You are on page 1of 79

Operations

Management
Topic 4 – Plant Layout

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 1


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you should be
able to:
1. Recognize the objectives of strategic layout
decisions
2. Discuss factors that influence layout decisions
3. Identify types of layout and apply for
appropriate usage.
4. Explain how to balance production flow in a
repetitive or product-oriented facility

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 2


Pearson-Prentice Hall
12/06/20 3
Layout
• Facility or Plant Layout: the configuration of
departments, work centers, and equipment, with
particular emphasis on movement of work manpower or
materials through the system. Basics type of layouts:
o Fixed-position layout
o Process-oriented layout
o Work-cell layout
o Product-oriented layout
• Service layouts must be aesthetically pleasing as well
as functional
o Warehouse and storage layouts
o Retail layouts
o Office layouts

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 4


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Strategic Importance of Layout
Decisions

The objective of layout strategy


is to develop an effective and
efficient layout that will meet the
firm’s competitive requirements

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 5


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Layout Design Considerations

1. Higher utilization of space, equipment,


and people
2. Improved flow of information, materials,
or people
3. Improved employee morale and safer
working conditions
4. Improved customer/client interaction
5. Flexibility
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 6
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Factors Influencing Layout Decision #1

1) Type of product / Nature of product


 Concerns whether the product is a good or a service, the aspect
of product design and quality standard and whether it is for stock
or made to order products.
 product layout is suitable for uniform products whereas process
layout is more appropriate for custom-made products.
2) Characteristics of the materials and material handling
equipment.
 The characteristics of materials such as size, shape, fragility,
bulkiness and weight, influences the types of material handling
equipment to be used, such as cranes, conveyors and automatic
carts to deliver and store material.

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and Pearson- 7


Prentice Hall
Factors Influencing Layout Decision #2

3. Nature of manufacturing process


 The size, number and sequences of machines required in the
technology of the production process needs to be considered.
 Type of machinery: General purpose machines are often
arranged as per process layout while special purpose machines
are arranged according to product layout.
 Repairs and maintenance: machines should be so arranged that
adequate space is available between them for movement of
equipment and people required for repairing the machines.

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and Pearson- 8


Prentice Hall
Factors Influencing Layout Decision #3

4. Volume of production
 Plant layout is generally determined by taking into consideration the
quantum of production to be produced.
5. Types of production/operation methods
 In assembly line industries, product layout is better. In job order
or intermittent manufacturing on the other hand, process layout is
desirable.
6. Factory building:
 The nature and size of the building determines the floor space
available for layout. While designing the special requirements, e.g. air
conditioning, dust control, humidity control etc. must be kept in mind.

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and Pearson- 9


Prentice Hall
Factors Influencing Layout Decision #4

7. Human needs:
 Adequate arrangement should be made for washroom, lockers,
drinking water, toilets and other employee facilities, proper provision
should be made for disposal of effluents, if any.
8. Plant environment:
 Heat, light, noise, ventilation and other aspects should be duly
considered, e.g. paint shops and plating section should be located in
another hall so that dangerous fumes can be removed through proper
ventilation etc. Adequate safety arrangement should also be made.

NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and


12/06/20 10
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Types of Layout
1. Office layout
2. Retail layout
3. Warehouse layout
4. Fixed-position layout
5. Process-oriented layout
6. Work-cell layout
7. Product-oriented layout

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 11


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Types of Layout
1. Office layout: Positions workers, their
equipment, and spaces/offices to
provide for movement of information
2. Retail layout: Allocates shelf space
and responds to customer behavior
3. Warehouse layout: Addresses trade-
offs between space and material
handling

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 12


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Types of Layout

4. Fixed-position layout: Addresses the


layout requirements of large, bulky
projects such as ships and buildings
5. Process-oriented layout: Deals with
low-volume, high-variety production
(also called job shop or intermittent
production)

