Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Informational Session
Training Objectives
The Purpose of Performance Management
Performance Management Cycle
Roles & Responsibilities
Methods of Assessment
Understanding the Ratings
Training Objectives (cont.)
Conducting the Performance Review Meeting
Appeal Process
Best Practices and Common Pitfalls in Assessing
Performance
The Purpose of the Policy
Designed to establish a system for:
Phase III
Phase II
Evaluation
Monitoring
Phase I
Planning
Examples
Supervisory evaluations: top-down performance evaluation
conducted by a direct supervisor
Peer-to-peer: performance evaluation conducted by a
colleague in an equal position level and typically in the same
functional area
360° Assessment: provides a more holistic view of the
employee's performance by attaining feedback from the
employee, subordinates, superiors and peers
Self–evaluation: completed by employee and usually
complimented by supervisor’s evaluation on the same factors
Phase I
Setting Goals
Planning
Basic Competencies
Job knowledge
Leadership skills
Problem solving
Relationship building
Communication
Organizational citizenship
Phase I
Planning
Employee Involvement
Monitoring
Em
plo
yee
s
are
mor
e
likel
y to
de
mo
nstr
ate
gen
uin
e
co
mm
itm
ent
to
goa
ls
and
perf
orm
anc
e.
Phase II
Monitoring
Performance Documentation
Both Employee and Supervisor are encouraged to maintain documentation
in support of performance evaluation.
Supervisor Employee
Employee
Self
Interim Assessme
Evaluation nt
s
Supervisor
’s
Document
ation
Performance Evaluation
Phase III
Evaluation
1 2 3 4 5
Competencies
Performance Review Meeting
During the Meeting:
Encourage dialogue;
Be specific, use plenty of examples;
Focus on the issues, not on the person;
Close on a positive note and make arrangements for
follow-up with next-steps.
Performance Review Meeting
Follow up includes:
1. A written development plan with new goals, timelines
and clarified standards of performance.
2. Additional meetings between employee and
supervisor.
3. Interim evaluations.
4. Training to build on strengths and address the needs.
5. Coaching and mentoring.
Coachi
Best Practices
ng
Collab
oration
Communica
tion
http://www.wm.edu/offices/hr/managerssupervisors/performance-b/index.php
Common Pitfalls
Using evaluation as a corrective action tool.
Opportunity bias: give credit or fault an employee for factors beyond his/her control.
Recency bias: give more importance to recent performance and ignoring the past.
Rating the job rather than individual: applying job criticality factor.
Length of service bias: credit for longevity of service or penalizing for being new.
Appeal Process
1. Employee should discuss issue with supervisor within 10 business days
of having received the evaluation for reconsideration.
2. Supervisor may decline to reconsider, or reconsider it and either affirm or
revise the evaluation.
3. If issue is not resolved, employee may file a written appeal with the
reviewer within 10 business days of receiving the supervisor’s response.
4. Reviewer will discuss the appeal with the employee and the supervisor.
Within 10 business days of receiving the appeal the reviewer must
respond in writing to the employee. The response should indicate:
reviewer agrees with the supervisor’s evaluation; or
supervisor will revise the evaluation or complete a new evaluation
The reviewer’s decision is final; however employees alleging policy violations may
have access to the Professional & Professional Faculty Grievance Procedure.
Performance Evaluation Cover Form
http://www.wm.edu/offices/hr/documents/forms/professional-professional_faculty_performance_checklist.pdf
Performance Management
Timetable
Performance,
Monitoring,
Feedback
Mid-year Review
Dec-Jan
Annual Review Due date set
by Provost
Questions and Answers