The 1999-2000 budgets, Australia published comprehensive
accrual-based financial statements and had wholly adopted accrual output budgeting (C. Mark, 2006)
Australia has produced a budget surplus steadily close to a
decade, and it has thrived in reducing its net debt from a high of 25% of GDP in the mid-1990s
Its gross financial liabilities have reduced from a soaring of
43% of GDP in 1995 to 15% in 2005, the second lowest possible percentage in the OECD2 (OECD Economic Outlook, 2005). The rationale for accrual accounting • Accrual accounting offers the benefits of improved accountability and improved resource management (Funnell & Cooper 1998: 3; Ranby 1997: 9).
Enhance accountability since the true cost of
government spending is conveyed in a more transparent manner.
Cash system is unable to provide adequate
information for the full costing of operation (Management Advisory Board (1997) New Zealand • Issues : output-based budgeting
The legislature specifically avoids specifying how much is
to be spent on the individual expense-generating elements of each output.
President complicates the budget process in ways that a
Parliamentary system avoids, making the possibility of an American output-based budgeting system seem even more uncertain.
GAO in its 2000 report to Congress on accrual accounting,
in which it essentially recommended against implementing a full accrual system