You are on page 1of 42

Chapter 5

Applying
Consumer
theory
Topics

• Deriving Demand Curves.

• How Changes in Income Shift Demand


Curves.

• Effects of a Price Change.

• Cost-of-Living Adjustments.

• Deriving Labor Supply Curves.

5-2 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.1 Deriving
(a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints

Wine, (W), Gallons per year


12.0

an Individual’s
Demand Curve
Budget Line, L
e1
Y - Pb 2.8
W= b
PW PW L1 (pb = $12) I1

0 26.7 Beer (b), Gallons per year

Initial Values (b) Demand Curve


Initial optimal bundle of

p b, $ per unit
beer and wine
Pb = price of beer = $12
PW = price of wine = $35 12.0 E1

Y = Income = $419.

Beer (b), Gallons per year


0 26.7

5-3 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.1 Deriving
(a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints

Wine, (W), Gallons per year


12.0

an Individual’s
Demand Curve
Budget Line, L e2
4.3
e1
Y - Pb 2.8 I2
W= b
PW PW L1 (p b = $12) I1 L2 (p b = $6)

0 26.7 44.5 Beer (b), Gallons per year

New Values (b) Demand Curve

p b, $ per unit
Pb = price of beer = $6
PW = price of wine = $35 12.0 E1

Y = Income = $419.
E2
6.0

Price of beer goes down!


0 26.7 44.5 Beer (b), Gallons per year

5-4 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.1 Deriving
(a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints

Wine, (W), Gallons per year


12.0

an Individual’s
Demand Curve
Price-consumption curve
Budget Line, L 5.2
e2
e3

4.3
e1 I3

Y - Pb 2.8 I2
W= b
PW PW L1 (pb = $12) I1 L2 (pb = $6) L3 (p b = $4)

0 26.7 44.5 58.9 Beer (b), Gallons per year

New Values (b) Demand Curve

p b, $ per unit
Pb = price of beer = $4
PW = price of wine = $35 12.0 E1

Y = Income = $419.
E2
6.0

Price of beer goes down 4.0


E3
D1, Demand for Beer

again!
0 26.7 44.5 58.9 Beer (b), Gallons per year

5-5 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Price-Consumption Curve

• A line through optimal bundles at each


price of one good (beer) when the price of
the other good (wine) and the budget are
held constant.
• The demand curve corresponds to the
price-consumption curve.

5-6 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Solved Problem 5.1

• In Figure 5.1, how does Mimi’s utility at E1


on D1 compare to that at E2?
• Answer:
 Use the relationship between the points in
panels a and b of Figure 5.1 to determine
how Mimi’s utility varies across these points
on the demand curve.

5-7 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Solved Problem 5.2

• Mahdu views Coke, q, and Pepsi as


perfect substitutes: He is indifferent as to
which one he drinks. The price of a 12-
ounce can of Coke is p, the price of a 12-
ounce can of Pepsi is p* and his weekly
cola budget is Y. Derive Mahdu’s demand
curve for Coke using the method
illustrated in Figure 5.1.

5-8 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Solved Problem 5.2
(cont.)

5-9 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Effects of a Rise in Income

• Engel curve - the relationship between


the quantity demanded of a single good
and income, holding prices constant.
• Income-consumption curve shows how
consumption of both goods changes when
income changes, while prices are held
constant.

5 - 10 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Wine, Gallons per year
Figure 5.2 Effect of a
Budget Increase on an
Individual’s Demand Curve
L1

2.8 e1

Budget Line, L
I1
0 26.7 Beer, Gallons per year

Price of beer, $ per unit


Y - Pb
W= b
PW PW 12
E1

Initial Values
D1

Pb = price of beer = $12 0 26.7 Beer, Gallons per year

PW = price of wine = $35

Y, Budget
$628
Y = Income = $419.

Income goes up! Y 1 = $419 E 1*

0 26.7 Beer, Gallons per year

5 - 11 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Wine, Gallons per year
Figure 5.2 Effect of a
Budget Increase on an
L2

Individual’s Demand Curve


L1

4.8 e2
2.8 e1
I2

Budget Line, L
I1
0 26.7 38.2 Beer, Gallons per year

Price of beer, $ per unit


Y - Pb
W= b
PW PW 12
E1 E2

Initial Values D2
D1

Pb = price of beer = $12 0 26.7 38.2 Beer, Gallons per year

PW = price of wine = $35

Y, Budget
$628
Y = Income = $419.
Y 2 = $628 E 2*
Income goes up! Y 1 = $419 E 1*

0 26.7 38.2 Beer, Gallons per year

5 - 12 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Wine, Gallons per year
Figure 5.2 Effect of a L3

