Bakhtin argues that [1] no words are neutral or uninfluenced by others as language is inherently social and dialogic in nature. [2] Every utterance is shaped both by centripetal forces that aim to unify language within social norms, as well as centrifugal forces that promote diversity and individualization. [3] This interplay between unification and diversification determines the style and profile of any utterance to at least the same degree as conformity to social and linguistic conventions.
Bakhtin argues that [1] no words are neutral or uninfluenced by others as language is inherently social and dialogic in nature. [2] Every utterance is shaped both by centripetal forces that aim to unify language within social norms, as well as centrifugal forces that promote diversity and individualization. [3] This interplay between unification and diversification determines the style and profile of any utterance to at least the same degree as conformity to social and linguistic conventions.
Bakhtin argues that [1] no words are neutral or uninfluenced by others as language is inherently social and dialogic in nature. [2] Every utterance is shaped both by centripetal forces that aim to unify language within social norms, as well as centrifugal forces that promote diversity and individualization. [3] This interplay between unification and diversification determines the style and profile of any utterance to at least the same degree as conformity to social and linguistic conventions.
No member of a verbal community can ever find words in the
language that are neutral, exempt from the aspirations and evaluations of the other, uninhabited by the other’s voice. On the contrary, he receives the word by the other’s voice and it remains filled with that voice. He intervenes in his own context from another context, already penetrated by the other’s intentions. His own intention finds a word already lived in.
--Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, p. 131
CentrifugalCentripetal
Every concrete utterance of a speaking subject serves as a
point where centrifugal as well as centripetal forces are brought to bear. The processes of centralization and decentralization, of unification and disunification, intersect in the utterance; the utterance not only answers the requirements of its own language as an individualized embodiment of a speech act, but it answers the requirements of heteroglossia as well; it is in fact an active participant in such speech diversity. And this active participation of every utterance in living heteroglossia determines the linguistic profile and style of the utterance to no less a degree than its inclusion in any normative-centralizing system of a unitary language. --Bakhtin: Discourse on the novel. p. 272 Opposing Forces Heteroglossia/Multivoiced Novel > Poetry Individual as Intersection of Discourses Discourse as Creation of Reality (e.g., Freud) Dialogism
No utterance in general can be attributed to
the speaker exclusively; it is the product of the interaction of the interlocutors, and broadly speaking, the product of the whole complex social situation in which it has occurred. -- Freudianism: A Marxist Critique Internal Dialogue Speech Genres Playfulness/Carnaval
M. M. Bakhtin - 'Rabelais and Gogol - The Art of Discourse and The Popular Culture of Laughter', Mississippi Review, 11 (3), 'Essays Literary Criticism', 1983