in Nursing Jayson S. Austria, RN 12/23/2016 Outline Learning Outcomes Introduction Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Research Learning Outcomes Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based nursing practice. Apply the steps of change used in implementing evidence-based practice. Describe limitations in relying on research as the primary source of evidence for practice. Differentiate the quantitative approach from the qualitative approach in nursing research. Cont. Outline the steps of the research process. Describe research-related roles and responsibilities for nurses. Describe the nurse’s role in protecting the rights of human participants in research. INTRODUCTION All nurses are expected to use evidence and research to determine proper nursing actions, to engage in research activities as appropriate to their abilities, and to share knowledge with other nurses. All nurses need a basic understanding of the research process and its relationship to evidence-based practice. EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE Evidence-based nursing, occurs when the nurse can “integrate best current evidence with clinical expertise and patient/family preferences and values for delivery of optimal health care” (Cronenwett et al., 2007). Cont. Melnyk, Fineout-Overholt, Stillwell, & Williamson, 2010: Cultivate a spirit of inquiry. Ask clinical questions: PICOT Search for the best evidence. Integrate the evidence with clinical expertise and client/family preferences and values. Implement and evaluate the outcomes of the intervention. Cont. Some scholars contend that, while evidence includes theories, opinions of recognized experts, clinical expertise, clinical experiences, and findings from client assessments, findings from research studies are often given the most weight in the decision-making process. Research entails using formal and systematic processes to address problems and answer questions. Resulting findings should be accurate, dependable, and free from bias. Reasons for concerns about reliance solely on research for EBP 1. Research is often done under very controlled circumstances, which is very different from the real world of health care delivery. 2. Research evidence suggests that there is one best solution to a problem for all clients and this limited perspective stifles creativity. 3. Not all published research is robust and flawless. 4. EBP should promote cost-effective care, but cost is often not included in traditional research studies. NURSING RESEARCH Approaches to Nursing Research Overview of the Research Process Research-Related Roles and Responsibilities for Nurses NURSING RESEARCH 1854, Florence Nightingale demonstrated how research findings could be used to improve nursing care. By systematically collecting, organizing, and reporting data, Nightingale was able to institute sanitary reforms and significantly reduce mortality rates from contagious diseases and infection. All nurses, however, have a responsibility to identify nursing issues that require research and to participate in research studies to the extent they are able. Research-Related Role Expectations for Nurses with Different Levels of Educational Preparation Educational Preparation Identified Expectations Baccalaureate degree Basic understanding of the research process. Able to understand and apply research findings from nursing and other disciplines in clinical practice. Understand the basic elements of evidence-based practice. Work with others to identify potential research problems. Collaborate on research teams. Master’s degree Evaluate research findings. Implement evidence-based practice guidelines. Form and lead research teams in work settings and professional groups. Identify practice and systems problems that require study. Work with scientists to initiate research. Research-Related Role Expectations for Nurses with Different Levels of Educational Preparation Educational Preparation Identified Expectations Practice-focused doctoral Focus on the evaluation and use of research rather than the (DNP) degree conduct of research. Translate scientific knowledge into complex clinical interventions tailored to meet individual, family, and community health and illness needs. Use leadership skills to evaluate the translation of research into practice. Collaborate with scientists on new health policy research opportunities that evolve from the translation and evaluation processes. Research-focused Conduct independent research. doctoral Seek needed support for the initial phases of a research (PhD) degree program. Involve others in research projects. Postdoctoral preparation Establish and pursue a focused research agenda. Approaches to Nursing Research Quantitative research Qualitative research A quantitative approach to research is useful for research questions such as these: What causes ___________? Which treatment for a condition is more effective? What factors are associated with a specific condition or outcome? If I know X, to what extent can I predict the occurrence of Y? QUALITATIVE RESEARCH systematic collection and thematic analysis of narrative data research collects and analyzes words, rather than numbers rooted in the philosophical perspective of naturalism (sometimes referred to as constructivism),reality is relative or contextual