Electric Vehicle on

pattern of Magnetar
Dr. A.B. Rajib Hazarika , PhD ,FRAS , AES
Assistant Professor
Department of Mathematics
Diphu Government College, Diphu
Assam, India-782462
 ABSTRACT
• On the pattern of Magnetar with reference to the astrophysical
conditions a model of Electric vehicle is studied . As we know in
astrophysical context that magnetars are enormous source of energy,
which provides never ending energy due to self-generating process.
Here we have studied the system on the pattern based study of two
different type of models viz. Dynamo(generating) model and fossil field
model(dissipating).In electric vehicle we will put together the Dynamo
for generation and battery for fossil field which dissipates.
• PACS: 04.30-w, 26.60+c , 52.90+z , 95.10-a ,97.60Jd , 88.85Hj
• Keywords: Gravitational waves , Nuclear matter aspects of neutron
stars, Other topics in physics of plasma and electric discharge ,
fundamental astronomy , neutron stars , fuel cell vehicles
GO GREEN THE NEED OF AN HOUR
• DIFFERENT ASPECTS WHICH INTEREST YOU ALL
1. Electric vehicle
2. Self charging battery system
3. Mathematics
4. Astronomy & Astrophysics
5. Fusion plasma
6. Self balancing fusion plasma with surplus energy
for electricity generated
7. Self excited technology for space science and
technology such as Rockets and satellites
OVERVIEW OF ELECETRIC VEHICLE MODEL

Battery Dynamo Dynamo theory

for evolution in
ENERGY Magnetar

Magnetar

Output Booster DC Motor Fossil field theory

for Dissipation in
FUSION Magnetar
 What is Magnetar?

• A magnetar is a type of neutron star

believed to have an extremely powerful
magnetic field (∼1013 to 1015 G, ∼109 to
1011 T). The magnetic field decay powers
the emission of high-energy
electromagnetic radiation, particularly X-
rays and gamma rays.
Magnetar
 Size of Magnetars
• Magnetars are around 20 kilometers (12 mi) in
diameter and have a mass 1–2 times that of
the Sun.
• The density of the interior of a magnetar is such
that a tablespoon of its substance would have a
mass of over 100 million tons.
• Magnetars are differentiated from other neutron
stars by having even stronger magnetic fields, and
by rotating comparatively more quickly.
• Most neutron stars rotate once every one to ten
seconds, whereas magnetars rotate once in less
than one second.
 Electric vehicle model
• Since we are considering Dynamo motor
• 𝛻𝑋 𝐵 = 4𝐵0 for Magnetar
• Then the eqn. (1) will become
𝜕𝐵 4
• = −𝛻 𝑋 4𝜂(𝐵) + 𝐵 𝑋𝐵
𝜕𝑡 𝑁𝑒
(2)
•
𝜕𝐵
• = −16η𝐵
𝜕𝑡
(3)
•
• As we are interested in electric vehicle charging more than the depletion of the battery as pattern we
consider here the dying and evolution of neutron star or Magnetar so the model is using evolution and
dissipation process together.
•
𝜕𝐵 1
• = −𝛻 𝑋 𝜂(𝛻𝑋𝐵) + 𝛻𝑋𝐵 𝑋𝐵 − 16η𝐵
𝜕𝑡 𝑁𝑒
(4)
• The magnetic field is expressed as two function
•
• 𝐵𝑝 𝑟, 𝜃, 𝜑 poloidal-field𝐵𝑡 𝑟, 𝜃, 𝜑 toroidal field
•
• 𝐵 = 𝛻 X 𝛻 X 𝐵𝑝 𝑟Ԧ + 𝛻 𝑋 𝐵𝑡 𝑟Ԧ
(5)
•
 Results and Discussions

• The potential difference of Dynamo theory

•
1
• 𝛻∅ = −𝑣 𝑋 𝐵 + 𝛻𝑝 + 𝐽Ԧ 𝑋 𝐵 − 𝜂𝐽Ԧ +
𝑁𝑒 𝑒
1 𝜕𝐽Ԧ
𝜔𝑝2 𝜕𝑡

• And of Fossil field theory

1 𝜕𝐽Ԧ
• 𝛻∅ = −𝑣 𝑋 𝐵 + 𝛻𝑝 − 16𝜂𝐽Ԧ + 2 𝜕𝑡
𝜔𝑝
 Series 1=Dynamo , Series 2= Fossil
25000
Electric Vehicle Model

