Revolution – The Neolithic Revolution was the transition from hunting and gathering to agriculture, as first adopted by various independent prehistoric human societies. • Barter – Barter is a type of trade where goods or services are exchanged for a certain amount of other goods or services, i.e. there is no money involved in the transaction. • Trade – Trade is believed to have taken place throughout much of recorded human history. There is evidence of the exchange of obsidian and flint during the Stone Age • Industrial revolution – The Industrial Revolution was the major technological, socioeconomic and cultural change in the late 18th and early 19th century resulting from the replacement of an economy based on manual labor to one dominated by industry and machine manufacture Industrial Revolution
A Watt steam engine in Madrid
• The Industrial Revolution was the major technological, socioeconomic and cultural change in late 18th and early 19th century that began in Britain and spread throughout the world. During that time, an economy based on manual labour was replaced by one dominated by industry and the manufacture of machinery. The period of time covered by the Industrial Revolution • Varies with different historians. • Eric Hobsbawm held that it 'broke out' in the 1780s and wasn't fully felt until the 1830s or 1840s • T.S. Ashton held that it occurred roughly between 1760 and 1830 (in effect the reigns of George III, The Regency, and George IV) • The first Industrial Revolution merged into the Second Industrial Revolution around 1850, – when technological and economic progress gained momentum with the development of steam-powered ships and railways, – and later in the nineteenth century with the internal combustion engine and electrical power generation. The causes of the Industrial Revolution • complex and remain a topic for debate, – some historians seeing the Revolution as an outgrowth of social and institutional changes brought by the end of feudalism in Britain after the English Civil War in the 17th century. – As national border controls became more effective, the spread of disease was lessened, therefore preventing the epidemics common in previous times. – The percentage of children who lived past infancy rose significantly, leading to a larger workforce. • The presence of a large domestic market should also be considered an important catalyst of the Industrial Revolution, particularly explaining why it occurred in Britain. In other nations, such as France, markets were split up by local regions, which often imposed tolls and tariffs on goods traded amongst them • In India, the noted historian Rajni Palme Dutt has been quoted as saying, "The capital to finance the Industrial Revolution in India instead went into financing the Industrial Revolution in England." In direct contrast to China, India was split up into many different kingdoms all fighting for supremacy, with the three major ones being the Marathas, Sikhs and the Mughals. In addition, the economy was highly dependent on two sectors-- agriculture of subsistence and cotton, and technical innovation was non-existent. The vast amounts of wealth were stored away in palace treasuries, and as such, were easily moved to England • The stable political situation in Britain from around 1688, and British society's greater receptiveness to change (when compared with other European countries) can also be said to be factors favouring the Industrial Revolution. • Post industrial Era – A post-industrial society is a proposed name for an economy that has undergone a specific series of changes in structure after a process of industrialization. Such societies are often marked by: – A rapid increase in the size of the service sector, as opposed to manufacturing, – An increase in the amount of information technology, often leading to an "information age". History of Corporations • Corporations have been present in some forms as far back as Ancient Rome. Although devoid of some of the core characteristics by which corporations are known today, they nonetheless were enterprises, sanctioned by the state, with a form of shareholders who invested money for a specific purpose. • First corporations were created in Europe as not-for-profit entities to build institutions, such as hospitals and universities, for the public good. • In the 17th century making money became a major focus for corporations. British East India Company • The British East India Company, sometimes referred to as "John Company", was a joint- stock company of investors, which was granted a Royal Charter by Elizabeth I on December 31, 1600, with the intent to favour trade privileges in India. The Royal Charter effectively gave the newly created Honourable East India Company a 21 year monopoly on all trade in the East Indies. The Company transformed from a commercial trading venture to one which virtually ruled India as it acquired auxiliary