BIOGRAPHICAL BACKGROUND CONCEPT OF THEORY CRITICISMS PERSONAL EVALUATION RESEARCH VALIDATION VIEW OF HUMAN NATURE TRAIT PERSONALITY THEORIES OUTLOOK ON HUMAN NATURE CAN BE CONSIDERED AS NEUTRAL. THE THEORY LOOKS ON HUMANS AS NEUTRALS, POSSESSING NEITHER POSITIVE NOR NEGATIVE TRAIT. ONE OF THE BASIC ASSUMPTION THE TRAIT THEORIES HAS IS THAT PEOPLE POSSESS A BROAD NATURES, CALLED TRAIT TO RESPOND IN A PARTICULAR WAYS. (CERVONE & PERVIN, 2008). AS HUMAN BEINGS, TRAIT THEORIES STATES THAT WE POSSESS WIDE VARIETY OF TRAIT CHARACTERISTICS THAT ARE CONSTANT OVER TIME. ALTHOUGH HUMANS POSSESS WIDE VARIETY OF TRAIT CHARACTERISTICS, NOT EVERYONE SHARES THE SAME TRAIT CHARACTERISTICS. VIEW OF HUMAN NATURE THE DIFFERENT COMBINATION OF TRAITS FOUND IN EACH PERSON ARE THE ONES THAT MAKES EACH UNIQUE. TRAIT THEORIES ARE THEREFORE FOCUSED ON THE DIFFERENCES IN PEOPLE WITH RELATION TO THEIR OWN SET OF PERSONALITY TRAITS. VIEW OF HUMAN NATURE THE HUMANISTIC PERSPECTIVE OF TRAIT THEORY IS BASED AROUND THE MEASUREMENT AND COMPREHENSION OF TRAITS. TRAITS ARE CHARACTERISTIC PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOR THAT ARE ASSESSED USING OF A VARIETY OF METHODS. THE TRAIT THEORY BELIEVES TRAITS ARE STABLE OVER TIME. THIS MEANS A PERSON'S TRAITS DO NOT CHANGE WITH TIME AND ENVIRONMENT. THE TRAIT THEORY ALSO PROMOTES DIFFERENCE IN TRAITS IN INDIVIDUALS AND THE INFLUENCE OF TRAITS ON BEHAVIORS. THE TRAIT THEORY SUPPORTS THE IDEA THAT TRAITS VARY FROM PERSON TO PERSON AND THAT TRAITS REMAIN CONSTANT. THE TRAIT THEORY ALSO BELIEVES ATTRIBUTES BEHAVIOR TO TRAITS. THE TRAIT THEORY IS USED TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF BEHAVIORS IN INDIVIDUALS COMPARED TO OTHERS. ALLPORT’S TRAIT THEORY OF PERSONALITY GORDON W. ALLPORT NOVEMBER 11, 1897-OCTOBER 9,1967
GORDON W. ALLPORT WAS A LONGTIME AND
INFLUENTIAL MEMBER OF THE FACULTY AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY FROM 1930 TO 1967. IN 1931, HE SERVED ON THE FACULTY COMMITTEE THAT ESTABLISHED HARVARD'S SOCIOLOGY DEPARTMENT. HE RECEIVED THE APA'S DISTINGUISHED SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION AWARD. GORDON ALLPORT DIED ON OCTOBER 9, 1967 IN CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS OF LUNG CANCER. HE WAS SEVENTY YEARS OLD. GORDON W. ALLPORT NOV.11, 1897-OCT.9,1967
ALLPORT WAS BORN IN MONTEZUMA, INDIANA, THE
YOUNGEST OF FOUR SONS OF JOHN EDWARD AND NELLIE EDITH (WISE) ALLPORT. WHEN GORDON WAS SIX YEARS OLD, THE FAMILY HAD MOVED MANY TIMES AND FINALLY SETTLING IN OHIO; HIS EARLY EDUCATION WAS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF CLEVELAND, OHIO. HE WORKED AS AN INSTRUCTOR IN PSYCHOLOGY FROM 1924 TO 1926 AND BEGAN TEACHING HIS COURSE "PERSONALITY: ITS PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL ASPECTS" IN 1924; IT WAS PROBABLY THE FIRST COURSE IN PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY EVER TAUGHT IN THE U.S. GORDON W. ALLPORT NOV.11, 1897-OCT.9,1967
ALLPORT WAS ONE OF THE FIRST