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 13


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Types of Layout

6. Work cell layout: Arranges machinery


and equipment to focus on production
of a single product or group of related
products
7. Product-oriented layout: Seeks the
best personnel and machine
utilizations in repetitive or continuous
production

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 14


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Layout Strategies
TABLE 9.1 Layout Strategies
OBJECTIVES EXAMPLES

Office Locate workers requiring Allstate Insurance


frequent contact close to one Microsoft Corp.
another

Retail Expose customer to high- Kroger’s Supermarket


margin items Walgreen’s
Bloomingdale’s

Warehouse Balance low-cost storage with Federal-Mogul’s warehouse


(storage) low-cost material handling The Gap’s distribution center

Project (fixed Move material to the limited Ingall Ship Building Corp.
position) storage areas around the site Trump Plaza
Pittsburgh Airport

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 15


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Layout Strategies
TABLE 9.1 Layout Strategies
OBJECTIVES EXAMPLES

Job Shop Manage varied material flow for Arnold Palmer Hospital
(process each product Hard Rock Cafe
oriented) Olive Garden

Work Cell Identify a product family, build Hallmark Cards


(product teams, cross train team Wheeled Coach Ambulances
families) members

Repetitive/ Equalize the task time at each Sony’s TV assembly line


Continuous workstation Toyota Scion
(product
oriented)

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 16


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Good Layouts Consider
► Material handling equipment
► Capacity and space requirements
► Environment and aesthetics
► Flows of information
► Cost of moving between various work
areas

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 17


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Office Layout
► Grouping of workers, their equipment,
and spaces to provide comfort, safety,
and movement of information
► Movement of information is main
distinction
► Typically in state of flux due to
frequent technological changes

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 18


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Relationship Chart

Figure 9.1
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 19
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Office Layout
► Three physical and social aspects
► Proximity
► Privacy
► Permission
► Two major trends
► Information technology
► Dynamic needs for space and services

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 20


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Supermarket Retail Layout

▶ Objective is to maximize profitability


per square foot of floor space
▶ Sales and profitability vary directly
with customer exposure

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 21


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Five Helpful Ideas for Supermarket
Layout
1. Locate high-draw items around the periphery of
the store
2. Use prominent locations for high-impulse and
high-margin items
3. Distribute power items to both sides of an aisle
and disperse them to increase viewing of other
items
4. Use end-aisle locations
5. Convey mission of store through careful
positioning of lead-off department
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 22
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Store Layout

Figure 9.2
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 23
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Retail Slotting
▶ Manufacturers pay fees to retailers to
get the retailers to display (slot) their
product
▶ Contributing factors
▶ Limited shelf space
▶ An increasing number of new products
▶ Better information about sales through
POS data collection
▶ Closer control of inventory
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 24
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Servicescapes
1. Ambient conditions - background
characteristics such as lighting, sound,
smell, and temperature
2. Spatial layout and functionality - which
involve customer
circulation path planning,
aisle characteristics, and
product grouping
3. Signs, symbols, and
artifacts - characteristics
of building design that
carry social significance
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 25
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Warehousing and Storage Layouts

▶ Objective is to optimize trade-offs


between handling costs and costs
associated with warehouse space
▶ Maximize the total “cube” of the
warehouse – utilize its full volume
while maintaining low material
handling costs

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 26


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Warehousing and Storage
Layouts
Material Handling Costs
► All costs associated with the transaction
► Incoming transport
► Storage
► Finding and moving material
► Outgoing transport
► Equipment, people, material, supervision,
insurance, depreciation
► Minimize damage and spoilage
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 27
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Warehousing and Storage Layouts
▶ Warehouse density tends to vary inversely
with the number of different items stored
▶ Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems
(ASRSs) can significantly improve
warehouse
productivity by
an estimated 500%
▶ Dock location is a
key design element
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 28
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Cross-Docking
▶ Materials are moved directly from receiving to
shipping and are not placed in storage in the
warehouse
▶ Requires tight
scheduling and
accurate shipments,
bar code or RFID
identification used for
advanced shipment
notification as
materials are unloaded
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 29
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Random Stocking
► Typically requires automatic identification
systems (AISs) and effective information
systems
► Allows more efficient use of space
► Key tasks
1. Maintain list of open locations
2. Maintain accurate records
3. Sequence items to minimize travel, pick time
4. Combine picking orders
12/06/20 5. Assign classes
NY- MEMof
575:items
Courtesy of to particular
Mc Graw Hill and areas 30
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Customizing
▶ Value-added activities performed at the
warehouse
▶ Enable low cost and rapid response
strategies
▶ Assembly of components
▶ Loading software
▶ Repairs
▶ Customized labeling and packaging

