Presented By

Sanjay Kumar Yadav,

BBM 5TH SEM

Email ID: sanjayyadav330@gmail.com

ACHARYA INSTITUTE OF GRADUATE

STUDIES

1
 Section I
The Need for Corporate Governance

 Responsibility to Stakeholders
 Predictability
 Transparency
 Accountability
 Easier access to capital (FII, VCF)

 Efficiency (at the firm level) and Global

Competitiveness (IPRs)

2
 Section II
Conceptualizing Corporate Governance
 Narrow Definition
- A set of relationships between the company and
shareholders, directors and management.

 Broad Definition
- Going beyond and looking to the implicit and explicit
relationships of the company with employees, creditors,
consumers, distributors, local communities.

3
 Conceptualizing Corporate Governance
(Contd.)
 OECD Definition
– System by which corporations are directed and controlled.
– Spells out the rules / procedures for making decisions on corporate
affairs.
– Provide the structure through which the company objectives are set, and
the means of attaining those objectives and monitoring performance
– Specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different
participants in the corporation, such as, the board, managers,
shareholders and other stakeholders

 World Bank Definition

– Corporate governance is about promoting corporate fairness,
transparency and accountability

4
 Conceptualizing Corporate Governance
(Contd.)
 What constitutes shareholders’ interest? sustainable
profitability versus profitability
 Need for external regulation
– FOR:
» Conflict of interest b/w Management/Promoters and other
constituencies
» To protect small investors
» To account for Externalities
– AGAINST:
» Risk of excessive policing (time & cost of compliance)
» Increase costs
» Check the box approach

5
 Section III
Evolution of Systems of Accountability:
Indian Initiatives
 In December 1995, CII set up a task force to design a voluntary code
of corporate governance
 In April 1998, the Desirable Corporate Governance: A Code, was
released
 SEBI set up the Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee in 1999 to design
a mandatory-cum-recommendatory code for listed companies ( Clause
49)
 DCA set up the Naresh Chandra Committee Report in 2002. The key
recommendation related to financial and non-financial disclosures and
independent auditing and board oversight of management (Draft
Companies Bill)
 The Narayana Murthy Committee was set up by SEBI in 2002 to
review clause 49 and suggest measures to improve corporate
governance standards (Proposed Clause 49)

6
 Developments in the U.S
 ENRON
– Bankruptcy filing in 2001 (largest in US history)
– Accounting techniques involving unconsolidated partnerships and
“special purpose entities” to hide losses from financial statements
& conceal indebtedness.
– Issues regarding independence of auditors, provision of non audit
services & conflict of interest
– Independence of directors

 SARBANES OXLEY ACT, 2002 (SOX)

– Signed into law July 30, 2002
– Enhances reporting obligations of public companies to prevent
securities fraud & other abuses

7
 SOX

 Applicable to:
– Companies listed or traded in the U.S (including non U.S
Companies)
– Subsidiaries of U.S Companies in India (provided they
have a business connection in the U.S)
– Foreign accounting firms that prepare or furnish audit
report for an issuer
– Sometimes compliance expected by U.S Companies
from business partners in India (implications for BPO
sector)

8
 SOX-Brief Overview
 CEO & CFO certification in SEC Reports (Ss 302 & 906)
– Compliance with Securities Exchange Act, 1934
– Financial statements represent the true financial condition of the
Company operations
– Financial results contain no untrue statement /omission of
material fact
– Company has complied with Disclosure norms
– Management have disclosed significant deficiencies, changes,
fraud to auditors & audit committee
 Ban on loans to executive officers and directors
 Accelerated filings of periodic reports
 Filing of change of beneficial ownership within 2 days

