You are on page 1of 11

APPENDIX 17

UNIFORM GUIDELINES FOR BLACKLISTING OF MANUFACTURERS, SUPPLIERS,


DISTRIBUTORS, CONTRACTORS AND CONSULTANTS
SCOPE These guidelines shall apply to all branches:
• constitutional commissions and offices
These guidelines shall govern the blacklisting of • Agencies
manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, contractors and
• Departments
consultants (“contractors” for brevity) involved in government
procurement for offenses or violations committed during • Bureaus
competitive bidding and contract implementation, in • Offices
accordance with Section 69.4 of the Implementing Rules and
• instrumentalities of the Government
Regulations (“IRR”)117 of Republic Act No. 9184 (“R.A.
- Government-owned and/or controlled corporations (“GOCCs”)
9184”), otherwise known as the “Government Procurement - Government financial institutions (“GFIs”)
Reform Act.” - state universities and colleges (“SUCs”)
- Local government units (“LGU”)
PROHIBITION ON BLACKLISTED PERSONS/ENTITIES TO
PARTICIPATE INTHE BIDDING OF GOVERNMENT
PROJECTS/CONTRACTS
• A person/entity that is blacklisted by a procuring entity and/or
included in the Government Procurement Policy Board (“GPPB”)
Consolidated Blacklisting Report

• A joint venture or consortium which is blacklisted or which


has blacklisted member/sand/or partner/s as well as a
person/entity who is a member of a blacklisted jointventure or
consortium

• In the case of corporations, a single stockholder, together with


his/her relatives up to the third civil degree of consanguinity or
affinity, and their assignees, holding at least twenty percent (20%)
of the shares therein, its chairman and president, shall be
blacklisted after they have been determined to hold the same
controlling interest in a previously blacklisted corporation or in two
corporations which have been blacklisted; the corporations of
which they are part shall also be blacklisted.
Contoso Ltd.
SANCTIONS AND GROUNDS FOR BLACKLISTING
1. Submission of eligibility requirements containing false information or falsified
Competitive Bidding Stage documents.

2. Submission of Bids that contain false information or falsified documents, or the


During the competitive bidding stage, concealment of such information in the Bids in order to influence the outcome of
pursuant to Section 69 of R.A. 9184, the eligibility screening or any other stage of the public bidding.
procuring entity shall impose on bidders or
prospective bidders the penalty of 3. Allowing the use of one’s name, or using the name of the name of another for
purpose of public bidding.
suspension for one (1) year for the first
offense, suspension for two (2) years 4. Withdrawal of a bid, or refusal to accept an award, or enter into contract with
for the second offense from participating the government without justifiable cause, after he had been adjudged as having
in the public bidding process, without submitted the Lowest Calculated Responsive Bid or Hprescribed time.
prejudice to the imposition of additional
administrative sanctions as the internal 5. Refusal or failure to post the required performance security within the
rules of the agency may provide and/or prescribed time.
further criminal prosecution, as provided
6. Refusal to clarify or validate in writing its Bid during post qualification within
by applicable laws, for the following a period of seven (7) calendar days from receipt of the request for clarification.
violations:
7. Any documented unsolicited attempt by a bidder to unduly influence the
outcome of the bidding in his favor.

8. All other acts that tend to defeat the purpose of the competitive bidding, such as
habitually withdrawing from bidding or submitting late bids or patently
Contosoinsufficient
Ltd.
bids120, for at least three (3) times within a year, except for valid reasons.
SANCTIONS AND GROUNDS FOR BLACKLISTING
Business model
Contract Implementation Stage • Failure of the contractor, due solely to his fault or negligence, to mobilize
and start work or performance within the specified period in the Notice to
Pursuant to Section 69 (6) of R.A. 9184 and Proceed (“NTP”)
without prejudice to the imposition of additional
administrative sanctions as the internal rules of • Failure by the contractor to fully and faithfully comply with its contractual
the agency may provide and/or further criminal obligations without valid cause, or failure by the contractor to comply with
any written lawful instruction of the procuring entity or its representative(s)
prosecution as provided by applicable laws, the pursuant to the implementation of the contract. For the procurement of
procuring entity shall impose on contractors infrastructure projects or consultancy contracts, lawful instructions include
after the termination of the contract the penalty but are not limited to the following:
of suspension for one (1) year for the first
offense, suspension for two (2) years for the a. Employment of competent technical personnel
second offense from participating in the public
b. Provision of warning signs and barricades
bidding process, for violations committed
Research Abstractc. Stockpiling in proper
Design
places of all materials and removal from the
during the contract implementation stage,
which include but not limited to the following: project site of waste and excess materials
Lorem ipsum dolor sit Lorem ipsum dolor sit
amet, consectetur d. Deployment ofamet,
committed equipment, facilities, support staff and
consectetur
adipiscing elit. manpower adipiscing elit.

e. Renewal of the affectivity dates of the performance security after


its expiration during the course of contract implementation.

