP quality

At advanced phase of pharmaceutical development


To prove bioequivalence To optimize, scale-up, and transfer a To be robust, transferable, accurate,
after critical stable and controlled and precise for specification
variations to the manufacturing process for the setting, stability assessment, and
prequalified dossier prequalification product QC release of prequalified
batches

29 | Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009

You might also like