Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AiR HRM JOB EVALUATION2
AiR HRM JOB EVALUATION2
Compensating
Management Human
Resources
TENTH EDITON
Chapter 12
Compensation Strategies
and Practices
PowerPoint Presentation
© 2003 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
by Charlie Cook
Learning Objectives
Types of Rewards
– Intrinsic
• Intangible, psychological and social effects of
compensation
– Extrinsic
• Tangible, monetary and nonmonetary effects of
compensation
Figure 12–1
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–6
Direct Compensation
Compensation Type
Base Pay The basic monetary compensation that an
employee receives, usually as a wage or
salary.
Figure 12–2
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–8
Continuum of Compensation Philosophies
Figure 12–3
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–9
Compensation Approaches
Figure 12–4
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–10
Compensation Quartile Strategies
Figure 12–5
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–11
Decisions About Compensation Levels
Compensation Strategies
Above-Market Paying for higher qualified, more productive
workers.
Limitations Pricing
(How many?) Competencies
Competency-
Based Pay
Systems
KBP/SBP
Maintenance of
Training
Competencies
Figure 12–6
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–14
Individual vs. Team Rewards
Figure 12–7
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–17
Fair Labor Standards Act (FSLA) of 1938
Figure 12–8a
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–19
Wage/Hour Status Under Fair Labor Standards Act
Figure 12–8b
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–20
Wage/Hour Status Under Fair Labor Standards Act
Figure 12–8c
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–21
The IRS Test for Employees and
Independent Contractors
Figure 12–10
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–25
Job Evaluation
Job Evaluation
– The systematic determination of the relative worth
of jobs within an organization.
Benchmark Job
– A job found in many organizations and performed
by several individuals who have similar duties that
are relatively stable and require similar KSAs.
Ranking Classification
Job
Evaluation
Methods
Factor Point
Comparison Method
Figure 12–11
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–28
Legal Issues and Job Evaluation
Job Evaluation
Gender Issues
Traditional job evaluations place less weight on knowledge,
skills, and working conditions for female-dominated jobs
Conduct Survey
Market Line
– The line on a graph showing the relationship
between the job value, as determined by job
evaluation points, and pay survey rates.
Common Pay Structures
– Hourly and salaried
– Office, plant, technical, professional, managerial
– Clerical, information technology, professional,
supervisory, management, and executive
Figure 12–12
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–32
Pay Structures (cont’d)
Pay Grades
– A grouping of individual jobs having approximately
the same job worth.
Broadbanding
– The practice of using fewer pay grades having
broader pay ranges that in traditional systems.
– Benefits
• Encourages horizontal movement of employees
• Is consistent with trend towards flatter organizations
• Creates a more flexible organization
• Encourages competency development
• Emphasizes career development
Figure 12–13
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–34
Pay Scattergram
Figure 12–14
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–35
Typical Pay Range Widths
Figure 12–15
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–36
Example of
Pay Grades
and Pay
Ranges
Figure 12–16
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–37
Pay Rate Issues
Seniority
– Time spent in an organization or on a particular job.
– Used to determine eligibility for organizational
rewards and benefits.
Maturity Curve
– A curve that depicts the relationship between
experience and pay rates.
– Assumption is that as experience increases,
proficiency and performance increase.
Figure 12–17
© 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 12–41
Compa-Ratio Example
Compa-ratio
– The pay level divided by the midpoint of the pay
range.