Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENGINEERING
ME 4305
Related Terms
• Sustainable Development
• Sustainable Engineering
• Sustainable Design
• Sustainability
• Sustainability Science
SUSTAINABILITY
What is it?
Why is it?
Sustainability (U.S. EPA)
• Sustainability is based on a simple principle: Everything
that we need for our survival and well-being depends,
either directly or indirectly, on our natural environment.
Sustainability creates and maintains the conditions under
which humans and nature can exist in productive
harmony, that permit fulfilling the social, economic and
other requirements of present and future generations.
• Sustainability is important to making sure that we have
and will continue to have, the water, materials, and
resources to protect human health and our environment.
http://www.epa.gov/sustainability/basicinfo.htm#sustainability
Sustainable Development (Brundtland)
• Sustainable development is development that meets the
needs of the present without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their own needs. It contains
two key concepts: (1) the concept of “needs”, in particular
the essential needs of the world’s poor, to which
overriding priority should be given; (2) the idea of
limitations imposed by the state of technology and social
organizations on the environment’s ability to meet present
and future needs
"Brundtland Report”: Our common future. By World commission on environment and development.
London, Oxford University Press, 1987
• Mihelcic, J., Crittenden, J., Small, M., Shonnard, D., Hokanson, D., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Sorby, S., James, V.,
Sutherland, J., Schnoor, J. (2003). Sustainability science and engineering: emergence of a new metadiscipline.
Environmental Science & Technology, 37(23), 5314-5324.
THE “THREE PILLARS”
OF SUSTAINABILITY
Environmental
Social Sphere Sphere
(what’s good for people) (what’s good for the
natural world)
Techno-
economic
Sphere
(what’s good for
business)
Environmental
Sphere
Social Sphere (what’s good for the
(what’s good for people) natural world)
b le
a
quit
e
Techno-
economic
Sphere
(what’s good for
business)
bearable
Environmental
Social Sphere Sphere
(what’s good for people)
(what’s good for the
natural world)
Techno-
economic
Sphere
(what’s good for
business)
Social Sphere Environmental
(what’s good for people)
Sphere
(what’s good for the
natural world)
via
ble
Techno-
economic
Sphere
(what’s good for
business)
Sustainable
Environmental
bearable
Social Sphere
(what’s good for people) Sphere
(what’s good for the
natural world)
le
it ab via
u
eq ble
Techno-
economic
Sphere
(what’s good for
business)
Deceptive Venn Diagram
The diagram on the left, while useful, falsely implies that the three
pillars can exist independently. Rather, they are subsets.
Who’s invested most heavily in each pillar?
People and
organizations
concerned with world
poverty, health, social
justice, etc.
Society
Labor (human capital)
Environmental
products and Recycle/reuse
Waste &
services
t emissions
im pac
me ntal
iron
Env
Environmental
amenities
Environment
(natural capital)
Adapted from Engineering Applications in Sustainable Design and Development, Striebig/Ogundipe/Papadakis
Also known as the “Triple Bottom Line”, or “People, Planet, Profit”
Sustainable Engineering Knowledge
• Technological
• Environmental
• Social
• Economic
Some issues
• Population
• Water
• Soil
• Forests
• Biodiversity
• Pollution & waste production
• Mineral extraction
• Fossil fuel resources
• Renewable energy
• Climate change
• Healthcare
• Food production
• Economic development
Facts of Nature
• Matter
• The earth is a closed system matter-wise (approximately)
• Energy
• The earth is an open system energy-wise, (primarily) driven by the
sun
• Life
• Life exists in the biosphere – a thin, fragile layer on and around the
earth surface
• Key life process
• Photosynthesis underwrites existence (mostly)
• Systems
• Life depends on complex, interconnected, self-regulating
processes that circulate energy and materials in cycles
Historical/Conventional Thinking
• TAKE – MAKE – WASTE
• Take natural resource from the earth
• Make useful products from them or use as fuel
• Dump or emit the waste byproducts, along with the products
themselves when they’ve outlived their usefulness
• Based on the “empty world” assumption
• The assumption was workable for much of human history
• Population was low
• Consumption low
• Resources abundant and mostly renewable
• Natural recycling processes capable of handling waste
• Human activities could reasonably be thought of as independent of
one another, as regards earth’s environment
Example – fishing (then and now)
When fish were abundant and
fishing was simple, what was the
limiting factor for how much
economic benefit could be gained
from fishing?
