You are on page 1of 16

UNILEVER

IN BRAZIL Group Members


Umair ijaz
Usama aziz
Iyyaz khalid
Sehrish khalid
A case of Marketing Strategies for Low Daniyal zaidi
Income Consumers Fazeelat ashraf
About Unilever and the target
segment in Brazil
▸ Unilever is one of the world’s top ▸ Unilever is one of the world’s
makers of packaged consumer top three food firms with Nestle
goods operating in 190 countries and Kraft
and
▸ The world’s second largest
▸ Have a large brand portfolio of packaged consumer goods
over 400 brands under two divisions company behind Procter &
Gamble.
▸ Foods and Home & Personal
care. ▸ The main success factor of the
company is the constant focus
on innovative product
developments

2
Vision Unilever’s vision is “to make sustainable living commonplace. We
believe this is the best long-term way for our business to grow.”

Unilever’s corporate mission is “to add vitality to life. We meet


Mission every day needs for nutrition, hygiene and personal care with
brands that help people feel good, look good and get more out of
life.”

Four core values of Unilever are


Value • Integrity
• Responsibility
• Respect
• Pioneering
High Success in the Overall Brazilian Detergent
Powder and Laundry Soap Market

▸ Omo (powder premium brand)


▸ Minerva (sold as powder & laundry soap)
Brand ▸ Campeiro (cheapest powder brand)
Portfolio ▸ 81% market share in detergent powder category
▸ Vs. 15% market share of P&G, the next biggest
competitor

4
Low- Income Consumers in Northeastern Brazil
Constitute a Large but very Specific Customer

Demographic Background Laundry and Detergent


▸ 48 million low-income Use Patterns
consumers ▸ Clothes washed
▸ 28% of Brazil‘s total frequently due to few
population clothes and more time
▸ 40% illiterate ▸ Pleasurable activity
(washing in a public
▸ Per capita income of $ 2,250 laundry, river, or pond
▸ 53% live on less than two ,meeting and chatting
minimum wages with friends)

5
“ Should Unilever target the low-income segment of consumers in the
Northeast? What are the short-term and long-term implications of the
decision?

▸ Unilever enjoys the market leadership with 81% of market share in detergent powder
category.
▸ There is no other way to grow other than expanding into new segments.
▸ The competition from P&G is a threatening one, in view of their formidable R & D and
marketing expertise.
▸ With a growth rate of 17% the detergent market is a swiftly growing and lucrative one.
▸ Hence it is imperative that Unilever enter the market of low income consumers.

6
IMPLICATIONS OF ENTERING THE
NEW MARKET SEGMENT
Short term implications Long term implications
▸ Entering a new market segment implies that ▸ By employing the right strategy, a whole
money has to be invested for setting up new class of consumer segment will be
infrastructure and facilitating marketing opened up for Unilever.
activities.
▸ A suitable positioning of the product in the
▸ This causes the diversion of funds perception map will ensure that the new
earmarked for the premium brands, product does not cannibalize the market
affecting their promotional activities of the flagship brand, Omo.
▸ The positive side of such a move is that
Unilever can obtain first mover advantage in
a fast growing market and this momentum,
if utilized effectively can bolster their market
leadership in this category.
7
Current brand portfolio
Unilever in Brazilian Fabric Wash Market

1
Detergent Powder 1
Laundry Soap
• Market worth $106 mn • Market worth $102 mn
• Growing at 17% Growing at 6%
• 3 major competitors • Many local competitors
Omo
• Premium product Minerva
2 2
• USP is having high ability to • Relatively cheaper
remove stains • USP is its ability to dissolve
• 52% market share at $3/kg easily
• 17% market share at $2.4/kg
Campeiro 3
• Cheapest 3

• No USP , targeted at low income Minerva


group • Competing with the local
• 6% market share at $1.7/kg brands
• 19% market share, at $1.7/kg

8
Brand positioning vs. Brand extension

▸ In case of a brand ▸ Introducing a brand


repositioning campeiro extension , backed by
will be the suitable suitable product
candidate. promotion will enable the
▸ However, the customer company to successfully
perception of campeiro position the product
as a low quality product among the target
may affect the customers
repositioning exercise. ▸ The proposed positioning
of the product is depicted
below:

9
10
Positioning statement
Who we are? What business are we looking?

Major manufacturers in Food, NE Brazilian Fabric Wash


Home care and Personal care Market

20XX 20XX

20XX
20XX

Who is the Target Market?


Need of the Target Market

Low income groups of NE


Brazil A Detergent powder(like Omo)
at an affordable price with better
characteristics than detergents like
Campeiro

11 .
PEST Analysis
Political Forces No Forces
Economic Forces Low Income consumer
Social & cultural Forces Washing clothing like festival
Technological Forces 72% , no washing machines

12
Marketing MIX
Product Price
• Quality to be better than Campeiro • Ideally between Minerva and
and to be sold in boxes of multiple Campeiro.
types & sizes.
• Product to form easy lather and
should produce foam when dissolved
in water.
• It should also have a pleasant smell

Place Promotion
• The existing distribution channels • promotional activities to take
may not be of much use. place in mass media as well as in
• May look into highly specialized the areas where the target
distributors, who have knowledge and customers reside.
access of the pockets where the low
income consumers reside.

13
SWOT Analysis
Strength weakness
• Pioneer of consumer goods in brazil • Price level OMO is expensive
• The size of the company is its major • Lack of small store experience
strength • Less experience of approaching less
• Leadership position in the market of income level consumers
detergent and soap • Lack of proper distribution channel
• Good image in the customer mind of • Prices of Unilever products are higher
the previous products than its competitors.
• High brand image
Opportunity Threats
• Northern market not strutted yet • Economic challenges
• A new market available • Tough competition
• Have about 75000 small outlets • Social cultural differences
• Competitive advantage • Difficult to keep the margin
• Customer trust on the previous brands • An increased social and
• A strong image in the customers mind environmental concern.

14
Conclusion
• Unilever to launch a brand extension
targeted at lower income customers.
• Distribution channels may be
modified to efficiently reach the
target segment .
• Sufficient funds may be allocated to
the project, to gain the first mover
advantage and to sustain the
momentum

15
Thanks!
Any questions?

16

You might also like