Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 Year Extension Seminar
2 Year Extension Seminar
Where,
𝐹𝑝 = Volume flow rate provided by the pump
𝑉𝑝 = Fixed pump displacement
𝐿𝑝 = Resistance to pump leakage flow path
𝐸𝑠 = Main pump pressure or system pressure
𝐶𝐷 = Coefficient of discharge
𝐴 = Orifice area of the proportional valve
𝐸𝑑 = Proportional relief valve pressure or delivery pressure
And 𝐸𝑠 =𝑘𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑘 𝑡𝑑 𝑝𝐹 , 𝑘𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑘 = Bulk Modulus
16DR000229 Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad
Mathematical Modelling
𝟐 𝑬𝒔 −𝑬𝒅 𝑬𝒅
𝑭𝒎 = 𝑪𝑫 𝑨 𝑺𝒈𝒏 𝑬𝒔 − 𝑬𝒅 − 𝑽𝒎 𝝎𝒎 − (2)
𝝆 𝑳𝒎
Where,
𝐹𝑚 = Volume flow rate provided by the motor
𝑉𝑚 = Volumetric motor displacement
𝐿𝑚 = Leakage of motor
𝜔𝑚 = Angular velocity of motor
And 𝐸𝑑 = 𝑘𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑘 𝑡𝑑 𝑚𝐹
2 𝐸𝑐ℎ −𝑃𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝐹𝑚1 = 𝑉𝑚 𝜔𝑚 − 𝐶𝑑 𝐴𝑐ℎ 𝑠𝑔𝑛 𝐸𝑐ℎ − 𝑃𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝜌
2 𝐸𝑙𝑑 −𝐸𝑐ℎ
+ 𝐶𝑑 𝐴𝑙 𝑠𝑔𝑛 𝐸𝑙𝑑 − 𝐸𝑐ℎ (4)
𝜌
Loading pump
Loading pump which is coupled with the hydraulic motor also experiences some
hydraulic losses during fluid flowing through the pump. Now, the flow from the pump is
described as,
2 𝐸𝑙𝑑 −𝐸𝑐ℎ
𝐹𝑙𝑝 = 𝑉𝑙𝑝 𝜔𝑚 − 𝐶𝑑 𝐴𝑙 𝑠𝑔𝑛 𝐸𝑙𝑑 − 𝐸𝑐ℎ (5)
𝜌
Where the pressure at the inlet to the loading pump = 𝐸𝑙𝑑 = 𝑘𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑘 𝑡𝑑 𝑝𝑙𝐹
𝐸𝑠ሶ 𝐸𝑠 2 𝐸𝑠 −𝐸𝑑
𝑅𝑑1 = 𝑉𝑝 𝜔𝑝 − − − 𝐶𝐷 𝐴 𝑆𝑔𝑛 𝐸𝑠 − 𝐸𝑑 (6)
𝑘𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑘 𝐿𝑝 𝜌
𝐸ሶ 𝑠 2 𝐸𝑠 −𝐸𝑑 𝐸𝑠
And 𝜀1 = + 𝛿𝑉𝑝 𝜔𝑝 + 𝛿 𝐶𝐷 𝐴 +
𝛿𝑘𝑏𝑙𝑘 𝜌 𝛿𝐿𝑝
Here, is the uncertainty for the associated parameter and its value is considered as 0.1 (i.e. 10
%).
