Menulis Artikel di Jurnal

Internasional
Bevaola Kusumasari, PhD
Scopus ID: 36460064500
Orchid ID: 0000 0003 3784 4904
H-Index Scopus: 4
H Index Google Scholar: 6
 Kalau mau
mengenal dunia,
membacalah
Kalau mau dikenal dunia,
menulislah
 Pengalaman Menulis
Judul Artikel
1. Resource Capability for Local Government
in Managing Disaster
(selected for inclusion in Emerald Reading
‘ListAssist’ under the topics of ‘Humanitarian
Logistics’)
2. Network Organisation in Supporting post-
disaster management in Indonesia
3. Local Wisdom-Based Disaster Recovery
Model in Indonesia
4. Bridging the Gaps: the role of local
government capability and the management
of a natural disaster in Bantul, Indonesia
5. Civic Engagement: Connecting Adolescents’
Voice through Social Media and the
Implications for Government Policy-Making
Nama Jurnal
Internasional Journal of Disaster
Prevention and Management Volume
19, No. 4, Tahun 2010
International Journal of Emergency
Services Volume 1 No. 1, Tahun 2012
Internasional Journal of Disaster
Prevention and Management Vol.21
No.3, 2012
Natural Hazards Volume 60 No. 2
Tahun 2012
The Asian Review of Public
Administration Vol. 24 Issue 1-2,
January-December 2013
 Judul Artikel
6. Local Government Capability in
Managing Disaster: Evidence from Bantul,
Indonesia
7. Women Adaptive Capacity in Post
Disaster Recovery in Indonesia
8. Policy Evaluation on the Worst Forms of The Social Sciences Vol. 11 Issue 5 Tahun
Child Labour in Indonesia: Why Does It
Matter?
9. The Business Model of Social
Entrepreneurship in Indonesia
10. Climate Change and Agricultural
Adaptation in Indonesia
11. Digital Democracy and Public
Administration Reform in Indonesia
12. Strengthening the Effectiveness of
Whistleblowing System
A Study for the Implementation of Anti-
Corruption Policy in Indonesia
Nama Jurnal
Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate
Change Adaptation: Case Studies from
South and Southeast Asia (Vol. 14). Bonn:
SOURCE
Asian Social Science Vol.11 No.12 Tahun
2015
2016
Jurnal Bisnis dan Birokrasi Vol.22 (3)
Tahun 2015
Mimbar Vol. 32 No.2 Tahun 2016
International Journal of Electronic
Governance Vol.10 No.3 Tahun 2018
Journal of Financial Crime Volume 25,
Issue 1 Tahun 2018
 Judul Artikel Nama Jurnal
13. Application of The Resource Journal of Comparative Asian
Mobilization Theory in Indonesia’s Development, Vol.17 No.2, 2018
Environmental Movements

14. Women Workers Resistance Against Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan 9(1), 27-55
Elite Class Hegemony in Indonesia Tahun 2018

15. A Study on Digital Democracy Practice: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Vol. 22 (1)
Opportunities and Challenges of e-Health Tahun 2018
Implementation in Indonesia

