Professional Documents
Culture Documents
H
MA.,PhD.,K-SET.,TET., Dip in Gandhi,
Ambedkar,Basava Studies.,B.Ed.
Faculty of MA-
School of
Rural Development and Panchayat Raj
Public Administration
Karnataka State Rural Development and
Panchayat Raj
University,Gadag
• What is mean by Society
• A society is a system which people live
together in organized communities having
shared customs, law, organization and living in
a particular region
• A Society can be understood as a social
system. As a social system has many parts
(family, religion, economy, science), that are
interdependent, giving the society a structure
• The term "society" which came from the Latin
word societas generally designates persons
belonging to a specific in-group.
• According to MacIver, “Society is a system of
usages and procedures, of authority and
mutual aid, of many groupings and divisions,
of controls of human behaviour and of
liberties. This ever-changing complex system
we call society. It is the web of social
relationships”.
• According to Giddings, “Society is the union
itself, the organisation, the sum of formal
relations in which associating individuals are
bound together”.
S RURAL SOCIETY MEANING AND
CHARTACTERSTICS
• INTRODUCTION
The term “rural society” is used almost
interchangeable with terms like ,villages,
countryside or folk society.
• F. S. Chapin
The sociology of rural life is a study of rural population, rural social
organization and the rural social processes operative in rural society.
T. L. Smith
“ Such sociological facts and principles as are derived from the study
of rural social relationships may be referred to as rural sociology.” —
A.R. Desai
The prime objective of rural sociology should be to make a scientific,
systematic and comprehensive study of the rural social organization
of its structure, functions and objective tendencies of development
and on the basis of such study, to discover the laws of its
development.” —
Sanderson
• "Rural sociology is the sociology of life in the rural
environment.” —
• Environmental crisis:
• Rural Sociology also deals with environmental decay and
erosion of ecology.
Importance and Significance of Rural Sociology:
• The practical value of the study of rural sociology is widely recognized today.
• It is with the help of rural sociology that it can be possible to find out what
are the causes of break-up of the self-sufficiency of the village community.
• Rural sociology presents a scientific picture of rural life.
Villages are important for many reasons because they are the
springs to feed urban areas. So rural sociology is an important
subject and can be put under the following head.
• In the year 1955, prominent village studies by famous sociologists were brought
out in India. It was suggested that there was a need of rural reconstruction and
welfare. Therefore community development programmes came into the scene.
Planning Commission has introduced several projects, land reforms, co-
operative movement, five-year plans, Panchayat Raj etc.
• These plans and programmes have contributed a lot towards the development of
rural sociology in India. Different sociologists have made their original
contributions in the field of rural sociology in India. Among them are Dr. D. N.
Majumdar, Prof. N. K. Bose, Prof. M.N. Srinivas, S. C. Dube etc. are the pioneers.
• Before independence, also, many studies were conducted
about village life in India.
• In 1926, Royal Commission on Agriculture was set up.
• World war time agrarian crisis and began to draw the
attention of the scholars towards rural India.
• George Keating’s and Harold Mann in Bombay,
• Gilbert Slater in Madras and
• E.V. Lucas in Punjab initiated intensive studies of particular
villages.
Structure and Functions of Rural Society: in
India
Rural Structure: The village is the unit of the rural society.
Every society has certain units.
It is these units that form the social set up or social structure.
These units are inter-related and through their study, it is possible
to study the behavior patterns of the society. particularly the
Indian Rural Society.
In Indian Rural Society, different villages are the units and they
have geographical, moral, traditional, different culture and other
types of structures.
For the proper study of the Indian Rural Society, the units that
from the social structure have to be studied.
• Units of Rural Social Structure:
we have just now seen that the villages form the units of the Rural Society.
These villages have their own structure and Functions
The structure formed out of the following units:-
SOCIAL
POLITICAL
ECONOMIC
RELIGIOUS
CULTURAL
EDUCATIONAL
CHANGING TRENDS IN RURAL FAMILY
Size of Rurality and size of community are Urbanity and size of community is
community not correlated positively correlated.
population. More Homogeneity (diversity) More Heterogeneity (more
diversity)
Culture 1. conservative and tradition Free from conservation and
bound tradition
2. Guided by superstitions and Free from superstitions and
age old customs. They do not customs. They are influenced by
accept importance of scientific the scientific inventions which
functions. bring about changes in every day
life
Social stratification 1. Has the traditional system of The society is divided into
(Hierarchy) stratifications. different strata on the basis
economic, social, political,
educational and other factor
2. Status is determined by birth Status is not determined by
But on the economic, social,
political, educational and oth
consideration.
