Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PRINCIPLES OF
TAXATION
TAX 1 – INCOME TAXATION
INHERENT POWERS OF THE STATE
POLICE POWER
POWER OF TAXATION
POLICE POWER
SIMILARITIES
They are all necessary for the
existence of a sovereign state
They are all legislative in nature
They are involve, when exercised,
an interference with private rights
INHERENT POWERS OF THE STATE
DIFFERENCES
Benefitreceived by the person
whose property is taken
Use/Purpose of the property taken
As to persons affected
Amount of imposition
Impairment Clause
POWER OF TAXATION
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS
INHERENT LIMITATIONS
It must be for public purpose
It is legislative in character
It is subject to the concept of
TERRETORIALITY
It is subject to international comity
It allows exemption of government
agencies or instrumentalities
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS
Provisions directly affecting taxation
Prohibition against imprisonment for non-payment of poll tax (Art. III, Sec.
20)
Uniformity and equality of taxation (Art. VI, Sec. 28)
Progressive system of taxation (Art. VI, Sec. 28)
Grant by Congress of authority to the president to impose tariff rates
(Art. VI , Sec. 28)
Prohibition against taxation of religious, charitable entities, and
educational entities (Art. VI, Sec. 28)
Prohibition against taxation of non-stock, non-profit educational
institutions (Art. IX , Sec. 4)
Majority vote of Congress for grant of tax exemption (Art. VI , Sec. 28)
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS
Provisions directly affecting taxation (cont’d)
Prohibition on use of tax levied for special purpose (Art. VI, Sec. 29)
President’s veto power on appropriation, revenue, tariff bills (Art. VI,
Sec. 27)
Non-impairment of jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (Art. VI, Sec. 30)
Grant of power to the LGUs to create its own sources of revenue (Art.
IX, Sec. 5)
Origin of Revenue and Tariff Bills (Art. VI, Sec. 24)
No appropriation or use of public money for religious purposes (Art. VI,
Sec. 28)
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS
Provisions indirectly affecting taxation
Due process (Art III, Sec. 1)
Equal protection (Art III, Sec. 1)
Religious freedom (Art III, Sec. 5)
Non-impairment of obligations of contracts (Art III, Sec. 10)
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS
A poll tax is one levied on persons who are residents within the territory of
the taxing authority without regard to their property, business or
occupation. Thus, only the basic community tax under the Local
Government Code could qualify as a poll tax, and the non-payment of
other (additional) taxes imposed, not being in the nature of poll taxes, may
validly be subjected by law to imprisonment (Vitug, 2006).
UNIFORMITY AND EQUALITY
The rule of taxation shall be uniform and equitable. (Art.
VI, Sec. 28[1], 1987 Constitution).
Uniformity – all taxable articles or kinds of property of the same class shall
be taxed at the same rate. A tax is considered uniform when it operates
with the same force and effect in every place where the subject is found.
Different articles may be taxed at different amounts provided that the rate
is uniform on the same class everywhere, with all people at all times.
Equitability – Taxation is said to be equitable when its burden falls on those
better able to pay.
Equality – It is accomplished when the burden of the tax falls equally and
impartially upon all the persons and property subject to it.
UNIFORMITY AND EQUALITY
[BAR EXAM QUESTION]
A law was passed exempting doctors and lawyers from
the operation of the value-added tax. Other professionals
complained and filed a suit questioning the law for being
discriminatory and violative of the equal protection
clause of the Constitution since complainants were not
given the same exemption. Is the suit meritorious or not?
UNIFORMITY AND EQUALITY
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
YES, the suit is meritorious. The VAT is designed for economic efficiency; hence,
should be neutral to those who belong to the same class.
Professionals are a class of taxpayers by themselves who, in compliance with the
rule of equality of taxation, must be treated alike for tax purposes. Exempting
lawyers and doctors from a burden to which other professionals are subjected will
make the law discriminatory and violative of the equal protection clause of the
Constitution.
While singling out a class for taxation purposes will not infringe upon this
constitutional limitation, singling out a taxpayer from a class will no doubt
transgress the constitutional limitation. Treating doctors and lawyers as a different
class of professionals will not comply with the requirements of a reasonable,
hence valid classification, because the classification is not based upon substantial
distinction which makes real differences.
PROGRESSIVE SYSTEM
The Congress shall evolve a progressive system of taxation
The authority of the President to impose tariffs has the following requisites
Authorization granted to the President must be embodied in the law
Subject to constitutional limits and restrictions
Within the framework of the national development program
TAXATION OF RELIGIOUS,
CHARITABLE, EDUCATIONAL ENTITIES
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NO. The portion of the land occupied and used by the church, convent
and school run by the church are exempt from real property taxes while
the portion of the land occupied by commercial establishments and the
portion, which is idle, are subject to real property taxes. The “usage” of the
property and not the “ownership” is the determining factor whether or not
the property is taxable
NON-STOCK, NON-PROFIT
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
Allrevenues and assets of non-stock, non-profit
educational institutions used actually, directly, and
exclusively for educational purposes shall be exempt
from taxes and duties. xxx
Subject to conditions prescribed by law, all grants,
endowments, donations, or contributions used actually,
directly, and exclusively for educational purposes shall
be exempt from tax (Sec 4 (3] and [4], Art XIV, 1987
Constitution).