PSYCHOLOGIST TO FOCUS ON THE STUDY OF PERSONALITY TRAITS. HE FOCUSES ON THE UNIQUENESS ON AN INDIVIDUAL AND IMPORTANCE OF THE PRESENT CONTEXT AND OPPOSED TO PAST HISTORY. CONCEPT OF THEORY
ACCORDING TO ALLPORT’S TRAIT PERSONALITY THEORY, ALL HUMANS HAS
COMMON TRAIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAIT. COMMON TRAITS REFERS TO CHARACTERISTICS WHICH ARE MORE GENERAL THAN HABITS AND ATTITUDES IN RESPECT TO WHICH PEOPLE IN A POPULATION CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY COMPARED. INDIVIDUAL TRAITS REFERS TO BEHAVIORAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT ARE NOT FOUND IN ALL PERSONS AND MAY NOT EVEN EXIST THAT SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL. CONCEPT OF THEORY -COMMON AND INDIVIDUAL TRAIT
ACCORDING TO ALLPORT’S TRAIT PERSONALITY THEORY, ALL HUMANS HAS
COMMON TRAIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAIT. COMMON TRAITS REFERS TO CHARACTERISTICS WHICH ARE MORE GENERAL THAN HABITS AND ATTITUDES IN RESPECT TO WHICH PEOPLE IN A POPULATION CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY COMPARED. INDIVIDUAL TRAITS REFERS TO BEHAVIORAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT ARE NOT FOUND IN ALL PERSONS AND MAY NOT EVEN EXIST THAT SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL. CONCEPT OF THEORY -ALLPORT’S TRAIT LEVELS CARDINAL TRAITS- REFERS TO THE TRAITS THAT DOMINATES AND SHAPES A PERSON’S BEHAVIOR, OFTEN TO THE POINT THAT THE PERSON BECOMES KNOW SPECIFICALLY FOR THESE TRAITS (E.G NARCISSISM, CHRIST-LIKE, MARTYRS). CENTRAL TRAITS-REFERS TO THE CHARACTERISTIC THAT CONTROL LESS OF A PERSON’S BEHAVIOR BUT ARE NEVERTHELESS IMPORTANT. THESE ARE THE BASIC BUILDING BLOCKS THAT SHAPES MOST OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR. (E.G. HONEST, KIND, LOVING, PROUD, FUNNY). SECONDARY TRAITS- REFERS CHARACTERISTICS SEEN ONLY IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. THESE TRAITS ARE SOMETIMES RELATED TO ATTITUDES OR PREFERENCES AND OFTEN APPEARS ONLY UNDER SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES (E.G. ANXIOUS WHEN SPEAKING TO A GROUP OR IMPATIENT WHILE IN LINE) CONCEPT OF THEORY -ALLPORT’S GENOTYPES AND PHENOTYPES • ALLPORT HYPOTHESIZED THE IDEA OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FORCES THAT INFLUENCE AN INDIVIDUAL'S BEHAVIOR. HE CALLED THESE FORCES GENOTYPES AND PHENOTYPES. • GENOTYPES ARE INTERNAL FORCES THAT RELATE TO HOW A PERSON RETAINS INFORMATION AND USES IT TO INTERACT WITH THE EXTERNAL WORLD. • PHENOTYPES ARE EXTERNAL FORCES, THESE RELATE TO THE WAY AN INDIVIDUAL ACCEPTS HIS SURROUNDINGS AND HOW OTHERS INFLUENCE THEIR BEHAVIOR. THESE FORCES GENERATE THE WAYS IN WHICH WE BEHAVE AND ARE THE GROUNDWORK FOR THE CREATION OF INDIVIDUAL TRAITS. • THE PROBLEM WITH THIS HYPOTHESIS IS THAT IT CANNOT BE PROVEN AS THEY ARE INTERNAL THEORIES, INFLUENCED PRESUMABLY BY THE OUTER ENVIRONMENT. CONCEPT OF THEORY -ALLPORT’S DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELF
INFANCY- THE BODILY SELF