3. Stratification is more or less It changes with the changes
static. It does not change values. (e.g) A person who is
now may become poor tomo
So the status shall change.
4. Difference between the high More
and low is less.
Social mobility (Moving Frwd) 1. Lack social mobility. People do Have a lot of social mobility
not change their place,
occupation, religion, political
view etc
2. Wards generally carries the Occupation of wards is not
occupation of parents and the necessary that of the parents
social status also thus remains
more or less same
3. Occupation is determined by Occupation differs according
tradition & customs
Systems of interaction 1. Less contact per man Numerous Contact
(Process) 2. Narrow area of interaction Wide area of contact
Social control 1. Informal because of size of More formal because of more laws
community
2. It is the primary institutions like Primary institutions have social
family & neighborhood that control. There are secondary
control life and the society institutions like economic and other
institutions that control social life.
Social change The process of social change takes Social change is fast because there is a
place at a very slow rate because of good deal of competition
little competition
Social 1. More tolerance because 1. Less More tolerance because
tolerance and a. People do not face the new People often face new situation
family situation
domination b. There is cultural uniformity b. Cultural Variety Seen
c. Lack of variety (Neither different c.Full of verities
castes nor religions)
2. Family is the most dominant 2. Apart from family other institution
institution like economy dominates
Status of 1. Inferior to men On par with men
women 2. Role confined to house Free to take part in out-door activities
3. Live with serious restrictions. On par with men enjoy a good deal of
They do not enjoy full freedom freedom
Neighborhood 1. Have important place Not important
environment 2. Rural life is based on co- People have fairly convenient life.
operation and mutual goodwill. People belong to different
That is why neighborhood is communities, castes and places and so
important no institutions like neighborhood is
Leaders Based on personal characters characters
More impersonal
Sense of Less
belongingness More
Agrarian Classes
• ‘Agrarian’ means anything related to land, its management or
distribution.
• Agricultural land is the single most important resource and
form of property in rural society. But it is not equally
distributed among people living in a particular village or
region.
• Agrarian refers to Structure or distribution of land holdings
and tenure system.
• Land is the most imp Productive resource in rural areas
• Land and caste are linked ,
• usually dominant and upper castes had control over the land.
Agrarian Class Structure
• Agrarian structure involves the social, economic and technical
elements that affect production in the agricultural sector.
These factors are used to measure the productivity level of
farmers, the distribution of their income and the social
position of the rural population.
ಕೃಷಿ ರಚನೆ. ... ಕೃಷಿ ರಚನೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಕೃಷಿ ಕ್ಷೇತ್ರದ ಉತ್ಪಾದನೆಯ ಮೇಲೆ ಪರಿಣಾಮ ಬೀರುವ
ಸಾಮಾಜಿಕ, ಆರ್ಥಿಕ ಮತ್ತು ತಾಂತ್ರಿಕ ಅಂಶಗಳನ್ನು ಒಳಗೊಂಡಿರುತ್ತದೆ. ರೈತರ ಉತ್ಪಾದಕತೆಯ
ಮಟ್ಟ, ಅವರ ಆದಾಯದ ಹಂಚಿಕೆ ಮತ್ತು ಗ್ರಾಮೀಣ ಜನಸಂಖ್ಯೆಯ ಸಾಮಾಜಿಕ ಸ್ಥಾನವನ್ನು ಅಳೆಯಲು
ಈ ಅಂಶಗಳನ್ನು ಬಳಸಲಾಗುತ್ತದೆ.
Why India is called agrarian country?
(1) that there is a wide gap between land-reform ideology and actual measures
introduced for land reforms. Consequently, socialist transformation in the class
structure of the villages has not taken place;
(2) this lag could partly be explained by the class character of the Indian political
and administrative elites, who are resistant to the needed radical reforms;
(3) the existing land-reforms have initiated a process by which the security of
tenure and economic prosperity of the rich peasantry ha s increased but
condition of the small peasants both in respect of economic level and tenurial
stability ha s deteriorated;
(4) the feudalistic and customary types of tenancy have declined and it ha s been
replaced by a capitalistic form of lease-labour or wage labour agrarian system;
(5) a new class of rich middlestratum of peasantry has come into being and not
all of them are from among the ex-zamindars;
(6) the class inequalities between the top and the bottom
levels of the classes have increased rather than decreased;
(7) the benefits of land-reforms have so far not gone as much
to the agricultural workers or even as to ex-zamindars as to
the emergent middle peasantry;
(8) as a result of these contradictions in the agrarian class
structure, the tensions in the rural social system have
increased; and
(9) the sociological process dominant in the current class
transformations in the villages involves 'proletarianization'
of many social stratification.
