DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A

HIGH RISE RCC BUILDING

WITH IRREGULARITIES
Guided by, Presented by
Mrs. SUMI.S AYSHA.S
Asst Professor YCE19CESE 04
YCET YCET
OVERVIEW
• INTRODUCTION • PUSHOVER ANALYSIS
• LITERATURE REVIEW IN ETABS
• SUMMARY OF • PUSHOVER ANALYSIS
LITERATURE REVIEW RESULTS
• OBJECTIVES • RESULTS AND
• METHODOLOGY DISCUSSION
• SCOPE OF STUDY • CONCLUSION
• SCHEDULE OF WORKS • REFERENCES
• BUILDING DETAILS
• MODELLING IN ETABS
• LOAD CALCULATIONS

2
INTRODUCTION
• Seismic analysis is a subset of structural analysis and is the
calculation of the response of a building (or non building)
structure to earthquakes
• Methods
– Equivalent static
– Response spectrum
– Linear dynamic
– Non linear dynamic
– Non linear static

3
Contd..
• The performance of RCC structures will be nonlinear under
seismic loads, this behavior will be defined by the formation
of plastic hinges and loss of considerable stiffness
• Pushover analysis is an incremental static analysis

4
LITERATURE REVIEW
Name of Year and Title of Description
author name of journal
journal
Chatali May, 2018 Pushover The seismic behavior of multi-
Patel, Payal IJAERD analysis of storied building frame during an
Patel, High rise earthquake motion depends upon
Grishma RCC the distribution of strength, mass
Thaker buildings and stiffness in both horizontal and
with vertical vertical planes. All building frames
irregularities are analyzed by using design and
analysis software ETABS and
design as per IS 456:2000 and IS
1893:2002.

5
Contd..
Name of Year Title of journal Description
the and
author name of
journal
BG May- Comparative In this study is to evaluate the
Nareshku 2018 Study on Stiffness seismic performance of G+5 RC L
mar, IJERT Regular and shaped building with stiffness
Punith.N, Stiffness Irregular regular and stiffness irregular
Arun Building subjected to earthquake forces. The
Kumar Subjected to modeling and analysis of the
G.N , Seismic Load building is done by using ETABS
T.M using Pushover 2015 software and evaluated by
Prakash Analysis considering non-linear static
analysis called pushover analysis

6
Contd..
Name of Year Title of Description
the and journal
author name of
journal
S.M Patil, April Study of The purpose of this concerned work is
Y.M 2018, pushover to compare the pushover result obtained
Pudale, IJARSE analysis of in terms of parameter story drift, story
V.V Nair vertical displacement, story shear, Base shear,
irregular spectral displacement and spectral
structures acceleration of different vertical
irregular structure and to study the effect
of increase in vertical irregularity.

7
Contd..
Name of Year Title of Description
the and journal
author name of
journal
Namani June Study of The result of the analysis for
Saikiran, 2017, irregular RC displacement and storey drift have been
T.Parimala IJRAE frame studied and compared with reference to
buildings the serviceability and the time period,
under storey shear, storey moment and storey
seismic torsion, have been studied and
compared for different configurations
structure models and it was presenting
in graphical and tabular form.

8
Contd..
Name of Year Title of Description
the and journal
author name of
journal
Anju May Push over The objective of this study is to carry
Nayas, 2017, analysis of out nonlinear static analysis of irregular
Minu IJERT plan RC frame using special shaped columns
Antony irregular RC with plan irregularity. This study also
buildings finds out which plan irregular building
with special is the most effective in resisting lateral
columns loads. The software used for modelling
and analysis is ETABS 2015

9
Contd..
Name of Year and Title of Description
the name of journal
author journal
A.M Jan 2017, Impacts of The structural irregularity increases the
Mwafy, 16th world vertical uncertainty related to the capacity of the
S.Khalifa conferenc irregularity building to meet the design objectives.
e on of seismic The study also concluded that although
earthquak design of the design coefficients of regular tall
e high rise structures and buildings with
buildings insignificant irregularities are
adequately conservative, they can be
revised to arrive at a more cost-effective
design of tall buildings.

10
Contd..
Name of Year and Title of Description
the name of journal
author journal
Alhamd Dec 2016, Push over The purpose of the study is to evaluate
Farqaleet Journal of analysis the linear and nonlinear static and
, Akil civil engg and time dynamic responses of ten storied RCC
Ahmed & history building frame. In this study, five
Environme analysis of building models with different
ntal irregular irregularities in mass and stiffness are
technology RCC created including a regular model with
building no mass and stiffness irregularity. The
frames models are created using finite element
software SAP 2000.

