Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tom Mosquera
PB
Introduction
Legal Framework
Conclusions
Legal Framework
Summary of requirements
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (div 3.3)
Control of Risk (so far as is reasonably practicable)
Provision of Information
Legal Framework
Control of Risk
Eliminate or where not reasonably practicable, minimise risk
Use engineering controls, including substitution, isolation,
modifications to design and guarding.
Where not appropriate, use administrative controls, including safe
work practices
Where engineering and administrative controls are not effective,
specify the provision of appropriate personal protective equipment.
Basis for Safety in Design
Driver
Fatality and serious injury rates are too high
Approximately 50% of serious workplace incidents have some
design basis
Legal Requirement
Bad design can create unnecessary risk
All people have a right to be protected from unnecessary risk
Better to fix in design than have safety hazards in construction
Basis for Safety in Design
Benefits
Prevents death injury and illness
Complies with legislative
requirements
Improves constructability
Easier operation and maintenance
Encourages early consultation
between stakeholders
Safe design is good design –
improves and promotes thinking
Implementation and Process
PERFORMANCE
Strong, Sustained,
EFFORT
not tolerated
At a project level commitment to safety in design
and leadership is continuously demonstrated
Monitoring and feedback of performance – KPIs
and KRA
Implementation and Process
Client
Establish and Agree policies and framework;
provide key information on safety, e.g. operating information
Designer
Undertake safe design, liaise with other key stakeholders for
constructability / maintainability
Constructors and Operators
Provide input on constructability and construction methods
Provide input on design, serviceability, access and maintainability
Implementation and Process
Key Output:
List of hazards (e.g. project risk register)
How do we build - hazards
How do we operate and maintain - hazards
Implementation and Process
Lessons Learnt
Get the Right People on the bus –
designer, owner, builder, operator
Learn from Others – contractors have
a real focus on safety
Use SID as part of Design Review –
not as an add on, as good technical
solutions can come from SID
Set the Culture – having contractors and owners on the team
meant designers had to think about constructability
Challenge the Design – can we make it better?
Use the Tools – as a prompt, but you will need to adapt
ODX – Primary Water Supply System
Risk Management
Internal hazard identification of proposed
solutions with all staff
Further reviews with BHPB at Enterprise
wide risk management workshop and
HAZID workshop
Review of High level risks using BHPB
Enterprise wide risk Management process
reporting using EWRM form
Reporting of hazards using BHPB HAZID
forms
ODX – Primary Water Supply System
Lessons Learnt
A commitment to safe design is essential and effective
Integrated process with the Client provides clarity of purpose,
alignment and assisted success
Involving all the team leads to a good design approach; feedback is
essential
Study HSEC team was very proactive – leads to success
Conclusions