9
 SOX-Brief Overview (Contd.)

 Reimbursement by CEO/CFO upon

restatement of financial statements due to
misconduct
– Bonus/other incentive based compensation
– Profits from sale of securities
 Independence of Board of Directors/
Committees
 Enhanced Criminal Penalties (upto $5
million fine for individuals, $25 million for
entities, prison terms upto 20 years)
 Strict Reporting of illegal or unethical behavior
10
 SOX-Brief Overview (Contd.)
 Audit Committee
– Independent
– Financial Literacy of members
– At least one financial expert
– Responsible for appointment, compensation &
oversight of auditor & approval of audit/non
audit services
– Create compliant mechanism regarding
accounting and auditing
– Approve all related party transactions
 Implementation of a ‘Whistleblower’ policy
11
 SOX-Brief Overview (Contd.)
 Additional Disclosures
– Off Balance Sheet Items & transactions that may
have material current/future effect on financial
condition/results of operations
– Pro forma Information must conform to financials
prepared under GAAP - No untruth/omission
– All fees billed by auditors in annual report
– Audit Partner Rotation
– Registration with Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (including foreign audit firms that
audit Issuers)

12
 Major Areas of Debate

 Directors

 Independent Directors

 Audit Committees

 Auditors

13
 Section IV
Director: The Fiduciary
“If directors act within their powers, if they
act with such care as is reasonably to be
expected from them, having regard to their
knowledge and experience, and if they act
honestly for the benefit of the company they
represent, they discharge both their
equitable as well as their legal duty to the
company”

14
WHO DO DIRECTORS OWE A DUTY
TO?
SHAREHOLDERS

COMPANY

EMPLOYEES

PUBLIC

CREDITORS

15
 General Duties of Directors

 Duty of care and skill

 Duty of loyalty & disclosure
 Duty of disgorging profit in relation to
corporate opportunity

16
 Duty of Care and Skill

A director or officer has a duty to the

corporation to perform his functions in
good faith, and in a manner that he
reasonably believes to be in the best interest
of the corporation, and with a care that an
ordinary prudent person would reasonably
be expected to exercise in a like position
and under similar circumstances

17
 Duty of Care and Skill (Contd.)
Courts in UK and USA have held that directors in banks
and financial institutions owe a higher degree of care
– The banking industry is involved in regular receipt of public cash
and property and is thus more vulnerable than other businesses and
therefore a greater care is required;
– A director of a company (a bank) that has a large amount of liquid
assets carries with him higher risks and temptation to which such
assets give rise;
– There are more legislative and regulatory monitoring and liability
provisions pertaining to banking companies than any other
company and such provisions may also extend to the director of
the bank or financial institution.

18
 Duty of Care and Skill (Contd.)

 Exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence

 Continuing knowledge of company’s
business
 Reliance on Co-directors and Power to
delegate with supervision
 Bona fide and good faith intention

19
 Duty of Loyalty & Disclosure
 Section 299, Companies Act, 1956
 principal is based on the rudiments of law that the same
person cannot act for himself/herself and at the same time,
with respect to the same matter, act with another whose
interests are conflicting
 Effect of disclosure
 Disclosure to whom
 How extensive should the disclosure be

20
Duty in Relation to Corporate Opportunity

 By occupying a position of trust, a director must

not make a profit which he can acquire only by
use of his position and, if he does, he must account
for the profit so made.

21
 Corporate Opportunity
 Any profit made by a Director through holding the office
of such director must be accounted for. Therefore, a
Director would be held accountable for personal profits
made from:
–  The sale of goods, materials or services earlier dealt with by
Company for its business
– Forestalling the company’s business opportunity unless the
company has rejected such opportunity
– Requesting the customer to place orders for goods, materials and
services with another company in which he has some interest
– Receiving Commission from another company, which has sold
goods to the company

22
 Liabilities of Directors

 Derivative Action
 Statutory Liability
 Contractual Liability
 Tortuous Liability

23
 Derivative Action

 Resolutions by directors for transferring the controlling

interest of the company wherein there is a complete
changeover of the structure to the detriment of the
company
 Sale of land to oneself at a discounted value
 Directors passing an ordinary resolution where the act in
question would require a special resolution

24
 Statutory Liability

 Companies Act, 1956: Officers in default

 Banking Regulation Act, 1949
 Insurance Act, 1948
 Pollution Laws
 Income Tax Act, 1961

25
 Director:Legal Provisions

 Restrictions on loans to directors or other specified entities (s. 295)

