You are on page 1of 15

ORGANIGRAPHS

ORGANISATIONAL CHART
DISADVANTAGES

In 1999 Henry Mitzberg ( Canadian


• Gives only names and titles Business Theorist) & Ludo Van der
Heyden( Professor of
• No detailed information
management)
• No answer to different connectivities in the system Introduced Organigraphs
• Today the system is “newfangled”
• Strict rules of arrangement
• Connected by vertical chain
• Everything is dependent
BASIC FORMS

• set of items such as machine or people.


• For eg: finished product,
• professional service firms such as law offices.
• Share common resources facilities funds and overall
management.
• Chains are used to show connections.
• For eg. : assembly line in a automobile factory
• Chains are linear, standardize and enhance reliability
• Serves as a coordinating centre.
• Any physical point at which people, things or
information moving.
• For eg. : school, airport, machine etc.
• Depicts movement to and from one focal point
• They are grids with no center
• Allow open ended communication and
continuous movement of people and ideas
• For eg.: new product development
THE FOUR PHILOSOPHIES OF MANAGING
ORGANIGRAPH OF A NON-PROFIT
ORGANISATION
EXAMPLES
Chairperson TREASURER

P.R
V.C

CORE SPONSORSHIP
COMMITTEE

MARKETING
EVENT1 EVENT 2 EVENT 3 EVENT 4
STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT STUDENT

PARTICIPANT PARTICIPANT PARTICIPANT PARTICIPANT

ORGANIGRAPH OF SMS CUSAT


ORGANIGRAPH OF VKC GROUP
SALES AND
MARKETING PED

SKU
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT

MATERIAL
DEPARTMENT

RETAIL OUT-SOURCING
CLICKING UNIT
DEPARTMENT

WHOLESALE FINISHED GOODS MACHINE

You might also like