100% found this document useful (3 votes)
821 views15 pages

Functional Assessment in Rehabilitation

The document discusses functional assessment and various tools used to measure function. It describes the purpose of functional examination as analyzing activities and measuring an individual's ability to engage in them. Various types of instruments are discussed, including performance-based tests where the patient is observed performing activities, and self-reports where the patient reports their abilities. Key instruments described are the Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and SF-36, which measure different aspects of function like mobility, self-care, and health-related quality of life. Reliability and validity of the tools are also addressed.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (3 votes)
821 views15 pages

Functional Assessment in Rehabilitation

The document discusses functional assessment and various tools used to measure function. It describes the purpose of functional examination as analyzing activities and measuring an individual's ability to engage in them. Various types of instruments are discussed, including performance-based tests where the patient is observed performing activities, and self-reports where the patient reports their abilities. Key instruments described are the Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and SF-36, which measure different aspects of function like mobility, self-care, and health-related quality of life. Reliability and validity of the tools are also addressed.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Examination of Function: Discusses the purpose and scope of function examination, focusing on assessment and identification of individual capabilities in functional activities.
  • Testing Perspectives: Details different approaches to function testing, emphasizing perspectives of habitual ability versus capacity testing.
  • Types of Instruments: Outlines various instruments and tests used to assess a patient's functional performance, listing specific tests for performance-based assessments.
  • Self-Reports: Explores self-reported methods in functional assessment, detailing the reliability and application in evaluating capabilities.
  • Functional Examination and Impairment Terminology: Introduces key terminology used in functional examination, explaining various levels of patient assistance and supervision required.
  • Single Dimension versus Multidimensional Measures of Function: Compares and contrasts single versus multidimensional measures used to evaluate functional abilities, highlighting differences and applications.
  • Instruments to Assess Function: Describes instruments like the Barthel Index used for assessing function, detailing scoring and applications in rehabilitation settings.
  • The Functional Independence Measure: Defines and details the use of the Functional Independence Measure, its structure, and significance in grading functional status.
  • The Outcome and Assessment Information Set: Explains the design and use of OASIS in collecting and assessing patient data for home care quality and outcome tracking.
  • The SF-36: Details the SF-36 survey tool, highlighting its development from prior studies, and application in assessing patient health outcomes.

Functional Assessment

Dr Sonali Soumyashree
BPT, MPT(Neurology)
Lecturer, GDGU
 Function in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and
Health (ICF) encompassing all body functions and structures, activities, and
participation.
 disability is a term that encompasses impairments in body functions and
structures, activity limitations, and participation restrictions
EXAMINATION OF FUNCTION

Purpose of Examination of Function:


 Analysis of function focuses on the identification of pertinent activities and measurement of an
individual’s ability to successfully engage in them
 Application of selected functional tests and measures yield data that can be used as
(1) baseline information for setting function-oriented goals and outcomes of intervention;
(2) indicators of a patient’s initial abilities and progression toward more complex functional levels;
(3) criteria for placement decisions, for example, the need for inpatient rehabilitation, extended care,
or community services;
(4) manifestations of an individual’s level of safety in performing a particular task and the risk of injury
with continued performance; and #
(5) evidence of the effectiveness of a specific intervention (medical, surgical, or rehabilitative) on
function.
Testing Perspectives
 Function tests can utilize two highly divergent perspectives on what is
to be tested or measured by the physical therapist.
 These are:
 habitual level of a patient’s ability to do certain tasks and activities, or
 to identify the patient’s capacity to perform certain tasks and activities,
 whether the patient habitually performs up to that level or not, or even performs
them at all
Types of Instruments

Performance-Based Tests
 A performance-based test involves observing the patient during the
performance of an activity.
 These are:
 6-Minute Walk Test
 the Physical Performance and Mobility Examination,
 the Functional Reach Test,
 the Get Up and Go Test,
 the Timed Up and Go Test,
 the Physical Performance Battery
Self-Reports
 In this the patient is asked directly either by the therapist or a trained
interviewer (interviewer report) or through the use of a self-administered
report instrument.
 Self-report is a valid method of determining function and may be preferable
to performance-based methods in some circumstances
 Performance-based and self-report instruments grade performance on a
number of different criteria in a variety of formats
Functional Examination and Impairment Terminology
1. Independent: patient is able consistently to perform skill safety with no one present.
2. Supervision: patient requires someone within arm’s reach as a precaution; low probability of patient
having a problem requiring assistance.
3. Close guarding: person assisting is positioned as if to assist, with hands raised but not touching patient;
full attention on patient; fair probability of patient requiring assistance.
4. Contact guarding: therapist is positioned as with close guarding, with hands on patient but not giving any
assistance; high probability of patient requiring assistance.
5. Minimum assistance: patient is able to complete majority of the activity without assistance.
6. Moderate assistance: patient is able to complete part of the activity without assistance. 7.
7. Maximum assistance: patient is unable to assist in any part of the activity
SINGLE DIMENSION VERSUS MULTIDIMENSIONAL
MEASURES OF FUNCTION

