FT IIM STUDENT DORMITORY (Group -5)

COST CALCULATION (REVIT)

Sr no. Model Cost (INR) Schedule Properties
1 Architectural 17,35,602 - Count SITE-LAYOUT ANALYSIS
- Family & Type
2 Structural 19,60,482
- Material Volume
3 Plumbing 53,0,841
- Material Area
4 HVAC 7,97,067
- Unit Cost
Total Cost 50,23,994 - Total Cost
16% • Accurate quantities
11% 34% with cost.
• Helps in BOQ
39% Preparation
• Claims due to variation
1 Architectural 2 Structural
in quantity can be
3 Plumbing 4 HVAC
eliminated
CRANE POSITION ANALYSIS
• Alternative 1: To cover the stacking yard and to transfer the materials on
site (3 Dorms coverage) & the 50 mt. boom radius extends to 132 ft. Ring
Road which is not permissible considering safety norms.

• Alternative 2: Setup in the center to cover the maximum dorms (Half of

dorm no.38 & dorm no.43 is not covered). But as dorm 41 dorm & STP near
to it non critical and planned at the last, that space can be used as an
temporary stacking yard which holds feasible.

VALUE ENGINEERING SELECTION CRITERIA

- Major exposed concrete works
Achieving the
Basic
- Total concrete quantity – 20,575 cum (As per BOQ)
Studying Cost Identification Cost/Benefit
Breakdown of of Major Cost
Function
Analysis by - Total Sand Quantity – 16,890 ton (As per Mix Design)
through
the Structure Element
different
example
- Sustainability
alternatives

Variation of the Quantities from the Model Quantities obtained

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR SAND Manual Quantity Take-off 22.07 from Model are
useful in terms of
Model Quantity Take-off 22.580
M25 Grade Column Rate Analysis 1) BOQ Preparation
Sand in 1 cum Mix Design (kg) 842 Variation in Quantity (cum) 0.510 2) Accuracy
Sand in 1 cum Mix Design (ton) 0.842 % Variation 2.31% 3) Total Cost
Rate (INR) of River Sand (ton) 525 Calculation
Rate (INR) of Robo Sand (ton) 350 33.33% Savings for current case and if implemented at large
Rate (INR) of River Sand per cum (M25) 442.05 scale ‘ Sustainability can be promoted as well as more cost
INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES

Rate (INR) of Robo Sand per cum (M25) 294.7 savings’

Cost for Column Concreting (River Sand in INR) 2794 NAVISWORKS MANAGE
Cost for Column Concreting (Robo Sand in INR) 1863
SIMULATION

Inferences
- Better visualization of
sequence
- Sequence alternate
options can be tried by
4D

changing the schedule

LAST PLANNER® SYSTEM SUGGESTIONS

10% 15%
Unforseen Weather Conditions
• Internal Delay should be
100% 100% Dependent activity
88% 10%
Early Completion
minimized after analyzing
10%
71% 71%
64% 64% Equipment Shortage/Breakdown the reasons.
5%
• Critical activities should
50% 45%
43% 25% Internal Delay

25%
Shoratge of Manpower
Error/Rework
be targeted first.
WEEK-1 WEEK-2 WEEK-3 WEEK-4 WEEK-5 • Equipment Maintenance
Daily PPC Weekly PPC Plan should be prepared
& kept updated.
SITE PPC STATISTICS REASONS FOR VARIANCE

MONSOON SEMESTER END EXHIBITION

COURSE: M.Tech Construction Engineering and Management
SUBJECT: Studio – III | CM4001 – Integrated Construction Practices
STUDENT NAME: Raj Shah (PG180772)