• Agrarian means relating to the ownership and use of
land, especially farmland, or relating to the part of a society
or economy that is concerned with agriculture.
• Agrarian Class Structure. ... Agrarian
structure involves the social, economic and
technical elements that affect production in
the agricultural sector.
• These factors are used to measure the
productivity level of farmers, the distribution
of their income and the social position of the
rural population
Is India an agrarian economy?
• Tax from the land was a major source of revenue for the kings
and emperors from ancient times.
But the ownership pattern of land had witnessed changes
over centuries.
• During Kingship, land was divided into Jagirs, Jagirs were
allotted to Jagirdars, these Jagirdars split the land they got
and allocated to sub-ordinate Zamindars. Zamindars
• Land Revenue Systems in British India :
• Three major systems of land revenue collection existed in India. They
were – Zaminidari, Ryotwari and Mahalwari.
• Zamindari System
• Zamindari System was introduced by Cornwallis in 1793 through
Permanent Settlement Act.
• It was introduced in provinces of Bengal, Bihar, Orissa and Varanasi.
• Also known as Permanent Settlement System.
• Zamindars were recognized as owner of the lands. Zamindars were
given the rights to collect the rent from the peasants.
• The realized amount would be divided into 11 parts. 1/11 of the share
belongs to Zamindars and 10/11 of the share belongs to East India
• Land Revenue Systems in British India :
• Three major systems of land revenue collection existed in India. They
were – Zaminidari, Ryotwari and Mahalwari.
• Zamindari System
• Zamindari System was introduced by Cornwallis in 1793 through
Permanent Settlement Act.
• It was introduced in provinces of Bengal, Bihar, Orissa and Varanasi.
• Also known as Permanent Settlement System.
• Zamindars were recognized as owner of the lands. Zamindars were given
the rights to collect the rent from the peasants.
• The realized amount would be divided into 11 parts. 1/11 of the share
belongs to Zamindars and 10/11 of the share belongs to East India
Company.
• Ryotwari System
• Ryotwari System was introduced by Thomas Munro in
1820.
• Major areas of introduction include Madras, Bombay,
parts of Assam and Coorgh provinces of British India.
• In Ryotwari System the ownership rights were handed
over to the peasants. British Government collected
taxes directly from the peasants.
• The revenue rates of Ryotwari System were 50% where
the lands were dry and 60% in irrigated land.
• Mahalwari System
• Mahalwari system was introduced in 1833 during the period of
William Bentick.
• It was introduced in Central Province, North-West Frontier, Agra,
Punjab, Gangetic Valley, etc of British India.
• The Mahalwari system had many provisions of both the Zamindari
System and Ryotwari System.
• In this system, the land was divided into Mahals. Each Mahal
comprises one or more villages.
• Ownership rights were vested with the peasants.
• The villages committee was held responsible for collection of the
taxes.
• I. Abolition of Intermediaries:
• Before the attainment of independence we
had four tenancy systems in the country.
• 1. Ryotwari system
• 2. Mahalwari system
• 3. Zainindari system
• 4, Jagirdari system
The Ryotwari System:
This system was introduced by Sir Thomas Munro in 1792. Under this system, the
responsibility of paying land revenue to the Government was of the proprietor, who is
the registered holder of the land.
There was no intermediary between him and the state. He was at liberty to sublet his
property or to transfer it by gift, sale or mortgage.
He could not be ejected from his land till he paid the revenue.
Advantages of Ryotwari System:
1. The system was successful in abolishing intermediaries.
2. The proprietor of the land took all interest for improving the land and its other related
facilities, for example, irrigation facilities.
Drawback of the System:
In Ryotwari system the land was sublet to the landless peasants. In the long run the
ryotwari system created a group of peasants who were subordinate to the proprietor
of the land. The ryotwari system was abolished by the land reform measures.
• 2. Mahalwari System:
This was introduced by the then Viceroy Lord William
Bentinck during British rule.
