“I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.”
Socrates Creative thinking skills are considered one of the key competencies for the twenty-first century Creativity will allows us to remain flexible by providing us with the capacity to deal with the opportunities and challenges that are part of our complex and fast-changing world. (Reiter-Palmon, Mumford, & Threlfall, 1998) Creativity plays an important role in everyday problem solving (Cropley, 1990; Runco, 1994) Architectural design education is a highly sophisticated means of building creative problem solving abilities The complex and flexible nature architectural design education can be seen to accommodate three types of learning:
i. Learning about design (the development of knowledge)
ii. Learning to design (the development and application of skills) (Schon, 1984) iii. Learning to become an architect (the transformative pedagogy in which learning is identified as changing as a person) (Dutton, 1987) Architectural design education
Visual Expression + Verbal Expression
Unfortunately, visual expressions are often perceived as
a non-rational way of learning (Goldschmidt, 1994) and therefore classified to only play a secondary role in design education. Creative Skills vs. Cognitive Ability
i. Primary value is often attached to theory (verbal expression),
which focuses on developing cognitive abilities at the expense of creative skills ii. Educational preferences continue to be shaped by linear predictive models iii. Due to the highly prized theory within the university structure, more and more academics with high cognitive abilities (such as PhD holders) are being hired even when they have little or no creative skills This situation, according to Ayiran (2007) has estranged design education from its essential necessities (such as visual thinking) and deteriorates the balance between theory and praxis:
In architectural education, students tend to explain their project ideas
verbally instead of through visual mediums. However, architectural thoughts are primarily non-verbal thoughts
Therefore, more emphasis should be on verbal expression than on
visual expression in design education, because true creativity starts where language ends (Koestler, 1990) The major role of visual thinking is to solve design problems through visual representation of concept, as research shows that visual representation increases creativity during the design process (Goldschmidt, G., Smolkow, 2004) i. It is important to establish a balance between theory and praxis in curriculums
ii. Since the learning process in design studio requires
active participation, learning by creative self-discovery is essential
iii. It is also imperative to balance the academics in a
design institution with skilled staff (who are good in design skills) regardless of their educational levels Fostering Creativity in Design Education Robinson (1999) and Rutland and Spendlove (n.d.) suggests that when teaching for creativity educators should ensure the following:
i. Include broad and narrow experimental activities
ii. Encourage a positive attitude to imaginative activity and self-expression iii. Provide space for generative thought that is free from immediate criticism and discouragement iv. Encourage self-expression; v. Understand the phases of creative activity; vi. Be aware of the differing contexts for the development of ideas, the role of intuition, unconscious mental processes and non-directive creative thinking; vii. Encourage and stimulate free play with ideas, the use of imagination, originality, curiosity and questioning and free choice Conclusion
i. In architectural design, theory and praxis are interwoven,
which makes the boundary between them ambiguous ii. In order to redress the balance between theory and praxis in architectural design education, it is important to give primary role to visual expression and praxis by employing creative staff who can teach design skills and build visual thinking abilities in students.