Budget Increase on an L2

Individual’s Demand Curve 7.1


L1

e3
Income-consumption curve

4.8 e2
2.8 e1 I3
I2

Budget Line, L
I1
0 26.7 38.2 49.1 Beer, Gallons per year

Price of beer, $ per unit


Y - Pb
W= b
PW PW 12
E1 E2 E3

Initial Values D3
D2
D1

Pb = price of beer = $12 0 26.7 38.2 49.1 Beer, Gallons per year

PW = price of wine = $35

Y, Budget
Engel curve for beer

Y = Income = $837.
Y 3 = $837 E3*
Y 2 = $628 E 2*
Income goes up again! Y 1 = $419 E 1*

0 26.7 38.2 49.1 Beer, Gallons per year

5 - 13 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Solved Problem 5.3

• Mahdu views Coke and Pepsi as perfect


substitutes. The price of a 12-ounce can
of Coke, p, is less than the price of a 12-
ounce can of Pepsi, p*. What does
Mahdu’s Engel curve for Coke look like?
How much does his weekly cola budget
have to rise for Mahdu to buy one more
can of Coke per week?

5 - 14 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Solved
Problem 5.3

5 - 15 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Consumer Theory and Income Elasticities

• Formally,
Q
%Q Q Q Y
  
%Y Y Y Q
Y
 where Y stands for income.
• Example
 If a 1% increase in income results in a 3% decrease in
quantity demanded, the income elasticity of demand is
 = -3%/1% = -3.

5 - 16 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Consumer Theory and Income Elasticities
(cont.)

• Normal good - a commodity of which as


much or more is demanded as income
rises.
 Positive income elasticity.

• Inferior good - a commodity of which less


is demanded as income rises.
 Negative income elasticity.

5 - 17 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.3 Income-Consumption
Curves and Income Elasticities
• As income rises
Housing, Squarefeet per year

Food inferior,
housing normal the budget
ICC 1
constraint shifts to
L2
a
the right.
 The income
Food normal,
housing normal
elasticities depend
on….
ICC 2
b
• …where on the new
L1
budget constraint
the new optimal
consumption bundle
e will be
c
Food normal,
ICC 3 housing inferior
I

Food, Pounds per year

5 - 18 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.4 A Good (a) Indifference Curves and Budget Constraints

All other goods per year


That Is Both Inferior Y3 L3

and Normal Y2 L2
Income-consumption curve
e3

• When Gail was poor Y1 L


1
I3
and her income e2

increased.. e1 I2

 …she bought more I1

hamburger (b) Engel Curve


Hamburger peryear

• But as she became

Y, Income
Y3 E3

wealthier and her Y2


income rose…
E2
Engel curve

 ….she bought less Y1


E1
hamburger and more
steak. Hamburger peryear

5 - 19 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Effects of a Price Change

• Substitution effect - the change in the


quantity of a good that a consumer
demands when the good’s price changes,
holding other prices and the consumer’s
utility constant.

• Income effect - the change in the


quantity of a good a consumer demands
because of a change in income, holding
prices constant.
5 - 20 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.5 Substitution and Income
Effects with Normal Goods
Budget Line, L1
1
Y1 PF
C= - 1
F
1
PC PC
Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary)
2
Y2 PF
C= 2
- 2
F
PC PC
1 1
 PC   PF

5 - 21 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.6
Giffen Good
Basketball, Tickets per year

When the price of movie tickets


L2
decreases the budget constraint
rotates out…
L1 e2

I2

e1 allowing the consumer to


increase her utility.

I1
Total effect Movies, Tickets per year
Nevertheless, the total effect is negative. WHY?
5 - 22 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.6
Giffen Good
Basketball, Tickets per year
• Even though the substitution
L2
effect is positive….
 …the income effect is larger
L1 e2
and negative (since this is an
inferior good).

L* I2

e1

e*

I1
Total effect Substitution effect Movies, Tickets per year
Income effect

5 - 23 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Inflation Indexes

• Inflation - the increase in the overall price


level over time.
 nominal price - the actual price of a good.
 real price - the price adjusted for inflation.

• How do we adjust for inflation to calculate


the real price?

5 - 24 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Inflation Indexes (cont.)

• Consumer Price Index (CPI) – measure the cost of a


standard bundle of goods for use in comparing prices
over time.

 We can use the CPI to calculate the real price of a


hamburger over time.

 In terms of 2008 dollars, the real price of a hamburger in


1955 was:

CPI for 2008 211.1


 price of a burger   15  1.18
CPI for 2005 26.8

5 - 25 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Effects of Inflation Adjustments

• Scenario: Klaas signed a long-term contract when he


was hired. According to the COLA clause in his
contract, his employer increases his salary each year
by the same percentage as that by which the CPI
increases. If the CPI this year is 5% higher than the
CPI last year, Klaas’s salary rises automatically by
5% over last year’s.

• Question: what is the difference between using the


CPI to adjust the long-term contract and using a true
cost-of-living adjustment, which holds utility constant?