governmental and military functions, until the Company's dissolution in 1858. CORPORATE FINANCE AND THE FINANCIAL MANAGER • The major decisions faced by financial managers are: 1.Managing the balance sheet equation • Assets = Liabilities + Capital Colonialism • Colonialism is the extension of a nation's sovereignty over territory and people outside its own boundaries, often to facilitate economic domination over their resources, labor, and markets. The term also refers to a set of beliefs used to legitimize or promote this system, especially the belief that the mores of the colonizer are superior to those of the colonized. Corporate Colonialism • Corporate colonialism relates to the involvement of corporate bodies in the practice of colonialism or imperialism. Economic incentives to colonise have long existed, and the structures and methods of state colonialism have not always prevailed. • In many cases the Victorian dictum that trade follows the flag has played out in reverse form. • The Viking appropriation and settlement of areas such as Varangian Rus‘( they were Scandinavians who traveled eastwards, mainly from Jutland and Sweden. Promoting trade, piracy and mercenary militarism) • may appear to modern eyes as colonization at the behest of small bodies of freebooters: a takeover by the crew of a trading ship rather than an exercise in statecraft. • Later in the Middle Ages, the Hansa(The Hanseatic League consisted of an alliance of trading cities that established and maintained a trade monopoly over the Baltic Sea and most of Northern Europe for a time in the later Middle Ages and the Early Modern period, between the 13th and 17th centuries.) controlled a colonial empire dotted around the shores of the Baltic and the North Seas. Its trade-based structure and its insignificant-in-area holdings belied its influence. • In the age of exploration a corporation often became the favored vessel for trading activity: merchant adventurers clubbed together to profit. Some of them gained theoretical monopolies from nascent states. • While the Muscovy Company (was a trading company chartered in 1555. It was the first major English joint-stock trading company, the precursor of the type of business that would soon flourish in England, and became closely associated with such famous names as Henry Hudson and William Baffin. The Muscovy Company had a monopoly on trade between England and Muscovy until 1698 and it survived until the Russian Revolution of 1917. ) and the Levant Company in Elizabethan England failed to parlay their charters into colonial empires • The British East India Company and the Hudson's Bay Company succeeded spectacularly in acquiring vast wealth and territories, taking over the government of India and of much of Canada over the centuries. The Dutch East India Company (The Dutch East India Company (Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie or VOC in Dutch, literally "United East Indies Company“ was established on March 20, 1602, when the Estates-General of the Netherlands granted it a monopoly to carry out colonial activities in Asia. It was the first multinational corporation in the world and it was the first company to issue stocks • The company established its headquarters in Batavia on Java (now Jakarta, Indonesia). Other colonial outposts were also established in the East Indies what later became Indonesia, such as on the Spice Islands (Moluccas), which include the Banda Islands where the VOC forcibly maintained a monopoly over nutmeg and mace. Methods used to maintain the monopoly included the violent suppression of the native population, not stopping short of extortion and mass murder. and the French East India Company rivaled them in scope and profit in an age before their holdings underwent nationalisation. • Colonisation with an emphasis on settlement also often took on a corporate tinge. In North America the Virginia Companies, the Massachusetts Bay Company and its predecessors exemplify the process; the two New Zealand Companies played a major role in setting up New Zealand. • While state colonialism predominated in the later 19th century, a return to corporate foreign activity did occur. German colonies in Togoland, Samoa, South-West Africa and New Guinea had corporate commercial roots, while the equivalent German-dominated areas in East Africa and China owed more to political motives. • The twentieth century saw the era of the banana republics, whereby corporations such as United Fruit dominated the economies and sometimes the politics of parts of Latin America. Oil companies such as BP and Royal Dutch Shell held influence in "key" areas such as parts of Iran and of Nigeria, despite the preservation of fictional independence. • The activities of Halliburton in 21st century Iraq. • Halliburton is the only company mentioned by Osama bin Laden in an April 2004 tape in which he claims that "this is a war [in Iraq] that is benefiting