Equity courts will not provide relief to plaintiffs who do not come to the court with clean hands regarding the matter in dispute. This means if a plaintiff engaged in willful misrepresentation, fraud, or misleading behavior to obtain an agreement, they will be denied specific performance of that agreement. Exceptions exist if the plaintiff's conduct is unrelated to the matter at hand or if both parties engaged in illegal behavior. Overall, the plaintiff's conduct must have a direct connection to the equitable relief sought for this maxim to apply.
Equity courts will not provide relief to plaintiffs who do not come to the court with clean hands regarding the matter in dispute. This means if a plaintiff engaged in willful misrepresentation, fraud, or misleading behavior to obtain an agreement, they will be denied specific performance of that agreement. Exceptions exist if the plaintiff's conduct is unrelated to the matter at hand or if both parties engaged in illegal behavior. Overall, the plaintiff's conduct must have a direct connection to the equitable relief sought for this maxim to apply.
Equity courts will not provide relief to plaintiffs who do not come to the court with clean hands regarding the matter in dispute. This means if a plaintiff engaged in willful misrepresentation, fraud, or misleading behavior to obtain an agreement, they will be denied specific performance of that agreement. Exceptions exist if the plaintiff's conduct is unrelated to the matter at hand or if both parties engaged in illegal behavior. Overall, the plaintiff's conduct must have a direct connection to the equitable relief sought for this maxim to apply.
CLEAN HANDS Introduction: The court would take into consideration the personal conduct of the plaintiff in the transaction in dispute and if he had not sought the help of the court with clean hands, the court would refuse to grant him any relief. Equity works on the assumption that it was a matter of conscience and so it is discretionary with the court to grant relief. It took into consideration whether the person applying for equity had himself acted with good conscience in the matter. Explanation: If plaintiff has been guilty of any willful misrepresentation, fraudulent suppression of facts or put forth misleading particulars, he will not get any relief and if he has attained the agreement by any of the above mentioned ways, he will not be able to get specific performance. Examples: Fraud: If A and B made an agreement to divide the property equally and to get benefits equally, obtained by fraud but A gained the whole profit and gave nothing to B. B sues A in equity for equal shares. The suit was dismissed. Specific Performance: Equity will refuse specific performance of a contract if the plaintiff has been guilty of undue influence, and if he has attained the agreement by misrepresentation. Illegality: Where ttwo parties to an illegal agreement are in equal guilt, equity will not help any of them by enforcing the contract. Exceptions to the Maxim: 1.General Depravity: The general depravity of the plaintiff will not dis-entitle him to the relief. The conduct complained of must have an immediate relation to the equity sued for. 2. When transaction is unlawful: Where the transaction is unlawful itself , no suit lies. I t is not because of demerits of the plaintiff himself. Conclusion: This maxim must not be taken too widely; as it does not mean that a plaintiff in equity court will fail if he has led a blameful life. What bans the claim is not his general depravity but it is the one which has an immediate relation to the equity sued for.
The 5 Elements of the Highly Effective Debt Collector: How to Become a Top Performing Debt Collector in Less Than 30 Days!!! the Powerful Training System for Developing Efficient, Effective & Top Performing Debt Collectors