and constructed by individuals who are experiencing a phenomenon. Cont. qualitative approach to research is characterized by flexible and evolving study processes and by minimized “distancing” between the researcher and study informant. a holistic perspective and results in a report that may read like a story. three distinct qualitative traditions phenomenology, ethnography, or grounded theory. Cont. Phenomenology: lived experiences, Ethnography: cultural patterns of thoughts and behaviors Grounded theory: social processes. Additional qualitative types include historical and case study research. A qualitative approach to research is useful for research questions such as these: What is the experience of receiving diagnosis X or undergoing treatment Y? (phenomenology) What are typical behaviors of certain groups of clients (who may be defined by a diagnosis or membership in a cultural or ethnic group)? (ethnography) How do individuals cope with X? (grounded theory) Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Approaches Characteristic Quantitative Research Qualitative Research Reality Stable Personal, contextual Data Numbers, “hard” data Words, “soft” data Perspective Outsider Insider Approach to Reductionistic Contextual, holistic knowing Research approach Objective, structured, rational, Subjective, artistic, intuitive empirical Research conditions Controlled, laboratory Naturalistic, fieldwork Goal Verification, test theory Discovery, generate theory Methods Measurement Thick description Data analyses Deductive, statistics Inductive, intuitive, themes Outcome Facts Meaning, understanding Findings/results Replicable, reliable, generalizable Valid, credible, transferable Overview of the Research Process FORMULATING THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND PURPOSE DETERMINING STUDY METHODS COLLECTING RESEARCH DATA ANALYZING RESEARCH DATA COMMUNICATING RESEARCH FINDINGS USING RESEARCH FINDINGS IN PRACTICE FORMULATING THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND PURPOSE The researcher’s first task is to narrow a broad area of interest into a more specific problem that indicates the issue of concern behind the study. Ideas for research problems may arise from recurrent problems encountered in practice, questions that are difficult to resolve because of contradictions in the literature, or areas in which minimal or no research has been done. Cont. A research problem should be significant to nursing and offer the potential to improve client care. The problem must also be feasible to study in light of the resources (including time and skill) that are available to conduct the study. Research problem also must be something that can be answered by scientific investigation. Cont. A research problem should be of interest to the researcher because the researcher’s enthusiasm and commitment to the problem can be a factor in the successful completion of the study. The researcher must also decide on the purpose of the study or on the nature of information that it will provide. Cont. A study’s purpose statement is characterized by an action verb that indicates whether the study will provide descriptive information, explanatory information, cause-and-effect information, or information that will allow prediction and control. A study’s purpose statement has important implications for how the study will be conducted and how the data collected will be analyzed. One strategy for stating the problem you wish to explore is to use the PICO format: P – Patient, population, or problem of interest I – Intervention or therapy to consider for the subject of interest C – Comparison of interventions, such as no treatment O – Outcome of the intervention. PICOD by adding study Design, PICOS by adding Setting or PICOC adding Context, and PICOT by adding Timeframe. Cont. Formulating the research problem and purpose is facilitated by conducting a review of the relevant literature. This literature review helps the researcher become familiar with the current state of knowledge in regard to the problem area and build on that knowledge when designing the current study. Cont. Reviewing the literature can also help the researcher identify strategies that have been used successfully (and unsuccessfully) in the past to investigate the problem and to measure the variables of interest. Dependent variable: behavior, characteristic, or outcome that the researcher wishes to explain or predict. Independent variable: presumed cause of or influence on the dependent variable. Cont. In some studies, the researcher may develop a hypothesis or a predictive statement about the relationship between two or more variables. DETERMINING STUDY METHODS The methodological elements of the research process deal with how the study is organized, who or what will be the sources of information for the study, and data collection details such as what data will be collected, how data will be collected, and the timing of data collection. Cont. The first methodological decision made by a researcher is whether the study will use a quantitative or qualitative research approach. This decision has implications for subsequent methodological decisions about research design, sampling, and data collection, as well as data analysis. Cont. Research design refers to the overall structure or blueprint