It was first started in Agra and Oudh and was later on
extended to Punjab.
It is the system, by which the land belonged to a small
group of families who were usually the most
powerful in their region and who were responsible
for paying rent to the state.
• Under the mahalwari system, the land ultimately belonged to the
state. The land belonging to the state was held by mahals (i.e.
villages or village communities) and not by individuals.
• According to the congress land reforms committee, the
ownership of land under this system was collective. Period of
‘settlement’, fixation of the land revenue etc. were different in
different mahalwari areas.
• This mahalwari system also came to an end soon after
independence. Today it is not at all found in north India.
• The greatest drawback of the Mehalwari system was that
through the presence of certain intermediaries it contributed to
the presence of absentee landlords.
• 3. Zamindari System:
• This system prevailed in Bengal, UP, Bombay
presidency and Tamilnadu.
• The Zamindari system was created by Lord
Cornwallis who entered into “Permanent
Settlement” with the landlords in 1793, with a view
to increase the revenue of the East India Company.
• Zamindari means normally a non-cultivating
landlord.
• Main Defects of Zamindari System:
1. The zamindars did not take interest in the improvement of land or cultivation. They
concentrated their attention in collecting revenue. That’s why quality of cultivation suffered.
2. It creates the problem of Absentee-Landlordism. This means, tills system created a unique
agrarian structure in the villages, which conferred a right of the sharing the produce of the
land on a few without participating personally in the productive process. It means it gave rise
to what is known as “absentee landlordism”. This problem resulted in the decay of the
agriculture.
3. The zamindari system was based on exploitation. The zamindars were conferred unlimited
rights to extract as much rent as they wished.
4. This system also suffers from the problem of sub-renting. The zamindars subdivided the land
and rented it out to other small zamindars, who failed to give rent to the main zamindars. The
ultimate result was the reduction in the number of actual cultivators possessing occupancy
rights.
5. This system led to a mass litigation and agrarian discontentment.
6. This system has created a kind of insecurity in the minds of the cultivators.
7. Farmers lost interests in the land.
The independent Indian Government after realising the evil consequences of zamindari system
abolished it.
• 4. Jagirdari System:
• This system was found mainly in the former princely states of
Rajasthan.
• Under this system jagirs were granted to certain military
commanders, ministers and courtiers who took revenue for their
own support or for the military force which they were obliged to
maintain.
• This system thus created a class of unproductive mass of people
by granting them jagir lands.
• The Rajasthan Jagir Abolition Act was passed in 1952 and
implemented in the year 1954. This put an end to Jagirdari
Tenancy system in Rajasthan.
II. Tenancy Reforms:
The state governments were forced to enact tenancy legislations in order to
remove the evils of the tenancy system.
The tenants of India are divided into three categories:
1. Permanent or occupancy tenant.
2. Temporary or non-occupancy tenant.
3. Sub-tenants.
Occupancy or permanent tenants enjoy permanent rights like the owner. They
do not face the fear of eviction as long as they pay rent on time. The non-
occupancy or temporary tenant and sub-tenants are in a precarious condition.
Their very existence depends on the mercy of landlords. They can be evicted
from land on minor pretexts. They do not make any improvement on the land
for the fear of eviction.
• Legislation for security of tenure had three essential aims:
1. Tenants cannot be evicted without any reason. They can be evicted in accordance with
the laws. Land may be resumed by an owner on the ground of personal cultivation only.
In the event of resumption, the tenant is assured of a prescribed minimum area.
Security of tenure creates interest among the cultivators for improving their land.
The basic objectives are:
1. Increase in productivity.
2. Promotion of social justice.
However, tenancy legislations in India are not uniform throughout the country. It varies
from state to state.
Right of Ownership:
Some states have passed the legislations to confer the right of ownership on the tenants.
Under the tenancy law, the tenants could acquire the ownership of the lands, which
they have been cultivating by paying some amounts. This is conferment of ownership
rights.
• III. Ceilings on Land Holdings:
• Ceilings on Land Holdings mean the fixation of maximum limit (Ceiling
Limit) on the individual land holdings. Land ceiling is one of the
measures to take away surplus land from those who cross the limit of
land possession beyond a contain point.
• In January 1959, at the Nagpur conference of the Indian National
Congress, It was resolved that agrarian legislation to cover restrictions on
the size of land holdings must be implemented in all states by the end of
1959.