16.Revisiting Understanding of the Policy and Governance Review 1 (3), 165-

Whistleblowing Concept in the Context of
Indonesia
17.Walking the Talk on Social Equity: A Call
for Advancing the Fourth Pillar of Public
Administration
177 Tahun 2017
International Journal of Administrative
Science and Organization, Bisnis &
Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan
Organisasi Vol. 25(2), 2018
Judul Artikel Nama Jurnal
18. Humanizing or Dividing? Management Research and Practice Vol. 10 Issue 4,
The Challenge of Digital Democracy Implementation 2018
in Indonesia
19. Building Network Concept In Contemporary Public Administration Issue, Special Issue 1, 2019
Public Administration
20. Natural Hazards Governance in Indonesia Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard
Science, 2019
21. The Dynamics of Social Network Structures and Policy & Governance Review
Contestation in the Collaborative Management of Volume 2 Issue 3, Tahun 2018
Lake Tempe in South Sulawesi
22. Socio-Cultural Dynamic of Resilience Building: Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik Vol. 23 (1),
Lesson Learned from Sleman, Indonesia 2019
23. Why would whistleblowers dare to reveal International Journal of Law and Management 61 (3),
wrongdoings? An ethical challenge and dilemma for 2019
organisations
24. Unpacking Actor Intervention in Influencing Jurnal Borneo Administrator 15 (2), 2019
Environmental Policy Formulation: The Case of
Shrimp Farm Relocation Policy in Yogyakarta
25. Key Elements of Environmental Justice in the Jurnal Politik Vol 5 No. 1 Tahun 2019
Geothermal Power Plant Resistance Movement
26. What Shapes Public Sector Innovation? Public Policy and Administration Vol 18 No. 4 Tahun
2019
 Co-Writings with Students
(Under-review)
Judul Artikel Nama Jurnal
Network Structure and Collaborative Management Journal of Environmental Science and Management
in Natural Resource and Environmental
Management: A Review of the Literature
(Said-S3 AP)
Linking Indigenous Collaborative International Journal of Social Economics
Governance and Decision-Making
Process in the Context of Bali Customary
Governance
Scrapping Social Media Data for Disaster Natural Hazards
Communication:
How the pattern of twitter users affecting in Asia and
the Pacific Disasters

Understanding Policy Advocacy in Shaping Role of Journal Environmental Planning and Management
Actors through Social Networks Analysis: The Case of
#SawitBaik
 Editor
• Editor in Chief: Policy and Governance Review
by Indonesian Association of Public
Administration
• Former editor in Jurnal Sosial dan Politik,
FISIPOL UGM
 International Reviewer
• International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
• Child Abuse and Neglect by Elsevier
• British Journal of Education, Society and Behavioral
Science
• International Journal of Tropical Disease and
Health
• Journal of Basic and Applied Research International
• International Review of Social Sciences and
Humanities
• Disasters
• Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and
Society
 National Reviewer
• Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP) FISIPOL
UGM
• Jurnal Borneo Administrator
• Jurnal Pengembangan Kota
• Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik
• Jurnal Sawala
• Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial
 Mengapa harus publish?
• Mengembangkan kemampuan menulis
• Menunjukkan posisi keilmuwan
• Menerima masukan dari ahli
 Jurnal mana yang dipilih?
• Berdasarkan bacaan dalam studi literatur yang
dilakukan
• Berdasarkan Ranking jurnal: 20712 journal
• Index jurnal
• Topik riset
• Waktu dan biaya untuk publish
 The Structure of an Academic
Journal Article
• 20-25 halaman A4
• 1,5 spasi
• 4000-7000 kata yang terdiri dari:
a. Judul: 8-15 Kata
b. Abstract: 200-250 kata
c. Keywords: 6-8 kata
d. Introduction: 500-1000 kata
e. Literature review (conceptual development or
conceptual framework): 1000-2000 kata
f. Methodology: 500-1000 kata
g. Result: 1000-1500 kata
h. Discussion (summary of findings, implications,
limitations, recommendations for futher
research) : 1000-1500 kata
 Article Title
• Should attract the reader’s attention
• Title should clearly reflect the main theme,
issue or position discussed in the article
• As specific as possible given the restrictions on
length
A Title should preferably answer the questions:
• What will be researched?
• How will the topic be researched?
• With whom? – Describe the research
population and units of measurement
• Where/in what context will the study be
conducted?
• Gobler (2003) suggests the following basic structure
for a title:
Main theme or research topic: Research Design +
Population + geographical area