or general layout of a study. The research design indicates how many times data will be collected in a study, the timing of data collection relative to other study events, the types of relationships between variables that are being examined, the number of groups being compared in the study, and how extraneous variables will be controlled so that study findings are more reliable and accurate. Cont. There are two major types of research designs: experimental design and nonexperimental design experimental design, the researcher controls the independent variable by administering an experimental treatment to some participants while withholding it from others. Experimental designs are used to determine cause- and-effect relationships. Cont. nonexperimental design, there is no manipulation of the independent variable; in fact, there may be no identifiable independent and dependent variables in the study. Nonexperimental designs are used for descriptive research studies. Cont. Sample or sources of information for a study may be humans, events, behaviors, documents, or biologic specimens. Samples are carefully selected so that they are as accurate a representation as possible of the target population, or the universe of elements to which the researcher wishes to be able to apply the study’s findings. Cont. The sample is a carefully chosen segment of the target population. Nurse researchers use a wide variety of data collection strategies, including questionnaires, interviews, observation, record reviews, and biophysical measures. Cont. Data collection decisions spell out how any intervention that is going to be administered to study participants will be implemented. Data collection decisions interface closely with sampling decisions. For example, if a researcher is going to distribute a questionnaire to collect data, study participants must be able to read it! Cont. One quality control strategy in research is to conduct a pilot study. A pilot study is a “dress rehearsal” before the actual study begins. Pilot studies are helpful for detecting problems such as instructions or questionnaire items that can be misunderstood and for providing a chance to correct these problems before formal data collection procedures get under way. COLLECTING RESEARCH DATA During the actual data collection phase of a research study, all of the methodological decisions that have been made are implemented. Researchers expend great effort to ensure that data collection occurs in a consistent manner throughout the course of the study. Detailed data collection protocols or instructions and careful training of research assistants are strategies that can be used to ensure the consistency and integrity of data collection procedures. Cont. Reliability refers to the consistency of measures. Validity refers to the completeness and conceptual accuracy of measures The way in which reliability and validity are established depends on the data collection procedure being used and the nature of the data being collected. Conducting a pilot test allows a researcher to do a preliminary estimate of reliability and validity. ANALYZING RESEARCH DATA During the data analysis stage of the research process, the collected data are organized and analyzed to answer the research question(s) or test the study’s hypothesis. If a study has used a quantitative approach, data analysis involves the application of a variety of statistical procedures. Descriptive statistics are procedures that organize and summarize large volumes of data including measures of central tendency and measures of variability Cont. Measures of central tendency provide a single numerical value that denotes the “average” value for a variable. Measures of variability describe how values for a variable are dispersed or spread out. Cont. The use of inferential statistics allows researchers to test hypotheses about relationships between variables or differences between groups. Inferential statistics are particularly useful when a researcher wants to establish the effectiveness of an intervention. Cont. If results are statistically significant, it means that they are not likely to have occurred only by chance. The notion of statistical significance is linked to probability. By convention, probability (a p value) of less than .05 is considered to indicate statistical significance. A p value of .05 means that the observed statistical results are likely to occur solely by chance only 5% of the time. Cont. The CI indicates the range within which the true value lies, with a specific level of confidence. For example, if a study indicates that something occurs, on average, 2.5 times more often in one group than in another, with a 95% CI of 1.9–3.2, this means that there is a 95% likelihood that it occurs between 1.9 and 3.2 times more often. Cont. As long as zero does not fall within the CI, the findings are statistically significant. It is important to keep in mind that just because results are statistically significant does not automatically mean that they are clinically significant. Cont. If a research study uses a qualitative approach, data analysis involves searching for themes and patterns. This procedure is sometimes referred to as content analysis because the content of narrative materials is being analyzed. Qualitative researchers may synthesize