• The idea was to reduce the extent of Inequality in the ownership of land.
Moreover, land being in limited supply as compared to the demand for it,
the producer of the land, its proper rationing and distribution was
considered highly conducive in agricultural growth and employment.
• Failure of Land Ceiling:
• Several factors are responsible:
• These are:
• 1. Illegal transfer of land.
• 2. Judicial interventions.
• 3. Inefficient administration.
• 4. Political pressure.
• 5. Non-availability of land records.
• 6. Loopholes in ceiling laws.
• IV. Consolidation of Land Holdings:
It means bringing together the various small
plots of land of a farmer scattered all over I he
village as one compact block.
It is through purchase or exchange of land with
others. This measure is designed to solve the
problem of fragmentation of land holdings.
Advantages of Consolidation of Land Holdings:
1. It prevents the endless subdivision and fragmentation of land holdings.
2. It saves the time and labour of a farmer, since all his lands are brought
together, as one compact block.
3. It encourages improvement on land, in the form of building, fencing etc.
4. It promotes for mechanisation and large-scale cultivation.
5. It is very much helpful in irrigation.
6. It lowered down the cost of cultivation.
7. It reduces litigation among farmers.
Though consolidation of land holdings is a very useful instrument in solves
the problem of fragmentation, the task is not completely accomplished
unless laws are passed to prevent fragmentation in future.
• V. Compilation and Updating of Land Records:
• Compilation and updating of the land records are an essential condition for
the effective implementation of land reforms programme.
Land records include:
(a) the survey number of the land.
(b) the total size of the land.
(c) the name of Its owner.
(d) information regarding Irrigation facility.
(e) the level of fertility of land.
(f) the types of crops raised in the land.
In India, most of the farmers do not have proper records in this Regard. In
government offices also proper records are not maintained. In recent years,
efforts are being made to maintain the land records through computerization.
• VI. Co-Operative Farming:
• It constitutes one of the aspects of land reforms. It has
been advocated to solve the problems of sub-division
and fragmentation of holdings.
• In this system, farmers pool their small holdings for
the purpose of cultivation and reap benefits of large
scale farming.
• Here the farmers retain their ownership right on their
land and are free to withdraw their membership at
anytime.
• Co-operative farming was proposed for India due to the
following causes:
1. It solves the problem of fragmentation of land holding.
2. It would facilitate extensive agriculture, scientific fanning,
adopting new potential technologies, mechanization of
agriculture etc.
3. It contributes to higher agricultural productivity and
production.
4. It provides more income to the farmers and raises their
standard of living.
Land (including all natural resources)
Labor (including all human resources)
Capital (including all man-made resources)
Enterprise (which brings all the previous resources together for production).
Production
Simple term of Production means Creation of value in the goods.
The means of production of a society include all of the physical elements,
aside from human beings, which go into producing goods and services,
A mode of production is the relationship between the relations of
production and the forces of production. Modes of production can be
distinguished from one another by different relationships between the
forces and relations of production.
Relations of Production
• Refer to social relationships that arise directly out of the process of
production. These social relationships include the relationships
between the owners and non-owners of the means of production.
These relationships decide and even determine the control and the
capacity to possess the product
1. Land Relations and Contradictions.
While a large number of really weak tenants have lost whatever security
they had, the dominant class is extending its operational control on
land through leasing in.
Even if concentration in ownership declines, concentration in operational
holdings need not. In fact, the latter concentration is tending to be
larger than the former.
2. Income level and Rural Class Configuration.
Basically rural areas are very less developed as compared to urban areas
in terms of social, cultural and economic aspects. Lifestyle of an
individual’s are widely depended on their economic status.
Even within a small village, different types of economic classes are found.
3. Peasantry and Landless Agricultural Workers.
1) The Landlord: A landlord is a person who owns land, does not engage in labor himself, or
does so only to a very small extent, and lives by exploiting the peasants.
The collection of land rent is his main form of exploitation; in addition, he may lend money,
hire labor, or engage in industry or commerce. But his exaction of land rent from the
peasants is his principal form of exploitation.
2) The Rich Peasant: The rich peasant as a rule owns land. But some rich peasants own
only part of their land and rent the remainder. Others have no land of their own at all
and rent all their land.
The rich peasant generally has rather more and better instruments of production and
more engages in labor himself, but always relies on exploitation for part or even the
major part of his income.