major companies with billions of dollars." may compare with this pattern. • Various degrees of inter-relationship may pertain between corporate colonisers and their home governments. The protection of trade, the interests of monopoly and mercantilism, and the role of plausible deniability (Plausible denial involves the creation of power structures and chains of command loose and informal enough to be denied if necessary. The idea was that the CIA could be given controversial instructions by powerful figures—up to and including the President himself—but that the existence and true source of those instructions could be denied if necessary; if, for example, an operation went disastrously wrong and it was necessary for the administration to disclaim responsibility.) • may all play their part. National defence, cultural outreach and the evangelisation (For many groups, a church planter is called an evangelist. Sometimes, the regular minister of a church is called an evangelist in a way that other groups would typically use the term pastor(A pastor is the head minister or priest of a Christian church . ) of the benighted may not appear on corporate balance sheets, but still may impel and inspire directors and officials. Source: http:www.wikipedia.org/wik i/Corporate_colonialism • Of the world's 100 largest economic entities, 51 are now corporations and 49 are countries. • compiled by Sarah Anderson and John Cavanagh of the of the Institute for Policy Studies in their Report on the Top 200 corporations released in December 2000 • 1UnitedStates 8,708,870.002 • Japan 4,395,083.003 • Germany 2,081,202.004 • France 1,410,262.005 • United Kingdom 1,373,612.006 • Italy 1,149,958.007 • China 1,149,814.008 • Brazil 760,345.009 • Canada 612,049.0010 • Spain 562,245.0011 • Mexico 474,951.0012 • India 459,765.0013 • Korea Rep. 406,940.0014 • Australia 389,691.0015 • Netherlands 384,766.0016 • Russian Federation 375,345.0017 • Argentina 281,942.0018 • Switzerland 260,299.0019 • Belgium 245,706.0020 • Sweden 226,388.0021 • Austria 208,949.0022 • Turkey 188,374.00 Of the world's 100 largest economic entities, 51 are now corporations and 49 are countries.
• 44Venezuela103,918.0045Iran, Islamic rep.101,073.0046Israel99,068.0047Sumitomo9 5,701.6048Nippon Tel & Tel93,591.7049Egypt, Arab Republic92,413.0050Marubeni91,807.4051Colo mbia88,596.0052AXA87,645.7053IBM87,548.00 54Singapore84,945.0055Ireland84,861.0056BP Amoco83,556.0057Citigroup82,005.0058Volks wagen80,072.7059Nippon Life Insurance78,515.1060Philippines75,350.0061Si emens75,337.0062Malaysia74,634.0063Allianz 74,178.2064Hitachi71,858.5065Chile71,092 • 66Matsushita Electric Ind.65,555.6067Nissho Iwai65,393.2068ING Group62,492.4069AT&T62,391.0070Philip Morris61,751.0071Sony60,052.7072Pakistan59,880.0073 Deutsche Bank58,585.1074Boeing57,993.0075Peru57,318.0076Cze ch Republic56,379.0077Dai-Ichi Mutual Life Ins.55,104.7078Honda Motor54,773.5079Assicurazioni Generali53,723.2080Nissan Motor53,679.9081New Zealand53,622.0082E.On52,227.7083Toshiba51,634.908 4Bank of America51,392.0085Fiat51,331.7086Nestle49,694.1087 SBC Communications49,489.0088Credit Suisse49,362.0089Hungary 90 Hewlett-Packard 48,253.00 91 Fujitsu 47,195.90 92 Algeria 47,015.00 93 Metro 46,663.60 94 Sumitomo Life Insur. 46,445.10 95 Bangladesh 45,779.00 96 Tokyo Electric Power 45,727.70 97 Kroger 45,351.60 98 Total Fina Elf 44,990.30 99 NEC 44,828.00 100 State Farm Insurance 44,637.20 • Of the world's 100 largest economic entities, 51 are now corporations and 49 are countries; • The world's top 200 corporations account for over a quarter of economic activity on the globe while employing less than one percent of its workforce. • According to a study, "The Seattle protestors expressed their anger at institutions like the WTO for elevating the interests of large corporations over everyone else. We analyzed just how powerful the world's biggest firms are and our findings are staggering Contributions of Top Corporations • This is not to deny that these firms may influence our lives in many other ways. Particularly in rich nations, it is difficult to go through a day without direct contact with many of these companies, whether you are watching a movie, shopping in a super-market, driving a car, or depositing a check. • Nevertheless, given their extreme levels of economic and political power, it is important to take a hard look at whether these corporate giants are indeed upholding their end of the social compact. The corporations themselves, when lobbying for policies to lift barriers to trade and investment, have promised that they will lead not only to improved consumer goods and services but also to significant job creation and an overall improvement in social welfare. • It seems only fair that the public should be able to expect—at a minimum—that these colossal firms be major providers of employment opportunities and that they bear their share of the tax burden.