– Interest rate shall not be less than 4% above prevailing bank rate
– Quantum of loan to not exceed 25 times the gross salary
– No default on public deposit by the company
 Boards sanction for contracts in which directors are interested (s.
297)
– Consent by way of board resolution
– Prior to the contract or within three months
– Except contract between two public companies
– Prior approval of the central government for a contract where the
company has paid up share capital of not less than Rs 1 crore

26
 Director: Legal Provisions (Contd.)
 Disclosure of interest by directors (s. 299)
– Default ground for vacation under s. 283.
 Interested directors not to participate or vote in board proceedings (s. 300)
– Applicable only to public companies
 Maintenance of records of contracts, companies, firms in which directors are
interested (s. 301)
– to be signed by all the directors present in the next board meeting
– kept at registered office and available for inspection
 Restriction on directors from holding office of profit (s. 314)
– Company can give consent by special resolution
– Does not apply to managing directors

27
 Issues for Consideration

 Should the directors be educated on the risk

profile of the company and their duties as a
director?
– Narayana Murthy Committee Report
 Should there be codified duties and
responsibilities?
 Should the liability of the non-executive directors
mirror the liability of the executive directors?

28
 Independent Directors
 No mention in the Companies Act
 Clause 49
- Optimum combination of executive and non-executive directors
- Not less that fifty per cent being non-executive
- If non executive chairman, at least one third of the board should comprise of
independent directors
- If executive chairman, at least half of the board should comprise of
independent directors
 Clause 63, Draft Companies Bill
– Every public company of prescribed paid up capital or turnover to have at least
seven directors of which at least three or fifty percent, whichever is higher, to
be independent directors
» Would include unlisted public companies also

29
 Who is an Independent Director?

 Independence of judgement

 No material relationship

 No pecuniary relationship

30
 What is Independence?
 The Cadbury Report defines independence as:
Apart from their directors’ fees and shareholdings, they
should be independent of management and free from any
business or other relationship which could materially
interfere with the exercise of their independent judgement.

 Clause 49
‘Independent’ defined as those directors who, apart from
receiving director’s remuneration do not have any other
material pecuniary relationship or transactions with the
company, its promoters, management or subsidiaries,
which in the view of the board may affect independence of
judgment
31
 What is Independence? (Contd.)
 Clause 2(45), Draft Companies Bill

“Independent Director” means a non-executive director of a

company who apart from receiving director’s remuneration,
does not have any material pecuniary relationship or
transactions of such amount as may be prescribed, with the
company , its promoters, managing director, whole time
director, other directors, manager or its holding company
and its subsidiaries apart from possessing such attributes for
being treated as Independent director as may be prescribed
by the Central Government from time to time.
 Excessively restrictive?

32
 Independent Directors

 External expert

 Independent director: watchdog?

33
 Audit Committee

 Clause 49, Listing Agreement

– Minimum three members, all non-executive directors
– Majority independent, chairman independent
– At least one director having financial and accounting
knowledge
– Must have at least three meetings per year

34
 Audit Committee (Contd.)
 Section 292A, Companies Act
– public companies
– minimum three directors
– two thirds other than managing or whole time directors
» no other qualifications prescribed
– recommendations relating to financial management binding
» reasons for not accepting any recommendation
– Auditors required to attend the meetings

 Clause 62, Draft Companies Bill

– not less than two independent directors
» no other qualifications prescribed

35
 Audit Committee (Contd.)

 Proposed Clause 49 (pursuant to N.M. Report)

– At least one member having financial and accounting
expertise
– All members to be financially literate
– Expanded role- independent judgment
– Focusing on
» Quality of accounting policies
» Alternate accounting policies
» Internal control deficiencies
– Implementation of ‘whistleblower’ policy

36
 Audit Committee (Contd.)
 Audit committees- Efficacy?

– Chairman of Enron’s audit committee was a Stanford

professor with 30 years experience in auditing and
accounts
– Should the members of audit committee be financially
literate?
– Should the scope of audit committee be decided by the
Board of Directors?
– Is remuneration of members an issue?