A person who owns a fair amount of good land, farms some of it himself without hiring
labor, but exploits other peasants by means of land rent, loan interest or in other ways,
shall also be treated as rich peasant.
3) The Middle Peasant: Many middle peasants own land. Some
own part of their land and rent the rest. Others own no land
of their own at all and rent all their land.
All of them have a fair number of farm implements. A middle
peasant derives his income wholly or mainly from his own
labor.
As a rule he does not exploit others and in many cases he
himself is exploited by others, having to pay a small amount in
land rent and in interest on loans. But generally he does not
sell his labor power.
4) The Poor Peasant: Among the poor peasants some own part
of their land and have a few odd farm implements, others
own no land at all but only a few odd farm implements.
As a rule poor peasants have to rent the land they work on and
are subjected to exploitation, having to pay land rent and
interest on loans and to hire themselves out to some extent.
In general, a middle peasant does not need to sell his labor
power, while the poor peasant has to sell part of his labor
power.
This is the principal criterion for distinguishing between middle
and a poor peasant.
5) The Worker:
The worker (including the farm laborer) as a rule owns no land
or farm implements, though some do own a very small
amount of land and very few farm implements. Workers make
their living wholly or mainly by selling their labor power
4. Production Conditions ·in Agriculture.
Physical Factors, Agriculture depends to a great extent on the physical factors of natural
environment.
Climate Like other parts of Assam, the climate of the district is characteristically monsoonal with
changing season. The high temperatures being experienced during the south-west monsoon
season along with abundant rains and highly humid atmosphere throughout the year.
Flood Like the most parts of Assam, the district of Darrang too is chronically a flood affected area.
Droughts are little known in the district while widespread flood has become a regular
phenomenon here.
Soil Erosion Soil erosion is an important inhibitory physical factors faced by the farmers
Socio-Economic Factors In addition to the physical factors, agricultural land use, cropping pattern
and agricultural processes
Size of Land Holdings Efficiency of agricultural operation depends to a large extent on the
possession and size of landholding of the peasants.
Land Revenue System formed part of different kingdoms at different periods of time and its real
history as a geographical unit began in 1615
5. Public Expenditure Policy, Rural Employment and Poverty.
Indirect social impacts include improvement in the quality
and quantity of public services; and improved
governance through more transparent, and accountable
management of public resources.
Rural development is an important cross–sectoral area
including rural infrastructure; water supply and
sanitation; rural finance and credit; natural resource
management; agricultural health and education
development; and decentralization.
6. Correlation between Class and Caste.
As a form of stratification, the caste is peculiar to the Indian society. It may be called as
an extreme form of closed class system. The status of individuals in the social
hierarchy is determined by birth.
Every society classifies its population into different segments on the basis of
occupation, wealth or education, which are considered predominant
characteristics of class. Persons belonging to particular segment of society are
pronounced as a separate class.
Factors Contributing to the Unity of India:
Geographical unity:
Religious Unity:
Cultural Unity
Political Unity:
Emotional Unity: etc…..
7) Credit and Indebtedness
The rural people incur debts for nonproductive purposes such as to meet the family
needs, perform social functions (related to marriages, birth, death), litigation, etc.
Since money taken does not contribute to production but instead to consumption,
it drags the rural people into indebtedness.
Causes of Indebtedness:
Poverty:
Poverty is perhaps a major cause for rural indebtedness. The low level of rural
incomes, the uncertain and primitive farming of small landholdings makes it
impossible to meet the needs required for their living. Often, the rural people
take debts to meet these needs.
Social and Religious Needs:
Villagers are mostly bound by the social traditions and customs, which are considered
to be sacred and had to be performed. Some of these ceremonies are marriage,
births, deaths, religious occasions, etc.
• Litigation:
• Generally, the agriculturists in India are involved in various kinds of
disputes related to land, property, etc., which force them to go to a court
of law. Often, they view it important to win the case as it is related to the
family prestige and honour. Such litigations involve heavy expenditure
and time. In order to meet these needs, the agriculturists take loans that
they are not able to repay and are caught into indebtedness.
• Backwardness of Agriculture:
• Indian agriculture is an uncertain business. It virtually depends on
unreliable rains for the supply of water. If there are no rains or untimely
rains, the entire crop is lost and the credit invested in the agriculture goes
waste. As a result, the loan taken for the productive purposes also
becomes a burden, leading to indebtedness of the farmers.