Contoso Ltd.
5
Add a footer
SANCTIONS AND GROUNDS FOR BLACKLISTING
Business model
Contract Implementation Stage • Assignment and subcontracting of the contract or any part thereof or
substitution of key personnel named in the proposal without prior written
Pursuant to Section 69 (6) of R.A. 9184 and approval by the procuring entity.
without prejudice to the imposition of additional
administrative sanctions as the internal rules of • For the procurement of goods, unsatisfactory progress in the delivery of
the agency may provide and/or further criminal the goods by the manufacturer, supplier or distributor arising from his fault
or negligence and/or unsatisfactory or inferior quality of goods, as may be
prosecution as provided by applicable laws, the provided in the contract.
procuring entity shall impose on contractors
after the termination of the contract the penalty • For the procurement of consulting services, poor performance by the
of suspension for one (1) year for the first consultant of his services arising from his fault or negligence. Any of the
offense, suspension for two (2) years for the following acts by the consultant shall be construed as poor performance:
second offense from participating in the public
bidding process, for violations committed a. Defective design resulting in substantial corrective works in
Research Abstract Design
during the contract implementation stage, design and/or construction.
which include but not limited to the following:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit b. Failure to deliver
Loremcritical outputs
ipsum dolor sit due to consultant’s fault or
amet, consectetur negligence. amet, consectetur
adipiscing elit. adipiscing elit.
c. Specifying materials which are inappropriate, substandard, or
way above acceptable standards.
d. Allowing defective workmanship or works by the contractor being
supervised by the consultant. Contoso Ltd.
6
Add a footer
SANCTIONS AND GROUNDS FOR BLACKLISTING
Business model
Contract Implementation Stage • For the procurement of infrastructure projects, poor performance by the
contractor or unsatisfactory quality and/or progress of work arising from his
Pursuant to Section 69 (6) of R.A. 9184 and fault or negligence as reflected in the Constructor's Performance
without prejudice to the imposition of additional Evaluation System (“CPES”) rating sheet. In the absence of the CPES
administrative sanctions as the internal rules of rating sheet, the existing performance monitoring system of the procuring
the agency may provide and/or further criminal entity shall be applied. Any of the following acts by the constructor shall be
construed as poor performance:
prosecution as provided by applicable laws, the
procuring entity shall impose on contractors
a. Negative slippage of 15% and above within the critical path of
after the termination of the contract the penalty
of suspension for one (1) year for the first the project due entirely to the fault or negligence of the contractor
offense, suspension for two (2) years for the b. Quality of materials and workmanship not complying with the
second offense from participating in the public
approved specifications arising from the contractor's fault or
bidding process, for violations committed
Research Abstractnegligence. Design
during the contract implementation stage,
which include but not limited to the following:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit • Lorem ipsumordolor
Willful or deliberate abandonment sit
non-performance of the project or
amet, consectetur amet, consectetur
contract by the contractor resulting to substantial breach thereof without
adipiscing elit. adipiscing elit.
lawful and/or just cause.

Contoso Ltd.
7
Add a footer
PROCEDURE FOR SUSPENSION AND BLACKLISTING DURING PROCEDURE FOR SUSPENSION AND BLACKLISTING DURING
THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING STAGE THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING STAGE

1. Initiation of Action Upon termination of contract due to


2. Notification default of the contractor, the Head of the
3. Hearing
Procuring Entity shall immediately issue
4. Decision
5. Notice of Decision a Blacklisting Order disqualifying the
6. Effect of Decision erring contractor from participating in
7. Motion for Reconsideration the bidding of all government projects.
8. Protest from Decision The performance security of said
9. Finality of Decision contractor shall also be forfeited.

Contoso Ltd.
8
Add a footer
STATUS OF BLACKLISTED PERSON/ENTITY DELISTING

Before the issuance of a Blacklisting Order, the A blacklisted person/entity shall be


erring contractor may participate in the
automatically delisted after the period for
procurement of any government project except in
the agency where he is
the penalty shall have elapsed, unless the
suspended. But if Blacklisting Order is issued blacklisting agency requests the GPPB to
prior to the date of the notice of award (“NOA”), maintain the blacklisted person/entity in the
the blacklisted person/entity shall not be qualified GPPB Consolidated Blacklisting Report due
for award and such project/contract shall be to justifiable reasons. In the latter case, the
awarded to another bidder pursuant to R.A. 9184 blacklisted person/entity shall be delisted
and its IRR. only upon the blacklisting agency’s issuance
of a Delisting Order.
If the Blacklisting Order is issued after award of a
government project/contract to the blacklisted
person/entity, the awarded project/contract shall
not be prejudiced by the
said order: Provided, however, that the said
offense(s) committed by the blacklisted
person/entity is/are not connected with the
awarded project/contract. Contoso Ltd.
9
Add a footer
AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVITY

• In the implementation of these These Guidelines or any amendments


guidelines, the GPPB may introduce thereof shall take effect immediately
modifications thereto through the after publication in the Official Gazette
amendment of its specific provisions or a newspaper of general nationwide
as the need arises. circulation and upon filing with the
University of the Philippines Law Center
• Any amendment to these guidelines of three (3) certified copies of these
shall be applicable to government guidelines.
projects advertised for bid after the
affectivity of the said amendment.

Contoso Ltd.
10
Add a footer
Thank you

You might also like