37
 Section V
Auditors: The Watchful Eye

 Appointment regulated by the Companies Act

(s.224)
– Maximum number of companies prescribed (20)
 Qualifications & Disqualifications (s. 226)
– Person holding any security of that company (2000
Amendment)
 Requirement to report on specific matters (s. 227)
 ICAI Code of Conduct

38
 Section V
Auditors: The Watchful Eye
 Duties of Auditor
– Duty of Care (Re Kingston Cotton Mills Co.)
» Reasonable care and skill
– Auditor is the servant of the shareholder and
whose duty is to examine the affairs of the
company on their behalf at the end of a year
and to report to them what he has found.
– The auditor is like a trustee for shareholders.
– Watchdog and not a bloodhound
39
 Auditor’s Liability

 Basis of Liability
– Contractual and Fiduciary
» Company
» Shareholders as a body

– Tortuous
» “Holding out”

40
 Auditor’s Liability (Contd.)
 Stage I (Upto 1963)
– Candler v. Crane
» Privity doctrine: a third party not in privity with the auditor cannot recover
damages for negligence
» Justice Denning gave a dissenting judgment
 it must be known to the advise41r that the advice would be communicated to the
plaintiff in order to induce him to adopt a particular course of action
 the advice must be relied upon for the purpose of the particular transaction for
which it was known to the advisers that the advice was required.
 Stage II (1964-1990)
– Hedley Byrne & Co. v. Heller & Partners
» Liability for a negligent misstatement made by one person to another, even
in the absence of any contractual or fiduciary relationship causing financial
loss
41
 Caparo Industries Plc v. Dickman
 Stage III (Post 1990)
– Watered down in Caparo Industries case
» The three criteria for the imposition of a duty of care are
 foreseeability of damage
 proximity of relationship
 the reasonableness or otherwise of imposing a duty

» The auditor of a public company's accounts owed no duty

of care to a member of the public at large, who relied on
the accounts to buy shares in the company.
 An auditor owed no duty of care to an individual shareholder in the company
who wished to buy more shares in the company
 The purpose for which accounts are prepared and audited is to enable the
shareholders as a body to exercise informed control of the company
42
 Caparo Industries Plc v. Dickman
 Cadbury Committee on Caparo Industries
– the case exposed two widely held misconceptions:
» audit report is a guarantee to the accuracy of the accounts,
and perhaps even as to the soundness of the company
» that anyone (including investors and creditors) can rely on
the audit, not only in a general sense but also very
specifically by being able to sue the auditors if they are
negligent

 In light of Enron is there a need to re-examine the issue

of auditor’s liability as set out in the Caparo Industries
case?

43
 Issues for Consideration
 Should statute set out the liability?
– Should ‘breach of care’ be extended to any other
group?

 Whether rules for auditors liability need to be

codified and made stricter?
– Recommendations of Naresh Chandra Committee Report

 Should Audit committees evaluate independence

of auditors?

44
 Similarities between US position & Indian
Proposals
SOX
 CEO/CFO Certification
 Reimbursement for
misstatement
 Ban on loans to directors
 Code of Conduct/Ethics
 Independent Board/
Committee
 Disclosure of Off Balance
Sheet/transactions that may
have future impact
Narayana Murthy Committee
 CEO/CFO Certification
 Reimbursement for
misstatement
 Restriction on loan to
directors
 Written/Public Code of
Conduct
 Independent Board of
Directors
 More limited disclosures-but
left open for consideration
45
Comparison between US & Indian Position

SOX Narayana Murthy Committee

Audit Partner Rotation Audit Partner Rotation

Audit Committee Audit Committee
• Financial Literacy • Financial Literacy
• One financial expert • One financial expert
• Oversee auditor • Oversee auditor
• Approve related party • Approve related party
transactions transactions
• Whistleblowers policy • Whistleblowers policy

46
 Proposed Amendments
 Proposed amendments to clause 49 and Draft
Companies Bill address major issues
– Appointment of a Chief Accounting Officer by a
Company
– Definition of related party transactions expanded and
specific approval requirements introduced
– Disclosure of all contingent liabilities
– Timely communication of Risk Management activities
– CEO/ CFO certification requirements

47
 Section VI
Reinventing Corporate Governance in
India
 Super regulator v. Multiple regulators?
- Efficiency
- Cost of Compliance

 Transparency by the regulators?

- Late trading and market timing investigations

 Enforcement by stock exchanges?