11
Contd..
Name Year and Title of Description
of the name of journal
author journal
J.Shaikh Oct 2016, Seismic This analysis shows focuses on the base
Sameer, Journal of response of shear carrying capacity of a structure
S.B civil engg vertically and performance level of structure under
Shinde & irregular sever zone of India. The result remarks
Environmen RC frame the conclusion that, a building structure
tal with mass with mass irregularity provides
technology irregualrity instability and attracts huge storey shear

12
Contd..
Name of Year and Title of Description
the name of journal
author journal
S M. Sept Pushover In the present analysis, a commercial
Muneer 2016, Analysis building is analyzed with columns,
Ahammed Internatio For columns with infill’s under non linear
, Mr. J. nal Seismic static analysis. The building is analyzed
Vara Journal of Assessmen and the results of Displacement, Base
Prasad Research t Of High shear vs displacement, soft storey
Rise results were also compared after
Building providing the infill’s at each elevation.
Using
Etabs

13
Contd..
Name of Year Title of Description
the and journal
author name of
journal
Patil Aug- Comparative This work shows that the comparison
Sadhana 2016 , Pushover seismic performance and behavior of
M. , IRJET Analysis of building frame with and without vertical
D.N.Shin High Rise irregularity in terms of parameter base
de RCC shear, storey displacement, storey drift, ,
Building spectral acceleration and spectral
Frame with displacement.
and Without
Vertical
Irregularities

14
Contd..
Name of Year and Title of Description
the name of journal
author journal
Md. July-2016 Linear and In the present study an irregular shape
Abdul IJERT Non Linear multistory building is analyzed using
Bari, (Pushover) shear walls at different positions to
Prof. Analysis of know the seismic behavior through
Shaik An seismic parameters like Time period,
Abdulla Irregular Base Shear, Storey Drift, Storey
Shape Displacements, Column Moments and
Multistorey Beam Moments.
Building
with
Different
Shear Wall
Position

15
SUMMARY
• The seismic behavior of multi-storied building frame during an
earthquake motion depends upon the distribution of strength, mass
and stiffness in both horizontal and vertical planes.
• All models are analyzed by using design and analysis software
ETABS or SAP and designed as per IS 456:2000 and IS 1893:2002.
• Push over analysis is a non linear static analysis had been used to
obtain the inelastic deformation capability of frame.

16
OBJECTIVES
The objective of the present study is
• To model a G+4 RCC building in ETABS
• To carry out push over analysis in ETABS to determine the
capacity, performance point

17
METHODOLOGY
• Studying the literature reviews for understanding the concept
• Identifying the building plan and material properties.
• Modelling the plan in ETABS.
• Analysis of the building using non linear static pushover by
ETABS software.
• Observation of results and discussions.

18
SCOPE OF STUDY
• To familiarize with the designing and analysis software
ETABS
• Validate and check the possibility of implementing ETABS
software.

19
 SCHEDULE OF WORKS
1st FEB 15th FEB

Literature review
10th FEB Present

Study of software
20th FEB 29th FEB

Modeling in ETABS
1st MAR 15th MAR

Software analysis
16th MAR 30th MAR

Analysis of result
JULY

Submission of final report

20
BUILDING DETAILS
• The building is a 5 storied structure for commercial purpose.
• It also consist of a stair cum machine room and a lift.
• The building as a whole, covers an area of 567 m2.
• The typical floor area is 113.4 m2.

21
 All dimensions in mm

Fig :Plan of the building

22
MODELLING IN ETABS
• Step 1- Story and grid data
• Step 2 – Defining and assigning beams
• Step 3 – Defining and assigning columns
• Step 4 – Defining and assigning slabs

• Step 5 – Defining shear wall

23
Contd..

Fig : 3D View Fig : 3D Rendered view

24
 LOAD CALCULATIONS
Seismic base shear
Seismic load
• VB = Ah x W
• Total D.L = 3434.1 KN
• Ah = (ZI/2R) (Sa/ g)
• Total L.L = 78.975 kN/m2
(25% of L.L ) – Z = 0.16 (zone III)
• Weight of floors 1,2,3 and 4 – I=1
is 5300KN – R = 3(OMRF)
• Weight of 5th floor = 5030 kN – Tx =0.38 s, Ty =0.36 s
• Total seismic load = W=5300 – Sa/g =2.5
x 4 + 5030 =26230 kN Ah = 0.067
VB = 0.067x26230= 1575kN

25
PUSHOVER IN ETABS
• Step 1 – Define load patterns
• Step 2 - Define load cases
– Push X
– Push Y

• Step 3 – Assign auto plastic hinge to beams

• Step 4 – Assign auto plastic hinge to columns
• Step 5 – Run analysis

26
PUSHOVER ANALYSIS RESULTS

• The figure shows the Pushover curve base shear vs lateral

displacement.

