LYNCH v DPP for Northern Ireland 1975 duress not available for attempted murder D was an accessory to murder in that he drove a car to a place under threats from an IRA gunman M. D waited while M and his associates killed a policeman, and then drove them away.
LYNCH v DPP for Northern Ireland 1975 duress not available for attempted murder D was an accessory to murder in that he drove a car to a place under threats from an IRA gunman M. D waited while M and his associates killed a policeman, and then drove them away.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
LYNCH v DPP for Northern Ireland 1975 duress not available for attempted murder D was an accessory to murder in that he drove a car to a place under threats from an IRA gunman M. D waited while M and his associates killed a policeman, and then drove them away.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Duress
CasesLYNCH v ppp for Northern Ireland 1975
Duress not available for attempted murder
D was an accessory to murder in that he drove a car to a place under
threats from an IRA gunman M. D waited while M and his associates
killed a policeman, and then drove them away.
Held: A 3-2 majority in the House of Lords allowed his defence of
duress. [The decision to allow the defence of duress to an accessory to
murder has since been overruled in HOWE
Lord Simon (dissenting)
+ The threat must be a threat of death or serious personal injury;
+ Threats to damage property, or threats of any other kind, are not sufficient.
Not guilty but would be nowR v HOWE 1987
Duress not available in murder or attempt
D acting under duress, took part with others in two separate
murders, and on a third occasion the intended victim escaped.
Held: Using the 1966 Practice Statement to depart from the
decision in Lynch. — overruled
Duress is not available as a defence to murder either to a principal
or accessory. Morals, law and policy should deny a man the right to
take an innocent life even at the price of his own.
Lord Hailsham;
”.. the overriding objects of the criminal law must be to protect
innocent lives and to set a standard of conduct which ordinary men
and women are expected to observe if they are to avoid criminal
responsibility...”
Guilty