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 31


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Fixed-Position Layout
▶ Product remains in one place
▶ Workers and equipment come to site
▶ Complicating factors
▶ Limited space at site
▶ Different materials
required at different
stages of the project
▶ Volume of materials
needed is dynamic
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 32
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Alternative Strategy
▶ As much of the project as possible is
completed off-site in a product-oriented
facility
▶ This can
significantly
improve
efficiency but
is only possible
when multiple
similar units need to be created
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 33
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process-Oriented Layout
▶ Like machines and equipment are
grouped together
▶ Flexible and capable of handling a
wide variety of products or services
▶ Scheduling can be difficult and setup,
material handling, and labor costs can
be high

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 34


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process-Oriented Layout
Surgery ER triage room Emergency room admissions
Patient A - broken leg

Laboratories

Radiology ER Beds Pharmacy Billing/exit

Figure 9.3
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 35
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process-Oriented Layout
▶ Arrange work centers so as to minimize
the costs of material handling
▶ Basic cost elements are
▶ Number of loads (or people) moving
between centers
▶ Distance loads (or people) move between
centers

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 36


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process-Oriented Layout
n n
Minimize cost =å å X ijCij
i=1 j=1

where n = total number of work centers or


departments
i, j = individual departments
Xij = number of loads moved from
department i to department j
Cij = cost to move a load between
department i and department j

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 37


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process Layout Example
Arrange six departments in a factory to
minimize the material handling costs. Each
department is 20 x 20 feet and the building
is 60 feet long and 40 feet wide.
1. Construct a “from-to matrix”
2. Determine the space requirements
3. Develop an initial schematic diagram
4. Determine the cost of this layout
5. Try to improve the layout
6. Prepare a detailed plan
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 38
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process Layout Example
Figure 9.4

Number of loads per week


Department Assembly Painting Machine Receiving Shipping Testing
(1) (2) Shop (3) (4) (5) (6)

Assembly (1) 50 100 0 0 20

Painting (2) 30 50 10 0

Machine Shop (3) 20 0 100

Receiving (4) 50 0

Shipping (5) 0

Testing (6)

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 39


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process Layout Example
Figure 9.5 Area A Area B Area C

Assembly Painting Machine Shop


Department Department Department
(1) (2) (3)

40’

Receiving Shipping Testing


Department Department Department
(4) (5) (6)

Area D Area E Area F


12/06/20
60’
NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 40
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process Layout Example
Figure 9.6
Interdepartmental Flow Graph
100

Assembly 50 Painting 30 Machine


(1) (2) Shop (3)
20 20
10
50 100

Receiving Shipping Testing


(4) (5) (6)
50

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 41


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process Layout Example
n n
Cost =å å X ijCij
i=1 j=1

Cost = $50 + $200 + $40


(1 and 2) (1 and 3) (1 and 6)
+ $30 + $50 + $10
(2 and 3) (2 and 4) (2 and 5)
+ $40 + $100 + $50
(3 and 4) (3 and 6) (4 and 5)
= $570
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 42
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process Layout Example
Revised Interdepartmental Flow Graph
Figure 9.7
30

Painting 50 Assembly 100 Machine


(2) (1) Shop (3)

