Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.Primary Metastatic.
BCs are derived from the epithelial cells that line the
TDLU.
Classification of invasive BC.
o The most commonly used classification of invasive BC
divides them into ductal and lobular types → based on the
belief that ductal Ca. arose from ducts and lobular Ca. from
lobules. We now know that invasive ductal and lobular
BC both arise from the TDLU, and this terminology is no
longer appropriate.
o Some tumors show distinct patterns of growth and cellular
morphology, and on this basis certain types of BC can be
identified → Invasive Ca. of Special Type, while the
remainder are considered to be of no special type. This
classification has clinical relevance in that certain special
type tumors have a much better prognosis than tumors that
are of no special type [in Node (-)ve Patients].
o The "NOS" categories contain Ca. not easily classified into
other histologic types or Ca. for which minimal tissue was
available for diagnosis.
90% Originate from Lactiferous Ducts.
10% Originate from Peripheral/Terminal Ducts.
ILC 5.9 84
Medullary 2.8 82
Mucinous 2.1 95
Comedocarcinoma 1.4 87
Papillary 0.8 96
Tubular 0.6 96
T3 5cm
>
T1 N1 81 71
T2 N0
IIB T N M0
2 1
T N
3 0
Rules for Use of TNM.
o cT : Physical or Mammographic .
o pT : Measurement of Invasive component (Not In Situ).
o Multiple Simultaneous Ipsilat. Ca. → use the largest
lesion & specify that this is a case of multiple lesions.
o Any Skin Changes other than edema, ulceration &
satellite nodules (Dimpling; Nipple Retraction..etc) →
don’t change T staging.
o Chest Wall includes Ribs, Intercostal Ms. and Serratus
Ant. Ms. (not Pectoral Ms.).
.Rules for Use of TNM (2)
o If there is Doubt concerning the correct T, N, or M
category → the lower (less advanced) one should be
chosen.
o Paget’s dis. of the nipple without an associated tumor
mass → Tis. Lesions with a demonstrable mass
(clinically or pathologically) → T according to the size of
the mass.
o Inflammatory Carcinoma → is a clinicopathologic entity
characterized by Diffuse, Brawny Induration of the skin
of the breast with an Erysipeloid edge, usually without
an underlying palpable mass → due to Embolization of
Dermal Lymphatics.
Prognostic and Predictive Factors
o Intensive efforts to define an individual
patient's risk of recurrence → have
produced a plethora of potential prognostic
factors, from patient characteristics to
histologic, biochemical, and molecular
characteristics of the tumor.
o The importance of these various prognostic
factors has been the subject of controversy.
▪ Prognostic factors are those that predict
the risk of recurrence or death from BC after
primary surgery.
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are familial (inherited) gene mutations that have
been linked to BC. BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor gene located on the
long arm of chromosome 17, and BRCA2 is located on chromosome
13. → play a role in regulating cell growth. When one copy of BRCA1
is inherited in a defective (mutant) form, a woman is predisposed to
breast and ovarian cancer. However, BRCA1 mutations do not appear
critical for the development of the majority of breast and ovarian
cancers. Development of cancer in either organ involves a number of
additional mutations, at least one of which involves the other copy
(allele) of BRCA1. A woman who inherits one mutant allele of BRCA1
from either her mother or father has a greater than 80% risk of
developing breast cancer during her life. While it appears that a high
number of currently identified high-risk families have mutations in
either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, hereditary breast cancer accounts
for only about 5% of all cases of breast cancer.
Carcinoma In Situ
(CIS).
Observ. to
Ax.
→
If
o Staging and Skip Metastases :
1. Studies to assess the extent of ALND needed to determine whether
LNs are (-) or (+)ve revealed :
2. Involv. of Level III in absence of Level I&II is Rare.
3. Involv. of Level II in absence of Level I is Variable (Not Definite ).
4. Some authors concluded that Level I Dissect. Provides accurate
Staging Information. However, Most authors concluded that
removal of at least All Level I and some of Level II is required, this
is best defined anatomically rather than by the No. of LNs removed.
5. Local Control :
Also a Level I-II Dissect. Is Effective at providing LC in the Ax.→
<3% LR. More Limited Ax. Sampling → the likelihood of
LR is related to the No. of LNs removed :
No LN removed → 20% 5-y LR. 1-
2 LNs →
10% 5-y LR.
6-10 LNs. → Need to be Removed to Avoid
Misclassification & Optimize LC in the Ax.
Advantages to ALND :
o Accurate Staging : The Number of Involved Ax. LNs
Remains the Single Most Reliable Indicator of
Prognosis → helps to determine Further Treatment.
o A Reliable Treatment of the Axilla (LC) : Few LR. in
patients with dissected histologically (+)ve Ax. LNs.→
RT to the Ax. Is unnecessary following Complete
Dissection.
o Palliation : If Bulky Ax. LNs can be excised → Sparing
the patient to develop a painful edema of UL (due to
invasion of the neurovascular bundle).