48
 Reinventing Corporate Governance in
India (Contd.)

 Disclosure of voting agreements which impact

governance of companies?

 Pro-active role by institutional investors?

 Mandatory Corporate Governance Ratings?

- Will it lead to better corporate governance?

49
 Reinventing Corporate Governance in
India (Contd.)

 How can whistle blowers be encouraged?

- Narayana Murthy Report
- Immunity for whistleblowers?

 Directors & officers liability insurance?

50
 Conclusion

 Good corporate governance – means to the end of

sustainable wealth creation
 The positive side of adherence to most rigorous standards
in governance for corporations:
- Increased importance of corporate governance as an investment
criteria among large investors
- Improved Equity Price Performance
- Higher Valuations
- Access to global markets
- Increased investor goodwill & confidence
 Balance between ‘enterprise’ and ‘constraints’
51
 Internal Audit
• CARO Requirement
• As per Sarbanes Oxley Act, 2002
• Clause 49 of Listing Agreement
• SAS 70 Report

52
 Internal Audit
• CARO Requirement
Requirement of CARO – Auditor’s comment on
internal audit
• Clause 49 of Listing Agreement
- Applicable to listed companies in Indian Stock
Exchange.
• SAS 70 Report
- Use of Service Organizations like payroll - Hewitt,
MF accounting – Syntel Outsourcing, etc
53
 Internal Audit
Sarbanes Oxley Act, 2002
• Applies to all companies listed in SEC
• US based company and its subsidiaries, foreign
companies like Patni, TATA Motors ADR
listed in NYSC.
• Sec 404 – Internal control on Financial
Reporting
• Certification by CEO/CFO on quarterly basis.

54
 Internal Audit
Sarbanes Oxley Act, 2002
Senator Paul Sarbanes
Mike Oxley

55
 End in Mind…
 a statement acknowledging your responsibility for establishing and maintaining
adequate “internal control over financial reporting“
 a statement identifying the internal control framework you used to conduct your
evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
 an assessment of the effectiveness of your company's internal control over financial
reporting as of the end of your most recent fiscal year.
– Assertion: a statement as to whether or not your company's internal control over
financial reporting is effective
 disclosure of any “material weaknesses“ in your company's internal control over
financial reporting.
– If there are any disclosed material weaknesses, then you are not permitted to
conclude that your internal control over financial reporting is effective
 a statement that your independent auditors have issued a report on your assessment of
internal control over financial reporting

56
 How to be there..,
Financial Controls must be suitably designed using established criteria
(COSO)
·   Control objectives and related financial controls are appropriately
documented
·   Documentation is auditable
·   Key financial controls are identified (Assertions)
·   Management perform the own tests of:
• the design of controls over financial reporting
• the effectiveness based on key financial controls
·   Deficiencies are documented, disclosed and addressed.

57

Monitoring
 Assessment of a control
system’s performance
over time.
 Combination of ongoing
and separate evaluation.
 Management and
supervisory activities.
 Internal audit activities.
Control Activities
 Policies/procedures that
ensure management
directives are carried out.
 Range of activities including
approvals, authorizations,
verifications,
recommendations,
performance reviews, asset
security and segregation
of duties.
Applying the COSO
Framework
Control Environment
 Sets tone of organization-
influencing control
consciousness of its people.
 Factors include integrity,
ethical values, competence,
authority, responsibility.
 Foundation for all other
components of control.
58
Information &
Communication
 Pertinent information
identified, captured
and communicated
in a timely manner.
 Access to internal and
externally generated
information.
 Flow of information that
allows for successful control
actions from instructions on
responsibilities to summary
of findings for management
action.
Risk Assessment
 Risk assessment is the
identification and analysis of
relevant risks to achieving the
entity’s objectives – forming
the basis for determining
control activities.
 Controls
 Preventative and Detective Controls

 Manual and Automated Controls

 Business Performance Review / Monitoring Controls

 General Computer Controls (IT Level Controls)