Upper threshold value = 𝑅𝑑1 + 𝜀1
Lower threshold value =𝑅𝑑1 − 𝜀1
𝐸ሶ 𝑑 2 𝐸𝑠 −𝐸𝑑 𝐸𝑑
And 𝜀2 = + 𝛿𝑉𝑚 𝜔𝑚 + 𝛿 𝐶𝐷 𝐴 +
𝛿𝑘𝑏𝑙𝑘 𝜌 𝐿𝑚
Upper threshold value = 𝑅𝑑2 + 𝜀2
Lower threshold value = 𝑅𝑑2 − 𝜀2
2 𝐸𝑙𝑑 −𝐸𝑐ℎ 𝐸ሶ 𝑐ℎ
+ 𝐶𝑑 𝐴𝑙 𝑠𝑔𝑛 𝐸𝑙𝑑 − 𝐸𝑐ℎ − (10)
𝜌 𝑘𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑘
And
2 𝐸𝑐ℎ −𝑃𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝜀5 = 𝛿𝑉𝑚 𝜔𝑚 + 𝛿 𝐶𝑑 𝐴𝑐ℎ
𝜌
2 𝐸𝑙𝑑 −𝐸𝑐ℎ 𝐸ሶ 𝑐ℎ
+ 𝛿 𝐶𝑑 𝐴𝑙 +
𝜌 𝛿𝑘𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑘
Upper threshold value = 𝑅𝑑5 + 𝜀5
Lower threshold value = 𝑅𝑑5 − 𝜀5
16DR000229 Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad
Mathematical Modelling
From the five residual equation from (6) to (10), the fault signature matrix can be drawn
as follows, which represents the components related to a fault.
Components Rd1 Rd2 Rd3 Rd4 Rd5 I
𝑉𝑝 1 0 0 0 0 0
𝑉𝑚 0 1 1 0 1 1
𝐴 1 1 0 0 0 1
𝐴𝑙 0 0 0 1 1 1
𝑉𝑙𝑝 0 0 1 1 0 1
𝐿𝑝 1 0 0 0 0 0
𝐿𝑚 0 1 0 0 0 1
𝑓 0 0 1 0 0 1
16DR000229 Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad
Mathematical Modelling
According to the mathematical equations of the above section, a block model is made
in MATLAB/Simulink. The model has been divided into two parts – Behavioral model
(Figure 2 and Figure 3) and Diagnostic model (Figure 4). In the behavioral model the
constitutive relations given in Eqns. (1) through (5) are evaluated. Whereas, the
diagnostic model is simple computation of the residuals given in Eqns. (6) through
(10). The output from the behavioral model is measurable system variables which are
considered as the inputs for the diagnostic model, and outputs from the diagnostic
model are residuals that are monitored for fault detection. In this work, initially the
faults are imposed on the model itself to understand the sensitivity of the residuals.
Finally the same faults are tested on the test set-up for validation.
𝐸𝑝 2 𝐸𝑝 −𝐸𝑜
𝐹𝑝𝑡1 = 𝑉𝑝𝑡1 𝜔𝑝 − − 𝐶𝐷 𝐴 𝑆𝑔𝑛 𝐸𝑝 − 𝐸𝑜 (13)
𝐿𝑝𝑡1 𝜌
And
𝐸𝑝 2 𝐸𝑝 −𝐸𝑜
𝐹𝑝𝑡2 = 𝑉𝑝𝑡2 𝜔𝑝 − − 𝐶𝐷 𝐴 𝑆𝑔𝑛 𝐸𝑝 − 𝐸𝑜 (14)
𝐿𝑝𝑡2 𝜌
Figure 11 and 12 show time evolution of the estimated values obtained through genetic
algorithm. After the imposition of fault at 5 s, the estimated value of displacement of
pump (Vp) is obtained as 2.074 × 10-6 m3/rad and leakage resistance (Lp) is 1.5×1011 N-
s/m2. Whereas, the nominal values for Vp and Lp are 3.14 × 10-6 m3/rad and 1×1011 N-
s/m2 respectively (refer Table 2). But increase of leakage resistance above nominal is not
admissible. Hence, the admissible solution is the reduction of pump displacement to
2.074× 10-6 m3/rad.
Figure 11 and 12 show time evolution of the estimated values obtained through genetic
algorithm. After the imposition of fault at 5 s, the estimated value of displacement of
pump (Vp) is obtained as 2.074 × 10-6 m3/rad and leakage resistance (Lp) is 1.5×1011 N-
s/m2. Whereas, the nominal values for Vp and Lp are 3.14 × 10-6 m3/rad and 1×1011 N-
s/m2 respectively (refer Table 2). But increase of leakage resistance above nominal is not
admissible. Hence, the admissible solution is the reduction of pump displacement to
2.074× 10-6 m3/rad.
2. However, sensor faults are not accounted in this work. Also, different combination of
faulty situations may suppress the effect of one fault into another. This is termed as the
fault masking which may be taken up for future investigation.