UP TO 18 MONTHS-SELF IDENTITY 2 TO 3 YEARS OLD-SELF ESTEEM 4 TO 6 YEARS OLD-SELF EXTENSION, SELF IMAGE 7 TO 12 YEARS OLD- THE SELF AS RATIONAL ADOLESCENCES ONWARDS- THE SELF AS KNOWER-INTEGRATING ALL THE ASPECTS OF THE SELF CONCEPT OF THEORY -ALLPORT’S DEVELOPMENT OF THE MATURE PERSONALITY ALLPORT BELIEVED THAT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MATURE PERSONALITY TAKES TIME AND THAT ONLY THE ADULT IS CAPABLE OF COMING CLOSE TO SELF- REALIZATION. AS THEIR SELF DEVELOPMENT, CHILDREN ALSO LEARN TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AGAINST THREATS THROUGH THE USE OF VARIOUS DEFENSIVE STRATEGIES. CONCEPT OF THEORY -ALLPORT’S FUNCTIONAL AUTONOMY OF MOTIVES • ALLPORT WAS ONE OF THE FIRST RESEARCHERS TO DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN MOTIVE AND DRIVE. HE SUGGESTED THAT A DRIVE FORMS AS A REACTION TO A MOTIVE, WHICH MAY OUTGROW THE MOTIVE AS THE REASON FOR A BEHAVIOR. THE DRIVE THEN BECOMES AUTONOMOUS AND DISTINCT FROM THE MOTIVE, WHETHER THE MOTIVE WAS INSTINCT OR SOMETHING ELSE. THE IDEA THAT DRIVES CAN BECOME INDEPENDENT OF THE ORIGINAL MOTIVES FOR A GIVEN BEHAVIOR IS KNOWN AS "FUNCTIONAL AUTONOMY.“ CONCEPT OF THEORY -ALLPORT’S FUNCTIONAL AUTONOMY OF MOTIVES CHARACTERISTICS OF MATURITY 1 EXTENSION OF THE SENSE OF SELF-PARTICIPATE IN ACTIVITIES THAT GO BEYOND THEMSELVES. 2. WARM RELATEDNESS TO OTHERS—INTIMACY AND COMPASSION 3. SELF-ACCEPTANCE--EMOTIONALLY SECURE. 4. REALISTIC PERCEPTION OF REALITY--DO NOT CONTINUALLY DISTORT REALITY . 5. SELF-OBJECTIFICATION--INSIGHT INTO THEIR OWN ABILITIES AND LIMITATIONS MURRAY'S TRAIT THEORY OF PERSONALITY HENRY A. MURRAY MAY 13, 1893 – JUNE 23, 1988
HENRY MURRAY'S HISTORY IS ANYTHING BUT A PREREQUISITE
FOR A CAREER IN PSYCHOLOGY. HE EARNED HIS BACHELOR'S DEGREE IN HISTORY IN 1915, A MEDICAL DEGREE FROM COLUMBIA IN 1919 AND THEN COMPLETED A DOCTORATE IN BIOCHEMISTRY FROM CAMBRIDGE NINE YEARS LATER. HIS START IN PSYCHOLOGY OCCURRED AFTER READING JUNG AND EVENTUALLY ARRANGING A MEETING WITH HIM. DURING THIS MEETING, JUNG CONVINCED MURRAY TO STUDY PSYCHOANALYSIS, WHICH HE DID AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY. AFTER COMPETING HIS TRAINING, MURRAY ACTUALLY BEGAN TEACHING PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY AT HARVARD, AND HE REMAINED THERE FOR THE REST OF HIS PROFESSIONAL CAREER. HENRY A. MURRAY MAY 13, 1893 – JUNE 23, 1988
ALTHOUGH CONSIDERED A TRAIT THEORIST, MURRAY'S
MEDICAL BACKGROUND, COMBINED WITH HIS ANALYTICAL TRAINING GIVE A UNIQUE FLAIR TO HIS RESEARCH AND WRITING. THIS IS PROBABLY MOST EVIDENT IN HIS DEVELOPMENT OF THE THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST (TAT), A PERSONALITY TEST DESIGNED TO DETERMINE PERSONALITY THEMES AS WELL AS UNCONSCIOUS MOTIVATION. HE WAS FOCUSED ON BASIC NEEDS IN PERSONALITY WHICH HE CALLED PSYCHOGENIC NEEDS. HE BELIEVED THESE NEEDS WERE LARGELY AT THE UNCONSCIOUS LEVEL. AFTER RESEARCHING THIS AREA, HE NARROWED THESE NEEDS DOWN TO 27, ALTHOUGH THE LIST AND NAMES VARY DEPENDING ON THE TIME FRAME AND THE AUTHOR. HENRY A. MURRAY MAY 13, 1893 – JUNE 23, 1988
HENRY ALEXANDER MURRAY (MAY 13, 1893 – JUNE 23,