5 - 26 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.7 The Consumer Price
Index
Budget Line, L1
C, Units of clothing pe year

But
Thesince
firm Klaas is
ensures 1
Y1 PF
Y1/pC1 better off, the
that Klaas canCPI
buy C= - 1
F
adjustment
the same bundle of PC
1
Pc
Y2 /pC2 overcompensates
goods in the second Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary)
for thethat
year change in
he chose 2
inflation
in the first year… Y2 PF
C1
e1 C= 2
- 2
F
PC Pc
e2 1 1
C2  PC   PF

I2
I1

L1 L2

F1 F2 Y1/pF1 Y2/pF2
F, Units offood peryear

5 - 27 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


True Cost-of-Living Adjustment

• True cost-of-living index - an inflation


index that holds utility constant over time.

• Question: how big an increase in Klaas’s


salary would leave him exactly as well off
in the second year as in the first?

5 - 28 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


True Cost-of-Living Adjustment
Budget Line, L1
C, Units of clothing per year

1
Y1 PF
Y1/pC1 C= - 1
F
1
PC Pc
Y2 /pC2 Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary)
2
Y*/pC2 Y2 PF
C1
e1 C= 2
- 2
F
PC Pc
1 1
C2
e2  PC   PF
e*

I2
I1

L1 L* L2

F1 F2 Y1/p1F Y2* /pF2 Y2/pF2


F, Units of food per year

5 - 29 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Table 5.1 Cost-of-Living
Adjustments

5 - 30 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


CPI Substitution Bias

• Income adjustments based on CPI suffer


from an upward bias.
• The CPI-based adjustment suffers from
substitution bias – it ignores that
consumers may substitute toward the
relatively inexpensive good when prices
change disproportionately.

5 - 31 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Labor-Leisure Choice

• Leisure - all time spent not working.


• The number of hours worked per day, H,
equals 24 minus the hours of leisure or
nonwork, N, in a day:
H = 24 − N.

 The price of leisure is forgone earnings.


• The higher your wage, the more an hour of leisure
costs you.

5 - 32 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Labor-Leisure Choice: Example
• Jackie spends her total income, Y, on various goods.
 The price of these goods is $1 per unit.

• Her utility, U, depends on how many goods and how much leisure
she consumes:
U = U(Y, N).

• Jackie’s earned income equal:

wH.

• And her total income, Y, is her earned income plus her unearned
income, Y*:

Y = wH + Y*.

5 - 33 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


(a) Indifference Curves and Constraints
Time constraint
Figure 5.8 Demand

Y, Goods per day


for Leisure
I1

Budget Line, L1
L1

Y = w1H –w1
1 e1
Y1

0 N1 = 16 24 N, Leisure hours per day

Y = w1(24 − N). 24
(b) Demand Curve
H1 = 8 0 H, Work hours per day

Each extra hour of leisure w, Wage per hour

she consumes costs her w1


goods.

w1 E1

0 N1 = 16 N, Leisure hours per day


H1 = 8 H, Work hours per day

5 - 34 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


(a) Indifference Curves and Constraints

Y, Goods per day


I2 Time constraint
Figure 5.8 Demand L2

for Leisure –w2


1
I1
e2
Y2

Budget Line, L1
L1

Y = w1H –w1
1 e1
Y1

0 N2 = 12 N1 = 16 24 N, Leisure hours per day

Y = w1(24 − N). 24
(b) Demand Curve
H2 = 12 H1 = 8 0 H, Work hours per day

w, Wage per hour


Budget Line, L2
E2
w2
Y = w2H

Y = w2(24 − N). w1 E1

Demand for leisure

w2 > w1 0 N2 = 12
H2 = 12
N1 = 16
H1 = 8
N, Leisure hours per day
H, Work hours per day

5 - 35 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.9 Supply Curve of Labor

5 - 36 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.10 Income and Substitution
Y, Goods per d ay Effects of a Wage Change
I2 Time constraint
L2

Since income effect is


I1
positive, leisure is a normal
good.

L* e2
e*

L1 e1

0 N* N1 N 2 24 N, Leisure hours per d ay


24 H* H1 H 2 0 H, Work hours per d ay
Substitution effect Total effect
Income effect

5 - 37 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Solved Problem 5.5

• Enrico receives a no-strings-attached


scholarship that pays him an extra Y* per
day. How does this scholarship affect the
number of hours he wants to work? Does
his utility increase?

5 - 38 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Solved Problem 5.5 (cont.)

5 - 39 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.11 Labor Supply Curve That
Slopes Upward and Then Bends Backward
(a) Labor-Leisure Choice (b) Supply Curve of Labor

Supply curve of labor


Y, Goods per d ay

w, Wage per hour


L3 I3 Time const raint E3

I2
E2
I1
e3
L2
e2 E1

L1 e1

24 H2 H H1 0 0 H1 H3 H2 24
3
H, Work hours per d ay H, Work hours per d ay

butlow
At at high
wages,
wages,
an increase
an increase
in the
in the
wage causes the worker to work
more….
less….

5 - 40 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.12 The Relationship of U.S. Tax
Revenue and the Marginal Tax Rate

5 - 41 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Figure 5.13 Per-Unit Versus Lump-
Sum Child Care Subsidies

5 - 42 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

You might also like