Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gemma R. Macatangay
BLGD-DILG
March 23-24, 2017
Lucena City
JMC 2016-01:
AMENDMENTS TO PCW-DILG-DBM-NEDA JMC NO.
2013- 01: GUIDELINES ON THE LOCALIZATION OF
THE MAGNA CARTA OF WOMEN
JUL
JAN
JUN
MARCH
APRJAN
---AUG
FEB
JUL
MAY
Barangay Level
BARANGAY
Prepares GAD Plan
and Budget
City/Mun. Planning
Development Office (C/MPDO)
Reviews GPB to ensure
alignment to Return to Barangay
municipal/City priorities
and correctness of the with comments
template/form used and and
completeness of the Aligned?
No
recommendations
entries of GPB form
Yes
Yes
Issue Certificate of
Review and
Incorporates the Endorsement to
endorsed GPB in the concerned LGU
AIP and Annual Province/HUC/ICC & LGUs
Budget within MM
Section 4.1.C.7 Implementation and
Monitoring of the LGU GAD Plan
and Budget
GAA
R.A. 7192 (1995) JC 2012 - 01
(1992) R.A. 9710
(2009)
JMC 2013 – 01
and JMC 2016-01
DBM,DILG,
NEDA DBM,
and NEDA andCircular
PCW Joint PCW Joint 2012-01
Memorandum
- Guidelines for Circular
the 2013-1
Preparation
Women in Development and &
of 2016-01
GAD
Plans General
:Guidelines
Magna
and Carta
Budgets Appropriations
onofthe
Women
and GADof Act
Localization
2009
ARs toof the
Nation Building
MCW Act
implement the MCW
Women in Development and Nation-Building
Act of 1992 (RA 7192)
38
Women in Development and Nation-Building
Act of 1992 (RA 7192)
39
* 1995 General Appropriations Act (GAA)
General Appropriations
• Mandates agencies to set aside 5% of
their total annual for GAD concerns
(Sec. 27)
Act (GAA)
EO 273 (1995)
• Approved and adopted the PPGD
• Mandates agencies to allocate funds for the
implementation of a GAD plan
40
General Appropriations Act
• Directs government agencies to formulate a
GAD plan, the cost of which shall not be less
than 5% of their yearly budget.
53
Priority gender issues may be derived from the:
Review of national GAD policies and plans;
Result of the conduct of gender analysis; Results of
gender analysis and/or gender assessment using sex-
disaggregated data (LGU GAD database, Ecological
Profile, CBMS; LGU’s major programs and services of the
LGU reflecting gender gaps/issues);
Results of program and project evaluations in terms of
benefits to target beneficiaries;
Review of GAD fund audit results GAD ARs to surface
remaining gender issues not addressed in previous GPBs.
STEPS IN FORMULATING THE
GAD PLAN AND BUDGET
55
Determining appropriate PPA to Gender
Issues
Determining appropriate PPA to Gender
Issues
64
COSTING AND ALLOCATION OF THE GAD
BUDGET
65
Attribution to the GAD Budget: GPB
Harmonized
GAD Gender and
PLANNING Development
AND Guidelines
BUDGETING
PROGRAM/PROJE
(GPB) CT DESIGN Design checklists:
(Proposal, Concept Box 7a – Generic Checklist
Paper, Workplan) Boxes 9-15, 18-27 & B1
(Sectoral Design checklist)
Box F1
(Funding facilities checklist)
Corresponding Budget for the
Year of the Program that may
HGDG Interpretation
Description be Attributed to the LGUs
Score
GAD Budget
Gender sensitive Proposal passing the GAD test 50% of the budget for the year
8.0 – of the program/project, may be
14.9 attributed to the GAD budget
68
ANNEX D
Gender Issue GAD Objective Relevant LGU GAD Activity Performance
and/or GAD Program or (4) Indicator and
Mandate (2) Project Target
(1) (3) (5)
Client- 1. To educate Conduct of Mother’s 6 batches of
the mothers Coaching Session on coaches session
focused on proper Health Nutrition conducted by
end of
GAD Issue nutrition and December 2018:
Inadequate nutrition Development and
2. To uplift the
knowledge on status of
Program Printing of IEC 500 mothers
Materials coaches on
proper nutrition nutrition among Nutrition by
among mothers Activity 3
malnourished end December
Activity 4
of children,
malnourished pregnant women 500 Copies of
children, and adolescents IEC Materials on
pregnant Nutrition
developed and
women and printed
adolescents
500 mothers
provided IEC
materials on
Nutrition
GAD Budget Lead or Responsible Office
(6) (7)
MOOE PS CO
MOOE PS CO
Title of Program & Project HGDG Design/ Total Annual GAD Lead or
Funding Program/ Attributed Responsible
Facility/ Generic Project Budget Program/ Office
(8) Checklist Score Project (12)
(9) (10) Budget
(11)
1. Disaster Risk Reduction Capacity 14 P650,000.00 P325,000.00 CDMO/PPDO
Enhancement Program
2. Farm to Market Road P375,000.00 Engr’s Office
3. Health Program 5 P1,500,000.00
7 P750,000.00 P187500.00 Health Office
4. Summer Sports Fest 16 P100,000.00 P75,000.00 Office of the
5. Cultural Development 9 P200,000.00 P100,000.00 LCE
6. Cleanliness and Waste Mgt Office of the
Program 20 P500,000.00 P500,000.00 LCE
Office of the
LCE
Sub-Total C P1562500.00
99
THANK
YOU!
PRERATION OF LGUs Annual GAD
ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT
Column 1- 5
The data /information identified/reflected in the previous reviewed and indorsed
GPB
The changes must be explained in Column 9 (Variance or Remarks) of the GAD AR.
Column 6: Actual Results
This column shall indicate the results/outputs of GAD PPAs
based on the identified targets in the GPB.
It shall also reflect the results/outputs of other GAD PPAs
that were conducted and/or implemented by the LGU.
The LGU may also give a description of the change that has
occurred after implementing the GAD PPA.
Column 7: Total Approved GAD Budget
111
Guiding Principles
1) In case the LGU attributes a portion or the whole of the
budget of its major program/project to the GAD budget, it
shall subject the same program/project (using its
accomplishment report for the year) to the HGDG test using
the Project Implementation PIMME checklist to determine
the actual expenditures that may be attributed to the GAD
Expenditure
For example, If the LGU has an HGDG score of 8
(higher than its target), it can attribute 50% of the
program’s budget to the actual GAD expenditure
2) Familiarity of the HGDG Score Guide
Attribution of Regular PPAs
HGDG DESCRIPTIO Corresponding Budget for the Year of the Program that
SCORE N may be Attributed to the LGU GAD Budget
Below 4.0 GAD is invisible 0% or no amount of the program/project budget for the year
may be attributed to the GAD budget
4.0 – 7.9 Promising GAD 25% of the budget for the year of the program/project may
prospects be attributed to the GAD budget
(conditional
pass)
8.0 – 14.9 Gender 50% of the budget for the year of the program/project, may
Sensitive be attributed to the GAD budget
15.0-19.9 Gender- 75% of the budget for the year of the program/project may
responsive be attributed to the GAD budget
20.0 Fully gender- 100% of the budget for the year of the program may be
responsive attributed to the GAD budget
Column 12