their findings to develop a theory or conceptual framework of the phenomenon being studied COMMUNICATING RESEARCH FINDINGS Research findings must be made public if they are to become accessible and used to guide practice decisions. Research findings can be communicated through publication in journals or at conferences. Even small-scale research projects that are carried out in a clinical setting should be communicated. USING RESEARCH FINDINGS IN PRACTICE Before a study’s findings are used to guide practice, they should undergo three types of evaluation: scientific validation, comparative analysis, and cost–benefit appraisal. Scientific validation is a thorough critique of a study for its conceptual and methodological integrity. This means scrutinizing how the study was conceptualized, designed, and conducted in order to make a judgment about the overall quality of its findings. Cont. Comparative analysis involves assessing study findings for their implementation potential. Three factors are considered: (1) how the study’s findings compare to findings from other studies about the problem; (2) how the study’s findings will transfer from the research conditions to the clinical practice conditions in which they will be used; and (3) practical or feasibility considerations that need to be addressed when applying the findings in practice. Cont. Cost–benefit analysis involves consideration of the potential risks and benefits of both implementing a change based on a study’s findings and not implementing a change. Both immediate and delayed potential costs and benefits to clients, nursing staff, and the organization as a whole should be considered. Research-Related Roles and Responsibilities for Nurses RESEARCH CONSUMER LOCATING RESEARCH LITERATURE CRITIQUING RESEARCH REPORTS RESEARCH TEAM MEMBER PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF STUDY PARTICIPANTS Research-Related Roles and Responsibilities for Nurses In today’s EBP environment, all nurses, regardless of their educational preparation, need to be able to assume two research- related roles: that of research consumer and research team member. RESEARCH CONSUMER Being a research consumer means routinely searching and reading the current research literature in order to stay current with new insights in client experiences and nursing and medical interventions. Two skills are fundamental to this role: locating relevant literature and critiquing research reports. LOCATING RESEARCH LITERATURE CRITIQUING RESEARCH REPORTS In addition to locating research literature about current clinical topics and identified clinical problems, nurses must be able to critique or critically read and evaluate research articles. A research critique enables the nurse, as a research consumer, to determine whether the findings of a study are of sufficient quality to be used to influence practice decisions. Cont. A research critique involves dissecting a study to determine its strengths and weaknesses, statistical and clinical significance, and the generalizability and applicability of its results. Conducting an effective critique of a research study entails reading it several times. First, scan the article from start to finish getting a general sense of how the study was conducted. Next, focus on the results and discussion sections of the article. A key question that guides the research critique process is “Do the study findings and the researcher’s interpretation of these findings make sense in view of how the study was conducted?” Characteristics of an Ideal Study RESEARCH TEAM MEMBER This role is particularly important in hospitals that are seeking or wishing to maintain magnet recognition status. Nurses in hospitals with this designation are expected to be involved in research and EBP activities on an ongoing basis. Cont. Identifying clinically relevant problems that need to be studied Reviewing the literature to provide background information for a study Recruiting study participants Securing clients’ consent to participate in a study Designing data collection instruments Pilot-testing data collection procedures Collecting research data Monitoring for adverse effects of study participation Implementing research interventions Assisting with interpretation of study findings. PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF STUDY PARTICIPANTS Because nursing research usually involves humans, a major nursing responsibility is to be aware of and to advocate on behalf of clients’ rights. Before any research on humans can be started, the researcher must obtain approval from the relevant committee designated to protect human subjects’ rights. This includes research that does not require direct involvement of the person, only access to data about the client. This committee is often called the Institutional Review Board (IRB Cont. Cont. All nurses who practice in settings where research is being conducted with human subjects or who participate in such research play an important role in safeguarding the rights discussed next. Cont. RIGHT NOT TO BE HARMED RIGHT TO FULL DISCLOSURE RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION RIGHT TO PRIVACY Reference Berman, S., Snyder, S. J., & Frandsen, G. (2016). Kozier & Erb’s Fundamentals of Nursing: Concepts, Process, and Practice (10th Ed.). Boston:Pearson. pp. 26-36.