 single dimension measures may include a specific construct such as balance,


gait, or reaching
 multidimensional measures would include a combination of these constructs
or have items that represent impairments, activity limitations, and
participation restrictions.
INSTRUMENTS TO ASSESS FUNCTION

The Barthel Index


 Barthel Index specifically measures the degree of assistance required by an individual on
10 items of mobility and self-care ADL.
 Levels of measurement are limited to either complete independence or needing assistance
 Each performance item is scored on an ordinal scale with a specified number of points
assigned to each level or ranking.
 Scoring: A single global score, ranging from 0 to 100, is calculated from the sum of all
weighted individual item scores, so that 0 equals complete dependence for all 10
activities, and 100 equals complete independence in all 10 activities
 Barthel Index has been used widely to monitor functional changes in
individuals receiving inpatient rehabilitation, particularly in predicting the
functional outcomes associated with stroke.
 Barthel Index has demonstrated strong interrater reliability (0.95) and test–
retest reliability (0.89)
Items Included in the Barthel Index
 Feeding: scores range from independent (able to use utensils and other apparatus) to dependent (needs assistance)
 Bathing: scores range from independent to dependent
 Personal Toilet: scores range from independent (able to wash, comb hair, brush teeth or shave) to dependent (needs
assistance)
 Dressing: scores range from independent (able to dress, fasten closures, tie shoes, apply orthosis as needed) to
dependent (needs assistance)
 Bowels: scores range from independent (accident-free, able to use suppositories or enemas as needed) to dependent
(occasional accidents, needs assistance)
 Bladder: scores range from independent (accident-free, able to use collection device as needed) to dependent
(occasional accidents, needs assistance)
 Transfers–Toilet: independent (able to use toilet or bedpan) to dependent (needs assistance)
 Transfers–Chair and Bed: scores range from independent (able to manage wheelchair as needed) to dependent (needs
assistance)
 Ambulation: scores range from independent (able to use assistive devices as needed) to dependent (needs assistance)
 Stair Climbing: scores range from independent (able to use assistive devices as needed) to dependent (needs
assistance)
The Functional Independence Measure
 Functional Independence Measure (FIM)52,53 is an 18-item measure of
physical, psychological, and social function that is part of the Uniform Data
System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSMR)
 FIM uses the level of assistance an individual needs to grade functional status
from total independence to total assistance .
 A person may be regarded as independent if a device is used, but this is
recorded separately from “complete” independence.
 The instrument lists six selfcare activities: feeding, grooming, bathing, upper
body dressing, lower body dressing, and toileting. Bowel and bladder control,
aspects of which some may consider as impairments rather than function, are
categorized separately
 Functional mobility is tested through three items on transfers.
 Under the category of locomotion, walking and using a wheelchair are listed
equivalently, whereas stairs are considered separately.
 The FIM also includes two items on communication and three on social cognition
 Interrater reliability of the FIM: 0.86 to 0.88
 WeeFIM, an 18-item instrument based on the FIM, has been developed for use
for children between the ages of 6 months and 18 years
The Outcome and Assessment Information Set
 Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) was designed to
ensure the collection of pertinent data on the adult patient in the
home care setting that would Information Set he Outcome and
Assessment Information Set (OASIS) was designed to ensure the
collection of pertinent data on the adult patient in the home care
setting that would
 allow home health agencies to assess the quality of care by measuring
the outcomes of care
 The SF-36
 The SF-36 contains 36 items based on questions used in the RAND
Health Insurance Study. hese 36 items were culled from the 113
questions used by RAND in the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) to
explore the relationship between physician practice styles and patient
outcomes.
 SF-36 demonstrated high reliability and validity (correlation
coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.88)

You might also like