10
20 20 100
50

Receiving Shipping Testing


(4) (5) (6)
50

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 43


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process Layout Example
n n
Cost =å å X ijCij
i=1 j=1

Cost = $50 + $100 + $20


(1 and 2) (1 and 3) (1 and 6)
+ $60 + $50 + $10
(2 and 3) (2 and 4) (2 and 5)
+ $40 + $100 + $50
(3 and 4) (3 and 6) (4 and 5)
= $480
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 44
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Process Layout Example
Figure 9.8 Area A Area B Area C

Painting Assembly Machine Shop


Department Department Department
(2) (1) (3)

40’

Receiving Shipping Testing


Department Department Department
(4) (5) (6)

Area D Area E Area F


12/06/20
60’
NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 45
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Computer Software
▶ Graphical approach only works for small
problems
▶ Computer programs are available to solve
bigger problems
► CRAFT ► Factory Flow
► ALDEP ► Proplanner
► CORELAP

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 46


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Computer Software
▶ Proplanner analysis
▶ Distance traveled reduced by 38%

After

Before

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 47


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Computer Software
▶ Three dimensional visualization software
allows managers to view possible layouts
and assess process, material
handling, efficiency, and safety issues

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 48


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
BEFORE IMPROVEMENT AFTER IMPROVEMENT

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 49


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Work Cells
▶ Reorganizes people and machines into
groups to focus on single products or
product groups
▶ Group technology identifies products
that have similar characteristics for
particular cells
▶ Volume must justify cells
▶ Cells can be reconfigured as designs
or volume changes
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 50
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Advantages of Work Cells
1. Reduced work-in-process inventory
2. Less floor space required
3. Reduced raw material and finished goods
inventories
4. Reduced direct labor cost
5. Heightened sense of employee participation
6. Increased equipment and machinery
utilization
7. Reduced investment in machinery and
equipment
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 51
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Requirements of Work Cells
▶ Identification of families of products
▶ A high level of training, flexibility and
empowerment of employees
▶ Being self-contained, with its own
equipment and resources
▶ Test (poka-yoke) at each station in
the cell

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 52


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Improving Layouts Using
Work Cells
Figure 9.9 (a)

Material

Current layout - workers in


small closed areas.

Improved layout - cross-trained


workers can assist each other. May
be able to add a third worker as
additional output is needed.

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 53


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Improving Layouts Using
Figure 9.9 (b)
Work Cells

Current layout - straight lines


make it hard to balance tasks Improved layout - in U shape,
because work may not be workers have better access.
divided evenly Four cross-trained workers
were reduced.

U-shaped line may reduce employee movement


and space requirements while enhancing
communication, reducing the number of workers,
and facilitating inspection

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 54


Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Time Study
Staffing and Balancing Work Cells
• The time study involves some calculation of finding time availability, takt
time and necessary manpower.
• Time availability is the time available to work specifically on the process of
producing the product .
• Takt time is the time availability that a process has based on customer
demand. Takt time is the foundation of pull system.
• Necessary manpower is the manpower required for a required process. It is
total cycle time for a product line based on total takt time. The equations are
as followed for 100% target:

Takt Time (in second) = Time Availability (in second) / Customer


Demand.
Necessary Manpower= Total Cycle Time for All process/Total
Takt Time for All Process.
12/06/20 55
Staffing and Balancing Work Cells
Time Study Table for Company A - Forming Process of Packing Tray
1) Determine the total working time each shift

2) Determine the
total working time
each month

3) Get order qty

4)

5) Take cycle time


of the whole 6)
processes

12/06/20 56
Staffing Work Cells Example 2
600 Mirrors per day required
Mirror production scheduled for 8 hours per day
From a work balance 60
chart total operation
50
time = 140 seconds

Standard time required


40

30

20

10
Figure 9.10
0 Assemble Paint Test Label Pack for
shipment
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and Operations 57
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Staffing Work Cells Example 2
600 Mirrors per day required
Mirror production scheduled for 8 hours per day
From a work balance
chart total operation
time = 140 seconds

