Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Early
Early middle
middle ages
ages
GROUP
GROUP 2
2
MEMBERS :
RIZKAWATI SAIFUDIN
WIDYANTI FACHRANI
WIDIA HANDAYANI GAI
WANANDA BERLIAN SEKARNINGRUM
LUSIANA
HABIBA PUTRI ABDILAH
RIFDA CAHYU JABIR
CHAPTER 4 : CONQUEST AND FEUDAL RULE
William organized his English kingdom according to the feudal system which had
already begun to develop in England before his arrival. The word “feudalism”
comes from France word, feu, which the Normans used to refer to land held in
return for duty or service to a lord. The basis of feudal society was the holding
of land, and it’s main purpose was economic. The central idea was that all land
was owned by the king but it was held by others, called “vassals”, in return for
service and goods. The king gave large estate to his main nobles in return for a
promise to serve him in war for up to forty days.
There were two basic principals to feudalism: every man had a lord, and every lord had land. The
king was connected through this “chain” of people to the lowest man in the country. At each level a
man had to promise loyalty and service to his lord.
When a noble died his son usually took over his estate. But first he had to receive permission from
the king and make a special payment. If he was still a child the king would often take the produce
of the state until the boy was old enough to look after the estate himself. If all the nobles family
died the land went back to the king, would be expected to give it to another deserving noble.
But the king often kept the land for some years, using it’s wealth,
before giving it to another noble.
If the king did not give the nobles land they would not fight for
him. Between 1066 and the mid-fourteenth century there were only
thirty years of complete peace. So feudal duties were extremely
important. The king had to make sure he had enough satisfied
nobles who would be willing to fight for him.
William gave out land all over England to his nobles. By 1086 he
wanted to know exactly who owned which piece of land, and how
much it was worth. He needed this information so that he could plan
his economy, find out how much was produced and how much he
could ask in tax.
• Kingship : a family bussiness
To understand the idea of kingship and lordship in the early middle
ages it this important to realise that at this time there was tittle
or no idea of nationalism. When william died, in 1087, he left the
Duchy of Normandy to his elder son, Robert. William Rufus died in
a hunting accident in 1100, shut dead by an arrow. The Norman
nobles in England had to choose between Henry and Robert. In the
end they chose Henry because he was in London, with the crown
already on his head. Henry I’s most important Iam was to pass on
both Normandy and England to his successor. His pan the rest of
his life fighting to keep Normandy from other French nobles who
tired to take it.
During the next fiftheenth years Henry hoped for another son
but finally excepted that his daugther, Matilda, whould follow
him. At the time both the possible heirs to Henry were on there
own estate. Matilda was with her husband in Anjou and Henry’s
nephew, stephen of Blois, was in Boulogne, only a day’s journey by
see from England. Henry II was rule of far more land than any
pervious king.
•Magna Carta and the decline of feudalsm
his new agreement was known as “Magna Carta”, the
Great Carter and was an important symbol of political freedom.
Magna Carta marks a clear stage in collabs of English feudalism.
Feudal sociaty was based on links between lord and vassal. At
runymede the nobles were not acting as vassals but as a class.
They a established a committee of twenty- four lords to make
sure John kept his promises. That was not “feudal” thing to do.
In adition. The nobles were acting in co-operation with the
merchant class of towns. The nobles did not allow John’s
successors to forget this carter and it promises. There were
other small sigens that feudalism was changing. When the king
went to war he had the right to fourty days’ fighting service
from each of his lords.
CHAPTER 5 : THE POWER OF THE KING OF ENGLAND
King John had signed Magna Carta unwillingly, and John died
suddenly in 1216. John's son , Henry Ill , was only nine years
old. During the first sixteen years as king he was under the
control of powerful nobles, and tied by Magna Carta. Henry was
finally able to rule for him self at the age of twenty-five. It
was understandable that he wanted to be completely
independent of the people. who had controlled his life for so
long. When Henry died in 1272 his son Edward I took the
throne without question.
Several kings had made arrangements for taxation before,
but Edward I was the first to create a "representative
institution" which could provide the money he needed.
•Dealing with the celts
Most important of all, the officials in westminster had to watch the economy of the country carefully. It is not
surprising, either, that the administration began to grow very quicky. When wiliam I invaded britain he needed only a few
clerks to manage his paperwork.
•Law and justice
The king, of course was responsible for law justice. But king’s usually had to leave the administration
of this important matter to someone who lived close to the place where a crime was committed .Henry
I introduced the idea that all crimes ,even those inside the family ,were no longer only a family matter
but a breaking of the “king’s peace”. at first the king’s judges had no special knowledge or training .
The church at local village level was significantly different from the politically powerful
organisation the king had to deal with. In many places the lord continued to choose the local priest,
and to have more influence over him than the more distant Church authorities were able to have. In
this it was more successful, and by the end of the thirteenth century married priests were unusual.
There were probably between I.5 and 2 million people living in England in 1066. It also tells us that 80 per cent of the land used for
farming at the beginning of the twentieth century was already being ploughed in 1086. Life in the countryside was hard. Most of the
population still lived in villages in southern and eastern parts of England and they lived in the simplest houses. The poor were divided
from their masters by the feudal class system. The basis of this "manorial system" was the exchange of land for labour. The
landlord expected the villagers to work a fixed number of days on his own land, the "home farm". Over three-quarters of the
country people were serfs.T hey were not free to leave their lord's service or his land without permission. Even if they wanted to
run away, there was nowhere to run to.
Anyway, a serf's life, under his lord's protection, was better than the life of an unprotected wanderer. Order
and protection, no matter how hard life might be, was always better than disorder, when people would starve.
The manorial system was not the same all over the country, and it did not stay the same throughout the Middle
Ages. The manorial system is often thought to be Norman, but in fact it had been growing slowly throughout the
Anglo-Saxon period. The Normans inherited the system and developed it to its fullest extent. But the Normans
were blamed for the bad aspects of the manorial system because they were foreign masters. Most landlords
obtained their income directly from the home farm, and also from letting out some of their land in return for
rent in crops or money.
• The growth of towns as centres of wealth
England was to very large degree an agricultural society.Even in towns and cities , many
of those involved in trade or industry also farmed small holddings of land on the edge of
town .In this sence England was self- sefficient. However , througthout the middle ages
England needed things from abroad,such as salt and spices.
The growth of literacy in England was closely connected with the twelfth-century Renaissance, a cultural movement which had first started in Italy. Its
influence moved northwards along the trade routes, reaching England at the end of the century. This revolution in ideas and learning brought a new
desire to test religious faith against reason. Schools of learning were established in many towns and cities. Some were "grammar" schools independent
of the Church, while others were attached to a cathedral. All of these schools taught Latin, because most books were written in this language. Although
it may seem strange for education to be based on a dead language, Latin was important because it was the educated language of almost all Europe, and
was therefore useful in the spread of ideas and learning. In spite of the dangers, the Church took a lead in the new intellectual movement.
In England two schools of higher learning were
established, the first at Oxford and the second at
Cambridge, at the end of the twelfth century. By the
1220s these two universities were the intellectual
leaders of the country.
IN THE EARLY MIDDLE
AGES THERE WAS LITTLE
OR NO IDEA OF
NATIONALSM. HOW CAN
YOU PROVE THIS FACT BY
REFERRING TO WILLIAM
RULE?
Apa motif penaklukan
norman ?