To strengthen the
fishing economy,
what should
society invest in?
To strengthen the
fishing economy,
what should
society invest in? Renewal, conservation, and
management of (i.e., sustaining)
the fish ecosystem
Grand Banks Cod Fishery
Grand Banks Cod Fishery
Grand Banks Annual Catch (Metric Tons). Source: Annual Catch of Cod from 1850 to 2011,
Myers et al., 1995; Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization
Modern Challenges to Conventional Thinking
Modern Challenges to Conventional Thinking
Modern Challenges to Conventional Thinking
Modern Challenges to Conventional Thinking
Modern Challenges to Conventional Thinking
Modern Challenges to Conventional Thinking
• Empty world assumptions may no longer be viable
• Population now large and growing exponentially
• Resource consumption large and growing
• Resource reserves dwindling and in some case non-renewable
• Natural recycling (waste absorption) processes incapable of
handling waste production on relevant timescales
Full World Assumptions
• Need to transition to behavior based on a “full world”
assumption
• Population growth cannot continue indefinitely
• Resources must be strategically managed to avoid depletion
and/or alternatives must be developed
• Waste must be minimized and/or artificially processed to avoid
environmental accumulation/damage
• Human activities must be analyzed in the context of being part of a
complex, interconnected system.
Challenges for sustainability
• Time Scales
• Human default is for short term thinking
• Nature operates on long time frames
• Scope of thinking
• Human default is for reductive, modular thinking (treat different parts of
the environment in isolation)
• Ecological complexity, with intricate relationships, requires systemic
thinking
• Competing values
• Humans disagree about what values have priority
• Economic, aesthetic, cultural, etc..
• Value visibility
• Humans most readily respond to economic value
• Many parts of nature don’t have direct economic value, but may
nonetheless play vital, if unobserved, roles in the overall ecosystem
“Laws” of ecology
• Everything is connected to everything else
• The environment is a complex system – every change affects
the overall balance, every part has a role to play
• Everything must go somewhere
• There is no “away” in “throw away”
• Nature knows best
• Trying to overcome, circumvent, or control nature is
wrongheaded. Work with nature, not against it
• There is no free lunch
• Everything comes from somewhere. Everything we gain from
the environment comes with some type of environmental cost
Case study in:
• Long vs. short term thinking
• Holistic vs. modular thinking
• Ecological complexity
• Everything is connected to everything
McDonald Creek,
Tributary to
Flathead River
Columbia River Watershed
Stanley Creek,
Tributary to
Kootenay River
Columbia River Watershed
Salmon
Fishing
Logging
Columbia River Watershed
Columbia River Watershed
But are they independent?
How do these activities impact each other?
Blocks rivers and
eliminates/reduces salmon
migration; salmon fry
preyed upon in reservoirs Dams
Accommodating salmon
migration increases dam
construction costs and
operating costs
Salmon
Fishing
Logging
Fish ladder – Bonneville Dam
How do these activities impact each other?
”The San Clemente Dam reservoir [was] over 95% full of sediment”
How do these activities impact each other?
900
800
700
600 USA
500
Max Sustainable AVG Energy consumption
400
300
200
100
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
http://www.donellameadows.org/archives/a-synopsis-limits-to-growth-the-30-year-update/
LtG: Stable Solution: technical and social actions
http://www.donellameadows.org/archives/a-synopsis-limits-to-growth-the-30-year-update/
A causal loop
diagram from
the LtG report
Behavior of Complex Systems
Overshoot & Collapse: Reindeer
http://www.geo.arizona.
edu/Antevs/nats104/00l
ect21reindeer.html
Overshoot & Collapse - Cyclic
http://www.ualberta.ca/~gyates/projectlynx/lynxecology.html