Takt time = (8 hrs x 60 mins) / 600 units


= .8 min = 48 seconds
Total operation time required
Workers required =
Takt time
= 140 / 48 = 2.92
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 58
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Work Balance Charts
▶ Used for evaluating operation times in
work cells
▶ Can help identify bottleneck
operations
▶ Flexible, cross-trained employees can
help address labor bottlenecks
▶ Machine bottlenecks may require
other approaches
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 59
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Focused Work Center and Focused
Factory
• Focused Work Center
– Identify a large family of similar products
that have a large and stable demand
– Moves production from a general-purpose,
process-oriented facility to a large work cell
• Focused Factory
– A focused work cell in a separate facility
– May be focused by product line, layout,
quality, new product introduction, flexibility,
or other requirements
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 60
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Repetitive and Product-
Oriented Layout
Organized around products or families of
similar high-volume, low-variety products
1. Volume is adequate for high equipment utilization
2. Product demand is stable enough to justify high
investment in specialized equipment
3. Product is standardized or approaching a phase of
life cycle that justifies investment
4. Supplies of raw materials and components are
adequate and of uniform quality

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 61


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Product-Oriented Layouts
► Fabrication line
► Builds components on a series of machines
► Machine-paced
► Require mechanical or engineering changes to
balance
► Assembly line Both types of lines
► must
Puts fabricated parts together at be balanced
a series of
workstations so that the time to
perform the work at
► Paced by work tasks each station is the
► Balanced by moving tasks same

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 62


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Product-Oriented Layouts
Advantages
1. Low variable cost per unit
2. Low material handling costs
3. Reduced work-in-process inventories
4. Easier training and supervision
5. Rapid throughput
Disadvantages
1. High volume is required
2. Work stoppage at any point ties up the whole
operation
3. Lack of flexibility in product or production rates
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 63
Pearson-Prentice Hall
McDonald’s Assembly Line

Figure 9.11
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 64
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Assembly-Line Balancing
▶ Objective is to minimize the imbalance
between machines or personnel while
meeting required output
▶ Starts with the precedence relationships
1. Determine cycle time
2. Calculate theoretical
minimum number of
workstations
3. Balance the line by
assigning specific
tasks to workstations

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 65


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Wing Component Example
TABLE 9.2 Precedence Data for Wing Component
ASSEMBLY TIME TASK MUST FOLLOW
TASK (MINUTES) TASK LISTED BELOW
A 10 – This means that
B 11 A tasks B and E
cannot be done
C 5 B until task A has
D 4 B
been completed

E 11 A
F 3 C, D
G 7 F
H 11 E
I 3 G, H
Total time 65

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 66


Pearson-Prentice Hall
Wing Component Example
Precedence Data for Wing
TABLE 9.2 Component 480 available mins
TASK MUST
per day
ASSEMBLY TIME FOLLOW TASK 40 units required
TASK (MINUTES) LISTED BELOW
A 10 –
Production time available
B 11 A per day
C 5 Cycle
B time = Units required per day
D 4 B Figure 9.12
= 480 / 40
E 11 A 5
F 3 C, D = 12 minutes per unit
C
G 7 F 10 11
n 3 7

H 11 E
Minimum number
A åB Time for task
F i G
4
I 3 of workstations
G, H = i=1 3
CycleD time I
Total time 65 11 11
= 65E / 12 H
=5.42, or 6 stations
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 67
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Wing Component Example
Layout Heuristics That May Be Used to Assign Tasks
TABLE 9.3
to Workstations in Assembly-Line Balancing
1. Longest task time From the available tasks, choose the task
with the largest (longest) task time
2. Most following tasks From the available tasks, choose the task
with the largest number of following tasks

