Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Applying
Consumer
theory
Topics
• Cost-of-Living Adjustments.
an Individual’s
Demand Curve
Budget Line, L
e1
Y - Pb 2.8
W= b
PW PW L1 (pb = $12) I1
p b, $ per unit
beer and wine
Pb = price of beer = $12
PW = price of wine = $35 12.0 E1
Y = Income = $419.
an Individual’s
Demand Curve
Budget Line, L e2
4.3
e1
Y - Pb 2.8 I2
W= b
PW PW L1 (p b = $12) I1 L2 (p b = $6)
p b, $ per unit
Pb = price of beer = $6
PW = price of wine = $35 12.0 E1
Y = Income = $419.
E2
6.0
an Individual’s
Demand Curve
Price-consumption curve
Budget Line, L 5.2
e2
e3
4.3
e1 I3
Y - Pb 2.8 I2
W= b
PW PW L1 (pb = $12) I1 L2 (pb = $6) L3 (p b = $4)
p b, $ per unit
Pb = price of beer = $4
PW = price of wine = $35 12.0 E1
Y = Income = $419.
E2
6.0
again!
0 26.7 44.5 58.9 Beer (b), Gallons per year
2.8 e1
Budget Line, L
I1
0 26.7 Beer, Gallons per year
Initial Values
D1
Y, Budget
$628
Y = Income = $419.
4.8 e2
2.8 e1
I2
Budget Line, L
I1
0 26.7 38.2 Beer, Gallons per year
Initial Values D2
D1
Y, Budget
$628
Y = Income = $419.
Y 2 = $628 E 2*
Income goes up! Y 1 = $419 E 1*
Budget Increase on an L2
e3
Income-consumption curve
4.8 e2
2.8 e1 I3
I2
Budget Line, L
I1
0 26.7 38.2 49.1 Beer, Gallons per year
Initial Values D3
D2
D1
Pb = price of beer = $12 0 26.7 38.2 49.1 Beer, Gallons per year
Y, Budget
Engel curve for beer
Y = Income = $837.
Y 3 = $837 E3*
Y 2 = $628 E 2*
Income goes up again! Y 1 = $419 E 1*
• Formally,
Q
%Q Q Q Y
%Y Y Y Q
Y
where Y stands for income.
• Example
If a 1% increase in income results in a 3% decrease in
quantity demanded, the income elasticity of demand is
= -3%/1% = -3.
Food inferior,
housing normal the budget
ICC 1
constraint shifts to
L2
a
the right.
The income
Food normal,
housing normal
elasticities depend
on….
ICC 2
b
• …where on the new
L1
budget constraint
the new optimal
consumption bundle
e will be
c
Food normal,
ICC 3 housing inferior
I
and Normal Y2 L2
Income-consumption curve
e3
increased.. e1 I2
Y, Income
Y3 E3
I2
I1
Total effect Movies, Tickets per year
Nevertheless, the total effect is negative. WHY?
5 - 22 Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Figure 5.6
Giffen Good
Basketball, Tickets per year
• Even though the substitution
L2
effect is positive….
…the income effect is larger
L1 e2
and negative (since this is an
inferior good).
L* I2
e1
e*
I1
Total effect Substitution effect Movies, Tickets per year
Income effect
But
Thesince
firm Klaas is
ensures 1
Y1 PF
Y1/pC1 better off, the
that Klaas canCPI
buy C= - 1
F
adjustment
the same bundle of PC
1
Pc
Y2 /pC2 overcompensates
goods in the second Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary)
for thethat
year change in
he chose 2
inflation
in the first year… Y2 PF
C1
e1 C= 2
- 2
F
PC Pc
e2 1 1
C2 PC PF
I2
I1
L1 L2
F1 F2 Y1/pF1 Y2/pF2
F, Units offood peryear
1
Y1 PF
Y1/pC1 C= - 1
F
1
PC Pc
Y2 /pC2 Budget Line, L2 (increase in salary)
2
Y*/pC2 Y2 PF
C1
e1 C= 2
- 2
F
PC Pc
1 1
C2
e2 PC PF
e*
I2
I1
L1 L* L2
• Her utility, U, depends on how many goods and how much leisure
she consumes:
U = U(Y, N).
wH.
• And her total income, Y, is her earned income plus her unearned
income, Y*:
Y = wH + Y*.
Budget Line, L1
L1
Y = w1H –w1
1 e1
Y1
Y = w1(24 − N). 24
(b) Demand Curve
H1 = 8 0 H, Work hours per day
w1 E1
Budget Line, L1
L1
Y = w1H –w1
1 e1
Y1
Y = w1(24 − N). 24
(b) Demand Curve
H2 = 12 H1 = 8 0 H, Work hours per day
Y = w2(24 − N). w1 E1
w2 > w1 0 N2 = 12
H2 = 12
N1 = 16
H1 = 8
N, Leisure hours per day
H, Work hours per day
L* e2
e*
L1 e1
I2
E2
I1
e3
L2
e2 E1
L1 e1
24 H2 H H1 0 0 H1 H3 H2 24
3
H, Work hours per d ay H, Work hours per d ay
butlow
At at high
wages,
wages,
an increase
an increase
in the
in the
wage causes the worker to work
more….
less….