Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8. All other acts that tend to defeat the purpose of the competitive bidding, such as
habitually withdrawing from bidding or submitting late bids or patently
Contosoinsufficient
Ltd.
bids120, for at least three (3) times within a year, except for valid reasons.
SANCTIONS AND GROUNDS FOR BLACKLISTING
Business model
Contract Implementation Stage • Failure of the contractor, due solely to his fault or negligence, to mobilize
and start work or performance within the specified period in the Notice to
Pursuant to Section 69 (6) of R.A. 9184 and Proceed (“NTP”)
without prejudice to the imposition of additional
administrative sanctions as the internal rules of • Failure by the contractor to fully and faithfully comply with its contractual
the agency may provide and/or further criminal obligations without valid cause, or failure by the contractor to comply with
any written lawful instruction of the procuring entity or its representative(s)
prosecution as provided by applicable laws, the pursuant to the implementation of the contract. For the procurement of
procuring entity shall impose on contractors infrastructure projects or consultancy contracts, lawful instructions include
after the termination of the contract the penalty but are not limited to the following:
of suspension for one (1) year for the first
offense, suspension for two (2) years for the a. Employment of competent technical personnel
second offense from participating in the public
b. Provision of warning signs and barricades
bidding process, for violations committed
Research Abstractc. Stockpiling in proper
Design
places of all materials and removal from the
during the contract implementation stage,
which include but not limited to the following: project site of waste and excess materials
Lorem ipsum dolor sit Lorem ipsum dolor sit
amet, consectetur d. Deployment ofamet,
committed equipment, facilities, support staff and
consectetur
adipiscing elit. manpower adipiscing elit.
Contoso Ltd.
5
Add a footer
SANCTIONS AND GROUNDS FOR BLACKLISTING
Business model
Contract Implementation Stage • Assignment and subcontracting of the contract or any part thereof or
substitution of key personnel named in the proposal without prior written
Pursuant to Section 69 (6) of R.A. 9184 and approval by the procuring entity.
without prejudice to the imposition of additional
administrative sanctions as the internal rules of • For the procurement of goods, unsatisfactory progress in the delivery of
the agency may provide and/or further criminal the goods by the manufacturer, supplier or distributor arising from his fault
or negligence and/or unsatisfactory or inferior quality of goods, as may be
prosecution as provided by applicable laws, the provided in the contract.
procuring entity shall impose on contractors
after the termination of the contract the penalty • For the procurement of consulting services, poor performance by the
of suspension for one (1) year for the first consultant of his services arising from his fault or negligence. Any of the
offense, suspension for two (2) years for the following acts by the consultant shall be construed as poor performance:
second offense from participating in the public
bidding process, for violations committed a. Defective design resulting in substantial corrective works in
Research Abstract Design
during the contract implementation stage, design and/or construction.
which include but not limited to the following:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit b. Failure to deliver
Loremcritical outputs
ipsum dolor sit due to consultant’s fault or
amet, consectetur negligence. amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit. adipiscing elit.
c. Specifying materials which are inappropriate, substandard, or
way above acceptable standards.
d. Allowing defective workmanship or works by the contractor being
supervised by the consultant. Contoso Ltd.
6
Add a footer
SANCTIONS AND GROUNDS FOR BLACKLISTING
Business model
Contract Implementation Stage • For the procurement of infrastructure projects, poor performance by the
contractor or unsatisfactory quality and/or progress of work arising from his
Pursuant to Section 69 (6) of R.A. 9184 and fault or negligence as reflected in the Constructor's Performance
without prejudice to the imposition of additional Evaluation System (“CPES”) rating sheet. In the absence of the CPES
administrative sanctions as the internal rules of rating sheet, the existing performance monitoring system of the procuring
the agency may provide and/or further criminal entity shall be applied. Any of the following acts by the constructor shall be
construed as poor performance:
prosecution as provided by applicable laws, the
procuring entity shall impose on contractors
a. Negative slippage of 15% and above within the critical path of
after the termination of the contract the penalty
of suspension for one (1) year for the first the project due entirely to the fault or negligence of the contractor
offense, suspension for two (2) years for the b. Quality of materials and workmanship not complying with the
second offense from participating in the public
approved specifications arising from the contractor's fault or
bidding process, for violations committed
Research Abstractnegligence. Design
during the contract implementation stage,
which include but not limited to the following:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit • Lorem ipsumordolor
Willful or deliberate abandonment sit
non-performance of the project or
amet, consectetur amet, consectetur
contract by the contractor resulting to substantial breach thereof without
adipiscing elit. adipiscing elit.
lawful and/or just cause.
Contoso Ltd.
7
Add a footer
PROCEDURE FOR SUSPENSION AND BLACKLISTING DURING PROCEDURE FOR SUSPENSION AND BLACKLISTING DURING
THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING STAGE THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING STAGE
Contoso Ltd.
8
Add a footer
STATUS OF BLACKLISTED PERSON/ENTITY DELISTING
Contoso Ltd.
10
Add a footer
Thank you