Excessive Burden of Land Revenue and Rent:
Land revenue, where it is levied by the government in some states and the rent payable
to the landowners is becoming excessive burden on small farmers. In order to pay
these land revenue, mid-rent, the farmers take loan. Sometimes, the farmers have to
pay these rents and land revenues even during the floods and drought. This make the
farmers run into debts.
Defective Money Lending System:
The village money lending system is very much defective. The sole aim of the money
lenders is to extract the maximum from the farmers. The moneylenders make wrong
entries in their account books, charge very high interest rates and extract high prices
for the goods they sell to the farmers but purchase the farmers produce at very low
prices.
In course of time, as the amount debt increases, the moneylenders are much interested
in seizing the farmers lands, and other valuable assets than the debt being repaid by
the farmers. Thus, the farmers are trapped in the hands of the moneylenders.
• Consequences of Indebtedness:
• There are many economic and non-economic consequences, which are
caused by rural indebtedness. They are categorized into economic, social
and political consequences. Let us have a look at them in detail.
Economic Consequences:
Social Consequences:
Political Consequences:
Measures for the Removal of Indebtedness:
The problem of indebtedness can be solved by two means. The first is to take up measure to reduce the
burden of present indebtedness and the second is to prevent the evil from rising again in the future.
To reduce the present burden of indebtedness, the following measures have to be taken:
1. Canceling all the debts paid to the moneylenders by the farmers, which are more than the principal
amount itself, debts which are already been repaid but still stand in the account books of the
moneylenders, debts that are created by the moneylenders by fraud, loans for which repayments
have been received in the form of money, produce and other services like labour from the indebted
farmers.
2. Debts should be properly scaled down. According to law, the inheritors are liable to pay the debts
only to the extent they have inherited. In this way, most of the debts will be reduced. Debts that are
so excessive and standing are since a long time, should be settled between the concerned parties or
through the village panchayats. Debts, which do not have records or exist with incomplete records,
should also be reduced.
3. Apart from the above two steps, the remaining part of the debts should be handled by special
institutions such as banks. Such banks pay the amount to the moneylenders on one hand and recover
the same from the debtors on easy terms.
These banks also collect funds and provide credit facilities to their members.
To control the problem of indebtedness in future, the following steps are recommended:
1. The income of the farmers should increase so that they could meet the unproductive expenses
and are not forced to take any loan.
In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary that agriculture should be conducted on scientific
basis not depending totally on the natural climatic factors. Some other measures have also been
undertaken such as the introduction of land reforms providing market for the agricultural
produce, etc.
2. The panchayats and such other village level institutions should try to solve the village disputes
and try to prevent them from going to the courts of law, which need heavy expenditure.
3. Information regarding the laws and their implementation should be given to the villagers so
that they do not get into the clutches of the moneylenders for generations.
4. Adequate credit facilities on reasonable terms should be arranged to the farmers. Co-operative
credit is a good solution in this regard. Private lending should be eliminated in this field.
The above-mentioned two types of measures should be carried on simultaneously. Mere
prevention without any preventive measures for future would not help the situation; moreover,
there is every possibility of this evil to rise again and again. Thus, both these measures should
go hand in hand so that the problem of rural indebtedness vanishes completely.
• Peasant movement is a social movement involved with
the agricultural policy
• Peasant movements have a long history that can be traced to the
numerous peasant uprisings that occurred in various regions of the
world throughout human history.
• Early peasant movements were usually the result of stresses in
the feudal and semi feudal societies, and resulted in violent uprisings.
• More recent movements, fitting the definitions of social movements,
are usually much less violent, and their demands are centered on
better prices for agricultural produce, better wages and working
conditions for the agricultural laborers, and increasing the agricultural
production.
• The economic policies of British adversely affected the Indian
peasants the British Govt. used to protect the landlords and
money lenders. they exploited the peasants.
• The peasants rose in revolt against this injustice on many
occasions .
• The peasants in Bengal formed their union and revolted against
the compulsion of cultivating indigo.
• Anthony Pereira, a political scientist, has defined a peasant
movement as a
"social movement made up of peasants (small landholders or farm
workers on large farms), usually inspired by the goal of improving
the situation of peasants in a nation or territory
A few representing agrarian unrest
1. Caste is Innate::
Its first distinguishing feature is its absolute rigidity and
immobility. A man dies in the same caste in which he is born
and it is the caste that determines his status in life.