1988) WAS AN AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY. HE WAS DIRECTOR OF THE HARVARD PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINIC IN THE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES AFTER 1930. MURRAY DEVELOPED A THEORY OF PERSONALITY CALLED PERSONOLOGY, BASED ON "NEED" AND "PRESS". MURRAY WAS ALSO A CO- DEVELOPER, WITH CHRISTIANA MORGAN, OF THE THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST (TAT), WHICH HE REFERRED TO AS "THE SECOND BEST-SELLER THAT HARVARD EVER PUBLISHED, SECOND ONLY TO THE HARVARD HANDBOOK OF MUSIC." CONCEPT OF THEORY -MURRAY’S PERSONOLOGY ACCORDING TO MURRAY, AN INDIVIDUAL'S PERSONALITY DEVELOPS DYNAMICALLY AS EACH PERSON RESPONDS TO COMPLEX ELEMENTS IN HER OR HIS SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENT. MURRAY VIEWED AN INDIVIDUAL'S ENTIRE LIFE AS ONE UNIT, AND POINTED OUT THAT ALTHOUGH A SPECIFIC ELEMENT OF A PERSON'S LIFE CAN BE STUDIED THROUGH PSYCHOLOGY, THIS STUDIED EPISODE GIVES AN INCOMPLETE PICTURE OF THE ENTIRE LIFE UNIT. TO PROPERLY ANALYZE THE ENTIRE LIFE CYCLE, MURRAY FAVORED A NARRATIVE APPROACH TO STUDYING PERSONALITY, WHICH HE CALLED "PERSONOLOGY". THE PERSONOLOGICAL SYSTEM HAS BEEN USED AS AN APPROACH FOR MULTIPLE ACADEMIC DISCIPLINES: PHILOSOPHY, HUMANISM, BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, AND SOCIETAL AND CULTURAL STUDIES. CONCEPT OF THEORY -MURRAY’S PERSONOLOGY MURRAY DIVIDED PERSONOLOGY INTO FIVE PRINCIPLES: (1) CEREBRAL PHYSIOLOGY, ROOTED IN THE BRAIN, GOVERNS ALL ASPECTS OF PERSONALITY. (2) PEOPLE ACT TO REDUCE PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL TENSION TO GAIN SATISFACTION, BUT DO NOT STRIVE TO BE TENSION-FREE, AND RATHER CYCLE BETWEEN SEEKING EXCITEMENT, ACTIVITY AND MOVEMENT IN THEIR LIVES AND THEN RELAXING. (3) AN INDIVIDUAL'S PERSONALITY CONTINUES TO DEVELOP OVER TIME AND IS INFLUENCED BY ALL OF THE EVENTS THAT OCCUR OVER A PERSON'S LIFETIME. (4) PERSONALITY IS NOT FIXED AND IT CAN CHANGE AND PROGRESS, AND (5) EACH PERSON HAS SOME UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS AND OTHERS WHICH ARE SHARED BY EVERYONE. CONCEPT OF THEORY -MURRAY’S PERSONOLOGY MURRAY'S THEORY OF PERSONALITY IS ROOTED IN PSYCHOANALYSIS, AND THE CHIEF BUSINESS AND AIM OF PERSONOLOGY IS THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE INDIVIDUAL'S PAST LIFE EXPERIENCES IN ORDER TO EXPLAIN THEIR PRESENT BEHAVIOR. TO STUDY PERSONALITY, MURRAY USED FREE ASSOCIATION AND DREAM ANALYSIS TO BRING UNCONSCIOUS MATERIAL TO LIGHT. CONCEPT OF THEORY -MURRAY’S PSYCHOGENIC NEEDS NEED FOR POWER - REFERS TO THE DESIRE OR NEED TO IMPACT OTHER PEOPLE, TO CONTROL OR BE IN A POSITION OF INFLUENCE. CAREERS THAT INVOLVE THESE ASPECTS ARE BETTER SUITED FOR HIGH NPOW PEOPLE, SUCH AS TEACHERS, PSYCHOLOGISTS, JOURNALISTS, AND SUPERVISORS. THEY DON'T NECESSARILY MAKE THE BEST LEADERS THOUGH. RESEARCH HAS FOUND THAT THOSE WITH HIGH NPOW ARE MORE LIKELY TO RATE AN EMPLOYEE HIGHER IF THAT EMPLOYEE HAS A TENDENCY TO SCHMOOZE OR FLATTER THE SUBJECT