•We must therefore develop an Ethical system which would lay out some defining points regarding freedom and hapiness. An Ethical system to be precise! Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, Metaphysics and the Natural Law Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas • Aristotle distinguishes between particular laws and universal laws.
• The universal law is the natural law
Metaphysics of Nature What is nature? • St. Thomas relates essence and nature:
“essence is that which constitutes the common
nature of things which account for their being put into the same categorization” Defining Natural Law •Natural – pertaining to nature as essence which speaks of the root of the operations of a thing. • We also mean in here that which makes the thing what it is. •Law – from Lat. Lex from ligare i.e. to bind. “Ordinance of reason for the common good, made by him who has care for the community, and promulgated.” •The definition of law and nature are not isolated but are related.
•Nature is common to things under the same
genus.
•If law is for the common good, it must
recognize nature. •Law then, which must grasp natures, requires that the intellect grasps natures. Law must proceed from reason! Eternal Law and Natural Law What is Eternal Law?
•The primary law that governs the way by
which the universe works, the source of which is God. •Things therefore take their nature in such or such a way because it is ordained by the eternal law
•Our access to Eternal Law is through our
intellect when we grasp nature which is ordained by Eternal Law •Thus: “Natural law is nothing else than the rational creature’s participation of the Eternal Law.” Human Law and Divine Law •Sometimes general principles cannot be applied uniformly to particular situations.
•Practical reason must make laws which
now into consideration other conditions observed by the intellect. This is Human Laws. • But there is still a need for Divine Law. St. Thomas cites 4 reasons. 1. Man is ordained to a higher end: eternal happiness. This can only be achieved through conformity with the Divine Law. 2. Because man is imperfect, his judgments are bound to err. Therfore, in order for him to truly know what is right from wrong, he must be directed by the law given by God, i.e. Divine Law. 3. Man cannot perfectly achieve virtue by himself. There is then a need for a Divine Law. 4. Since human law cannot forbid all evil, Divine Law must intervene in this case. Synderesis •First Principle of Practical Reason
•Principle of intelligibility of actions
•Do good and avoid evil
Knowledge of Basic Goods and Natural Good •Being is apprehended by the intellect.
•But being is good.
•Therefore, the good is apprehended by
the intellect. •All things existing are beings. All beings are good. When we apprehend beings. We apprehend good. •But when we apprehend beings we apprehend them according to their nature. •Nature then is that good which is apprehended by the intellect. The Natural Good! •Once again Nature is the root of a thing’s operations.
•But good also implies perfection and
end.
•Good perfects nature!
• From our desire to have facilitation is given to us a natural inclination to some basic goods.
• These basic goods are not just deduced from
some of our operations. They are, in fact, primary and evident operations of man. •Self Preservation
•Operations out from animality and
rationality.
•Desire for true goods without conditions.
•This system allows us then to formulate laws based on the fulfillment of the said goods with the consideration of nature.
•But general principles become more
and more obscure as a situation becomes more and more particular. What must be done? •Natural Law Ethics must not be seen as enforcing us to do this or that. Instead it must be seen as a guideline which must be reflected upon so that we may have an inspiration when we contemplate on doing proper moral actions. •Real Freedom lies in our effort to fulfill our nature and is thereby limited by nature. Real Happiness is when ultimately our nature is perfected.