The document summarizes the key similarities and differences between India's National Health Policies from 2002 and 2017. Both policies aimed to improve healthcare access and outcomes, but the 2017 policy recognized changing disease burdens, focused more on non-communicable diseases, and aimed to strengthen primary care. While the 2002 policy targeted increasing public health spending to 2-3% of GDP, the 2017 policy lowered the target to 2.5% of GDP by 2025.
The document summarizes the key similarities and differences between India's National Health Policies from 2002 and 2017. Both policies aimed to improve healthcare access and outcomes, but the 2017 policy recognized changing disease burdens, focused more on non-communicable diseases, and aimed to strengthen primary care. While the 2002 policy targeted increasing public health spending to 2-3% of GDP, the 2017 policy lowered the target to 2.5% of GDP by 2025.
The document summarizes the key similarities and differences between India's National Health Policies from 2002 and 2017. Both policies aimed to improve healthcare access and outcomes, but the 2017 policy recognized changing disease burdens, focused more on non-communicable diseases, and aimed to strengthen primary care. While the 2002 policy targeted increasing public health spending to 2-3% of GDP, the 2017 policy lowered the target to 2.5% of GDP by 2025.
Shubhau Pal SIMILARITIES • The National Health Policy (NHP), released by health and family welfare minister JP Nadda on 16 March, 2017, is somewhat similar to the national health policy released in 2002 with similar goals and targets. • Some targets which were fixed to be fulfilled by 2010, were now given a new date, in the NHP 2017 • . National Health Policy 2017: Current Rates & Targets DISSIMILARITIES- The Positives • The new policy recognizes the shifting epidemiology of diseases, and put special focus on non- communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, along with communicable diseases. Another new focus area is the intent to make primary healthcare services more comprehensive. DISSIMILARITIES- The Positives • NHP 2017 envisages widening the net of basic healthcare services delivered through primary healthcare. It proposes inclusion of geriatric healthcare, palliative care and rehabilitative care services. The policy advocates allocating a major proportion (up to two-thirds or more) of resources to primary care, followed by secondary and tertiary care. It also aspires to provide at the district level most of the secondary care which is currently provided at a medical college hospital. DISSIMILARITIES- The Positives • NHP 2017 targets to increase in the use of public health facilities by 50% from current levels by 2025 and making two beds available per 1,000 population. • NHP 2017 envisages private sector collaboration for strategic purchasing, capacity building, skill development programmes, awareness generation, and developing sustainable networks for communities to strengthen mental health services. DISSIMILARITIES- The Negative • NHP 2002 targeted the government’s intent to increase public expenditure on healthcare to 2-3% of GDP. NHP 2017 has brought down the target of reaching public health expenditure of 2.5% of GDP by 2025.
Line of Sight: How Improved Information, Transparency, and Accountability Would Promote the Adequate Resourcing of Health Facilities Across Papua New Guinea