Ex. Value profiles and susceptibility to interpersonal

influence: A Survey of student smokers in Indonesia
 Abstract
• Short summary of an article
• Window display or advertisement for your
work and provides an opportunity to impress
the reader.
• Consist of :
a. Element 1: A brief theme sentence to
orientate the overall issue addressed
b. Element 2: Indicate the main aim or purpose
of the study
c. Element 3: Academic and/or practical importance of
the study should be explained
d. Element 4: Methodology used should be described
e. Element 5: The main findings should be summarised
f. Element 6: A statement of conclusions should indicate
the contribution made by the study in filling gaps in the
literature
g. Element 7: Practical or managerial implications of the
study findings should be highlighted where appropriate
 Bagaimana memulainya?
Mulai dengan beberapa kalimat:
• Aim (This paper explores ….)
• Main argument (In this paper, we argue
that ……)
• Method (This study was conducted …)
• What’s new (This paper contributes to the
debates on ….)
 Keyword
• A maximum of 6-8 keywords should be
included after the abstract
• Reflect discipline, sub-discipline, theme,
research design and context
• Draw attention of potential readers and used
to locate articles in an electronic database
 Writing an Introduction
• Element 1: The writer has to state the broad
theme or topic of the study
• Element 2: Provide a convincing answer to the
question: Why is this article important
• Element 3: Summarises the available literature
and cites the most important previous studies
• Element 4. Indicate the most important gaps
in the literature that the current study will
address
• Element 5 : state research problem,
objectives, context and units of analysis
• Element 6: Provide with an outline of the
structure of the rest of the article
 Comments from Editor
• The authors should revise the manuscript so the introduction
sets the stage for the reader.
• In the introduction, the authors must provide the reader with
a statement of the problem, explain the significance of the
problem, and explain how the manuscript provides insight
into how the problem might be resolved.
• this section should be brief, taking the reader directly to the
research questions, which are not explicitly specified
anywhere in the manuscript.
 Literature Review
• reviews the existing literature
• shows what gap this paper fills. If you do this,
your paper stands a much greater chance of
being accepted.
• outline the competing theories
• show the gap in the research that you fill or
how your paper advances theories of specific
issue
 Comment from editor
• The authors should revise the manuscript by including a
section that reviews the literature related to community
preparedness and community knowledge of soil landslide
events.
• The literature review should also provide the reader with
insights into what is known about the problem they seek to
address, theoretically or practically.
• The literature review should also provide the reader with
insights into the limitations of our knowledge. The inclusion of
these limitations in the literature review section will help the
authors to justify why their research needs to be undertaken.
• Equally important, the literature review helps
the reader to understand the logic behind the
research questions. When selecting literature,
the authors must make sure it is current and
relevant to the problem under consideration..
Apa yang tidak diharapkan dari editor?

• Informasi yang sudah diketahui oleh editor

• Literatur review yang panjang

Apa yang diharapkan?

• Literatur review yang padat dan singkat
• Kesimpulan yang didukung oleh temuan yang
baik
• Kontribusi kebaruan pada ilmu pengetahuan
 Methodology
• Describes the steps followed in the execution
of the study
• Provides a brief justification for the research
methods used
• Should contain enough detail to enable the
reader to evaluate the appropriatness of your
methods and the reliability and validity of your
findings
 Comments from Editor
• The authors should revise their manuscript by updating the method
section.
• In doing so, the authors must specify the methods they used to identify,
collect, and analyze their data.
• A reader would be left wondering what such a design might include. Did
the authors use a survey? If so, what was the nature and focus of the
survey instrument? How was the survey implemented in the field? How
were the respondents selected, meaning what was the population from
which the sample was drawn? How did the authors control for bias?
• Similarly, what exactly did the authors use as primary and secondary
data? Both forms of data need to be better specified and explained. Was
the primary data about community knowledge extracted from interviews
or other documents?
 Results VS Discussion
• Result
1. Summarises the data collected for a study
2. Describe the findings (table, graph)

• Discussion
1. Meaning of data
2. Implication of data
 Comments from Editor
• Analytical Findings (Results):

