Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Service
Winter 2006
CEE 320
CEE 320
Steve Muench
Outline
1. Definitions
2. Level of Service (LOS)
3. Freeway Segment LOS Determination
a. Free-flow speed
b. Flow Rate
4. Multilane Highway LOS
5. Design Traffic Volume
Winter 2006
CEE 320
I-5 Average Daily Traffic
Winter 2006
CEE 320
• Freeway Capacity
– The maximum sustained 15-min flow rate,
expressed in passenger cars per hour per lane,
that can be accommodated by a uniform freeway
segment under prevailing traffic and roadway
conditions in one direction of flow.
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Definitions – Flow Characteristics
• Undersaturated
– Traffic flow that is unaffected by upstream or downstream
conditions.
• Queue discharge
– Traffic flow that has just passed through a bottleneck and is
accelerating back to the FFS of the freeway.
• Oversaturated
– Traffic flow that is influenced
by the effects of a
downstream bottleneck.
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Sf
Free Flow Speed
Uncongested Flow
Speed (mph)
Sm
Optimal flow,
Congested Flow Flow (veh/hr) capacity, vm
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Uncongested Flow
Winter 2006
CEE 320
• Driver population
– Non-commuters suck more at driving
– They may affect capacity
• Capacity
– Corresponds to LOS E and v/c = 1.0
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Definitions – Level of Service
(LOS)
Freeway LOS
Freeway LOS
LOS Calculation
Determine LOS
CEE 320
Winter 2006
Determining FFS
V
vp =
PHF × N × f HV × f p
• Typical values
– 0.80 to 0.95
– Lower PHF characteristic or rural or off-peak
– Higher PHF typical of urban peak-hour
V
PHF =
V15 × 4
V= hourly volume (veh/hr) for hour of analysis
V15 = maxiumum 15-min. flow rate within hour of analysis
4= Number of 15-min. periods per hour
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Freeway LOS
• Two-step process
– Determine passenger-car equivalents (ET)
– Determine fHV
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Freeway LOS
Determine fHV
1
f HV =
1 + PT ( ET − 1) + PR ( E R − 1)
• Two-step process
– Determine passenger-car equivalents (ET)
– Determine fHV
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Freeway LOS
For 55 < FFS ≤ 70 mph AND (3400 – 30FFS) < vp ≤ (1700 + 10FFS)
1 v p + 30 FFS − 3400
2.6
Determine Density
Example
Determine the typical LOS for SR 520 eastbound near Microsoft
(MP 10.25 – shown in the picture below) at 7 a.m. and 10 p.m.
Geometry
• 11 ft. lane width
• Left lateral clearance = 5 ft.
• Right lateral clearance = 4 ft.
Other
• 7 am PHF = 0.95
• 10 pm PHF = 0.99
• 2% trucks
• 3% buses from WSDOT’s SRWeb
http://srview.wsdot.wa.gov/
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Freeway LOS
Determine FFS
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Freeway LOS
Determine FFS
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Freeway LOS
Determine FFS
from Microsoft MapPoint
Determine FFS
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Freeway LOS
Graph from the Puget Sound Regional Council’s Puget Sound Trends, No. T6, July 1997
Freeway LOS
Determine LOS
Winter 2006
CEE 320
CEE 320
Winter 2006
V
vp =
PHF × N × f HV × f p
• Two-step process
– Determine passenger-car equivalents (ET)
– Determine fHV
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Same as
Freeway LOS
Multilane Highway LOS
Determine fHV
1
f HV =
1 + PT ( ET − 1) + PR ( E R − 1)
34 v − 1400
219
S = FFS −
p
FFS −
205 41 171
FFS − 1181
5
S = FFS
Multilane Highway LOS
Determine LOS
Use vp and passenger car speed (S)
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Determine Density
DHV
K=
AADT
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Definitions
DDHV = K × D × AADT
Winter 2006
CEE 320
Typical Graph
Highest 100 Hourly Volumes Over a One-Year
0.15 Period for a Typical Roadway
Hourly volume as a proportion of AADT
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.10
0 20 40 60 80 100
Winter 2006