Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Faculty of Commerce
Department of Management Studies
Facilitator
Dr M. Mutsikiwa
0773206114
mmutsikiwa@gzu.ac.zw
CHAPTER 1
3
UNDER ARMOUR AT A GLANCE
1996 2006
57,300,000
Net Income 0
1,800,000,000
Equity Value 0
4
TWO RETAILERS AT A GLANCE
Sears Wal-Mart
600
Stores 1980 864
5289
Stores 2004 2026
$1,643 million
Revenues 1980 $25,194 million
$285,222 million
Revenues 2004 $36,100 million
Net profits 1980 606M (2.4% return on sales) $55 M(3.3% return on sales)
Net profits 2004 507M (-1.4% return on sales) $10,267 M
(3.6% return on sales)
Market capitalization 1980 USD 4.8 billion USD 1 billion
Market capitalization 2004 USD 12.2 billion USD 200.2 billion
5
THREE OVERARCHING THEMES
Implementing a good To succeed, Strategic leadership
strategy is at least as the formulation is responsible for
important as creating Firms and
of a good strategy
industries are
one, yet many and its implementa- making substantive
managers give too dynamic in
tion should be resource allocation
little thought to nature
inextricably decisions and
implementation connected
developing key-
stakeholder support
Strategic leader- of the strategy
ship is essential if a
firm is able to both
formulate and imple-
ment strategies that
create value
7
THE MILITARY ROOTS OF STRATEGY
8
THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Strategic analyses
• Internal
• External
Strategy
Vision and • Arenas
mission • Vehicles Implementation
• Differentiators levers
• Fundamental • Staging
organizational • Economic logic and
purpose
The central, integrated,
• Organizational externally oriented Strategic
values concept of how a firm leadership
will achieve its
objectives
9
QUESTIONS OF CORPORATE-LEVEL AND BUSINESS-LEVEL STRATEGY
Unit of measure
?
• In which markets do we compete today?
• In which markets do we want to
compete tomorrow?
• How does our ownership of a business
ensure its competitiveness today and in
the future?
Business-level strategy should ask
?
• How do we compete in this market
today?
• How will we compete in this market in
the future?
10
STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION ITERATE WAL-MART EXAMPLE
Implementation:
The process of
performing all the
activities necessary
to do what has been Invest heavily in
planned organizational structure,
systems, and processes
11
UNPLANNED ACTIONS CAN DRIVE STRATEGY
By 1984, 95%
Design and manufacture
of Intel revenue
of Dynamic, Random- Focus on micro-
came from the
Access Memory Chips processor segment
microprocessor
(DRAM)
segment
Unplanned
experimental
venture to make
microprocessors
for Busicom, a
Japanese
calculator maker
12
BUSINESS STRATEGY DIAMOND
Arenas
• Where will we be active? ( and with
how much emphasis?)
– Which product categories?
– Which channels?
Arenas – Which market segments?
– Which geographic areas?
– Which core technologies
– Which value-creation strategies?
Staging
• What will be our speed and Economic Vehicles
sequence of moves? Staging Vehicles
logic • How will we get there?
– Speed of expansion?
– Internal development?
– Sequence of initiatives
– Joint ventures?
– Licensing/franchising?
Economic logic – Experimentation?
Differentiators – Acquisitions?
• How will returns be obtained?
– Lowest costs through scale Differentiators
advantages? • How will we win?
– Lowest costs through scope – Image?
and replication advantages – Customization?
– Premium prices due to – Price?
unmatchable service? – Styling?
– Premium prices due to – Product reliability?
proprietary product features? – Speed to market? 13
JET BLUE STRATEGY
15
IMPORTANCE OF EXECUTION
16
FRAMEWORK FOR STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION
Strategic leadership
• Lever- and resource-allocation decisions
• Decision support among stakeholders
17
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
Competitive
Key question:
Advantage: a
how do Firms
Firm’s ability to
create sustained
create value in a
above-average
way that its
returns?
rivals cannot
18
THREE PERSPECTIVES OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
Often called the “resource Also called the “positional Suggests that in dynamic,
view”, contends that firms view”, contends that rapidly changing markets,
are heterogeneous variations in a firm’s a firm’s current market
bundles of resources and competitive advantage and position is not an accurate
capabilities and firms with performance are primarily prediction of future
superior resources and a function of industry performance. Instead, we
capabilities enjoy attractiveness. Companies look at the past for clues
competitive advantage should therefore either (1) about how the firm arrived
over other firms. This position themselves to at its current position and
advantage makes it compete in attractive to future trends – both
relatively easier to achieve industries or (2) adopt internal and external – in
consistently higher levels strategies that will make an effort to predict the
of performance their current industries future landscape
more attractive
19