The authors should revise their manuscript so that the

content of the findings (results) section is limited to just that:
the reporting of the results.
• The hypothesis statement (and discussion) should be included
in a preceding section of the manuscript, for example, at the
end of the literature review section or at the beginning of the
methods section.
Comments from editor: Discussion
• The authors should revise their manuscript so that the
discussion section explains how the empirical findings
contribute to the broader literature.
• Moreover, the focus of the discussion section should be on
how the findings presented in the manuscript contribute to
the broader literature.
• To this end, the authors could discuss how the findings
address a gap in the literature, extend our current knowledge,
or provide new insights into a specific phenomenon or
problem?
• the authors need to consider how they can expand their
discussion for each of their primary findings, drawing linkages
between each individual finding and the broader literature.
 Conclusion
• Provide recommendation
• State further research needed
 Editor’s Comments
• The authors might think about three things as they revise
their conclusion.
• First, it would be useful if they could identify some of the
practical implications of their findings, meaning what can be
done to improve community preparedness in the
communities that are the focus of this manuscript. The
authors must go beyond general statements.
• In doing so, the authors must be specific about the policy
actions that could be undertaken.
• Second, the authors could identify the limitations of their
research, which may including sample size issues or response
bias.
• This would be useful for a reader who wants to know
whether the results are generalizable to a different
community.
• Finally, the authors can provide insights into the types of
research activities that may come next, with an eye on
advancing or extending the findings presented in the present
manuscript.
 Time to reassess:
Ask yourself:
• Do I have enough literature?
• Am I making ‘knowledge claim’ or “just
reporting”
• Is this “an argument” of “manifesto”?
• Is my data sufficient to the claims I am
making?
• Am I being sufficiently speculative?
 Response dari Reviewer
• Ditolak? Jangan sakit hati
“We understand that this decision is likely disappointing to you and we are
sorry for that. It is particularly difficult for us, given the volume of interest in
our journal. Again, we believe it is fairer to everyone involved to not continue
with a paper that likely will not meet our standards after major revisions. This
does not mean your work is without merit or potential, and we hope you find
a suitable fit in the near future”.

• Revisi = kerja keras

• 1 kali diterima, addictive effect
Key factors (besides ensuring fit with the scope relevant
journal) when submitting to a more suitable journal in
the future:
1. The rationale for conducting this research is not clear from
the abstract and introduction.
2. What is the academic challenge addressed in this paper?
3. What is new in this paper?
4. What is the academic challenge you are trying to address?
5. How is the paper? Is The paper too descriptive? Does it
clearly state the conceptual as well as empirical findings?.
6. How about the conclusion? Is The conclusions weak? Does it
clearly state the implications to theory and practice,
limitations of this research and any future research
recommendations?
 Referencing
Using endnote:
1. Memanage daftar pustaka menjadi lebih
teratur
2. Sambil menulis dan otomatis daftar pustaka
ada dibawah tulisan kita
3. Ilmu sosial: APA, Harvard
4. Ada 495 style
 APA 5th
• Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative Research
Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, MA:
Pearson Education Allyn & Bacon.
• Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B.
(1994). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's
Vulnerability, and Disasters. London:
Routledge.
• Bardach, E. (2001). Developmental Dynamics:
Interagency Collaboration as an Emergent
Phenomenon. Journal of Public Administration
Research and Theory, 11(2), pp.149-164.
• Acedo, F. J. e., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. L.
(2006). The Resource-Based Theory:
Disssemination and Main Trends. Strategic
Management Journal, 27, pp. 621-636.
• Batley, R., & Larbi, G. A. (2006). Capacity to
Deliver? Management, Institutions and Public
Services in Developing Countries. In Y. Bangura
& G. A. Larbi (Eds.), Public Sector Reform in
Developing Countries: Capacity Challenges to
Improve Services. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
• Asian Disaster Reduction Center. (2004).
Country Report 2004: Indonesia. Retrieved
April 3, 2008, from
http://www.adrc.or.jp/countryreport/IDN/2004
/index.html
• Asian Disaster Preparedness Centre. (2008).
Monitoring and Reporting Progress on
Community-Based Disaster Risk Management
in Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: European
Commision Humanitarian Aid, UNESCAP, ADPC.