Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • BREAKDOWN AREL CONCEPT - Natasya Ayu Salsabilla

    Uploaded by

    Khairul Ali Alatas
    28 views4 pages
    The document breaks down the AREL concept for structuring arguments and then provides an example argument against banning company towns. The argument asserts that not banning company towns will attract investors to invest. It reasons that company towns provide good standards that attract investment and increase the economy cycle, benefiting people. The argument concludes that banning company towns would make it difficult to attract investors and slow economic growth, reducing new tax revenue.

    Original Description:

    Presentasi

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document breaks down the AREL concept for structuring arguments and then provides an example argument against banning company towns. The argument asserts that not banning company towns will attract investors to invest. It reasons that company towns provide good standards that attract investment and increase the economy cycle, benefiting people. The argument concludes that banning company towns would make it difficult to attract investors and slow economic growth, reducing new tax revenue.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    28 views4 pages

    BREAKDOWN AREL CONCEPT - Natasya Ayu Salsabilla

    Uploaded by

    Khairul Ali Alatas
    The document breaks down the AREL concept for structuring arguments and then provides an example argument against banning company towns. The argument asserts that not banning company towns will attract investors to invest. It reasons that company towns provide good standards that attract investment and increase the economy cycle, benefiting people. The argument concludes that banning company towns would make it difficult to attract investors and slow economic growth, reducing new tax revenue.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    BREAKDOWN THE

    CONCEPT OF AREL
    AREL AREL BREAKDOWN
    • A: assertion ASSERTION
    1. Assertion (must be specific!!)
    • R: reasoning REASONING
    2. root of problem/characterization/status quo is not
    • E: example enough
    3. reason why you bring your own assertion (+ example)
    • L: linkback 4. why good? (+example)
    5. why important?
    6. comparison
    LINBACK
    7. Linkback
    THW BAN COMPANY TOWNS
    opposition
    ASSERTION
    why not banning company town will attract investor to invest?
    REASONING

    characterization
    company town: Citraland, PIK, etc.
    investor has power to uphold the companies, and also government. Those actors need the help of investor to develop
    Problem
    government hard to negotiate with investor krn investor banyak demand (benefit, gamau rugi).
    Reason
    why not banning company town will attract investor to invest?
    because company town provides a good standard, it will attract investor to invest in those company towns.

    Why Good if investor invest?


    invest-got fund-INCREASE ECONOMY CYCLE
    Why important?
    because increase economy cycle-benefit for ppl (all people)
    in the end of the day, if those company town grow, even private, they’ll give tax to the government anyway. If those company manipulate, can also tackled
    by law buat punish
    Comparison
    if banning: susah attract investor krn interest gov sama investor beda- no place for new tax coming from cpmpany town-ekonomi gajalan.
    LINKBACK

    You might also like