3. Ranked positional From the available tasks, choose the task


weight for which the sum of following task times
is the longest
4. Shortest task time From the available tasks, choose the task
with the shortest task time
5. Least number of From the available tasks, choose the task
following tasks with the least number of subsequent
tasks
12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw 68
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
Wing Component Example
480 available mins
Figure 9.13 per day
40 units required
Cycle time = 12 mins
Minimum
5 workstations = 5.42 or 6
C
10 11 3 7
A B F G
4 3
D I
11 11
E H

12/06/20
NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 69
Pearson-Prentice Hall
Wing Component Example
Precedence Data for Wing 480 available mins
TABLE 9.2 Component per day
TASK MUST
ASSEMBLY TIME FOLLOW TASK
40 units required
TASK (MINUTES) LISTED BELOW Cycle time = 12 mins
A 10 –
Minimum
B 11 A
workstations = 5.42 or 6
C 5 B
D 4 B Figure 9.12
E 11 A 5
F 3 C, D
∑ Task
10
times
11
C
3 7
Efficiency
G = 7 F
H
(Actual
11
number of
E
workstations)
A B x (Largest cycle
F time)
G
4
3
I = 65 minutes
3 / ((6 stations)
G, H x (12 minutes))
D I
Total time 65 11 11
= 90.3%
E H

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 70


Pearson-Prentice Hall
NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw
12/06/20 71
Hill and Pearson-Prentice Hall
2) Advantages and disadvantages

Fixed Process Cell Product


- Very high variety - High variety and - Good compromise -Low unit costs for high
position
and product layout
product flexibility betweenlayout
cost and layout
volume
layout
flexibility flexibility
- Relatively robust - Gives opportunities
- Product/customer if in the case of - Fast throughput. for specialization of
not moved or disruptions equipment
disturbed.
- Group work can
Advantages - Easy supervision
result in good
- High variety of of equipment of
tasks for staff plant motivation

-Low utilization of -Can be costly to -Low variety and


resources. rearrange existing flexibility
-Very high unit cost. layout
-Can have very high -Not very robust to
Disadvantages -Scheduling space
WIP -Need more plant and disruption
equipment
and activities can
be difficult. -Complex flow. -Work can be very
repetitive.
Productivity

Units produced
Productivity =
Input used

 Measure of process improvement


 Represents output relative to input
 Only through productivity increases
can our standard of living improve

12/06/20 73
Productivity Calculations

Labor Productivity
Units produced
Productivity =
Labor-hours used

1,000
= = 4 units/labor-hour
250

One resource input  single-factor productivity


12/06/20 74
Multi-Factor Productivity

Output
Productivity =
Labor + Material + Energy
+ Capital + Miscellaneous
 Also known as total factor productivity
 Output and inputs are often expressed
in dollars

Multiple resource inputs  multi-factor productivity

12/06/20 75
Example: Collins Title Company
Old System (8 titles per/day)
•4 Staff working 8 hrs per day (Labour Hrs = 4 X 8 = 32)
•Payroll cost = $640 per day
•Overhead Cost = $ 400

New System (Purchased Computerized Title Search 14 titles


per/day)
•4 Staff working 8 hrs per day (Labour Hrs = 4 X 8 = 32)
•Payroll cost = $640 per day
•Overhead Cost = $ 800

12/06/20 76
Example: Single-Factor Productivity
Old System

productivity 8 titles/day
= = .25 titles per labour-hr
32 labour-hr

New System

productivity 14 titles/day
= = .43 titles per labour-hr
32 labour-hr
• Labour producticity increase from .25 to .43
• % increased =
.43 - .25 X 100% = 72 %
.25
12/06/20 77
Example: Multi-Factor Productivity

12/06/20 78
Let’s Recap
Can you:

1. List the objectives of strategic layout decisions


2. Discuss factors that influence layout decisions
3. Identify types of layout and apply for
appropriate usage.
4. Explain how to balance production flow in a
repetitive or product-oriented facility

12/06/20 NY- MEM 575: Courtesy of Mc Graw Hill and 79


Pearson-Prentice Hall

You might also like