Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effectiveness and
Extent of the Audit work Conducted
MATERIALITY
Materiality is the magnitude of an omission or misstatement of accounting
information that, in the light of surrounding circumstances, makes it probable
that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would
have been changed or influenced by the omission or misstatement.
The auditor is concerned with the relevance and reliability of the evidence.
Relevance refers to whether the evidence relates to the specific management assertion
being tested.
Reliability refers to the diagnosticity of the evidence. In other words, can
a particular type of evidence be relied upon to signal the true state of the account
balance or assertion being examined?
SAMPLING
In most situations, the auditor obtains only enough evidence to be persuaded
that the assertion is fairly stated. Additionally, for many parts of an audit, the
auditor examines only a sample of the transactions processed during the
period.
To deal with the problem of not being able to examine every transaction, the
auditor uses
(1) his or her knowledge about the transactions and/or
(2) a sampling approach to examine a subset of the transactions.
SAMPLE SIZE AND MATERIALITY
LOW Materiality
DIFFERENT STAGES OF CLIENT’S ACCOUNTING
SYSTEM
(1) the internal control put in place by the client to ensure proper handling of
transactions (e.g., evaluate and test the controls);
(2) the transactions that affect each account balance (e.g., examine a sample
of the transactions that happened during the period); and
(3) the ending account balances themselves (e.g., examine a sample of the
items that make up an ending account balance at year-end). Evidence that
relates directly to ending account balances is usually the highest quality, but
also the costliest, evidence.
MAJOR PHASES OF AUDIT
Client
acceptance/ Audit business
continuance Establish processes Evaluate
and Preliminary materiality Consider and and related Complete the results and
establishing engagement and assess Plan the audit audit internal accounts audit issue
an activities risks control (e.g., revenue audit report
understanding generation)
with
the client
CLIENT ACCEPTANCE
Professional standards require that public accounting firms
establish policies and procedures for deciding whether to accept
new clients and to retain current clients.
(prevent lawsuits, associating with a client who lack integrity etc.)
PRELIMINARY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
(1) determining the audit engagement team requirements
and;
(2) ensuring the independence of the audit team and audit firm.
PRELIMINARY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
The auditor’s understanding of the entity and its environment should include
information about each of the following categories:
Industry, regulatory, and other external factors.
Nature of the entity, including the entity’s application of accounting
policies.
Objectives, strategies and related business risks, including the entity’s risk
assessment process.
Measurement and review of the entity’s financial performance.
Internal control
ESTABLISH MATERIALITY AND ASSESS RISKS
The audit team must make a preliminary assessment of the client’s
business risks and determine materiality. The audit team relies on
these judgments to then assess risk relating to the likelihood of
material misstatements in the financial statements.
PLAN THE AUDIT
Proper planning is important to ensure that the audit is conducted in an
effective and efficient manner. In developing the audit plan, the auditor should
be guided by
(1) the procedures performed to gain and document an
understanding of the entity and
(2) the results of the risk assessment process.
As part of the planning process, the auditor may conduct preliminary
analytical
procedures (such as ratio analysis) to identify specific transactions or account
balances that should receive special attention due to an increased risk of
material misstatement.
CONSIDER AND AUDIT INTERNAL CONTROL
Provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement
of objectives in the following categories:
Audit
Opinion
Qualified Adverse
MODIFIED OPINION
PIECEMEAL OPINION
A piecemeal opinion is a report issued by an outside auditor, in which the
auditor states an opinion regarding specific line items within a client's financial
statements.
This type of opinion is no longer allowed under generally accepted auditing
standards, but had been intended to offset an overall adverse opinion or
disclaimer of opinion.
A piecemeal opinion is now banned because it tended to contradict the effect
of the overall opinion.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDITING Public Accounting Profession
ENVIRONMENT
THE ENRON
SCANDAL
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
Under pressure to restore public confidence, Congress passed the Sarbanes-
Oxley Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act in July
2002.
It started a process of broad reform in corporate governance practices that
would affect the duties and practices of public companies, financial analysts,
external auditors, and securities exchange markets.
It effectively transferred authority to set and enforce auditing standards for
public company audits to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS
General Standards:
1. The auditor must have adequate technical training and proficiency to perform the audit.
2. The auditor must maintain independence in mental attitude in all matters relating to the audit.
3. The auditor must exercise due professional care in the performance of the audit and the preparation
of the report.
Standards of Fieldwork:
1. The auditor must adequately plan the work and must properly supervise any assistants.
2. The auditor must obtain a sufficient understanding of the entity and its environment, including its
internal control, to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements whether due to
error or fraud, and to design the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures.
3. The auditor must obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence by performing audit procedures to
afford a reasonable basis for an opinion regarding the financial statements under audit.
GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS
Standards of Reporting:
1. The auditor must state in the auditor’s report whether the financial statements are presented
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
2. The auditor must identify in the auditor’s report those circumstances in which such principles
have not been consistently observed in the current period in relation to the preceding period.
3. When the auditor determines that informative disclosures are not reasonably adequate, the
auditor must so state in the auditor’s report.
4. The auditor must either express an opinion regarding the financial statements, taken as a
whole, or state that an opinion cannot be expressed, in the auditor’s report. When the auditor
cannot express an overall opinion, the auditor should state the reasons therefor in the auditor’s
report.
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS
Public accounting firms range in size from a single proprietor to thousands of
owners (or “partners”) together with tens of thousands of professional and
administrative staff employees.
Public accounting firms typically offer a variety of professional services in
addition to financial statement audits
Public accounting firms are organized as proprietorships, general or limited
liability partnerships (in rare cases, as corporation).
Public accounting firms are often categorized by size. For example, the
largest firms are the “Big 4” public accounting firms: Deloitte, Ernst & Young,
KPMG, and PricewaterhouseCoopers.
AUDIT TEAM STRUCTURE
Audit
Partner
Audit
Manager
Audit Audit
Senior Senior