Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enrollment of Advocates
Enrollment of Advocates
ADVOCATES
ADVOCATES
SENIOR ADVOCATES
SECTION 16(2)
(2) An advocate may, with his consent, be designated
as senior advocate if the Supreme Court or a High
Court is of opinion that by virtue of his ability
[standing at the Bar or special knowledge or
experience in law] he is deserving of such
distinction.
(3) Senior advocates shall, in the matter of their
practice, be subject to such restrictions as the Bar
Council of India may, in the interest of the legal
profession, prescribe.
Each High Court follows its own procedure in designating an
Advocate as a Senior Advocate.
Earlier the High Courts themselves used to consider certain
Advocates as worthy of being designated as Sr. Advocate and
after obtaining the consent of the Advocate concerned used to
designate him as such.
Now in some High Courts, the Advocate concerned who fulfills
the prescribed qualificationshas applies to the High Court and
makes a request to be designated as a Senior Advocate.
Upon such an application the sitting Judges of the High Court
express their views through ballot and according to the majority
opinion the Senior Advocate status is either granted or refused.
Supreme Court Guidelines to Regulate Conferment of
Designation of Senior Advocates, 2018”, empower a
permanent committee called “Committee for
Designation of Senior Advocates” to deal with all the
matters relating to such conferment.
this committee shall comprise of the Chief Justice of
India as its Chairperson, along with two senior-most
Supreme Court judges, Attorney general for India,
and a member of the Bar as nominated by the
Chairperson and other members.
The committee is expected to meet at least twice in a
calendar year. It will also have a Permanent
Secretariat, the composition of which shall be
decided by the CJI in consultation with other
members of the Committee.
A recommendation in writing can be submitted by
the CJI or any other judge if they are of the opinion
that an advocate deserves to be conferred with the
designation.
An Advocate on Record (AoR) seeking conferment of
distinction as Senior Advocate may also submit an
application in the prescribed format to the
Secretariat.
The Secretariat will invite applications from retired
Chief Justices or judges of the High Courts, and
Advocates seeking conferment of the distinction
every year in the months of January and July.
The notice shall be published on the official
Supreme Court website, and the information would
also be provided to the Supreme Court Bar
Association as well as the Supreme Court Advocates-
on-Record Association.
an Advocate shall be eligible for designation as
Senior Advocate only if he has 10 years combined
standing as an advocate or a District Judge, or as a
Judicial Member of any Tribunal whose qualification
for eligibility isn't less than that prescribed for a
District judge.
Retired Chief Justices or judges of the High Courts
are also eligible for the distinction
After overall assessment, the Advocates' candidature
would be submitted to the Full Court, which would
then vote on the same.
The guidelines however clarify that cases of retired
Chief Justices and judges of the High Courts will
straightaway be sent to the Full Court for its
consideration.
The Rules further specify that voting by secret ballot
will not normally be resorted to in the Full Court
except when "unavoidable".
Cases which are rejected by the Full Court can be
considered afresh after two years, and cases which
are deferred can be considered after one year from
such deferment.
The Rules clarify that if a Senior Advocate is found
guilty of conduct, which according to the Full Court
disentitles the Senior Advocate to continue to be
worthy of the designation, the Full Court may
review its decision to designate the person concerned
and recall the same.
A 2013 report of the Bar Council of India suggested
that less than 1% of all enrolled lawyers are senior
advocates
RESTRICTIONS
(a) A Senior Advocate shall not file a vakalatnama or
act in any Court, or Tribunal, or before any person or
other authority mentioned in Section 30 of the Act.
Explanation : “To act” means to file an appearance or
any pleading or application in any court or Tribunal or
before any person or other authority mentioned in
Section 30 of the Act, or to do any act other than
pleading required or authorised by law to be done by a
party in such Court or Tribunal or before any person or
other authorities mentioned in the said Section either
in person or by his recognised agent or by an advocate
or an attorney on his behalf.
(b) (i) A Senior Advocate shall not appear without an
Advocate on Record in the Supreme Court or without an
Advocate in Part II of the State Roll in any court or Tribunal
or before any person or other authorities mentioned in
Section 30 of the Act.
(ii) Where a Senior Advocate has been engaged prior to
the coming into force of the rules in this Chapter, he shall
not continue thereafter unless an advocate in Part II of the
State Roll is engaged along with him. Provided that a Senior
Advocate may continue to appear without an advocate in
Part II of the Sate Roll in cases in which he had been briefed
to appear for the prosecution or the defence in a criminal
case, if he was so briefed before he is designated as a senior
advocate or before coming into operation of the rules in this
Chapter as the case may be.
He shall not accept instructions to draft pleading or
affidavits, advice on evidence or to do any drafting
work of an analogous kind in any Court or Tribunal
or before any person or other authorities mentioned
in Section 30 of the Act or undertake conveyancing
work of any kind whatsoever.
This restriction, however, shall not extend to settling
any such matter as aforesaid in consultation with an
advocate in Part II of the State Roll.
A Senior Advocate shall, however, be free to make concessions
or give an undertaking in the course of arguments on behalf of
his clients on instructions from the junior advocate.