Fig : Push over curve

27
Contd..
• The Pushover Curve shows that the building has objectively
high Base Shear Capacity than the Design Base Shear.

• The Design base shear (VB) was found to be 1575 kN and the
capacity is 7637 kN which is much higher, hence the building
is safe for this level of earthquake.

28
Structure displacement

Fig : Dead load Fig : Live load

29
Contd..

Fig : Push x (step 9/9) Fig :Push y (step 7/7)

30
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Performance Point:
• The push over curve is also called as capacity curve which is a
plot of base shear v/s displacement
• The response spectrum is the plot between spectral
acceleration and the time period.
• The Performance point is the intersection of the demand and
capacity curves.
• At performance point, the effective time period is found to be
0.334 sec.
31
Contd..
• Spectral acceleration v/s time period

Fig : Spectral acceleration v/s time period

32
Contd..
• Maximum base force is found to be 9847.23 kN at step 8 of
push X and minimum is found to be zero

Fig : Table showing base force and moment

33
CONCLUSION
• Considering this project, it was concluded that, if the buildings
are designed with proper sections and reinforcement details as
per standard codes, it will perform better under seismic forces.
• Hinges developed from the lower floors, indicating that the
lower floor columns shall have more reinforcement area than
upper floor columns.
• The performance of the pushover analysis mostly depends on
the material used in the structure.
34
REFERENCES
1. Chatali Patel, Payal Patel, Grishma Thaker , May 2018 IJAERD , Pushover analysis of High rise RCC
buildings with vertical irregularities
2. B.G Nareshkumar, Punith.N, Arun Kumar G.N , T.M Prakash , May 2018 IJERT, Comparative Study on
Stiffness Regular and Stiffness Irregular Building Subjected to Seismic Load using Pushover Analysis
3. S.M Patil, Y.M Pudale, V.V Nair, April 2018, IJARSE , Study of pushover analysis of vertical irregular
structures
4. Namani Saikiran, T.Parimala , June 2017, IJRAE , Study of irregular RC frame buildings under seismic
5. Anju Nayas, Minu Antony, May 2017, IJERT , Push over analysis of plan irregular RC buildings with
special columns
6. A.M Mwafy, S.Khalifa , Jan 2017, 16th world conference on earthquake, Impacts of vertical irregularity
of seismic design of high rise buildings
7. Alhamd Farqaleet, Akil Ahmed , Dec 2016, Journal of civil engg & Environmental technology , Push
over analysis and time history analysis of irregular RCC building frames
8. J.Shaikh Sameer, S.B Shinde , Oct 2016, Journal of civil engg & Environmental technology , Seismic
response of vertically irregular RC frame with mass irregualrity
9. S M. Muneer Ahammed , Mr. J. Vara Prasad, Sept 2016, International Journal of Research , Pushover
Analysis For Seismic Assessment Of High Rise Building Using Etabs
10. Patil Sadhana M. , D.N.Shinde , Aug-2016 , IRJET , Comparative Pushover Analysis of High Rise RCC
Building Frame with and Without Vertical Irregularities
11. Md. Abdul Bari, Prof. Shaik Abdulla , July-2016 IJERT , Linear and Non Linear (Pushover) Analysis of
An Irregular Shape Multistorey Building with Different Shear Wall Position
35
Contd..
12. Keerthan M S , Dr. B S Jayashankar Babu , July 2016, IJESC , Seismic Performance Study
of RC Frames with Mass Irregularity from Pushover Analysis
13. Mirjunaidali kazi , Ayaz N Shaikh, May-2016 , IRJET , Pushover Analysis of Reinforced
concrete building with and without vertical Geometric Irregularity
14. Dr.Mohd.Hamraj , Sept 2014, IJSET , Performance based pushover analysis of RC.C frames
for plan irregularity
15. Mohommed Anwaruddin Md. Akberuddin, Mohd. Zameeruddin Mohd. Saleemuddin , Sep-
Oct 2013, IJERA , Pushover Analysis of Medium Rise Multi-Story RCC Frame With and
Without Vertical Irregularity
16. A S Patil, P D Kumbhar , August 2013 IJSCER , Time history analysis of multistoried rcc
buildings for different seismic intensities
17. F. Khoshnoudian , S.A. Mohammad , October 12-17, 2008, The 14 th World Conference
on Earthquake Engineering , Seismic response evaluation of irregular high rise structures by
modal pushover analysis
18. IS 456:2000, IS 1893:2002

36
THANK YOU

37