 Application Controls (Transaction Level Controls in

Computer System)
59
 Control objectives for Transaction
Processing
 Completeness of records (C) - controls over completeness are designed to ensure
that:
– All transactions are recorded once and only once.
– All transactions are recorded in the correct period and in the correct legal entity.
 Accuracy of records (A) - controls over accuracy are designed to ensure that:
– All transactions are accurately recorded in the general ledger, including correct
classification to ensure compliance with disclosure requirements.
– Assets and liabilities are recorded at an appropriate value.
– Changes to standing data are accurately input.
 Validity of records (V) - controls over validity are designed to ensure that:
– Transactions are authorized.
– Transactions are genuine and they relate to Company.
– Changes to standing data are authorized.
 Restricted access to assets and records (R) - controls to restricted access are
designed to ensure that:
– There is appropriate segregation of duties with respect to key controls.
– Physical assets (e.g. gold bullion) are
60 appropriately safeguarded.
 Financial Reporting - Assertions
 Existence or Occurrence
– Assets or liability exist at a given date (FG)
– Transaction occurred during a given period (Sales)

 Completeness
– All financial transactions are included for reporting (Purchases)

 Valuation or Allocation
– All amounts represented at appropriate amount (Accounts receivable)

 Rights and Obligations

– Assets and Liabilities represents rights and obligations (Lease capitalized)

 Presentation & Disclosure

– Properly classified and disclosed (Long term liabilities)

61
 Documentation standards
 Management must document the design of controls related to all relevant
assertions for all significant financial statement accounts
 Documentation must encompass the entire process of:
– initiating
– authorising
– recording
– processing
– reporting individual transactions
 The required documentation might take various forms: flowcharts, policy
manuals, accounting manuals, narrative memoranda, decision tables,
procedural write-ups or completed questionnaires
 Flowcharts, supplemented by narrative descriptions, are frequently the
most effective form of control documentation

62
 Objectives of a walkthrough
 Confirms that the documentation prepared by the company
reflects its actual processes
 Confirm that controls described in the documentation are
actually those applied “in the field”
 Confirm that, at least, all key controls have been
documented appropriately (completeness of the process
documented)

Walkthroughs should confirm that the documentation is appropriate

to develop the testing plan

63
 Gaps in Controls
 Processes not adequately documented (scope and quality)

 Controls not implemented

 Controls poorly designed

 Controls not working effectively

 Control-related roles not assigned

 Non-existence of policies

 Gaps identified during documentation process – Will be shared on

confirmation during walk-through process

64
 Scope
Process identified for documentation

 Purchase of Materials and Accounts Payable

 Production Accounting
 Stock Accounting
 Sales Accounting and Accounts Receivables
 Treasury and Banking Transactions
 General Accounting
 Fixed Assets

65
 Purchase
Purchase of
of Materials
Materials and
and Accounts
Accounts
Payable
Payable

 Master maintenance – BOM & Suppliers

 Issue of purchase orders Receivables
 GAR and Inventory Verification
 Raising debit notes on creditors
 Accounting for creditors
 Payment processing

66
 Production
Production Accounting
Accounting

 Material Issues
 Production accounting – back flashing
 Costing and standard updation

67
 Stock
Stock Accounting
Accounting

 Physical Verification
 Stock valuation
 3P Management

68
 Sales
Sales Accounting
Accounting to
to Receivables
Receivables

 Master maintenance
 Receiving and accepting sales orders
 Dispatching
 Accounting sales and debtors
 Provision for debtors

69
 Treasury
Treasury and
and banking
banking transactions
transactions

 Payment and receipt of money

 Schedule of authority
 Banking of receipts
 Accounting for FOREX conversion and forward covers
 Export Packing credit management
 Bank Recos.

70
 General
General Accounting
Accounting

 IUT’s
 Cut offs and period end/ consolidation
 Journal entries
 Restructuring provisions

71
 Fixed
Fixed Assets
Assets

 Capital Proposal approval and capital advances accounting

 Receiving and accounting for capital WIP
 Additions to FA and deletion from FA
 Depreciation Accounting
 Impairment provisions
 Physical verification

72
Presented By

Sanjay Kumar Yadav, BBM 5th Sem

Email ID: sanjayyadav330@gmail.com

73 ACHARYA INSTITUTE OF GRADUATE STUDIES

74