NON-STOCK, NON-PROFIT
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
In granting tax exemptions, the absolute majority vote of all the members
of Congress is required. It means at least 50% plus 1 of all the members
voting separately
The item or items vetoed shall be returned to the Lower House of Congress
together with the objections of the President.
If after consideration 2/3 of all the members of the Lower House shall agree
to pass the bill, it shall be sent, together with the objection, to the Upper
House by which it shall likewise be considered, and if approved by 2/3 of
all the members of that House, it shall become a law.
JURISDICTION OF THE SC
The Supreme Court shall have the power to review, revise,
reverse, modify or affirm on appeal on certiorari as the laws or
the Rules of Court may provide, final judgments or orders of
lower courts in:
xxx
all cases involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or
toll or any penalty imposed in relation thereto (Art. VIII, Sec.
5[2][b]).
Even the legislative body cannot deprive the SC of its appellate jurisdiction over
all cases coming from inferior courts where the constitutionality or validity of an
ordinance or the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or toll is in question.
JURISDICTION OF THE SC
The Supreme Court shall have the power to review, revise, reverse,
modify or affirm on appeal on certiorari as the laws or the Rules of
Court may provide, final judgments or orders of lower courts in all
cases involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or toll or
any penalty imposed in relation thereto (Art. VIII, Sec. 5[2][b]).
Even the legislative body cannot deprive the SC of its appellate jurisdiction over all cases
coming from inferior courts where the constitutionality or validity of an ordinance or the
legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or toll is in question.
Scope of Judicial Review in taxation: limited only to the interpretation and application of
tax laws. Its power does not include inquiry into the policy of legislation. Neither can it
legitimately question or refuse to sanction the provisions of any law consistent with the
Constitution.
LGU’S POWER TO TAX
Each LGU shall have the power to create its own sources of
revenues and to levy taxes, fees and charges subject to such
guidelines and limitations as the Congress may provide,
consistent with the basic policy of local autonomy. Such taxes,
fees, and charges shall accrue exclusively to the local
governments (Art. X, Sec. 5).
Under the 1987 Constitution, Congress cannot pass a law abolishing the power to tax of
local governments as it would be violative of the constitutional provision.
REVENUE BILLS FROM THE LOWER HOUSE
All appropriation, revenue or tariff bills, bills authorizing increase
of the public debt, bills of local application, and private bills
shall originate exclusively in the House of Representatives, but
the Senate may propose or concur with amendments (Art VI,
Sec. 24).
What is required to originate in the House of Representatives is not the law but the
revenue bill which must “originate exclusively” in the lower house. The bill may undergo
such extensive changes that the result may be a rewriting of the whole. The Senate may
not only concur with amendments but also propose amendments.
Appropriation, revenue or tariff bills should originate from the Lower House on the theory
that, elected as they are from the districts, the members of the House of Representatives
can be expected to be more sensitive to the local needs and problems.
PUBLIC MONEY FOR RELIGIOUS PURPOSES
No public money or property shall be appropriated, applied,
paid or employed directly or indirectly for the use, benefit or
support of any sect, church, denomination, sectaraian
institution, or system of religion or of any priest, preacher,
minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary as such EXCEPT
when such priest, preacher, minister or dignitary is assigned to
the armed forces or to any penal institution or government
orphanage or leprosarium (Art. VI, Sec. 29[2])
This is in consonance with the inviolable principle of separation of the Church and State.
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS
All persons subjected to such legislation shall be treated alike, under like circumstances
and conditions, both in the privileges conferred and in the liabilities imposed.
The doctrine does not require that persons or properties different in fact be treated in laws
as though they were the same. Indeed, to treat them the same or alike may offend the
Constitution. What the Constitution prohibits is class legislation which discriminates against
some and favors others. As long as there are rational or reasonable grounds for so doing,
Congress may, therefore, group the persons or properties to be taxed and it is sufficient ―if
all of the same class are subject to the same rate and the tax is administered impartially
upon them.
EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW
No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws (Art.
III, Sec. 1).
All persons subjected to such legislation shall be treated alike, under like circumstances
and conditions, both in the privileges conferred and in the liabilities imposed.
The doctrine does not require that persons or properties different in fact be treated in laws
as though they were the same. Indeed, to treat them the same or alike may offend the
Constitution. What the Constitution prohibits is class legislation which discriminates against
some and favors others. As long as there are rational or reasonable grounds for so doing,
Congress may, therefore, group the persons or properties to be taxed and it is sufficient ―if
all of the same class are subject to the same rate and the tax is administered impartially
upon them.
RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and
enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without
discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No
religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political
rights (Art. III, Sec. 5)
NON-IMPAIRMENT CLAUSE
No law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be passed
(Art. III, Sec. 10).
Applies only when one party to the contract is the government itself. The State
cannot change the terms of the contract by making new conditions, changing
conditions in the contract or dispensing with the conditions expressed therein.
When the State grants an exemption on the basis of a contract, consideration is
presumed to be paid to the State and the public is supposed to receive the
whole equivalent therefore.
Exceptions:
if the grant of exemption is merely a spontaneous act of the legislature, the exemption may
be revoked (unilaterally granted by law)
If it is without payment of any consideration or the assumption of any new burden by the
grantee, it is a mere gratuity and exemption may be revoked.
DEFINITION OF TAXES
Are enforced proportional contributions from persons and
property levied by the law-making body of the State by virtue of
its sovereignty for the support of the government and all public
needs.