Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 5 Reflection and Referencing
Lecture 5 Reflection and Referencing
• Task 3 – Personal
Statement and
Reflection
• Reflection on events
throughout the year
What can I reflect on?
• Student union
• Work activities
experience/placements • Roles within
• Voluntary or pro bono community
work organisations
• Roles on university • Networking events
clubs or societies • Visits to courts or
• Acting as a student other organisations
representative or • Employment
ambassador
• Lectures
Why is reflecting important?
• Identify strengths
• Identify area for
improvement
• Develop new skills
• Strengthen abilities
• Employability
How to write a reflection
• Do not write an account of your experiences!
For each event/ experience
• What were you doing?
• What were you trying to achieve by doing it?
• Did you achieve it?
• What do you think went well?
• What needs to be improved upon?
• What skills have you learnt from this?
• Where will you be able to apply these
skills?
• What will you do next time to improve
on these skills?
Referencing
PLAGIARISM
Staffordshire University
policy on plagiarism
• Plagiarism is defined as passing off someone else's
work as your own. This can be research,
statements, images and statistical data.
• Plagiarism occurs when you don’t acknowledge
where the information that you have used in your
assignment came from. For example, copying
directly from a text word-for-word, using text
downloaded from the Internet, paraphrasing the
words of a text very closely, downloading or
copying pictures, photographs, or diagrams without
acknowledging your sources.
(Staffordshire University)
Plagiarism
Marks reduced. The maximum permitted penalty
Minor is award of zero marks for the assessment
Academic component and the minimum permitted penalty
is the award of a mark of 40%.
Misconduct Written warning
Zero marks for the component of assessment,
Major with a recommendation to permit an opportunity
Academic to be reassessed.
Written warning
Misconduct
Failure of the module with a right to
Gross reassessment at the next available opportunity.
Academic OR Failure of the module with no right to
reassessment.
Misconduct A student who is found to have committed gross
academic misconduct on two occasions will be
withdrawn from the programme permanently
Academic misconduct
Guidelines
http://www.staffs.ac.uk/assets/Procedu
re%20for%20Dealing%20with%20Brea
ches%20of%20Assessment%20Regulat
ions-
Academic%20Misconduct%202016-
17%20v1_tcm44-91272.pdf
OSCOLA
FOOTNOTES
1
‘The case of Donoghue v Stevenson
helps to illustrate the principle of
“reasonable foreseeability” in relation to a
breach of a duty of care in tort law’
1 [1932] UKHL 100
or
1 Donoghue v Stevenson
[1932] UKHL 100
Adding a Footnote in a
word document