Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Slides CH06
Slides CH06
Chapter 6:
Designing and Evaluating MCS
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003
Designing control systems ...
Two basic questions:
» What is desired ?
» What is likely to happen ?
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 -2-
What is desired ?
Start from objectives and strategies ...
» They should be important guides to the actions that
are expected, especially if they are specific …
e.g., “Become a leader in the industry ” vs.
“15% ROI and 20% sales growth.”
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 -3-
What is likely ?
Three questions:
» Do employees understand what they are expected
to do (key actions) or to accomplish (key results)?
lack of direction
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 -4-
Choice of controls ...
The different types of controls (action, results and people
controls) are not equally effective at addressing each of the
control problems.
Lack of Lack of Personal
direction motivation limitations
Results accountability
Action controls
- Behavioral constraints
- Preaction reviews
- Action accountability
People controls
- Selection / placement
- Training
- Provision of resources
- Strong culture
- Group-based rewards
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 -5-
Start with people controls ...
People controls …
» Must always be relied on to a certain extent;
» Have relatively few harmful side-effects;
» Involve relatively low out-of-pocket costs.
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 -6-
Pros and cons of action controls ...
PRO CON
The most direct form of control. Only for highly routinized jobs.
Tend to lead to documentation May discourage creativity,
of the accumulation of knowledge innovation, and adaptation.
as to what works best.
May cause sloppiness.
– Organizational memory
May cause negative attitudes.
An efficient way of coordination:
– e.g., little opportunity for
– i.e., they increase the predictability
creativity and self-
of actions and reduce the amount
of inter-organizational information
actualization.
flows to achieve a coordinated Sometimes very costly
effort.
– e.g., preaction reviews
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 -7-
Pros and cons of results controls ...
PRO CON
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 -8-
Choice of control tightness ...
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 -9-
Control system change ...
As firms grow, their controls evolve, usually towards …
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 - 10 -
Keep a behavioral focus ...
There is no one best form of control ...
– What works best in one company (or area within
a company), may not work in another ...
– e.g., accounting personnel vs. design engineers.
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 - 11 -
Overview ...
Can people be avoided? Yes Control-problem
(e.g., automation, centralization)
avoidance
No
Yes
Can you rely on people involved?
No People controls
Yes
Can you make people reliable?
No
Have knowledge about what Yes Able to assess whether
specific actions are desirable? specific action was taken?
Yes
No
Action controls
Have knowledge about what Yes
results are desirable? Able to measure results?
Yes
No
Results controls
?
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 - 12 -
Depending on ...
Action Control
and/or Action Control
Results Control (e.g., large projects)
High Low
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 - 13 -