20000
potential in Volts

15000
Series1

10000
Series2

5000

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
 Conclusion
• Certainly we can see that the difference
• Hall term is the additional one as in Fossil field
theory it becomes zero due to curl [curl B]
• Hall term is the recharging factor for battery
or for evolution in Magnetar
 References
• 1. Deutsch AJ (1955) The electromagnetic field of an idealized star in rigid rotation in
• vacuo. Ann Astrophys 18(1):1–10.
• 2. Thompson C, Duncan RC (1995) The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neutron stars - I. Radiative mechanism for outbursts. Mon Not R Astron Soc
• 275(2):255–300.
• 3. Thompson C, Duncan RC (1996) The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neutron stars. II. Quiescent neutrino, X-ray, and Alfven wave emission.
• Astrophys J 473(1):322–342.
• 4. Haberl F (2007) The magnificent seven: magnetic fields and surface temperature distributions. Astrophys Space Sci 308(1):181–190.
• 5. Rea N, et al. (2010) A low-magnetic-field soft gamma repeater. Science 330(6006):944–946.
• 6. An H, Kaspi VM, Archibald R, Cumming A (2013) Spectral and timing properties of the magnetar CXOU J164710.2-455216. Astrophys J 763(2):82.
• 7. Scholz P, et al. (2012) Post-outburst X-ray flux and timing evolution of swift J1822.3-
• 1606. Astrophys J 761(1):66.
• 8. Gavriil FP, Kaspi VM (2002) Long-term Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer monitoring of
• anomalous X-ray pulsars. Astrophys J 567(2):1067–1076.
• 9. Potekhin AY, Baiko DA, Haensel P, Yakovlev DG (1999) Transport properties of degenerate electrons in neutron star envelopes and white dwarf cores. Astron
Astrophys 346:345–353.
• 10. Guillot S, Perna R, Rea N, Viganò D, Pons JA (2015) Modelling of the surface emission of the low magnetic field magnetar SGR 0418+5729. Mon Not R Astron Soc
452(4): 3357–3368.
• 11. Bernardini F, et al. (2011) Emission geometry, radiation pattern and magnetic topology of the magnetar XTE J1810-197 in its quiescent state. Mon Not R Astron Soc
• 418(1):638–647.
• 12. Tiengo A, et al. (2013) A variable absorption feature in the X-ray spectrum of a magnetar. Nature 500(7462):312–314.
• 13. Güver T, Göǧüs¸ E, Özel F (2011) A magnetar strength surface magnetic field for the slowly spinning down SGR 0418+5729. Mon Not R Astron Soc 418(4):2773–
2778.
• 14. Rodríguez Castillo GA, et al. (2016) The outburst decay of the low magnetic field
• magnetar SWIFT J1822.3-1606: phase-resolved analysis and evidence for a variable
• cyclotron feature. Mon Not R Astron Soc 456(4):4145–4155.
• 15. Spruit HC (2008) Origin of neutron star magnetic fields. AIP Conf Proc 983:391–398.
• 16. Mösta P, et al. (2015) A large-scale dynamo and magnetoturbulence in rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae. Nature 528(7582):376–379.
• 17. Goldreich P, Reisenegger A (1992) Magnetic field decay in isolated neutron stars.
• Astrophys J 395(1):250–258.
• 18. Pons JA, Perna R (2011) Magnetars versus high magnetic field pulsars: A theoretical interpretation of the apparent dichotomy. Astrophys J 741(2):123.
• 19. Geppert U, Viganò D (2014) Creation of magnetic spots at the neutron star surface.
• Mon Not R Astron Soc 444(4):3198–3208.
• 20. Rheinhardt M, Konenkov D, Geppert U (2004) The occurrence of the Hall instability in crusts of isolated neutron stars. Astron Astrophys 420(2):631–645.
• 21. Wood TS, Hollerbach R, Lyutikov M (2014) Density-shear instability in electron magneto- hydrodynamics. Phys Plasmas 21(5):052110.
• 22. Gourgouliatos KN, Kondi_c T, Lyutikov M, Hollerbach R (2015) Magnetar activity via
• the density-shear instability in Hall-MHD. Mon Not R Astron Soc 453(1):L93–L97.
• 23. Wood TS, Hollerbach R (2015) Three dimensional simulation of the magnetic stress in a neutron star crust. Phys Rev Lett 114(19):191101.
• 24. Dormy E, Cardin P, Jault D (1998) MHD flow in a slightly differentially rotating
• spherical shell, with conducting inner core, in a dipolar magnetic field. Earth Planet
• Sci Lett 160(1-2):15–30.
• 25. Aubert J, Aurnou J, Wicht J (2008) The magnetic structure of convection-driven numerical dynamos. Geophys J Int 172(3):945–956.
• 26. Cumming A, Arras P, Zweibel E (2004) Magnetic field evolution in neutron star crusts due to the Hall effect and Ohmic decay. Astrophys J 609(2):999–1017.
• 27. Konstantinos N. Gourgouliatosa,1, Toby S. Woodb, and Rainer Hollerbacha (2016) Magnetic field evolution in magnetar crusts through three-dimensional simulations
PNAS,April12,2016,vol.113,no.15,3944-3949 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1522363113
•