WHERE THOSE WITH LOW OR MODERATE NPOW RATE EMPLOYEES THE SAME. IN THIS SENSE, THOSE WITH HIGH NPOW WOULD DO WELL IF THEY ALSO HAD TRAITS OF SELF-CONTROL AND OBJECTIVITY CONCEPT OF THEORY -MURRAY’S PSYCHOGENIC NEEDS DESCRIPTION OF NEED • ABASEMENT TO SURRENDER AND ACCEPT PUNISHMENT • ACHIEVEMENT TO OVERCOME OBSTACLES AND SUCCEED • ACQUISITION (CONSERVANCY) TO OBTAIN POSSESSIONS • AFFILIATION TO MAKE ASSOCIATIONS AND FRIENDSHIPS • AGGRESSION TO INJURE OTHERS • AUTONOMY TO RESIST OTHERS AND STAND STRONG • BLAME AVOIDANCE TO AVOID BLAME AND OBEY THE RULES • CONSTRUCTION O BUILD OR CREATE CONCEPT OF THEORY -MURRAY’S PSYCHOGENIC NEEDS • CONTRARIANCE TO BE UNIQUE • COUNTERACTION TO DEFEND HONOR • DEPENDENCE TO JUSTIFY ACTIONS • DEFERENCE TO FOLLOW A SUPERIOR, TO SERVE • DOMINANCE (POWER) TO CONTROL AND LEAD OTHERS • EXHIBITION TO ATTRACT ATTENTION • EXPOSITION TO PROVIDE INFORMATION, EDUCATE • HARM AVOIDANCE TO AVOID PAIN • INFAVOIDANCE TO AVOID FAILURE, SHAME, OR TO CONCEAL A WEAKNESS • NURTURANCE TO PROTECT THE HELPLESS ORDER TO ARRANGE, ORGANIZE, AND BE PRECISE CONCEPT OF THEORY -MURRAY’S PSYCHOGENIC NEEDS • PLAY TO RELIEVE TENSION, HAVE FUN, OR RELAX • RECOGNITION TO GAIN APPROVAL AND SOCIAL STATUS • REJECTION TO EXCLUDE ANOTHER • SENTIENCE TO ENJOY SENSUOUS IMPRESSIONS • SEX (EROTIC) TO FORM AND ENJOY AN EROTIC RELATIONSHIP • SEMBLANCE TO EMPATHIZE • OCCURRENCE TO SEEK PROTECTION OR SYMPATHY • UNDERSTANDING (COGNIZANCE) TO ANALYZE AND EXPERIENCE, TO SEEK KNOWLEDGE CONCEPT OF THEORY -MURRAY’S PSYCHOGENIC NEEDS • PLAY TO RELIEVE TENSION, HAVE FUN, OR RELAX • RECOGNITION TO GAIN APPROVAL AND SOCIAL STATUS • REJECTION TO EXCLUDE ANOTHER • SENTIENCE TO ENJOY SENSUOUS IMPRESSIONS • SEX (EROTIC) TO FORM AND ENJOY AN EROTIC RELATIONSHIP • SEMBLANCE TO EMPATHIZE • OCCURRENCE TO SEEK PROTECTION OR SYMPATHY • UNDERSTANDING (COGNIZANCE) TO ANALYZE AND EXPERIENCE, TO SEEK KNOWLEDGE RAYMOND BERNARD CATTELL MARCH 20, 1905 –FEBRUARY 2, 1998 RAYMOND BERNARD CATTELL WAS A BRITISH- AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, KNOWN FOR HIS PSYCHOMETRIC RESEARCH INTO INTRAPERSONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE.. HIS WORK ALSO EXPLORED THE BASIC DIMENSIONS OF PERSONALITY AND TEMPERAMENT, THE RANGE OF COGNITIVE ABILITIES, THE DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS OF MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, THE CLINICAL DIMENSIONS OF ABNORMAL PERSONALITY, PATTERNS OF GROUP SYNTALITY AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, APPLICATIONS OF PERSONALITY RESEARCH TO PSYCHOTHERAPY AND LEARNING THEORY, PREDICTORS OF CREATIVITY AND ACHIEVEMENT, AND MANY MULTIVARIATE RESEARCH METHODS] INCLUDING THE REFINEMENT OF FACTOR ANALYTIC METHODS FOR EXPLORING AND MEASURING THESE DOMAINS. RAYMOND BERNARD CATTELL MARCH 20, 1905 –FEBRUARY 2, 1998 • CATTELL WAS BORN IN ENGLAND IN 1905 TO A FAMILY OF ENGINEERS.
• CATTELL WAS A BRIGHT STUDENT, GRADUATING WITH
HIS DOCTORATE IN PSYCHOLOGY IN 1929 FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON AT 23.
