You are on page 1of 8

GROUP DISCUSSION

ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS OF GROUP 9 DISCUSSION DONE BY GROUP 8
OBSERVATION SUMMARY

■ We did the observation for Group 9 which included 7 members


■ The 7 members had different individual values and characteristics

Member Value Traits


1 Power Makes good decisions
2 Achievement Forces others to agree with him
3 Tradition Person who does what others say
4 Benevolence Tends to support others
5 Universalism Makes decisions carefully
6 Conformity Quiet
7 Stimulation Positive attitude towards everything
COURSE OF DISCUSSION

■ They initially started by discussing the movie scenes


■ They picked up various jurors and talked about the values they depicted with an
example from the movie
■ They had agreements and disagreements at various opinions
■ They had 1 conflict while discussing
■ Someone addressed the jurors wrongly once (Used juror 7 instead of 5)
■ They ended the discussion after talking about almost 9 out of 12 jurors
VALUES DISCUSSED

■ Universalism
■ Stereotypes
■ Perception
■ Motivation
■ Achievement
■ Power
■ Empathy
■ Respect others opinion
BEHAVIOUR ANALYSIS

POSITIVES NEGATIVES
■ Giving all group members a chance ■ Very Competitive amongst each
to speak other
■ Asking everyone their opinion ■ Created a fish market many times
during the discussion
■ Structured Discussion
■ Correcting each others mistakes
CHARACTER ANALYSIS

Member Character
1 Loud, very opinionated
2 Hard Worker, too much effort
3 Pushover, didn’t have own opinion
4 Simple, nice to everyone
5 Logical, open to facts
6 Serious, quiet
7 Happy, contradicting with positive sides
CLARITY OF DISCUSSION

■ There were certain people who were very logical in their approach in the discussion
■ Various facts were stated which helped the discussion build
■ Almost every jurors’ values were covered
■ Unnecessary contradictions somewhat led to explanations which gave a clearer
picture about the movie
THANK YOU

You might also like