Complications :
o Major (Infrequent) : Ax. Vein Thrombosis/Injury & Injury
to Motor Nerves of Ax.
o Minor (More Common) : Seroma; Loss of Sens. In
intercostobrachial n; Shoulder Dysfunction and Edema
of Arm & Breast.
Recently in view of Increased use of Adjuvant Systemic Therapy.
BCTT; Increased No. of patients with Small Mammographically
Detected Breast Ca. :
ALND. Can be used in only a proportion of patients:
o Will Undergo Mastectomy.
o Clinically Palpable Ax. LNs.
o To obtain Prog. Information in patients with
Favorable Hist. Features
→ (+)ve LNs → Adj. Syst. Therapy.
o Clinical Trials.
As the value of Biologic Prognostic Factors are established & the use
Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Biopsy
o Is defined as the first node in the lymphatic basin
that receives primary lymphatic flow. Studies
have shown that the identification of the SLN is
possible in 92% to 98% of patients. Preliminary
reports demonstrate a 97.5% to 100%
concordance between SNB and complete
ALND.
o Trials on SNB in BC are still ongoing, the
technique has been widely adopted by
surgeons. The development of SNB and the
increasing use of adjuvant systemic therapy
provide a rationale for omission of ALND, but it
has not yet been proven that these approaches
result in equivalent survival and axillary control.
To Locate the SLN→ a colored dye and/or
radioactive-labeled tracer is injected into
the breast near the tumor. A device called a
scintillation counter determines which LN
is the first node to take up the dye or
tracer.
This LN is then surgically removed and
sent
for pathologic examination.
o Advantages: it is accurate, less traumatic,
and it allows axillary dissections to be done
on only those women whose sentinel nodes
o Disadvantages: fairly new, not widely
available, and its accuracy depends in
large part on the training of the surgeon
doing the procedure. Several ongoing
clinical trials will ultimately determine
whether sentinel node biopsy becomes
part of the standard diagnostic procedure
for breast cancer.
o If the SN is cancer free, it's likely that the
other ALN are cancer free as well.
However, if the SN is positive for cancer,
there is a strong likelihood that other
nodes may also be involved, and a
standard ALND may be required.
:The NIH (2001), Surgical Recommendations
o The diagnosis should be established by FNAC, limited incisional
biopsy or definitive wide local excision.
o The type and placement of incisions can influence greatly the quality
of cosmesis.
o It is appropriate to excise the primary lesion with a normal tissue
margin of approximately 1 cm → to achieve a surgical margin that
is grossly and microscopically uninvolved with tumor. Mark the
specimen for proper orientation and to ink the resection margins.
When margins are grossly involved → further resection is indicated.
Available data are inadequate to determine whether focal
microscopic involvement of a margin $s the risk of local failure after
optimal RT. Because cosmetic result is related to the amount of
tissue excised, unnecessarily wide margins (> 2 cm) should be
avoided.
o A Level I-II ALND should be routine for staging and for prevention of
axillary recurrence → separate incisions → enhance functional and
cosmetic results.
.Breast
Reconstruction
Mastectomy causes significant Functional and Emotional
Problems → Reconstruction is an important option &
should routinely be discussed before definitive surgery.
o The Goal is to provide a Lasting Mound of Tissue with an
Acceptable Shape, Form and Consistency that is
Reasonably Symmetric with that of the Opposite Breast.
o Absolute Contraindication : Only in Comorbid
Conditions.
o Timing : Immediate (at time of mastectomy) or Delayed
3-6 ms. later (longer delay is possible up to many years).
o Radical Mastectomy Is more difficult to Reconstruct →
Loss of tissue; and tight skin.
Techniques
o Implants : the simplest technique and involves the use of available
tissue and placement of an implant (Inorganic material). Best for
small/median size breast with minimal ptosis → ±Tissue
Expander → if insufficient skin is available to achieve symmetry
with the contralat. Breast to cover the implant. Silicon Gel filled
implants → FDA declared not to be used since 1992
(Contractures, Leak & Connective tissue dis.). Now Saline filled
Implants are used. If Chest Wall RT is desired→ Avoid implants
(high risk of implant loss).
o Autologus Tissue (Flaps) : 1- Myocutaneous Flaps →
Serratus Ant.; Transverse Rectus Abdominus (TRAM) ± Implants.
2- Free Flaps → mainly for delayed reconstruction & need skilled
surgeons.
o Nipple Areola reconstruction : Another secondary procedure
→ Done by tattooing; local flap techniques or full thickness skin
grafts. Avoid the patients own nipple/areola → 2ry Ca. & also
contralat. nipple/areola → Transfer breast tissue to reconstruction
site.
Implants and Tissue Expander
Transverse Rectus Abdominus (TRAM)
THANK YOU