• IN 1937, CATTELL WAS INVITED TO THE STATES BY E.L.
THORNDIKE IN NEW YORK.
• IT WAS IN ILLINOIS, THAT HE SPENT HIS MOST
PRODUCTIVE YEARS DEVELOPING PERSONALITY TESTS.
• IN 1997, HE WAS AWARDED A LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT
AWARD FROM THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION. CONCEPT OF THEORY -CATTELL FACTOR-ANALYTIC TRAIT THEORY • CATTELL VIEWS PERSONALITY AS A COMPLEX AND DIFFERENTIATED STRUCTURE OF TRAITS. VIEW OF PERSONALITY • TRAIT IS RELATIVELY PERMANENT REACTION TENDENCIES THAT ARE BASIC STRUCTURAL UNITS OF THE PERSONALITY. • FACTOR ANALYSIS -A COMPLICATED STATISTICAL METHOD THAT FINDS RELATIONSHIPS AMONG MANY DIFFERENT OR DIVERSE ITEMS AND ALLOWS THEM TO BE GROUPED TOGETHER. • TRAIT THEORY - AN APPROACH FOR ANALYZING THE STRUCTURE OF PERSONALITY BY MEASURING, IDENTIFYING, AND CLASSIFYING SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY OR TRAITS. CONCEPT OF THEORY -CATTELL 16 PERSONALITY FACTOR (16PF) THEORY • THE 16PF PROVIDES A MEASURE OF NORMAL PERSONALITY AND CAN ALSO BE USED BY PSYCHOLOGISTS, AND OTHER MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, AS A CLINICAL INSTRUMENT TO HELP DIAGNOSE PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS, AND HELP WITH PROGNOSIS AND THERAPY PLANNING. THE 16PF CAN ALSO PROVIDE INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE CLINICAL AND COUNSELING PROCESS, SUCH AS AN INDIVIDUAL’S CAPACITY FOR INSIGHT, SELF-ESTEEM, COGNITIVE STYLE, INTERNALIZATION OF STANDARDS, OPENNESS TO CHANGE, CAPACITY FOR EMPATHY, LEVEL OF INTERPERSONAL TRUST, QUALITY OF ATTACHMENTS, INTERPERSONAL NEEDS, ATTITUDE TOWARD AUTHORITY, REACTION TOWARD DYNAMICS OF POWER, FRUSTRATION TOLERANCE, AND COPING STYLE. THUS, THE 16PF INSTRUMENT PROVIDES CLINICIANS WITH A NORMAL-RANGE MEASUREMENT OF ANXIETY, ADJUSTMENT, EMOTIONAL STABILITY AND BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS. CLINICIANS CAN USE 16PF RESULTS TO IDENTIFY EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES FOR ESTABLISHING A WORKING ALLIANCE, TO DEVELOP A THERAPEUTIC PLAN, AND TO SELECT EFFECTIVE THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS OR MODES OF TREATMENT.[1] IT CAN ALSO BE USED WITHIN OTHER AREAS OF PSYCHOLOGY, SUCH AS CAREER AND OCCUPATIONAL SELECTION CRITICISM OF TRAIT PERSONALITY THEORIES
1. BEING PURELY DESCRIPTIVE AND OFFERING LITTLE EXPLANATION OF THE
UNDERLYING CAUSES OF PERSONALITY 2. LEAD SOME PEOPLE TO ACCEPT OVERSIMPLIFIED CLASSIFICATIONS 3. UNDERESTIMATE THE EFFECT OF SPECIFIC SITUATIONS ON PEOPLE'S BEHAVIOR. 4. POOR PREDICTORS OF BEHAVIOR. PERSONAL EVALUATION
• QUANTIFYING TRAIT IN ORDER TO MEASURE PERSONALITY IS A
STRAIGHTFORWARD APPROACH. THE USAGE OF CORRELATION AND FACTOR ANALYSIS ARE BEST IN ACCOMPLISHING THIS TASK. • HOWEVER, IF HUMAN BEHAVIOR IS BOXED DOWN INTO TRAITS, WE HAVE NO WAY IF THESE TRAITS ARE BEING EXPRESSED IN ACTUAL SCENARIOS. ALSO ONE FACTORS TO CONSIDER IS THE ENVIRONMENT. ENVIRONMENT HAS A PROBABILITY TO ALTER THE EXPRESSION OF A TRAIT, SPECIALLY IN A VERY STRESSFUL AND CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT.